The cameras are in the court and the stage is set as the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman crime drama moves into its next stage. The fact that this is a production being staged for the purpose of creating conflict in our streets in invoking the Casey Anthony syndrome is blatant on its face.
George Zimmerman’s attorney, not be confused with a lawyer, allowed his client to appear in court at his bond hearing with his hands chained to his stomach, thus projecting him as at least being guilty of being dangerous.
When Zimmerman took the stand State Prosecutor Bernie de La Rionda asked the following question:
“Okay! Tell me after you committed this crime and spoke to the Police did you ever make this statement to the Police Sir? That you are sorry for what you have done or to their loss?”
Zimmerman replied: “No Sir”
I am not an attorney nor have I attended one day of law school; however I have studied the law. Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara, has been portrayed in the press as somewhat of a legal genius and top notch trial lawyer. So why did he allow his client George Zimmerman, under oath and on the stand, to admit that he had committed a crime? Why did this legal genius not object to the question as the issue for the trial is whether George Zimmerman did or not commit a crime in killing Trayvon Martin?
In short, this legal genius, Mark O’Mara, allowed his client to confess to committing a crime in answering that question. Or did I miss something here?
People, this is a propaganda production and this judge should be removed from the bench for allowing it to be put on in his court. There is one aspect that is absolutely crucial to the question as to whether George Zimmerman acted within the law in killing Trayvon Martin that we will not hear asked. This is, as prima facie, as Zimmerman’s attorney’s failure to object to the blatantly incriminating question.
Trayvon Martin had every right to be walking down that sidewalk and George Zimmerman had every right to be patrolling his neighborhood. Now, when Trayvon Martin became aware that George Zimmerman was following him, what were his options under the law?
Option one: He could have simply walked over to Zimmerman’s vehicle and said, “Howdy, can I help you with something?” And if Zimmerman is the reasonable decent citizen his family and neighbors say he is, he could have identified himself and told Trayvon that there had been several break-ins in the community and that he did not recognize him as a resident thereof. Trayvon Martin could then have explained to Zimmerman that his father lived in the community and that he was visiting. Zimmerman could then have said, “I’m sorry to have bothered you Trayvon, have a nice day.” Who knows, the two might have become friends later on.
Option two: Trayvon Martin was in a state of fear as a result of being followed. Well, he has a cell phone in his hand; he could have simply hung up on his girl friend and dialed 911. As George Zimmerman was already in contact with emergency services, and having both parties on the phone, one operator could have told Trayvon Martin who George Zimmerman was and the other operator after asking Trayvon why he was in the gated community and being informed that his father lived there, could have informed George Zimmerman, after which both could have went on their separate ways, never having met.
Option three: If Trayvon Martin was really afraid he could have simply took off running. He was an athlete. Looking at the two I have to believe Martin would have left Zimmerman in the dust.
Now, it has been evidenced that George Zimmerman did sustain injury during the confrontation. If Zimmerman was standing still and Trayvon Martin turned and took a single step towards Zimmerman, he had decided on confrontation. If he then punched Zimmerman in the nose knocking him down, then jumped on him and began pounding his head on the pavement, he had initiated violent confrontation. At this point it is not unreasonable to believe Zimmerman was in fear for his life. That being said, under Florida law, he committed no crime in answering what he believed to be deadly force with deadly force.
Again, this is a production and there is a political agenda, which is a nation-wide attack on our 2nd Amendment right to possess firearms and our natural right to defend our lives when we feel we are in danger.
When this whole thing began we were given a small portion of the available information in order to invoke righteous indignation. Remember, these photographs of George Zimmerman’s bloody head, just recently released, have been in existence since the night of the incident.
This is an attempt to divide we the people into two camps, using the technology developed through the Casey Anthony experiment. When this whole farce comes to a head, those controlling this propaganda will decide the verdict and that verdict will have nothing to do with guilt or innocence, but rather under which scenario the maximum chaos can be created in our streets.
Don’t fall for this crap, people. Reject it as it is designed to cause us all harm, no matter which team you think you’re on.
God bless this Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.