Water as a Weapon
In this video interview – Janet Phelan reveals a deadly water system has been deployed in the U.S. In 2007 she wrote an article, Water as a Weapon. She is a TI (targeted individual) and after an attempt was made on her life she fled the country. Read her book Exile.
Phelan is an investigative journalist whose articles have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The San Bernardino County Sentinel, The Santa Monica Daily Press, The Long Beach Press Telegram, Sovereign Mind Magazine and other regional and national publications.
Janet also specializes in issues pertaining to legal corruption and addresses the heated subject of adult conservatorship and elder abuse.
Here’s the pdf. – The American’s Bulletin for July/August 2007: Water as a Weapon by Janet Phelan
In August of 2004 an article, “Public Extermination Project” was published on Los Angeles Independent Media revealing a plan by the U.S. government to depopulate the country via the water system. The article alleged that the water system had been reconfigured country-wide so as to function as a finely honed targeting system, which, when deployed, would selectively target individual homes with undrinkable, or “death” water. The article alleged that this had been accomplished by the construction of a complex system of double lines and mixing capabilities on the main lines. In this manner, certain, pre-selected homes would receive the ordinary water while the targeted homes would receive the mixture.
It is the contention of this reporter that the mixture will kill those imbibing the water. Nearly three years have passed since the publication of “Public Extermination Project.”
New information has surfaced supporting these Water as a Weapon claims.
In addition, this reporter has determined some errors in the initial report, which mandate correcting.
A careful reading of Section 817 of the Patriot Act, “The Expansion of the Biological Weapons Statute,” reveals this to be the umbrella statute authorizing this project.
While the wording of this statute is somewhat opaque, a diligent scrutiny of the language reveals its true intent.
Firstly, 817 legalizes “delivery systems” and “toxins” under certain circumstances.
“Delivery systems” is weapons terminology. “Toxins” are poisons. The statute details when these delivery systems and toxins will and will not be legal.
Poisons, as we all know, are meant to terminate life. There is no mention in 817 of these poisons being utilized as any sort of legally sanctioned punishment for a crime, such as lethal injection.
Rather, the statute states that these SHALL be legal when used for purposes determined as “peaceful, protective, prophylactic or bona fide research.”
Setting aside the research clause, we are essentially seeing the legalizing of “peaceful, protective, prophylactic … . .” poisoning.
We have thus essentially bypassed any necessity for due process and have authorized the use of poisons to kill.
A dissection of the part of this statute which lists the “restricted persons,” who are disallowed from possessing or transporting these delivery systems and toxins, indicates that this statute is not authorizing a military operation.
We can therefore infer that 817 is NOT authorizing the use of poisons in warfare against an enemy of the U.S.A.
So who are the intended recipients of this biological warfare, authorized in this statute?
If not an enemy of this country, could it be segments of the U.S. population?
We have seen in our country, since 911, the stripping of civil rights that historically accompanies the rise of fascism.
Our vote seems to have gone the way of Diebold, and can now be electronically finessed by those who seek to cement their continued governing power.
Our privacy rights have been crushed by the “national emergency” that the attacks of 911 established as an ongoing national predicament. Most newspaper editors will acknowledge, at least in private conversation, that they believe their office phone lines to be tapped.
Peace groups have been under surveillance, and an act as unremarkable as checking a book out of a library now may invoke FBI scrutiny of library records, courtesy of the Patriot Act.
The Patriot Act had already been written before the attacks of 911, and was waiting in the wings to be rammed through Congress…
Missing is an awareness of a domestic extermination policy.
It is the contention of this reporter that the Patriot Act has indeed codified a domestic extermination policy, via “delivery systems” and “toxins,” which has yet to be deployed.
817 appears to be the slam dunk death clause in the Patriot Act.
It is NOT common knowledge that the government can, at will and without due process, poison selected U.S. citizens.
It is the hope of this reporter that by adequately documenting the plan to use the water system as a weapons system that it may be possible to derail what will otherwise be the worst genocidal attack in the history of the planet.
In order for the water system to be deployed as a selective, finely honed targeting system, it would be necessary for it to be configured in certain ways.
First of all, there would need to be at least two water lines in most neighborhoods.
One line would provide ordinary water, while the second line would contain the toxins.
My research on the water system in such disparate venues as Los Angeles and Spokane has revealed the existence of the double line system. I have attached two photographs of blueprints from the Spokane water system (Attachments 1& 2)…
However, the blueprints reveal something pivotal about this system: access line connecting the two lines, every fifty yards or so. According to the specs, both lines were placed 5.5 feet deep.
The only reasonable assumption is that the two mains are connected by the access lines…
While the crews are buttressing the aging pipes with cement, they are also replacing the manually operated valves with remote controlled valves.
This is critical to the deployment of this weapons system…
As you will see, there are three ports, or accesses. As water cannot flow both East/West and West/East at the same time, two of the ports provide for the uninterrupted flow of water in one direction. The third port would allow for the possibility of an introduction of a substance from another line into the main line.
A valve would be necessary to control the introduction of a substance from another source. Without a control valve, the two substances would be freely intermingling. My original assumption that tee valves were involved in this system may not be entirely accurate.
The red valve depicted in the second photo on the “Public Extermination Project” article is, in fact, a gate valve, which is a two port valve.
The system has been configured for a mass kill—therefore, it would be wildly impractical and ludicrously inefficient to attempt to dispatch teams of workers throughout the broad sweep of this country to dig up the streets and manually turn all the valves at the designated time of deployment.
The valves would need to be solenoid, or remote controlled. Thus, at the time of deployment, after determination had been made as to which locations house the targets and which will be “passed over,” one would need only throw a switch to open the valves… remote controlled sprinkler valves are small valves.
Just a reminder that in my post on Dead Scientist, Geetha Angara, age 43. found dead in water treatment plant tank on February 8, 2005. Angara, a senior chemist with a doctorate from New York University, was married and mother of three. She was last seen on the night of Feb. 8 doing water quality tests at the Passaic Valley Water Commission plant in Totowa, where she worked for 12 years. Investigators are treating Angara’s death as a possible homicide (she was strangled to death). Strangely, none of the scientist’s murderers have been found.