Could employers and states mandate COVID-19 vaccinations? Here’s what the courts have ruled

The Conversation

A safe and effective vaccine could end the coronavirus pandemic, but for it to succeed, enough people will have to get inoculated.

Recent polls suggest that the U.S. is far from ready. Most surveys have found that only about two-thirds of adults say they would probably get the vaccine. While that might protect most people who get vaccinated, research suggests it may be insufficient to reach herd immunity and stop the virus’s spread.

As a law professor who has written about the legal questions around vaccination laws, employment discrimination and religious exemptions, I see four possible approaches that governments and employers can take to ensure enough Americans are immunized against COVID-19.

Which ones are legal might surprise you.

Can governments require vaccinations?

The most intrusive policy would involve government mandating vaccination for all Americans, with the exception of those with a medical exemption.

People are often surprised to learn that states would likely have the legal right to enforce such a rule.

In the 1905 landmark case Jacobson v. Massachusetts, the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a state criminal law that required all adult inhabitants of Cambridge to get a smallpox vaccine or be fined. The Supreme Court explained that an individual’s liberty rights under the U.S. Constitution are not absolute and the mandatory vaccination law was necessary to promote public health and safety.

While Jacobson v. Massachusetts is over 100 years old, courts continue to rely on the reasoning of the case. State governments still occasionally enact broad compulsory vaccination policies. In 2019, in the midst of a measles outbreak, New York City mandated that anyone over six months of age who lived, went to school or worked in several ZIP codes within the city had to be vaccinated against measles or be subject to a fine.

[Expertise in your inbox. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter and get expert takes on today’s news, every day.]

Requiring people to be vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus could similarly be justified by government’s need to promote public health and safety. In late May, the New York State Bar Association’s Health Law Section even recommended mandatory COVID-19 vaccination for all Americans.

Yet in the United States today, where even mask mandates are controversial, it is unlikely that many states will enact a compulsory vaccination policy for everyone. Additionally, there is a risk that heavy-handed public health tactics can backfire and escalate tensions, increase mistrust of government and unintentionally increase the influence of the anti-vaccination movement.

What if only some people must get vaccinated?

A less intrusive tactic would be for state governments to require COVID-19 vaccinations for only certain segments of the population.

All 50 states currently have some type of compulsory vaccination laws covering K-12 schoolchildren, and many states have compulsory vaccination laws covering college students. These laws typically allow for some type of medical exemption. States may also have mandatory vaccination laws covering employees in nursing homes and health care facilities.

If states required this type of targeted mandatory COVID-19 vaccination, they could cover those most at risk and those most likely to be in contact with others in ways that could stem the virus’s spread.

Another approach would be legislation that requires proof of vaccination to obtain a passport, use public transportation or go to a gym.

One of the most controversial issues surrounding compulsory vaccination laws is the religious or philosophical exemption, which some states have eliminated in recent years. In the aftermath of the recent measles outbreaks, both New York and California eliminated these exemptions from vaccination laws covering schoolchildren. Courts have explained that while compulsory vaccination laws may burden religious practices, religious exemptions are not constitutionally required under the First Amendment’s free exercise clause since mandatory vaccination does not single out religion and is not motivated by a desire to interfere with religion.

What can employers require?

Private employers have significant flexibility for requiring vaccination. Yet few businesses outside of health care facilities have done so, partly out of fear that employees would consider these policies to be unacceptable invasions of their personal lives.

There is a risk in a unionized workplace that a mandatory vaccination policy could be struck down if it violates a collective bargaining agreement. However, unlike government-mandated policies, these would not be subject to constitutional restrictions.

Employers may also be concerned that if policies do not include significant religious exemptions, workers could sue, claiming religious discrimination. However, it is unlikely that federal law would require employers to accommodate employees requesting a religious exemption to a COVID-19 vaccine. Under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the federal law prohibiting religious discrimination in the workplace, employers are not required to accommodate religious employees if doing so involves more than a de minimis, or minimal cost.

Certainly, in the midst of one of the worst public health and financial crises in recent history, there is a significant cost to having an unimmunized workforce.

Setting an example

Beyond mandates and laws, employers, politicians and government agencies have other ways to encourage people to get vaccinated. In particular, the messages they send matter. That was evident in the public controversy over mask-wearing after President Donald Trump and other prominent Republicans ridiculed the precaution.

In New York, Gov. Andrew Cuomo mandated wearing face masks in public, but he also successfully convinced New Yorkers to wear them by emphasizing that doing so showed respect for others, particularly essential workers, health care providers and high-risk individuals.

Government can similarly encourage Americans to get vaccinated through education campaigns led by trusted community members, such as religious leaders or celebrities. During the New York measles outbreak, the Orthodox Jewish Nurses Association was at the forefront of educating the Orthodox Jewish community on the safety and efficacy of vaccination.

Government and employers also could make vaccines free and available at convenient locations.

As the U.S. government fast-tracks the development of potential vaccines, it’s important to remember that a COVID-19 vaccine will stop the virus only if enough people get vaccinated. Now is the time for governments and employers to develop policies to ensure it succeeds.

10 thoughts on “Could employers and states mandate COVID-19 vaccinations? Here’s what the courts have ruled

  1. Won’t even take the time to review any of this shit. There is no such authority. It can’t exist under our supreme laws and any who claim such or desire to mandate such, shall be dealt with.

    1. They can’t do shit even by their rules, their own courts have ruled against it in the past. In any event, if your lucky enough to be employed, you might not be for long, business’ are dropping like flies anyway, by design.

      Anyway, its good to read what the enemy has up it sleeve.

  2. I can hear the repeat of the union meeting where the speaker says, “It is coming, we best get ahead of it so that we are the ones that make the rules.”
    They said those words in a jam packed hall, where the meeting notice indicated we’d be voting about piss testing. Testing was nearly unanimously struck down, until they said it does not matter what we want. It is coming…
    The government knows full well this hoax is as illegal as can be, but they get merchants and employers to enforce the commie agenda or face consequences.
    It’s been 8 months folks, the novelty has worn completely off.
    Anybody not seeing it yet is not worth the effort, at this point.

    1. How about if they make threats that we make the consequences from us worse than the consequences of acquiescing to the corporate mafia?
      Had everybody back when they started the unlawful piss test bullshit physically went after the turncoat union bosses, I think the numbers would have been on the employees’ side.
      Our grandfathers didn’t take this shit. You tried to f-k them over, they’d shut the company down and get out the f-king guns and clubs and they got their way.
      Everybody just feels that the rich’s money can beat f-king bullets in a fight and so they pussy out and bow to their masters. They try to force a shot on you, shut their f-king asses down. No compromise.

  3. “The Supreme Court explained that an individual’s liberty rights under the U.S. Constitution are not absolute …”

    F*** the “Constitution”, the Bill of Rights is absolute and more than proves that forced vaccination is illegal and violators will be tried for treason.

    1. When we use their fake ass money, we are committing treason, no difference. Its not worth a rats ass, yet we continue to use it.

      I see an article. If it looks like something of interest, it goes to Henry. I dont read word for word, no time.Too damn busy making the fake ass money.

      You guys let me know real fkg quick if I’m a dumb ass. 🙂

      Impossible for me to proof every damn word. Drove 650 miles today, yeah, I got time to read this shit. If I’m posting, im on a break.

      I consider myself one lucky dude im able to at least work, should have died in 2013 from cancer, again 2 years ago.

      Rant over.. 🙂

      1. I do the same thing Mark
        Same reasons
        I send to Henry
        And I learn from all of us here ,where the bear shit and the buck wheat

  4. great post . They can try to force me to vaxx but its a fight to death with me . If my job tries I am done and the private war begins

    1. True that.
      I’ve been finding lately that when this stuff comes up At work and I want to lodge a threat or ultimatum I stop. And smile. Why advertise? I’m probably the only one armed at work. I will be the most likely to be able to refuse. No need to warn them. Just listen, sense and respond.

      The private war is a long time coming but will be short when it does. It will devolve into a battle few are able to fight very well.

      It needs to be taken to the powers that be but they will deflect it onto their quizlings first while they run and hide in their secluded retreats.

  5. I am late to the party today, but this treasonous article infuriates. I went to the source page and on the right side I see a picture of its author, Debbie Kaminer, the “Law Professor.” Clicked on her pic and up comes a mini profile, the first sentence of which easily reveals her prejudices and connections:

    “My scholarship focuses on employment discrimination, sex discrimination, disability discrimination, LGBTQ discrimination, religion and the law, and vaccination law.”

    Just below her profile is a “View All Partners” link. Check out who’s funding:

    Billy and Melinda listed as “Strategic Partners.”  Dictionary: strategic: relating to the identification of long-term or overall aims and interests and the means of achieving them; carefully designed or planned to serve a particular purpose or advantage with objective to win. Root word: stratagem: a plan or scheme, especially one used to outwit an opponent or achieve an end; cunning. Origin, 15th century, from the Greek stratagema: to be a general, to lead.

    I’ll add that my own take on ‘strategic” is that in the planning and implementation of those strategies, it is often done with manipulative and coercive methods. Underhanded and deceptive. Strategize me not, you mofos!!!

    Now how am I supposed to find anything that used to resemble a sweet Sunday afternoon?!! They ruin EVERYTHING!!



Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *