Read UN Small Arms Treaty: March 18 – 28 2013, If Ratified, The 2nd Amendment Will Be Gone

Conference emblemBefore It’s News – by Josey Wales

Many Americans can feel the tension in the air lately. With all the military maneuvers, military equipment being transported around the nation.

Then people are asking why all the UN Vehicles in the US?

Today it was announce that the Department Of Homeland Security just purchased 2700 MRAP’S , Mine Resistant Armor Protected Vehicles. On top of 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. It sure seems something big is about to happen. Add the Obama administrations relentless desire to disarm America and could this be the makings of a revolution, a civil war to come?

What many Americans don’t realize is that there is one more UN Small arms meeting coming to America’s shores this coming March 18th through the 28th. Could this be the end of private gun ownership in America as we know it?

Reuters reports that within hours of his securing his reelection, President Obama ordered the U.S. United Nations delegation to vote in favor of a UN proposal to fast track an international gun control treaty.

The United Nations Final Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty will take place at the United Nations Headquarters in New York on 18-28 March 2013. The first round of negotiations took place in July 2012, but did not result in an agreement on a treaty text.   The UN is a stealth organization, their small arms treaty is not only to stop arms trade between countries, but to disarm the American citizens. They feel the US citizens do not have a human right to own these small arms as you will see from this video. They even have UNICEF collecting money for them and supporting their gun control agenda for the American people.   Could this be the American gun owners against the world? If they ratify this UN Small Arms treaty in March, could it be the end of gun ownership in America?  Watch this video and you decide. Are you prepared?

http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2013/03/read-un-small-arms-treaty-march-18-28-2013-if-ratified-the-2nd-amendment-will-be-gone-video-2498844.html

86 thoughts on “Read UN Small Arms Treaty: March 18 – 28 2013, If Ratified, The 2nd Amendment Will Be Gone

  1. How many times do you have to be told that NO treaty can alter the U.S. Constitution (and that includes the amending articles)?

    All this hype about that idiot treaty is just that: HYPE!

    1. Actually, it not technically hype. It’s propaganda in that its false but some of the sheople will believe it. This is the hope of the administration so that some will be easier to talk into handing in their anti-tyranny tools.

      To The People:

      READ THIS: TREATIES CANNOT ALTER CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

      1. You DON’T GET IT. Sure, there is the Reilly decision, etc and Supreme Court Decisions that Treatys do NOT trump the Constitution. REALITY: President Teddy Roosevelt for one ..DID EXACTLY THAT. Signed a Treaty …AND THEN BROKE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS. Nobody would step forward and STOP him until two years later. How much damage can OBAMA and other FELON PERJURERS OF THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE ..UNDER GOD … do in two years with 2700 MRAP Heavy Attack weapons on our streets as he fills up the completed “REX 84” civilian incarceration facilities Halliburton is finishing up making ready ..for jailing 2 MILLION UNCOOPERATIVE AMERICANS removed from their homes by FEINSTEINS NEW BILL ..NO KNOCK NO WARRANT, NO 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS in the middle of each night in different locations.

    2. The soviet socialist insurgency has already declared our Bill of Rights null and void via the Patriot Act and the 2012 NDAA with sections 1021 and 1022. You act like there is still some government entity in place that is going to enforce the law.
      Bullshit and you know it’s bullshit, so take your phony ass somewhere else to troll.

    3. You are wrong…A treaty can and has altered the Constitution. The other “situation” which can/has is when our government declares WAR on something or someone. The War Powers Act dissolves constitutional rights. The War on Terror has dissolved Habeus Corpus for example as well as “search and seizure”.

    4. The writing has been on the wall for all to see since the passage of the National Firearms Act of 1934. This Act made it a federal offense to possess a machine gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun, or silencer without first paying a $200 fee to the United States Treasury.Fixing this little misunderstanding was the job of the so-called ‘greatest generation’ who were unfortunately a bit preoccupied fighting the Jews war and slaughtering our racial brothers and sisters in Europe.Kinda like todays generation in the middle east but I digress.Next,and this was fairly recently, the U.N. (a.k.a. the militant arm of the Jew World Order) did indeed seize control of ALL U.S. territory under the far reaching authority of Agenda 21,a very binding global treaty.Oh yes they did!When you hear ‘Sustainable Development’,that`s Agenda 21.It just hasn`t been formally announced yet. http://www.libertysentinel.org/article.php?id=LandGrab The point I`m making here is that U.N. treaties ARE indeed binding,and clauses are put in place to allow military intervention if not followed to the letter.That includes the small arms treaty.Not saying I agree of coarse,but to stop this madness will require shooting the bastards,no ifs ands or butts.Rant over.

    5. Actually a Treaty Trumps the Constitution Article 6 section 2 infers:

      “Clause two provides that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land. It provides that state courts are bound by the supreme law; in case of conflict between federal and state law, the federal law must be applied. Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.”

      So a ban, or registration, or the determination of legal or illegal, is tied to the Treaty and is enforceable as if the Second Amendment didn’t exist.

      The warning provided by Judicial scholars was to not enter into Treaties where there could be doubt.

      1. “…federal laws made pursuant to it and treaties made under its authority…” The question is, does the federal government have the authority to amend the Constitution by treaty? The logical answer is “NO!” There are provisions for Constitutional means to amend it.

        It is often said that the Constitution is a contract between the federal government and the States or the People. How many here would enter into a contract that would allow the other party to enter into a contract with a third party that would change the provisions of the contract? I doubt that anyone reading this would be that stupid. This is just another rationalization for usurpation of still greater power by the international money powers that rule us. If they get away with this, the only thing that might save the human race from abject slavery is annihilation by one of those monster asteroids they talk about.

      2. Bullshit, and I’ve about had all this bullshit I am going to endure.
        The Bill of Rights existed way before the Constitution did or even the Declaration of Independence. The Constitution is a commercial contract for services, nothing more. The Bill of Rights is the individual’s authority to enter into that contract. If the Bill of Rights is breached, the authority for the contract is breached. Our employees in the government are not allowed, hence not empowered by us, to enter into any treaty that infringes, hence diminishes, our absolute inalienable rights.
        I proudly hold my Bill of Rights high in my right hand while I wipe my ass with the subverted Constitution, which has been a fraud since it was unconstitutionally altered after the Civil War in order to create the illusion and the oxymoron that we the people are subject to the government that serves us.

        1. Bugler, sound the charge!
          Go get em Henry! I know exactly how you feel. I am at the point of finding it increasingly difficult NOT to choke the sh!t out of someone who desperatly needs it.
          We are surrounded by idiotic sheep!

        2. Bullshit! The Constitution, as it was originally written and promoted by Alexander Hamilton and his economic royalists buddies, was a blueprint for an unlimited, centralized government that his banker friends in NY and London would control. Only the alertness of men like Jefferson, Melacton Smith, and Richard Henry Lee delayed the tyranny for all too short a time with the 1st Ten Amendments.

          Even the terms “Federalists” and “Federalist Papers” were a fraud. This gang of bandits who subverted the Revolution from the beginning were Nationalists. They stole the “Federalist” name because the people wanted a federation and not a nation.

          We need to revert to the Articles of Confederation and then call a convention to amend those as was the original plan. This time, anyone attempting to replace the Articles with a new constitution should be hanged for treason.

          1. You are correct. The Constitution was written pretty much verbatim from the Masonic Constitution. I do not know if I agree as to the Articles of Confederation as these too were created by elitists. Article VI pretty much declares all those impoverished/without property to be devoid of rights.
            A state government can be corrupted just as easily as a federal government can.
            I think I like the idea of self governance with the common law as outlined in our Bill of Rights.
            I am a national of the United States, as no matter where I walk in this land, I take my rights with me, which are the only true laws, all other laws and policies notwithstanding.
            I do not know that state rule would be any less oppressive than federal rule. It certainly is not here where I live.
            I believe the original Constitution could work with a clear definition of who we the people are and a judicial elected on the local level with the penalty for treason being a death sentence.
            One thing for sure, before we can even go into this discussion, we first have to clean out this boar’s nest and secure our Bill of Rights.

          2. Quoting Henry… “we first have to clean out this boar’s nest and secure our Bill of Rights”. Can anyone say… Get the HEMP Rope!!! buahahaha

          3. When my cousins, somewhat older than I, came home from bombing Germany in WWII, they told of strategic targets they weren’t allowed to bomb because of who owned them. From that point on my uncle’s slogan was, “Give me a carload of rope and enough troops and let me go to Washington. I’ll straighten the country out. Sadly, he got neither the rope nor the troops. Evidence of that is what we have now.

          4. No doubt you’re right. The elite were behind the Articles, but they wanted a lot more centralized power. They were more or less forced to settle on the Articles until suitable crises could be created to justify (or rationalize) the strong central government they wanted.

            I also agree that the States aren’t perfect, but much of the faults stem from the monetary control the Federals now exercise over them. That the States still remain thorns in the sides of the elite is evidenced by the ongoing efforts to eliminate both State and local governments. The States may go rogue on their own, but the people, if they’re willing to dismount from their donkeys, can still control the petty gangsters in the States a lot easier than they can the Washington mob.

            You may or may not be interested, but this is the battle we fought to save our county and local governments in Bucks, PA. It’s followed by the mapped out plans for destroying our States and Locals.
            http://lostliberty1.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/regionalism-death-of-the-american-system/
            http://lostliberty1.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/designs-for-destruction-11/

          5. No, what the elite wanted initially, was to split this country in two (Civil War), due to the supply line problem (Europe to America) in those days. They ultimately wanted to have each state become totally independent of all the others, so that they could install central banks in each one, create wars between them, loan them the money (at exorbitant usury), and then loan them more money (again, at exorbitant usury) after the wars to rebuild.

            Obviously, that plan failed.

          6. Yes! History doesn’t support your position. Hamilton, as the agent of the banking powers (English), persuaded or conspired with fellow mason Washington to give us our first national bank. When Jackson refused to renew the bank’s charter, Biddle then moved his operations to Pennsylvania and proceeded with an attempt to bring PA banking totally under his thumb. I believe he succeeded. When we fought regional government in the Philadelphia area, much of the money for the other side was being supplied by the Biddle fortune.

          7. If you believe what’s written in the ‘history’ books, then this conversation is over.

            I don’t do sheeple arguments.

            I’ve got better things to do with my time.

          8. EXACTLY, Smilardog!

            The fewer countries there are, the fewer wars that are possible.

            Fewer wars = less money to be made.

            Money (mammon) is their top priority, the god they serve.

            “Give me control of a nation’s money, and I care not who makes the laws”
            Mayer Amschel Rothschild (Bauer, originally)

    6. Diogenes, and all who believe him pleas read Article 6 paragaph 2 of the Constitution. It clearly states in so many words that Diogenes is lying to you.
      It states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or the Laws of any State to the Contrary notwihstanding.”

      1. The people’s Bill of Rights is the authority for the Constitution. The 9th Article of that Bill of Rights says that nothing else in the Constitution shall be interpreted as to diminish the rights maintained by the people.
        In other words, you don’t have a f#@king clue as to what you are talking about. The Constitution (treaties included) exists at the leave of we the people.
        Having violated the Bill of Rights, the Constitution contract is null and void and of no affect. And any foreign son of a bitch that doesn’t like it, is going to find an ICBM coming at them to emphasize the point.

  2. ONE LAST TIME…

    TREATIES CANNOT SUPERSEDE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

    PLEASE STOP SPEWING THIS BULLSHIT!

    …there are a lot of people out there that you are stirring up that actually believe you.

    1. @ netranger … the constitution has been trampled by the obama administration already … why would you believe they would uphold it over a treaty ?? YOU are either a troll, a paid government shill , or one of the sheeple . maybe all 3

      1. I see one major flaw in your post. You put all responsibility for destroying the Constitution on Obama. Bush did more than his share as did every President in my lifetime. I think only one began to feel guilt about what he’d done and was ready to turn on his (our) masters. That bought him a one-way ticket to Dallas.

        1. Now, when the new “president elect” meets with the big boys, as Bill hicks stated, your shown a video of the Kennedy assassination from a view you’ve never seen before and told, “Any questions?”

    2. So NetRanger, are you saying that if they try to supersede Constitutional law with a treaty, you’re going to head straight to Washington and arrest that traitor Obummer, so we can hang him?

      If that’s your plan, then I’m behind you 100%.

      Figuratively speaking only.

    3. @Netranger,
      I can help but pity the ignorance you spewing!!! The government has had another agenda before, during, and following the construction of the Constitution. DO YOUR HOMEWORK & we will see you picketing about treaties on controlled media sites, right? Good luck with that!

  3. This is what happens when people think this is hype, we lose more of our rights. Read a book entitled; Here come the Black helicopters by Dick Morris.

  4. Hey, here we’ll just sign this-here international treaty outlawing small-arms and all ~300-odd million guns and billions of privately held rounds of ammo will suddenly vanish in a cloud of purple smoke, cost-free, and sweet-smelling.

    Annnnd…they’regone!

    Whew! Now that’s done how’s about this pesky freedom of speech?

    Yep, somebody wants you to believe this, go ape-$heet and start plinking at obvious feds like postal-workers, providing the Leviathan with the perfect justification to REALLY start cracking down.

    Why does the UN feel the need to disarm the most heavily-armed gun-carrying society on Earth FIRST? Wouldn’t it be wiser to get the tactics refined on an easier target?

  5. Unless i am mistaken a treaty is just that A treaty meaning that the president would have to surrender control of the US over to the UN.

    1. Umm…..DUH!! You are saying that as though he hasn’t surrendered control over to the UN already? What a dumbass? Wake up, sheeple. Our country is under control by a UN government. NOT the U.S. and that’s why we need to take it back.

    2. I remember hearing a while ago that the president is part of the U.N. so he technically already surrender the control of the U.S. If they try to take our guns people in a whole will not let that fly.

  6. FRUCK THE UN that is why we left and formed a free nation but somehoe The CONGRESS AND SENATE forget where they live and LIBERALS

  7. Article VI, Cause 2:
    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

    Like it or not folks this is your Constitution! The Small Arms Treaty will subordinate the 2nd Amendment if it is ratified by 2/3 of the Senate and signed by the Prez. Da, you think he’ll sign it?

    1. You’re reading it wrong. It says the Constitution shall be the supreme law of the land, along with only the laws and treaties that pass under constitutional authority. Any law or treaty that is not constitutional will not be a law of the land…

      1. It doesn’t matter how you read it, the soviet socialist insurgents and their enforcers are refusing and will continue to refuse to obey.

  8. When I was young, my intent was to go to medical school. The entrance exam included several questions that would determine eligibility.

    One of the questions was, “Rearrange the letters P N E S I to spell out an important part of human body that is more useful when erect.”

    Those who spelled “SPINE” became doctors… The rest ended up in Congress.

    I couldn’t spell or think of either answer.

  9. My Fellow Patriots:

    Legality has nothing to do with it.

    Everything Hitler did was also sanctioned by the courts.

    This is Shame-Law at its finest, presented as having full legal grounds.

    The intent is simple:

    Give the people of America some legal sounding argument and “debate”.

    Pass the “laws” or “treaties” that they will use to pursue their enslavement agenda.

    Suppress, arrest, exterminate those that don’t agree or comply.

    Disarm.

    Extract wealth.

    Exterminate.

    Any questions?,……. no?,…….. good.

    Then you are starting to get it.

    This is NOT an American gov’t,.. it is an “Enemy-Force-In-Occupation”,.. disquised as an American gov’t to keep the victims,.. I mean Americans, unaware of the coming atrocities.

    In response to someones use of the Supremecy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2):

    The Supremacy Clause only applies if Congress is acting in pursuit of its constitutionally authorized powers. Federal laws, and/or Treaties are valid and are supreme, so long as those laws were adopted in pursuance of—that is, consistent with—the Constitution.

    The extent of Congesses Constutitionally Authorized powers is to Uphold the US Constitution,.. not to undermine or eviscerate it, as they have been doing, and are actively engaged in doing now.

    JD – US Marines – All this legal wrangeling means one thing,… this criminal gov’t is going to push the American people to a physical confrontation in the very near future.

    1. So true JD! If the fight for freedom causes us to become “Bad Citizens” then so we must. The enemy is no respecter of the laws they make, neither should the American National!
      To resurrect and repurpose a slogan from the failed war on drugs:
      JUST SAY NO!

      1. Hi rhumstruck,

        Most countries do not have bad citizens, only bad governments.

        It is usually due to the avarice, greed and corruption of gov’t officials, and the role model they then present, that a country loses its moral compass and respect for God.

        In our case, it has been thru a quite, devious, and extended campaign of financial and moral corruption, perpetrated thru the bebasement and treachery of our “Free Press”, other mass media, and our monetary system.

        The only “Bad Citizens” in this country are the ones who support and/or agree with this wholly criminal gov’t, called the US Fed Gov’t, which like the US Fed Reserve, which is NOT what it appears to be, does not operate in the interest of America, or Americans, and whose actions clearly expose their true intent, which is the utter destruction and dissolution of the USA.

        The only “Bad Citizens” in this country are those who do not recognize this simple fact, refuse to acknowledge this simple fact, and those who are actively engaged in said actions.

        ALL others, are the “Good Citizens”, the real Americans, the loyal Americans, the moral, noble and legitimate Americans carrying out the responsiblities that all citizens are charged with, which is to hold a government accountable for its crimes, or abolish it when it seeks to destroy the very country is suppose to protect.

        With, or without God’s help, it will be done.

        Personally,.. I prefer Gods blessing for such an undertaking.

        JD – US Marines – Time to muster all of our own internal strengths,.. and to ask God to lend us his.

    2. All the so-called “legal wrangling,” nothing more than words on paper. My question is, why the Hell should anyone need words on paper saying it’s OK to possess adequate tools to keep the einsatzgruppen in check?

      1. Remember when George W. Bush said, “The Constitution is just a damn piece of paper.”?

        Well, if I were to use his philosophy, I am going to apply it to the UN Small Arms Treaty.

        “The UN Small Arms Treaty is just a damn piece of paper”.

        Funny how that “piece of paper” is only important when it applies to the elite’s rule and authority over us.

    3. TPTB can make the Supremacy Claus anything they want it to be. All this pissin’ and moanin’ won’t change the fact that they will use any pretext they want to attempt to disarm us. When they knock on YOUR door, what you gonna do? Get ready Amerika, they are coming to a neighborhood near you!

  10. “Could this be the end of private gun ownership in America as we know it?”
    No, laws are essentially just ink on paper stored in some courthouse, it doesn’t alter or abolish the possession of physical objects (drug laws illustrate this very well).
    Once again, no man, cop or king shall deprive us of our tools to resist enslavement & genocide by our government & the more they try, the more we must be wary of what they have planned.
    Remember, we are many, they are very few, they fear us.

  11. Section 9 of the Constitution says:

    “No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

    Remember this article?
    Obama First US President to Chair UN Security Council
    http://rense.com/general87/ob1.htm

    New York IS the UN!! And Obama chairs the U.N. as well as holds the office of U.S. President.

    The snake has TWO heads!!

    . . .

  12. My Christian brothers and sisters… Please listen to the link below. I have been listening to Nathan Leal for almost 5 years. He is a true Watchman of the Lord. The dude is spot on, totally!!! Give him a listen the subscribe to his show alerts so you don’t miss his shows. You will be blessed and come away better prepared ~ Smilardog

    Watchman’s Cry – News from the Wall #13

    —————————————————————————————–

    “The Pillars Have Fallen – Lament for America!”

    This end time series is an examination of Administration Obama & what it will mean for the world!
    March 3, 2013

    America’s pillars of strength have fallen.

    As a result, America is evolving into an unrecognizable creature.

    A scheme is underway to change the USA into a regime from hell!

    This message will visit these questions and more.

    1. America is being dismantled, piece by piece.

    2. Americans are being betrayed.

    3. A glimpse at the spiritual battle.

    4. America’s fall is similar to past history.

    5. What are the pillars? When did they fall?

    6. What do the fallen pillars mean?

    7. A Watchman’s Lament!

    Please share this audio program with your friends and family.

    God Bless,
    Nathan Leal

    ———————————————————————————–

    Listen to audio program here:

    News 13 – Pt 1

    News 13 – Pt 2

    —————————————————————

    Link to program’s audio page:

    http://www.watchmanscry.com/audio_news13.html

    ——————————————————————————————

    Watchman’s Cry
    http://www.watchmanscry.com

  13. Rebecca Peters is another Janet Napolitano look alike. Where do they find these man-hating, feminist looking people? All of these people in power wanting to take our guns are mostly women who look like men.

    Janet Reno
    Janet Napolitano
    Rebecca Peters
    Caitlin Halligan
    Hitlery Clinton

    I mean all of them look like men or beasts? Are they even human? They all look like they had a sex-change operation and we are letting them control our lives? Are you kidding me??

    HEY US MILITARY!!! WAKE THE F**K UP!!! This is proof that they are trying to take away our 2nd Amendment!!! This is proof of HIGH TREASON!!! WHERE THE HELL ARE YOU, GUYS!!!!!??? ARREST THESE BASTARDS!! ALL OF THEM!!!

    PROTECT THE US CONSTITUTION AND THE PEOPLE OF THE US AND STOP LIVING IN FEAR!!! WE THE PEOPLE DON’T SEND OUR HARD-EARNED TAX DOLLARS TO PAY FOR COWARDS IN THE MILITARY!! DO YOUR JOB AND DUTY, DAMMIT or WE THE PEOPLE WILL!!!!

    1. I think those like them reno, napolitano, clinton types are hermaphrodites – or is that hermafrodikes, lol. They got the best of two world I guess NC – they can go F themselves when ever they feel the urge coming on. lol

      1. I think this is about the dumbest thing that the oshithole has come up with, there is no way the un has a dammmmm thing to do with the countrys constitutions, they can’t make any decisions at all about it,,,,, AND people understand we are all soverign states and the damn government works for us, not the other way around , oshithole is not an AMERICAN, we must wake up before he convinces some other dumbasses, he is powerless with out us, STAND your ground, and IMPEACH HIS ASS.

          1. Think we could devote ourselves to rational approaches to the problem? We only get other leaders hung.

          2. Got plenty.

            (who knows how much it’ll cost by the time we get around to hanging traitors)

          3. I am going to start doing research on how to actually grow, and process hemp into usable products. Like what type of machines or equipment it takes to make rope (first, of course! hehe), textiles, plastics, and all the other 29,000 industrial products I keep reading about that you make with it. Maybe, go through the old patients online. There you can get the whole plans, with details, etc. Then I need to get me a connection for non=sterlized hemp seeds.

            The gears in my mind are turning! If I get to putting things together now. I should be able to have The Finest American Hanging Hemp Rope ready by around 3 months into the war. Assuming by then we got’s us a bunch of turncoats and traitors captured and ready for trials and hangings. It should be perfect timing.

        1. That would require a congress of WE THE PEOPLE. Not the insurgent govt. now in place.
          Wake the Hell up! It’s too late for those remedies. Pick your side and get ready to fight.

        2. Really try that then go right up to the President and tell him that and see wtf happens. Your blind if you think for a moment Gov isn’t about Ctrling us and doing what they want. We haven’t been truly free since WW1 or even earlier.

  14. I do know this. I will stand to protect my familys freedom from any and all.
    I will defend the constitution I took oath in 1996. USMC/ MOS8541!

  15. Whether this treaty trumps the Constitution isn’t even the issue. Barak Obama banks on the ignorance of “we the people”. If he can make Americans believe that it does, he will have succcessfully and silently hijacked this country.

  16. Anyone who has read the Constitution and its history carefully should know that, as reported out of the Convention, it was a blueprint for a centralized tyranny of the super rich, by the super rich, and for the super rich. It was designed by economic royalist Alexander Hamilton. Men like Jefferson, Melacton Smith, and Richard Henry Lee delayed the plan for a little while by their insistance on a Bill of Rights, but what Hamilton couldn’t get directly, he got by persuading or conspiring with Washington to give us a “national bank.” That was the beginning of the end way back then. Some might find this book excerpt interesting.

    The Two Nations, Christopher Hollis 1935
    As soon as Independence had been won from Great Britain, the decks were clear for a second fight. That fight, as is usually found after a successful revolution, was the fight to decide whether independence was to be true independence or whether, after the change of names, the financial system was to re-establish over the new government that same control which it had exercised over the old. The protagonist of plutocracy, a surprisingly frank protagonist, was Alexander Hamilton. Among his proposals was one astonishing in its impudence even for the antagonist of such a cause. The Germans in our own day have carried to a fine art the technique of first defaulting on the interest of their loans and then, when as a result the bonds have slumped, buying them up at a fraction of their par value and thus getting rid of their debts for perhaps a quarter of what they originally borrowed. Things were not very different in Alexander Hamilton’s America. In order to fight the war, Congress had raised certain loans and then had subsequently defaulted on their interest. As a result, of course, they stood very low and were only sellable at a fourth or a fifth part of their par value. Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, gave private information to his financial friends, who therefore bought up the loan at its low market figure. He then announced that the Government would redeem it by paying off the present holders at par plus accrued interest, with the price-level considerably lower than that of the time of the contraction of the debt. In order to pay them off, he raised a new loan from the New York bankers, thus saddling the new country with a permanent National Debt, which he confessed to thinking necessary in order that finance’s mastery of its policies should be unshakable. “He wishes it never to be paid,” explained Jefferson at the time, “but always to be a thing wherewith to corrupt and manage the legislature.” He thus bound, as Calhoun afterwards put it, “more strongly to the Government that already powerful class by giving them, through its agency, increased profit and a decided control over the currency, exchanges and the business transactions of the country.”

  17. Either we stand together and rebuild our country together, or be de- liced and washed off by a fire hose together and thrown into a hole.

    If you frequent this site, your going to stand and fight, Not cower under your mothers dress.

  18. The answers to all of your arguements are in the Federalist and anti- Federalist Papers as the Founding Fathers thought it

  19. Proven and approved by who, your handlers, Putz?

    Try trolling elsewhere, your self righteous drivel is nauseating.

    Loser.

  20. OMFG you trolls or naysayers on these site. Since when has the President or congress been stoped by the Constitution? We have laws on the books now that violate it so what makes this any different? Agenda 21 does give the UN say over tons of our land. DHS will shoot us too, but whe need to have heart and shoot them too. This is the rising of the beast this will be done too. The only other option, or scenerio is that our Gov know something that we don’t which is a possibility and were about to be attacked or something, and DHS will step in to help, but figure that aint much of a reality. I read the text on this treaty and at first doesn’t seem too bad, but saw some language I didn’t like; like states can state sovergnty only as long as it doesn’t violate the treaty? er import and exports ya among countries but the words used are states. So could be used to stop someone from selling accrossed state lines. Also if you sell to your neighbore your an exporter he’s the importer yes stretching it some, but seen that as a way to enforce universal background checks. Too Even though the assault weapons ban is dead UN will not allow those to come here oh ya this is the beast rising.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*