Nicholas Bluefin Stonybrook Radioactive Tuna L.A. Times Fisher

The People’s Voice

Direct quotes from L.A. Times: “A team of scientists who have been tracking radiation in Bluefin tuna since the 2011 tsunami that crippled the Fukushima Daichi power plant have a message for fearful American eaters: Stop worrying about the health effects of eating fish that carried the radiation from Japan to U.S. shores.”

Also from the same article, direct quote: “Pacific Bluefin tuna carried radioactivity from Japan’s 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster all the way across the ocean to the shores of California, scientists reported Monday.” So, putting the two diametrically opposed opposites together we can extrapolate, any and all Tuna making the journey west from Japan to Alaska, Hawaii, Washington, Oregon, California and/or Mexico are radioactive; but do not worry: after all, pro-nuke shills from Stonybrook are downplaying your tumor, cancer and leukemia risk with terms like “mildly radioactive”. What does “mildly radioactive tuna” actually mean? Is it blandly carcinogenic tuna, partially cancerous food, smoothly poisonous toxic meat, or just delicately toxic waste, radionuclide contaminated fish protein?  

What are the over-funded and under-informed Nicholas Fisher Stonybrook studies really telling us via L.A. Times, not-the-first-nor last nuclear shills-wannabe writers? That delicately indifferently lightly moderately quietly blandly calmly compassionately genially gingerly imperturbably kindly meekly mollifyingly patiently softly soothingly temperately tenderly tepidly tolerantly tranquilly carcinogenic tuna is almost harmless to humans? Same as what was told to troops underneath the fallout from Operation Grapple, and operations Grapple X, Grapple Y and Grapple Z. Project Faultless was also “safe”…

The article: Our Nuclear Menace – Just as Darwin Would Have Predicted – Andrew McKillop gives one a feel how the single molecule in a bronchiole of Plutonium it takes to vapidly end your life is alchemistrally transformed by NY Times, LA Times, The Economist and the Wall Street Journal into “safe, green Thorium”… …replete with no mining and milling HAZMAT. Imagine 67 years of Uranium mining and milling HazMat Toxic Waste and bomb-test-down winders-illness suddenly vaporized into health and prosperity by the 1’s and 0’s that make up “green thorium”…

The next three shill-expose-italic paragraphs are their own respective property:

“Nuclear Matters” the front group for nuclear industry shills …

Jun 3, 2014 – Nuclear Giant Exelon Launches Front Group to… … wrote a Wall Street Journal column attacking a key federal wind tax break that Exelon …

· Huff-Watch: HuffPost shills for proven US-based front group …

Sep 20, 2012 – HuffPost shills for proven US-based front group for Iran’s mullahs … The U.N. atomic agency has received new and significant intelligence over the … August 30, 2012, Wall St. Journal, “Iran’s Nuclear-Arms Guru Resurfaces”:

· spinbuster « nuclear-news

Aug 23, 2014 – These atoms and particle do not exist on the moon and the sun doesn’t … Lets put that into perspective on St Patty’s Day some community s pour 25 … “Nuclear Matters” the front group for nuclear industry shills …. To create a mile-long underground frozen wall to contain the destroyed power plant’s radiation.

One of the ‘benefits’ of the “safe tuna” Stonybrook “study” is anyone needing an upper and lower G.I can (insert-tongue-in-cheek) bypass radioactive dye and simply eat a pound of delicately indifferently cancerous, lightly moderately malignant,

quietly blandly toxic, calmly compassionately, genially gingerly viporous,

imperturbably kindly vociferous, meekly mollifyingly deadly, patiently softly pestilential, soothingly deleterious, temperately tenderly detrimental, tepidly dangerous, tolerantly malicious, tranquilly miasmatic tuna to track their upper and lower human digestive system with Fukushima radiation in lieu of radioactive dye.

1. The dirty tactics of pro thorium trolls | Nuclear Australia

2. s tweet attacks from pro Thorium Nuclear trolls « (49)

3. How pro nuclear trolls, (especially pro thorium) operate on the Internet « (45)

from Stoneybrook website: “… …said Professor Fisher. “In estimating human doses of the Fukushima-derived radioactive cesium in Bluefin tuna, we found that heavy seafood consumers – those who ingest 124 kg/year, or 273 lbs., which is five times the US national average – even if they ate nothing but the Cs-contaminated bluefin tuna off California, would receive radiation doses approximately equivalent to that from one dental x-ray and about half that received by the average person over the course of a normal day from a variety of natural and human sources. The resulting increased incidence of cancers would be expected to be essentially undetectable.” – See more at:

So, one dental x-ray has more Cesium-134 and Cesium-137 than does 273 pounds of top-ofits-food-chain-Bluefin swimming across from Fukushima to the Western United States? So says Nicholas Troll Shill Fisher. This writer has had one-half of one small can of Tuna since the 3/11/11 Fukushima Earthquake and Tsunami occurred… Man, humankind is the top of its food chain. Think of tuna as a pond full of chemicals and the thyroid in your neck as a sponge… your bone marrow as another sponge… your blood as another sponge. When the Stonybrook shill finishes his 273 pounds per year of “safe” tuna, then he will have equal credibility to the other trolls online…


Tracy Turner was born into two extended families of bookworms – one horticultural and one petroleum industry. Semi-retired from IT and Botanical Garden Plant Propagation, his main interest are science, news, politics national and world events. Urges anyone to ask several IT professionals about web censorship; which is becoming rampant. Twitter, Facebook and Myspace are not free speech – they are places of monitoring, censoring and personal data harvesting. If you love freedom, become active in free speech and freedom of the press activism. Post Peak Sanity, Oil & Freedom; Pre Peak Thirst, Hunger, War and Ponzi Fascism aka ‘Organic’ Back Yard Urrban Tomatoes vs. New York Beekeeping by Tracy Turner – Environmentalist, Horticulturist, Analyst ~ Pasadena, Californa

Start the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *