Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Famed Stanford prison experiment that ‘showed how we are all naturally inclined to abuse power’ was based on LIES and FAKERY, shocking expose claims

Daily Mail

One of the most famous and influential psychology studies of all time was based on lies and fakery, a new exposé reveals.

The Stanford prison experiment purported to show we are all naturally inclined to abuse positions of power – after volunteers randomly assigned to act as prison guards began abusing volunteer inmates in a mock prison.  

But now a report from author and scientist Dr Ben Blum claims the research was all a sham. It points to recordings found in archives at Stanford University which show the study’s author Professor Philip Zimbardo encouraged guards to treat inmates poorly.

Also, one volunteer prisoner has now admitted to faking a fit of madness that the study reported was driven by the prison’s brutal conditions.

The revelations have sent scientists into uproar, with some calling for the experiment and its findings to be wiped from psychology textbooks worldwide.

The experiment has been cited in many scientific textbooks, and is the subject of a number of documentaries, television series and even a feature-length film.

Participants in the study, all Stanford University students recruited through a newspaper advert, were assigned to be inmates or guards in a fake prison in a basement at the institution.

Prisoners were treated as second class citizens – they were made to wear women’s clothing, not allowed to wear underwear and were only referred to by a number.

One inmate reportedly broke out in a psychosomatic rash upon finding his ‘parole’ had been turned down, while another famously suffered a breakdown in his cell, screaming ‘I’m burning up inside!’

Guards were reportedly so cruel to inmates that the experiment had to be cut short after just six days of its planned two-week duration.

The study and its authors have been cited for decades as proof that cruelty is driven by circumstance.

‘The Stanford Prison Experiment is often used to teach the lesson that our behaviour is profoundly affected by the social roles and situations in which we find ourselves,’ Dr Blum wrote in a report posted to Medium.

‘But its deeper, more disturbing implication is that we all have a wellspring of potential sadism lurking within us, waiting to be tapped by circumstance.’

Dr Blum, who earned his PhD in computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, looked into previously unpublished recordings of Professor Zimbardo and interviewed some of the psychologist’s participants.

He found that one of the study’s most famous moments, in which a 22-year-old inmate broke down in distress at his treatment in the prison, was faked.

Student Douglas Korpi, now 57, admitted he feigned a psychotic breakdown because he wanted to quit the experiment to study for his exams.

‘Anybody who is a clinician would know that I was faking,’ he told Blum.

‘If you listen to the tape, it’s not subtle. I’m not that good at acting. I mean, I think I do a fairly good job, but I’m more hysterical than psychotic.’

Kopri added that he largely enjoyed the experiment and did not feel threatened because he know the guards weren’t allowed to harm him.

‘There were no repercussions. We knew [the guards] couldn’t hurt us, they couldn’t hit us. They were white college kids like us, so it was a very safe situation,’ he said.

‘It was a job…I was being a good employee. It was a great time.’

Dr Blum also reveals that Professor Zimbardo told guards to rile up prisoners, suggesting their cruelty did not bloom naturally from their position of power.

‘We cannot physically abuse or torture them,’ Professor Zimbardo told them in a meeting before the experiment began, according to recordings.

‘We can create boredom. We can create a sense of frustration. We can create fear in them, to some degree… We have total power in the situation. They have none.’

One guard told Dr Blum that he pretended to be a sadist, and acted cruelly in a way that was later reported as an organic product of the power dynamics at play.

‘I took it as a kind of an improv exercise,’ he said.

‘I believed that I was doing what the researchers wanted me to do.’

The guard added that he later regretted treating inmates poorly, though Professor Zimbardo had thanked him on his way out of the test.

‘He made it a point to come and let me know what a great job I’d done,’ he said.

‘I actually felt like I had accomplished something good because I had contributed in some way to the understanding of human nature.’

Several attempts to replicate the Stanford prison experiment have failed to recreate its dramatic results, leading some scientists to suggest the study was faked.

The research presents little in the way of concrete data, largely relying on testimonies from those involved in the study.

Professor Zimbardo has admitted he was an active participants in the experiment rather than a neutral observer, meaning he exerted influence over its results.

He also handed the guards batons, which may have predisposed them to consider physical force as an acceptable means of enforcing good behaviour.

Scientists took to Twitter to denounce the Stanford prison experiment following Dr Blum’s recent revelations.

Professor Simine Vazire, a psychology researcher at the University of California, Davis, said she was ’embarrassed’ her field treated the study’s author as a hero.

‘We must stop celebrating this work. It’s anti-scientific. Get it out of textbooks,’ she wrote.

‘It’s also irresponsible in many other ways (socially, politically). I’m embarrassed that my field treated this work and this man as heroic.’

New York University scientist Jay Van Bavel pointed out that the falsified study has had far reaching influences.

He tweeted: ‘The Stanford Prison Experience – as it is presented in textbooks – presents human nature as naturally conforming to oppressive systems.

‘This is a lesson that extends well beyond prison systems and the field criminology – but it’s wrong.’


This entry was posted in News, Videos. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Famed Stanford prison experiment that ‘showed how we are all naturally inclined to abuse power’ was based on LIES and FAKERY, shocking expose claims

  1. Koyote says:

    That’s why you can’t trust public education, or ever my own social opinions when I say, ” people are insane”.
    They aren’t all crazy, as a matter of fact, some are kind of like me!! Most arePerfectly capable of self governance……….

    • galen says:

      Hi! And yeah, maybe absolute power does NOT corrupt absolutely. I guess it depends on who’s wielding and how. For instance, parents should have absolute power in making decisions regarding the rearing of their children.

      They’re always ready to dehumanize us, tell us we’re bad to the core. So now a new study finds that we all do NOT harbor and inner sadist after-all. Ha! Many already knew that. So I guess I fall into the camp of those who believe humans are inherently good.

      What about the bad guys? The ones stealin’ and oppressin’ and killin’ and lying? Well, they ain’t human (at least not yet anyway).


  2. # 1 NWO Hatr says:

    “The revelations have sent scientists into uproar, with some calling for the experiment and its findings to be wiped from psychology textbooks worldwide.”


    Why bother?


  3. DL. says:

    WOW! Put this with the Harvard U experiment that “proved” nearly anyone would go so far as to “torture” a “test subject” if ordered to (the old Hitlerian “just following orders” meme)–the Milgram experiment–and I, someone who has a degree in Psychology as well as Counseling–am pretty much convinced now that ALL PSYCHOLOGY IS BUNK! And Psychiatry is BUNK FOR BIG BUCKS while creating more mental illness. “The business of psychiatry is to keep people mentally ill.”–my group psych professor!

    • mary in ND says:

      ‘ “The business of psychiatry is to keep people mentally ill.”–my group psych professor!’

      As the business of mediSIN is to maintain disease

  4. Darzak says:

    I’ve always mistrusted this “experiment”, especially since the radical change in the ‘guards’ happened in less than a week. The fact that the prisoners and guards were, for all purposes, a new prison facility; the lack of a previously established prison culture would make such a radical personality transformation highly improbable in such a short period of time. I therefore (belatedly here) call Shenanigans!

  5. Katie says:

    Bottom line to me after reading this is that this behavior is taught, condoned and encouraged. Can anyone say cop training in Israel?

  6. Katie says:

    Jesus Christ said-
    Matthew 19:17 King James Version (KJV)
    “And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

    And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.”

    • galen says:

      And yet we are told we are “made in the image and likeness of…”


      • Katie says:

        Adam, being the man spoken of was made in the image of God. God’s intent was that all of mankind be made in his image, no doubt.

        What is the image of God? “God is spirit” John 4:24

        God formed Adam from the dust of the earth, made Adam a living soul by breathing into his nostrils the breath of life and he became a living soul and created spirit life within Adam. Animals also have soul life/breath life. Recall the saying when someone dies, ” they took their last breath,” meaning the person has died.

        Adam disobeyed God by the freedom of his will even after God had told him that in the day/ that day, that he ate thereof, he would surely die.

        We see that Adam continued to live hundreds of yrs. after this because he continued to have soul life and eventually physically he died.

        What died, spirit.

        All men born after the fall of Adam are born without spirit life/the image of God, thus the purpose of God reconciling men unto Himself by way of Jesus Christ. Those that believe upon Christ receive spirit life/the image of God which is spirit.

        • galen says:

          Dear Katie, I know we all have a lifetime of studying many spiritual and philosophical perspectives. Mine just led me to believe that humans are inherently good. Can’t dive too deep on comment section, time and space will not allow. Will only say that my understanding of “the individual” tells me that Adam’s fall had nothing to do with me and deprived me of nothing. This is my understanding.



          • Katie says:

            galen, and herein lies the beauty of freedom of will. No man has the right to force another against his will, not even God does this.

          • galen says:

            “No man has the right to force another against his will.”

            But oh they try, Katie, they certainly try.


  7. Katie says:

    By the way, I’m not of the opinion that man is inherently evil but man is in need of the Saviour Christ, which is freely available and according to man’s free will choice.

Leave a Reply