Judge refuses to acquit Manning on theft charges

U.S. Army Private First Class Bradley Manning is escorted by military police as he arrives for closing arguments in his military trial July 25, 2013 Fort George G. Meade, Maryland (AFP Photo / Chip Somodevilla)RT News

A military judge said early Thursday that she would not dismiss charges of theft against Army Private first class Bradley Manning. The soldier is expected to be sentenced next week for the largest intelligence leak in United States history.

Col. Denise Lind ruled from Ft. Meade, Maryland Thursday morning that she must reject the defense’s plea to acquit Pfc. Manning on five charges relating to the alleged robbery of government documents.  

Judge denies motion to dismiss charges of stealing government property

Manning, 25, has been charged with nearly two dozen counts related to his admitted role in sending sensitive files to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks while deployed as an intelligence analyst in Iraq. Last week Col. Lind dismissed a request to acquit Manning on the charge of aiding an enemy, an allegation that could land him in prison for life if found guilty when the sentencing phase commences next week.

Among the 21 counts against Manning are allegations the soldier stole, purloined or knowingly converted information. The government has charged him with five counts of violating 18 USC § 641, one for each of the five tomes of data he admitted to sending to WikiLeaks.

If found guilty of stealing those databases — field reports from the Iraq and Afghan wars, Guantanamo Bay detainee assessment briefs, hundreds of thousands of State Department diplomatic cables and a global email address list for US soldiers — Manning could be sentenced to a total of 50 years in prison.

Defense attorneys for Manning hoped the court would acquit their client on the 641 violations in lieu of accepting pleas to lesser included offenses made by the soldier earlier this year.

Last week, journalist Alexa O’Brien reported from Ft. Meade that Manning faces upwards of 154 years to life if convicted on all counts presented by the government.

In addition to rejecting the defense’s motion to acquit, Col. Lind told attorneys for Manning that they could not move for a mistrial at this time since the prosecution was being afforded the opportunity to amend their charge sheet against the soldier.

According to Nathan Fuller, a journalist reporting on the trial for the Bradley Manning Support Network, Col. Lind said the prosecution could change their charge against the private in order to allege him of stealing “portion[s] of” databases instead of full databases under 18 USC § 641.

Judge allowed government to change (@ last minute) charge sheet to allege stole “portion[s] of” databases instead of full databases

First the government, then the defense, is scheduled to present closing arguments Thursday morning into the afternoon. Manning’s court-martial could conclude as early as next week, ending a more than three-year-old ordeal that involved keeping the soldier in pretrial detention for more than 1,000 days, months of which were served in isolation. The defense previously attempted, unsuccessfully, to have charges dropped against Manning on account of the abuse he suffered during that confinement. Col. Lind agreed to take 112 days off of any eventual sentence.


2 thoughts on “Judge refuses to acquit Manning on theft charges

  1. …the fix is in… just like they tried to do in the TM /Zimmerman trial…only they get to hide behind “national security” on this one..and hide behind the walls of corrupt government…when the revolution breaks out… and this “judge”…is found out in the street hung from a tree…with a Grand Jury finding of guilty taped to her chest…then perhaps “judicial ethics & fairness” will be present and inherent in the system again eh? Screw the Corrupt US Government and their NWO butt-boys like H Kissinger and this pig of a judge…convict her of treason and hang her complicit ass in the trees…


    RJ O’Guillory
    Author –
    Webster Groves – The Life of an Insane Family

  2. I would be greatly surprised if Col. Denise Lind has even read the Constitution with the Bill of Rights, which she took an oath to uphold and protect, much less understand it and how it should translate into how she performs her duties.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.