The Supreme Court has taken up the issue of the constitutionality, or lack thereof, of Obamacare. Being examined at present is the individual mandate. The question being can the government, using the Commerce Clause, order individual citizens to purchase a commercial product (medical insurance) and punish that citizen if he or she fails to do so. Again, at issue is the government authority under the Commerce Clause.
The founders of our Constitution inserted the Commerce Clause to allow the federal government to protect our industry using tariffs on foreign goods and anti-trust laws to prevent monopolies within the United States. I think the question that should be before the Supreme Court today is whether the implementation of CAFTA, NAFTA, and GATT are an act of treason under the Commerce Clause.
The Commerce Clause is being used by the insurgents within our government to invoke a “Cradle to the Grave” excuse to dictate every aspect of our lives; from the food we eat to the makeup of the structures we build on what is supposed to be our private property. In unconstitutionally contracting out their fiducial responsibilities to private corporations, hence non-government agencies, the traitors within have made every substance and action within our country, commercial. In short, in violating our Constitution they now seek to justify further violation of our Constitution.
The United States government was never supposed to contract with the private citizen as an individual, as any such contract automatically places conditions over the individual, which equates to an authority over the individual by the government. The government as an entity was never meant to have authority over we the people as individuals. Under our Constitution we are supposed to be self-governing, hence the only authority over the individual is the individual. Along with this freedom came the responsibility for one’s actions as they affect another citizen.
Enter in the people’s Title 3 Courts, wherein it was meant that we would settle our differences between one another as individuals. The whole idea of the government being able to move the courts in any way to force it’s will upon an individual suggests that the government has become an individual, hence equal to any individual or the people, et.al.
The fact is our government was put in place to serve us. It is not our equal, it is beneath us. We control it, it does not control us. The very idea of the government being able to mandate that any individual do anything is an assertion of treason, as only an individual sovereign citizen through the neutral Title 3 Court can force any action on another individual.
And as for this so called Supreme Court, it was only put in place to judge the constitutionality of the government within the government as a non-human entity without the rights and not being equal to any individual one of us.
In short, not only is Obamacare and the oppression it represents to the individual not lawful under our Constitution, but the very fact that the question is being asked is an affront to our individual freedoms and liberties.
God bless this Republic, death to the international corporate mafia, we shall prevail.