New South Wales Labor Leader – John Robertson
Despite overwhelming evidence that many vaccinations are harmful to babies and young children Government Leaders, Ministers for Health and State Leaders are now attempting to take away the rights of parents by applying unconstitutional pressure on those that care for their children.
I woke up this morning to the following article and felt compelled to respond to this “Hitler type scaremongery.”
NSW bill to ban ‘anti-vax’ kids
AAP May 19, 2013
Unvaccinated children would be banned from NSW preschools and childcare centres under legislation to be introduced into state parliament.
Labor leader John Robertson will introduce amendments to the public health act which would give early childhood centres the right to refuse kids who haven’t had their shots.
The move comes amid concern about high rates of unvaccinated children in some parts of NSW as well as the emergence of so-called “anti-vaxers” who oppose vaccination.
Mr Robertson says the move will remind those who had forgotten to fully vaccinate their children to do so.
He also said parents who chose not to vaccinate their children were putting the lives of other kids at risk.
“This shouldn’t be about the alternative wishes of parents who choose to ignore the advice of doctor, it has to be about the health of our children and young people,” he said in a statement on Sunday.
“Parents who choose not to vaccinate aren’t just putting their own children at risk, they are putting other people’s innocent children at risk of preventable diseases as well.
“There is quite simply no reasonable argument against childhood vaccination,” he said.
Mr Robertson says he will consult with the community and early childhood sector before drafting the legislation.
Let’s just take a look at the wording of this article:
- Unvaccinated children would be banned – what he really means to say is that they will certainly be banned as the government will apply pressure to schools to refuse entry!!
- The move comes amid concern about high rates of unvaccinated children – who is actually concerned those that support the pharmaceutical industry?
- Mr Robertson says the move will remind those who had forgotten to fully vaccinate their children to do so – What he actually means is this is not a simple reminder but a dictator telling the parents they must vaccinate their young!!
- He also said parents who chose not to vaccinate their children were putting the lives of other kids at risk – Perhaps Mr. Robertson could explain this theory…..does he mean those that have been vaccinated are at risk?
- “This shouldn’t be about the alternative wishes of parents who choose to ignore the advice of doctor, it has to be about the health of our children and young people,” – could he be more specific in this assumption – does he know that doctors are rewarded for taking sides with the pharmaceutical industry? – does he know that evidence from leading experts in the world now contradict the assurance of some vaccines, many of which are un-proven?
To summerise, if vaccinations are guaranteed protection against preventable diseases who would be at risk other than those that choose not to have such vaccines?…………really does not make sense!!
I think it is time to brief this poorly advised Leader of the Opposition (NSW) with facts rather than listen to his own rather pathetic diatribe, not forgetting the added decisions made by world leaders, Ministers for Health, Departments of Health in their support for such programmes and in taking away the responsibility of parents…………”Big Brother is certainly here to stay.”
An extraordinary new paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.
If you want to get an idea of who is responsible for your child’s condition resulting from a vaccine adverse reaction then this is the paper to read. What you have to ask yourself is if the people on these committees are honest and honourable and acting in the best interests of British children, how is it this has been going on for at least 30 years?
This is what everyone has always known but could never prove before now. Pass this information on to others so they can see what goes on in Government health committees behind locked doors.
Deliberately concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination programme.
The author, Dr Lucija Tomljenovic writes:
Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics (i.e., Helsinki Declaration and the International Code of Medical Ethics) but also, their own Code of Practice.
From my perspective I have covered the massive cover-up’s of past and current vaccination programmes in my many articles (that were supported by forensic evidence). I guess the likes of Mr. John Robertson would have no knowledge on the lack of medical evidence to support many of today’s vaccines let alone such things as the Helsinki Declaration or the International Code of Medical Ethics. No Doubt Mr. Robertson supports the UN Agenda 21 programme or maybe he’s also blind to what lies behind this evil programme of mass depopulation!!
Many times I have written to our leaders and respective medical professionals pleading with them to drop many of these forced unproven vaccination programmes (all to no avail). However, I will continue to provide the evidence which can be used at a later date in any class action against those that enforce these false vaccines and at the same time put such briefing on record to show they have reneged on their duty of care to protect their respective citizens.
Many very brave researchers and doctors have exposed themselves in bringing forward this vital information in the hope that we as parents can make an informed decision as to what our children should or should not have……..unfortunately it is such politicians that have decided that they now have the right to override the decision made by ordinary mum’s and dad’s……………this alone is truly a breach of human rights!!
I will now continue with more from Dr. Tomljenovic article:
The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website (for example, JCVI CSM/DH (Committee on the Safety of Medicines/Department of Health) Joint Committee on Adverse Reactions Minutes 1986-1992).
In summary, the transcripts of the JCVI/DH meetings from the period from 1983 to 2010 appear to show that:
1) Instead of reacting appropriately by re-examining existing vaccination policies when safety concerns over specific vaccines were identified by their own investigations, the JCVI either a) took no action, b) skewed or selectively removed unfavourable safety data from public reports and c) made intensive efforts to reassure both the public and the authorities in the safety of respective vaccines;
2) Significantly restricted contraindication to vaccination criteria in order to increase vaccination rates despite outstanding and unresolved safety issues;
3) On multiple occasions requested from vaccine manufacturers to make specific amendments to their data sheets, when these were in conflict with JCVI’s official advices on immunisations;
4) Persistently relied on methodologically dubious studies, while dismissing independent research, to promote vaccine policies;
5) Persistently and categorically downplayed safety concerns while over-inflating vaccine benefits;
6) Promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine paediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted;
7) Actively discouraged research on vaccine safety issues;
8) Deliberately took advantage of parents’ trust and lack of relevant knowledge on vaccinations in order to promote a scientifically unsupported immunisation program which could put certain children at risk of severe long-term neurological damage;
Notably, all of these actions appear to violate the JCVI’s own Code of Practice.
More evidence also became available as follows:
IN HONOUR OF DR DAVID FREED
THE HEALTH HAZARDS OF DISEASE PREVENTION
BSEM Scientific Conference, March 2011
The BSEM Scientific Conference in March 2011 with this title was organised by Dr David Freed. We resolved to publish the proceedings online, and David worked with the speakers to put papers into an agreed and aceptable format, and wrote a personal introduction. The next day he died suddenly. What follows are the last words that he wrote. He speaks from the heart about science, about corruption in high places, about the ethics of patient care, and above all about truth.
We dedicate these proceedings to David Freed. We have lost a wise man and a friend.
The issue of vaccination and its risks arouse strong emotions, not least of fear – fear of public attack for speaking out, for one. These are the conference presentations that we are permitted to publish. Several booked speakers withdrew, for various reasons, so are not posted. Some speakers were unable to attend, but were keen for their papers to be included in the proceedings; they are posted here.
Dr David Freed
It seems to me that the ethical background to vaccination – giving potentially harmful medications to healthy individuals in the hope of keeping them that way – has never been clearly addressed… Who gave us the right (a) to invade the bodies of healthy people who never asked us to, and (b) to do it not only without explanation of the possible risks, but in some countries even applying coercive pressures, denying the existence of the risks, and suppressing relevant information?
Vaccines, Atopy & Allergy: Problems & Solutions
Dr Richard Halvorsen
Time and time again I have heard from parents how they have been patronised, bullied and accused of not doing the best for their children, when they have simply questioned the necessity of the large number of vaccines that are being given to their children at such an early age…. The risk of severe eczema (atopic dermatitis) in a child who has caught chickenpox under eight years of age is 4% of that of a child who has not contracted the illness.
The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?
Deliberately concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.
Labels of Convenience: Are Labels of Child Abuse being used to cover up Vaccine Damage?
Just over ten years ago my family became one of the families in the child abuse statistics. In 1999 I was accused of suffering from Munchausen Syndrome By Proxy. In my case many of the reports and evidence ascertaining to my children were not read and many mistakes were made. I adopted both of my children and was accused of making up and causing the disabilities that they both had before I ever met them. This would not have happened if reports had been read in full.
Global Concerns about HPV vaccines
Leslie Carol Botha and Freda Birrell
We believe in science-based medicine. Our primary goal is to provide the information necessary for you to make informed decisions regarding your health and well-being. We also provide referrals to helpful resources for those unfortunate enough to have experienced vaccine-related injuries.
The Autism Epidemic & The Pill
Dr Ellen CG Grant
The use of hormonal contraceptives rose steeply in the 1970s, becoming nearly universal; the incidence of autism and ASD rose steeply in the 1980s. Exogenous hormones have been shown to be genotoxic in their own right, but they are also associated with accumulation of DNA-damaging toxins, and ASD subjects have decreased detoxifying ability.
The decision to use an HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer was based upon circumstantial evidence: assumptions. HPV vaccines have been promoted to women on selective information. This vaccine is an HPV vaccine not a cervical cancer vaccine. There is inconclusive evidence it will reduce any cervical cancer and the long –term risks of using this vaccine have not been determined.
Animal Vaccination Concerns: Vaccine-Associated Auto-Immune And Other Diseases
Michael W. Fox
The vaccinated, but not the non-vaccinated, dogs developed autoantibodies to many of their own biochemicals, including fibronectin, laminin, DNA, albumin, cytochrome C, transferrin, cardiolipin and collagen. Autoantibodies to cardiolipin are frequently found in genetically susceptible patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, and also in individuals with other autoimmune diseases. The widespread use of multiple modified live and new generation genetically engineered vaccines in food animals raised under cruel,stressful and disease-promoting intensive ‘factory’farm conditions that have become epicenters for global zoonoses and food-born illness, are also examined.
Doris M Jones MSc
For almost a century patients have taken prescribed drugs on medical advice and on trust, believing them to be based on sound and reliable science and playing a vital part in healing processes. Now huge question marks hang over many if not all these assumptions…
Political and corporate forces in Britain are able to air brush out a whole society of vaccine damaged children and their parents while censuring the academic history of a man who speaks out for them, is quite extraordinary. We must truly be thankful for all those that have been assassinated for bringing us the truth and all those that have lost their academic carrier it talking about it!!!
I was truly shocked to learn that Australia is now rolling out unproven HPV vaccines for all High School Boys as well as girls.
Then this shocking article from the UK:
Every child to get flu vaccine in bid to prevent epidemic
The Guardian – Oliver Wright – Tuesday 30th April 2013-05-13
Every child in England and Wales will be vaccinated against flu each year to limit the spread of outbreaks, the Government will announce today.
While flu is very rarely fatal in children, they tend to be the biggest transmitters of the virus which kills around 4,000 people each year and places a huge strain on the health service.
All children aged two will be offered a nasal flu vaccine from this September. The programme will be rolled out to all primary and pre-school children next year, with secondary school pupils starting to be vaccinated in 2015.
The flu programme is part of a wider roll-out of vaccinations across the NHS. As part of the plan, a new shingles vaccination will be available for people aged over 70. Health officials say that the programme will prevent nearly 40 per cent of the 30,000 cases seen every year in older people.
Children under the age of four months will be vaccinated against rotavirus – a highly infectious bug that causes around 140,000 diarrhoea cases a year in under-fives. It is estimated that the vaccine could halve the number of vomiting and diarrhoea cases caused by rotavirus, resulting in 70 per cent fewer hospital stays.
Health officials stressed that the timings of the new programmes had not been affected by the recent measles outbreak – which has focused attention on vaccination and led to a rise in the uptake of the MMR vaccine.
However, ministers believe that in the long-term mass vaccination programmes are a cost-effective way of reducing demand on the NHS at a time of tight financial constraint. The decisions to introduce the new vaccination programmes and update the existing ones were made after the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation – a panel of independent vaccine experts – studied all the available evidence.
Professor David Salisbury, the Government’s Director of Immunisation, said: “We already have a world class vaccination programme in place, so I’m pleased that we will be able to protect even more people against disease starting later this year.”
Based on my research and evidence all of the above is totally unnecessary and unacceptable and clearly shows a lean towards the UN Agenda 21 mass depopulation programme!!!
I would like to again give you the links to my many articles that contain overwhelming evidence on this subject as well as those by other experts:
The greatest lie ever told is that vaccines are safe and effective”
-Dr. Len Horowitz
Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have:
1. Known the vaccines don’t work
2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent
3. Known they are a hazard to children
4. Colluded to lie to the public
5. Worked to prevent safety studies
Educated parents can either get their children out of harm’s way or continue living inside one of the largest most evil lies in history, that vaccines – full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, faecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) – are a miracle of modern medicine.
Then this criticism of Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
This still has not happened.
The special Vaccine Court created by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), in 1987, had become overloaded with claims about 2007, and the Special Masters running the court simply did not want to have to trudge through the backlog of the 5,400 cases facing it over vaccine injuries.
There in 2010, a special Vaccine Court sub-set, called the OAP, decided six test cases – three from theMMR Vaccine causes Autism argument, and three from the Thimerosal (mercury) in vaccines causes Autism argument. Those cases were themselves, representing a backlog of the 5,400 cases, which, in turn, represented the interests of over 2,000,000 vaccine damaged children in the US. More, those cases, if won by the Plaintiffs, would have set the stage for relief for the families of the one in six children vaccine damaged showing neurological damage.
The OAP judges relied COMPLETELY, for all six cases, on the truth and validity of the five so-called studies ordered and run by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
On October 26, 2011, a Denver Post editorial expressed shock that the Obama administration, after promising to be especially transparent, was proposing changes to the Freedom of Information Act that would allow it to go beyond declaring some documents secret and to actually allow government agencies (such as the CDC) to declare some document “non-existent.”
Simultaneous to this on-going massive CDC cover up involving its primary “health” not recommendation but MANDATE for American children, the CDC is in deep trouble over its decades of covering up the damaging effects of fluoride and affecting the lives of all Americans, especially children and the immune compromised. Lawsuits are being prepared. Children are ingesting 3-4 times more fluoride by body weight as adults and “[t]he sheer number of potentially harmed citizens — persons with dental fluorosis, kidney patients tipped into needing dialysis, diabetics, thyroid patients, etc. — numbers in the millions.”
The CDC is obviously acting against the health of the American people. But the threat to the lives of the American people posed by the CDC’s behavior does not stop there. It participated in designed pandemic laws that are on the books in every state in the US, which arrange for the government to use military to force unknown, untested vaccines, drugs, chemicals, and “medical” treatments on the entire country if it declares a pandemic emergency.
“I Dare Anyone To Take Up This Challenge”
My final offer to all those Country Leaders, Ministers for Health and Departments of Health Executives is to allow me to debate the current vaccination concerns on live TV with all those so called political experts and health/pharmaceutical experts and prove that those that enforce these programmes are indeed badly informed……….Care to take up the challenge?
Peter Eyre – Broadcaster – Investigative Journalist – Middle East Consultant – Political Analysis – 19/5/2013