Questions about the Woolwich Slasher Incident

KingAdeIVOffSpectrum with James Farganne

I have a few questions about the alleged “terror” attack at Woolwich. I will ask them by way of a photo montage. All stills were taken from this video:

First, we have our “Islamic terrorist” assailant hanging around the scene of the crime and bragging about it into a passerby’s camera:  

“Iiiiiit’s SHOWTIME!!!”

By all accounts, this man just slashed a soldier to death, and by some accounts cut off his head. Can you imagine how messy that would be? Yet our “Islamic terrorist” perp somehow managed to carry it off without getting a single speck of blood on his face or clothes.

The hands, meanwhile, looked as if he dipped them in a pot of red ink. The ink must have been dry, because several times during the course of his diatribe, he touches his jacket, but leaves no stain on it.

Question 1: How the hell did the attacker come away with spotless threads?

Now, take a good look at those blades he’s brandishing:


This was reported as a machete attack. Those are not machetes, they are kitchen knives.

If you’re gonna cut off a soldier’s head, much less slash him to death, you had best be carrying bigger blades than that.

Question 2: Where are the machetes?

Now, onto the “victim”:


After his “scary Islamist” rant, he crosses the street to the crime scene. The car crashed into the pole is oozing liquid. Cars tend to do that when they’ve had their noses smashed.

But apparently people who have been hacked up and possibly decapitated don’t bleed anymore.

Question 3: Where did the victim’s blood go?

Now please examine the following sequence of photos and ask yourself if you see anything odd.

slasher-w1slasher-w2slasher-w3slasher-w4slasher-w5“I got down there and rolled around in it, just to make sure it isn’t there…”

I can sure identify with the woman in the gray sweatshirt. If I happened upon a hacked-up and possibly headless corpse, the first thing I would do is get down and lie on my back beside it.

But after I got up, I would be very surprised to find no blood on my sweatshirt.

To repeat, where did all the blood go?

This next shot gives another perpsective of the scene.


I guess the gray oval is to shield our delicate sensibilities from something too shocking to behold — something even worse than all that carnage at the Boston Marathon.

Again, nary a drop of blood to be found.

Down the street, you can see a fence with crouching figures on either side of it: two on the sidewalk, one on the street. They are attending to the attackers who have reportedly just been shot.

Let’s look at it from the other side:


Last time I checked, gunshot wounds produced bloodshed. Perhaps Britain has turned into some sort of alternate universe where people don’t bleed when their bodies get ruptured, or maybe British blood is so rarific that it just sublimates from liquid to gas instantaneously upon exposure to Earth’s atmosphere.


Also, if you watch the video, you’ll notice that the paramedic on the left is not DOING anything. She just holds onto the guy’s wrist. When she leans down, it looks very much as if she’s doing so in order to facilitate the conversation they are having. The two blokes on the right aren’t very active either. I’m no expert on EMS stuff, but it looks fake to me.

And that’s why we have –

slasher-cop2“That bloke in the blue shirt could stand right in the middle of everything, but you can’t film here!”

–Constable Nigel Cunningbottom, to the rescue of false flag obfuscation!

Here is the shooting scene from above:


I’m not a forensics expert, so back to asking questions.

Question 4: What are those taped-down squares all about? Are they there to mark where blood fell, and that’s why we can’t see any blood?

What is the dark area on the road where the left-hand paramedic was having a conversation with the guy and doing nothing to save him? Is THAT blood? I doesn’t look like blood to me, but I could be wrong.

I really don’t know. If you do, please leave a comment, and if your answer checks out, I will incorporate it into this piece.

Moving on, here’s an aerial shot of the crime scene:


Hey look! Do you see what I see?

TWO WHOLE SPURTS OF WHAT LOOKS BLOOD! Which abruptly peters out and does not continue to the tent that now houses the gray oval.

Yet Lady Gray Sweatshirt de Necrophilia lay down right next to to the corpse and got up completely unstained. Moreover, the sunshine on that sidewalk in those earlier shots doesn’t reveal those stains.

I can only conclude that some intern from props was sent to apply the fake blood before the helicopter showed up.

Speaking of which:


Aviation is yet another of the many areas where I lack any kind of expertise. But I do know this. I have NEVER seen a helicopter fly low to the ground in a crowded city. Have you? Just askin’.

OK, one last thing, and that is, another tent, another “scene”, that does not match the other two, and I haven’t heard or read of any other incidents that would explain it:


I’ve put this together in short snatches of stolen time, and haven’t read each and every article or breathtaking development. If you know what is supposed to have gone down at that location, please let me know.

8 thoughts on “Questions about the Woolwich Slasher Incident

  1. Another low budget false-flag crisis production.

    I am still wondering if their sloppiness reflects a confidence that the dominant media can convince the vast majority into believing these staged hoaxes are real, or are they watching to see who does not fall for the scam.

    And why would the controllers want to identify those who see through the deception? To eliminate us, or to recruit us?

  2. The amazing, nay magical, appearance of ‘blood’ by the road sign and crashed car is the most ridiculous aspect of this story.

    There are hours of video which clearly show no blood *at all* in these positions and then later in aerial shots there is this huge smear which would have been unmissable at ground level.

    Just look at the sequence of photos with the woman in the grey sweatshirt laying in the street, clearly there is no blood on the pavement in front of the car.

  3. The only question I have is that since the “beheading” of a soldier took place only a few hundred yards from a military barracks, and it took the police 30-40 minutes to get there, where is everybody?

    Anyone that has spend time around active military would know that the entire barracks would have emptied within minutes, and all they would have found of the perps would be little pieces.

    Unless they were ordered not to.

  4. These guys were newly converted to Muslim in 2007 from the Telegraph. Guess they smoked too much weed and filled their minds with too much nonsense.

    This is not a false flag event, there is no NWO agenda to be achieved just two idiots.

    This week the UK government just as in France (1.5 million marched in protest in Paris) fulfilled the NWO aim of degrading the family as the basis of a civilized society by forcing through Gay Marriage. Why not marriage between a mother and daughter? Why not polygamy? Why should two dogs not get married, this should keep our politicians busy debating?.

    “Socialism is not in the least what it pretends to be. It is not the pioneer of a better and finer world, but the spoiler of what thousands of years of civilization have created. It does not build, it destroys. For destruction is the essence of it. It produces nothing, it only consumes what the social order based on private ownership in the means of production has created”.
    – Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) Economist and social philosopher

    The national socialists (NAZIS) particularly of dual Israeli passports (Wonder if Rand Paul has got his?) are evil destructive scum.

  5. “Death to Israel, Death to Americ… What’s that, oh, Death to Israel, Death to Great Britain.”

    Doesn’t quite have the impact of the original FF line.

    Bet the Queen is delighted that the focus is off her 5 million pound a year raise to fund her lavish lifestyle.

  6. They don’t have to convince the Clovers. They readily accept the narrative without question. I have shown videos and pictures of the “police storming the (Sandy Hook) school” {that wasn’t Sandy Hook}, the “tourniquet” of the Boston bombing…and TO THE MAN….they say the very same thing – “those pictures prove nothing”.
    They then go on to scoff that the idea anyone in government would stage such a thing is ludicrous.
    That….is the mentality we’re dealing with.

  7. 1) What I would like to know is where is the head?

    2) They are raking in a fortune from ‘Help for Heroes’ charity – the soldier just happened to be wearing this shirt and so much so people are just throwing so much money at this charity that their website actually crashed! So follow the money once again.

    3) My opinion is that this is used to stir up more anti-Muslim sentiment.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.