Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

PENTAGON FAILS: Syria’s Air Defense System From Soviet Times Shoots Down 71 Tomahawks Out Of 103


Published on Apr 14, 2018

“According to available information, a total of 103 cruise missiles were fired… The Syrian air defense systems basically comprising Soviet-made weapons successfully repelled the strikes by aircraft and naval ships. A total of 71 missiles were intercepted,” Head of the Russian General Staff’s Main Operations Department Colonel-General Sergei Rudskoi said. No dead civilians or soldiers.

This entry was posted in Videos. Bookmark the permalink.
1102

8 Responses to PENTAGON FAILS: Syria’s Air Defense System From Soviet Times Shoots Down 71 Tomahawks Out Of 103

  1. Mark Schumacher in LV says:

    At this point, who gives a damn, we have no business being over there in the first place, I hope they shoot everyone of the goddamn things down. Tired of hearing about it, reading about it, talking about it, and watching Fox News getting sexually excited about it.

    Guard our boarders, throw the trash out already you traitous idiots.

  2. Enemy of the State says:

    Soon will come the further financial raping of the US public
    To pay for all this

    • galen says:

      Yeah, and then the arrival of thousands more “refugees” into our towns and cities.

      War is so good for immigration/globalization/homogenization/invasion/communism/slavery.

      🙁

      .

  3. James M says:

    It seems our president Trumpenberger should have “shined them up” a little better.

  4. galen says:

    In the pic on that vid, Putin is laughing ’cause he knows millions are fooled into thinking he’s one of the good goys, err, I mean guys:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=Picutres+of+Putin+with+chabad&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b

    .

  5. # 1 NWO Hatr says:
    • galen says:

      Yeah, and there’s more than one way to kill a people. Set them back 5 decades and cut off all means for advancement. Bombs have a way of doing that.

      🙁

      .

Leave a Reply