Dangerous New Car Features

Eric Peters Autos

New cars have become so “safe” they’re becoming dangerous. They have systems which make an accident more likely – while touting how much more crashworthy they are now vs. previously.

Arguably, the safer policy would be to avoid the crash.  

But that’s getting harder to do when the car second-guesses your steering inputs – and forcibly attempts to “correct” them  just one for-instance of new saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety technology being Borg’d into more and more new cars.

Formally, it’s styled Lane Keep Assist or Steer Assist, or something along those lines (depending on the brand of the car).

It’s actually the leading edge of the camel’s nose under the tent for automated driving technology, designed more to get us used to the idea of the car driving us rather than us driving the car. It is marketed as a way to make steering “easier” (as well as saaaaaaaafer) via electric motors that “assist” your steering – though this is hard to grok given all new cars built since the ‘80s have power-assisted steering and are already easy to steer.

But these new systems do more than “assist.”

They countermand your steering. The little motors turn the wheel in the opposite direction you’ve turned it. Which is unnerving as well as neither easy or saaaaaaaaaafe. Having to fight the car, for one, isn’t much in the way of assistance or ease. And unexpected steering inputs opposite your own can be most un-saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafe.

It happens when deviate from your lane, both unintended and intentional. It’s the latter thing that presents the saaaaaaaaaaaaafety hazard.

If you fail to signal before steering, as when making a lane change – the system will counter-steer. Because the system is designed to keep you in your lane. It’s sold as a way to check sloppy/distracted driving. But it’s also a system to enforce mindless rule-following, even at the expense of . . . saaaaaaaaaaafety.

Cameras in the front of the car pan the road ahead, using the painted lines on either side of the car to orient the car’s position in its lane. If the car wanders to the left or right – treading on the painted lines, this cues the electric motors connected to the steering wheel to nudge the steering wheel in the opposite direction – to keep the car in its lane.

Hence Lane Keep Assist.

As a sidebar: It’d be wiser to instill paying-attention in drivers rather than install idiot-proofing technology in cars, which only assures more not-paying-attention drivers.

But what happens when you purposely tread on a painted line – as when exiting the road or changing lanes? The system is dumb; it does not understand that you’re notwandering across your lane but changing lanes on purpose.

Unless you signal. Then it knows – and the electric motors don’t try to fight your lane change. So these systems are also another nudge in the ribs, to make you a better rule-obeying Clover.

But why should you signal when there’s no reason to – other than mindless totemic worship of traffic laws and to placate the car’s mindless saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafetysystem? If you are the only car on the road – this actually happens – signaling when no other cars are around is as retarded as knocking on your own bathroom door before entering, to make sure no one’s in there when you know you’re the only person in the house.

Or coming to a complete stop at a four-way stop sign in the desert with clear lines of sight for miles in every direction and it’s obvious there’s no traffic to stop for and so no good reason to waste gas and time and wear and tear on the car to completely stop . . . for the sake of totemic appeasement of a sign.

Even when you do signal, the “assist” is still generally unnerving, especially if you’re not used to it – or are a new/skittish driver. It is likely there will be accidents – caused by this saaaaaaaaaaaaafety system. People will feel the car steering contrary to their wishes, their desired course – and jerk the wheel the other way. As a guy who tests drives new cars every week, I can attest from personal experience in dozens of brand-new cars equipped with this technology that it presents a definite saaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaafety risk – yet it’s not only allowed but encouraged by the same government which croons its crocodile-teared concern for “our safety” at every turn.

Eric Peters Autos

6 thoughts on “Dangerous New Car Features

  1. Sounds like driving through a construction site or accident scene could create even MORE chaos and carnage, as well as give control of your vehicle to someone else. None of this b.s. is designed to keep you safe in the first place.

  2. I think drivers should know how to drive, and any automation intervening in that process is only making them worse at it, not to mention the fact that all of this computer technology they’re stuffing into cars is doing a good job of proving that it’s unreliable (just count up the recent recalls). No….I think I’ll steer my own car, thank you.

    And of course, like all computers, it’s hackable, so the little brat in the Volvo behind you can steer you into a tree for kicks. “We’re just playing computer games back here, Mom” — Little brat

  3. Hey, paint is cheap.

    Get a couple of gallons, one black, one white, a roller and have some fun.

    I suggest something along the lines of a painted off ramp into a tree.

    Time for the Darwinian approach to the stupidity. Survival of the attentive.

  4. 20mph school zones and school buses that make EVERYBODY wait until little Besty gets situated, have not made children respect the devastation that stupidity brings.
    Gun free zones, same.
    Safer cars are those not driven. Otherwise, pay attention and drive!

  5. As an engineer, I know the problems that crop up when you try to make something idiot proof, they just come out with better idiots.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *