Should Obama and Congress Be Arrested Under the NDAA?

Welcome to the beautiful and surreal reality of life under American corporatism, under a Congress that churns out thousands  and thousands of pages of (often contradictory) legislation a year.

If providing material assistance to al-Qaeda is illegal under the National Defence Authorization Act (2012), and Obama and Congress are sending $25 million of aid to al-Qaeda-affiliated Syrian opposition, aren’t Congress and President Obama violating their own law? Should Obama (or at least the Justice Department) not be using “all necessary and appropriate force” including “the power to indefinitely detain” to prevent Obama and Congress from assisting al-Qaeda? Did anyone in Congress or the Obama administration even bother to read the law that they were signing? Do Federal laws no longer apply to lawmakers?

The only question left from this abrupt and absurd turnaround — from funding bin Laden’s mujahideen thirty years ago, to ten years ago declaring war on al-Qaeda, to today sending them material assistance — would appear to be whether or not Obama will pull a 1984 and claim that “we have always been at war with Eurasia“.

This entry was posted in News, Videos. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Should Obama and Congress Be Arrested Under the NDAA?

  1. Ed Frye says:

    Arrest them all, NOW. Abolish the TSA and DHS. It is all fake and oppression. More pork we can’t afford for this dishonest government.

  2. David2 says:

    They want to arm the same terrorist Al-qaeda that kills thousands of the young American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq, the same organization blamed for the 911 terrorist attack on American soil and the entire reason for the war of terror and yet They want to disarm all peaceful and decent law abiding American citizens!

    These creeps make laws not for themselves, but CONTROL the people that is their sole evil intent.

    How do you feel watching your children being patted down by the TSA perverts or watching your Mom and Dad being patted down. Or the wife of a soldier who has lost a leg or an arm in Afghanistan or Iraq looking at her hero husband being treated as a suspected terrorist at the hand of these jerks. The reason for the perverse pat down is that your children, your parents, your soldiers, you and I are all suspected terrorists of Al-qaeda, what a sick joke! The Government arms our real enemy Al CIA da terrorists to help our closest ally in the Middle East and then disarms and intimidates your Mom and Pop to help that same ally who actively through zionist corporatism impoverishes Americans at home.

    It is beyond the time for a peoples revolt.

    Obama, Holder, Clinton, L. Graham, ,J. McCain, the judiciary, CONgress or anyone in the pay of the elite are not going to be imprisoned, they do not imprison themselves, someone unfortunately else has to do that or pay the zionist price.

  3. David2 says:

    Something to consider:

    Obama would not be eligible to obtain a drivers license in most States as his birth certificate is a proven forgery.

    Yet he decides under NDAA who gets to live and who gets to die, what psycho wars are to be promoted in the name of spreading democracy and freedom to nations that do not yet have the Muslim brotherhood as puppet leaders etc etc etc etc

  4. Jolly Roger says:

    Of course he SHOULD be arrested, but if there was any hope of arresting him for this, he would have been arrested for treason, war crimes, or lying to congress long ago.

    The man most definitely belongs in jail, but don’t hold your breath waiting for any government employees to put him there.

  5. NC says:

    “Should Obama and Congress Be Arrested Under the NDAA?”

    Is that a trick question? If it happens (which is about a 1% chance (no pun inteneded)) I just have to say, “What goes around, comes around” and “Payback’s a bitch.”

Leave a Reply