listen here

Choose from 5 Gift Options with a minimum donation of $35

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Feinstein & Cuomo Admit Planning Australian Style Government Gun Buy Back

AmmoLand – by Dan Roberts

New Jersey –-( News that a mandatory, government sponsored gun buy back scheme is in the planning stages emerged last Friday.

Friday is well known as the day of the week in the news cycle to release information or statements that is unusually controversial or ” bad news” , the theory being that the general public will be so distracted by the upcoming weekend that they will pay little if any attention.

Exploiting this common practice, word emerged at the end of last week that Congresswoman Dianne Feinstein and NY State Gov Andrew Cuomo are actively working on a planned govt fiat to seize lawfully owned private property without cause. In the form of an Australian style MANDATORY firearms buy back program, going so far as to tout that Countries program and so called positive results, while conveniently omitting the fact that Australia’s violent crime rate dramatically increased in the wake of the scheme and continues unabated.

While details are scant in both Feinstein’s and Cuomo’s press release on the plan, Cuomo was quoted as making it clear that the buyback would be compulsory and participation mandatory. Although it remains a question what the penalties for non compliance would be.

Cuomo further added that they would make gun owners “an offer they can’t refuse” when referring to buyback amounts of up to 500 dollars.

Sounding more like a NY mafioso then a “leader” in a Free State with significant Constitutional Protections in the way. Cuomo’s offer serves not only to further reveal his elitist arrogance, but also highlights his ignorance, presuming that the owner of a 1 , 2 or 3000 dollar firearm (or multiple ones) would roll over and comply for a cash value orders of magnitude below retail values.

Also worthy of note is Dianne Feinstein’s previous quotes on the news program 60 Minutes several years ago. During her interview with Mike Wallace about the 1994 to 2004 Clinton Era “Assault Weapons Ban” , where Feinstein lamented the fact she felt the law didn’t go far enough and stated “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them . . . Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in, I would have done it. I could not do that. The votes weren’t here.”

This is the same Feinstein who admitted in another, different interview that when she felt threatened by terrorists, she carried a gun for self defense and stated “I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out, I was going to take them with me.” — 27 April 1995.

And Gov Cuomo has a taxpayer supplied 24/7 security detail armed with actual, real fully automatic “assault weapons” at his side and disposal for his safety and the safety of his loved ones.

There should now be overwhelming evidence to anyone with two brain cells to rub together that we are no longer being “led” by elected Officials that took their Oath of Office seriously, but by rulers, tyrants who would be Kings, no different then King George III. We might as well take down Old Glory from every State Capitol and the US Capitol in DC and replace it with the Union Jack, while we’re at it, we can rename Congress, Parliament, because there really are no significant recognizable differences between the yoke of tyranny we are under today and the one we threw off over 200 years ago.

If Feinstein’s and Cuomo’s plan is allowed to proceed even one step further without being vociferously and publicly protested and killed in utero, they will have effectively struck the match and lit the fuse on a Second American Revolution.

About Dan RobertsDan Roberts is a grassroots supporter of gun rights that has chosen AmmoLand Shooting Sports News as the perfect outlet for his frank, ‘Jersey Attitude’ filled articles on Guns and Gun Owner Rights.As a resident of the oppressive state of New Jersey he is well placed to be able to discuss the abuses of government against our inalienable rights to keep and bear arms as he writes from deep behind NJ’s Anti-Gun iron curtain. Read more from Dan Roberts or email him at You can also find him on Facebook:


This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Feinstein & Cuomo Admit Planning Australian Style Government Gun Buy Back

  1. REDHORSE says:

    Inch by inch step by step.2013 is going to be the year of tyranny gone wild.Feinstin and cuomo are just another round of traitors to deal with this next year.I find it funny that they think that we would just jump at the chance to sell our guns back to them for less than they are worth.When they say it is mandatory they are really saying it’s time for war.If it’s war they are after then so be it, they’ll get what they want in spades.Beware you have crossed the line and there is no turning back you commie bastards.

  2. Drutch says:

    I would consider taking part in a voluntary buy back. I have a few hunting rifles that I would like to get cash for so that I can purchase assualt rifles or possibly even fully aitomatics guns, under Michigan law. The problem with the 2nd amendment is we do not enjoy it and never have since the revolutionary war. We do not get military grade weaponry to counter the military tyrany. We cannot own missle silos, tanks, fighter jets. If we truely were positioned to defend ourselves from our government then we would need the same weaponry at our disposal.

    • Henry Shivley says:

      Au contraire, our rifles will obtain for us whatever we lack, and contrary to popular belief, that isn’t much.
      If boots and guns were not essential to military conquest, why do we have soldiers by the hundreds of thousands in other countries? And look at Afghanistan. Eleven going on twelve years and those backward warriors have yet to be pacified. How many Afghanistans could you fit inside the United States?
      No, our position is primo. The mainstream propaganda machine will spare no effort in trying to make it seem otherwise.

    • chris says:

      Unless you have a shit ton of ammo at your disposal and all that extra cash lying around why would you want an auto weapon?

      It’s great if you are trying to suppress but outside of that and the “cool” factor auto weapons seem impractical…

      To each their own I guess.

      • Drutch says:

        Suppression is key when repositioning and movin your family from your home while under seige. No singel family can out gun govt goons, as Ruby Ridge proved. However if you can keep their heads burried long enough to make a run for it or at least so your loved ones can escape then that is good enough for me.

  3. rachel says:

    perhaps, a violet uprising is what they want. It makes no sense otherwise.

    • chris says:

      violence and force in general is the only thing these people understand and even if they are goading us into firing the first shot they will have bit off more than they could chew.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *