Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Medicine Hat man charged with inciting hatred in public

CBC News

A Medicine Hat, Alta., man is facing charges of inciting hatred in public after complaints from a local business about someone displaying money stamped with with an anti-Semitic message.

When police arrested the man on July 31, a search of the suspect’s backpack turned up several $5 and $20 bills that had been stamped with hateful markings directed toward Jewish people.  

Police later executed a search warrant at the accused’s home, where they seized numerous computers, USB drives, and documents pertaining to white supremacy, along with four firearms with the serial numbers removed, more than 1,200 rounds of ammunition, high capacity magazines and anti-Semitic stickers.

Loki Hulgaard, 35, is facing 14 charges including:

  • Inciting hatred in public.
  • Two counts of possessing a firearm with the serial number removed.
  • Four counts of unsafe storage of a firearm.
  • Three counts of possessing a prohibited device.
  • Four counts of unauthorized possession of a firearm.

Hulgaard went before a justice of the peace last week and was released on bail with numerous conditions.

His next court appearance is scheduled for Thursday.

Anyone with information is asked to contact Const. Eric Marshall of the Priority Street Crimes Unit.

Medicine Hat is about 290 kilometres southeast of Calgary.


This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Medicine Hat man charged with inciting hatred in public

  1. Bud Fox says:

    I wanna see the stamp that was on the currency…so it can be reproduced and spread widely!

    • galen says:

      Yeah, I wanna see ’em, too. Ha! This case will be one to watch. So many illegal charges. I hope we hear more soon.


  2. GrayRider says:

    Ohhhhhh what a BAD BOY !!!

    We must ‘Wack his Pee Pee’ for exercising his brazen right to Freedom of Expression!

    BUT FOR: Nichols v. Dancer, No. 10-15359 (9th Cir. 06/24/2011) ([1] It is by now black letter law that “a state cannot condition public employment on a basis that infringes the employee’s constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression.” Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 142 (1983).

    Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507, 509, 92 L.Ed. 8450, 68 S. Ct. 6665 (1948) (IA failure of a statute limiting freedom of expression to give fair notice of what acts will be punished and such a statute’s inclusion of prohibitions against expressions, [333 U.S. 507 , 510] protected by the principles of the First Amendment violates an accused’s rights under procedural due process and freedom of speech or press.); http://laws.findlaw.com/us/333/507.html

    “It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.” — Justice William O. Douglas (1898-1980), U. S. Supreme Court Justice Source: Address, Author’s Guild, 1952 http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/William.O..Douglas.Quote.3912

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR/C/81/Add.4 24 August 1994) http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx (Addendum UNITED STATES OF AMERICA*) (584. Freedom of expression. The freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment has been given a broad reading in its application by the courts. Perhaps its most obvious purpose is to prevent the government from restricting expression “because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content”. Police Dep’t of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (1972). “Regulations which permit the Government to discriminate on the basis of the content of the message cannot be tolerated”. Regan v. Time, Inc., 468 U.S. 641 (1984). The First Amendment has been applied to a broad range of activities. Symbolic speech, moreover, is also protected, as evidenced by recent cases striking down state and federal legislation against flag-burning. Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) (striking a state statute designed to protect the flag from desecration). United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990). http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/385c2add1632f4a8c12565a9004dc311/da936c49ed8a9a8f8025655c005281cf?OpenDocument

    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1976) (Article 19: 1). (Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. 2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.); http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/ccpr.htmhttp://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CCPR.aspx

  3. # 1 NWO Hatr says:

    “… a search of the suspect’s backpack turned up several $5 and $20 bills that had been stamped with hateful markings directed toward Jewish people.”

    If they had been stamped with hateful markings directed toward white people or Christians, there would be NO CHARGES, and we wouldn’t be reading this story.

    That being the case… here’s a ‘hateful marking’ directed toward the stinking jews…

    ……..(‘(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
    ……….”…\………. _.·´


    THE JEW??????????????????????
    SO JEW…………. PROVE IT ASSHOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  5. Norm says:

    Well I realize this is Canada, but Not a single thing they claim is a crime he committed is in fact any such thing….So, there you fkn have it…

  6. Lance from BC says:

    Canada has as many guns per capita as the US…we just don’t run around and proclaim them. It is time for Manifest Destiny before we get eaten by the Chinese.

    • Martist says:

      Who are facilitated and empowered by zio-joo commies through unholy alliances . We’re ALL gonna have to fight off the weapon as well as the bearer of it and it doesn’t matter who or what it is. Sometimes, s#!# just needs a killin’ because reasoning isn’t effective and they’ve left us no choice. So be it. Let it be done.

Leave a Reply