Stay away from the vaxxed, it is official, from Pfizer’s own documents

Jim Stone

Read it and weep, we are effed. Pfizer’s own documents state both inhalation and skin contact will transmit whatever is in the vax from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated and that the results are devastating.

Download from original source 

Here is what just this small portion of this Pfizer document is saying:

1. If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman, or breathes any of the air she breathes, (in other words, walks by her in the office) and he then has sex with his wife, his wife can have an adverse event and she should avoid having children. 2. If a woman who was never vaccinated gets exposed to a woman who was vaccinated, she can:

A: miscarry,
B: spontaneously abort,
C. poison a baby via her breast milk
D: Have babies that have congitive difficulties.

This is universal, and very bad. Here is a small section of text I translated to English:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure

“An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.”

TO CLARIFY: Vaccine study participants become super spreaders of something, they don’t say what it is, but it triggers secondary adverse events in people that never had the vax, when they are exposed to people who did have the vax.

THIS IS SO BAD that right here, in this little bit of quoted text, it warns that un-vaccinated men who have been exposed to a woman who was vaxxed will then pass whatever is in the vax to another woman.

Even the relatively small portion of the document I have put below here says the vax triggers spontaneous abortions and reproductive problems when un-vaccinated people are exposed to the vaccinated and that breast milk from a vaccinated mom can harm the infant. And if anyone does not believe it, then click the link above and wade through that enormous and intentionally confusing document. It’s for real folks, the vax is indeed the kill shot.

Do not permit the vaccinated to come anywhere near you, it is now official.

Here is a small portion of this huge document, straight from pfizer: Terms:

Study intervention – A vaccine test subject.
AE – Adverse event in someone who got the vax.
SAE: An adverse event in someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax.
EDP: Exposure during pregnancy

8.3.5. Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure Exposure to the study intervention under study during pregnancy or breastfeeding and occupational exposure are reportable to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of investigator awareness.
8.3.5.1. Exposure During Pregnancy An EDP occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be pregnant while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.
* A female is found to be pregnant while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention due to environmental exposure. Below are examples of environmental exposure during pregnancy:
* A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.

* A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.

____

If this vax is not shedding into other people, why would contact between vaccinated and un-vaccinated be an event worth noting? If this vax is not shedding, then WHY does a guy who has been around a vaccinated woman, even if he did not touch her or have sex, need to worry about getting a different woman pregnant?

____

That’s not all, the following is detailed, and far worse.

The investigator must report EDP to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The initial information submitted should include the anticipated date of delivery (see below for information related to termination of pregnancy). * If EDP occurs in a participant or a participant’s partner, the investigator must report this information to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form and an EDP Supplemental Form, regardless of whether an SAE has occurred. Details of the pregnancy will be collected after the start of study intervention and until 6 months after the last dose of study intervention. * If EDP occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the investigator must report information to Pfizer Safety using the Vaccine SAE Report Form and EDP Supplemental Form. Since the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. Follow-up is conducted to obtain general information on the pregnancy and its outcome for all EDP reports with an unknown outcome. The investigator will follow the pregnancy until completion (or until pregnancy termination) and notify Pfizer Safety of the outcome as a follow-up to the initial EDP Supplemental Form. In the case of a live birth, the structural integrity of the neonate can be assessed at the time of birth. In the event of a termination, the reason(s) for termination should be specified and, if clinically possible, the structural integrity of the terminated fetus should be assessed by gross visual inspection (unless preprocedure test findings are conclusive for a congenital anomaly and the findings are reported). Abnormal pregnancy outcomes are considered SAEs. If the outcome of the pregnancy meets the criteria for an SAE (ie, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, intrauterine fetal demise, neonatal death, or congenital anomaly), the investigator should follow the procedures for reporting SAEs. Additional information about pregnancy outcomes that are reported to Pfizer Safety as SAEs follows: * Spontaneous abortion including miscarriage and missed abortion; * Neonatal deaths that occur within 1 month of birth should be reported, without regard to causality, as SAEs. In addition, infant deaths after 1 month should be reported as SAEs when the investigator assesses the infant death as related or possibly related to exposure to the study intervention. Additional information regarding the EDP may be requested by the sponsor. Further follow-up of birth outcomes will be handled on a case-by-case basis (eg, follow-up on preterm infants to identify developmental delays). In the case of paternal exposure, the investigator will provide the participant with the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to deliver to his partner. The investigator must document in the source documents that the participant was given the Pregnant Partner Release of Information Form to provide to his partner. 8.3.5.2. Exposure During Breastfeeding An exposure during breastfeeding occurs if:
* A female participant is found to be breastfeeding while receiving or after discontinuing study intervention.
* A female is found to be breastfeeding while being exposed or having been exposed to study intervention (ie, environmental exposure). An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact. The investigator must report exposure during breastfeeding to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, irrespective of whether an SAE has occurred. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. When exposure during breastfeeding occurs in the setting of environmental exposure, the exposure information does not pertain to the participant enrolled in the study, so the information is not recorded on a CRF. However, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file. An exposure during breastfeeding report is not created when a Pfizer drug specifically approved for use in breastfeeding women (eg, vitamins) is administered in accord with authorized use. However, if the infant experiences an SAE associated with such a drug, the SAE is reported together with the exposure during breastfeeding.

Here’s the clear part of this, that everyone can understand:

8.3.5.3. Occupational Exposure An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care. The investigator must report occupational exposure to Pfizer Safety within 24 hours of the investigator’s awareness, regardless of whether there is an associated SAE. The information must be reported using the Vaccine SAE Report Form. Since the information does not pertain to a participant enrolled in the study, the information is not recorded on a CRF; however, a copy of the completed Vaccine SAE Report Form is maintained in the investigator site file.

I WILL TRANSLATE THAT TO ENGLISH:

An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with a vaccine test subject, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an adverse event. These people may include health care providers, family members, and other people who are around the trial participant.

When such exposures happen, the investigator must report them to Pfizer saftey within 24 hours of becoming aware of when they happened, regardless of whether or not there is an associated secondary adverse event. This must be reported using the vaccine secondary adverse event report form. SINCE THE INFORMATION DOES NOT PERTAIN TO A PARTICIPANT INVOLVED IN THE STUDY, THE INFORMATION WILL BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE STUDY.

Jim Stone

28 thoughts on “Stay away from the vaxxed, it is official, from Pfizer’s own documents

  1. For a praying person such as myself, this is the time to pray God will put an invisible shield around myself and those that didn’t swallow the jab kool-aid.
    It’s our turn now to look at those that willing got the jab as if they had a 2nd head growing from their neck, like the way they ridiculed and looked at us for not wearing the mask of shame, slavery, and stupidity.

      1. Did you miss the point of this? They’ve ensured that not just the lemmings will go over the cliff. You can suffer the same fate if exposed to a vaxxed COVIDiots. You don’t need to get a jab. You only need to touch the skin or inhale the exhaled breath of a lemming, and you’re screwed. This makes me wish those stupid masks actually worked. I’d suffer the brain damage to avoid the genetic damage from any of those shots. This is truly Pandora’s Box. Love on everyone you can. The ship is sinking.

      2. Hey Mary, thank you for first bringing us the shedding info. It will be very interesting to see where all the cards fall in a year or two. And your point is well-taken regarding those who complied and took the shot. They are no longer just ignorant; they’ve become dangerous.

        .

    1. They dont care about vacc failure.Its a Deathjab,wake up and stop helping the Murderers.You are turned into a walking virus factory spreading death to the unaware.Look into the history of these pharma deathco.s.peroxide and nebulizer=treatment. 25mg Prednisone=treatment. Medicalkidnap.com,briteon.com

    2. I understand that prayer, Katie. Ever since Mary first brought us the shedding info, all the world looked different to me. I felt my soul separate even more from the vaxxed. I saw the great polarity the poisoners are trying to unify. NEVER!!

      .

    3. Tell you what- Let’s have the jabbed go work for Bill Gates as servants in his home (and his soon-to-be ex-wife’s too). Send them there as a present to console them in their divorce.

      1. This made me laugh, but then I thought, oh man, they didn’t think it through. How will they ever find servants who won’t infect them!!

        .

  2. My only concern re this biological warfare they’re F’g with is it can also be used to create a strain designed for depopulation of the non-vaxxed, leaving the vaxtards unharmed from it. An evil double edged sword.

      1. Genius? No. Diabolical and murderous? Absolutely. They’ve been working on this crap for decades and I don’t put anything past them. 1000 evil monkeys with 1000 typewriters…

        1. Correct. The cabal has conducted many beta tests in the past and monitored how the public reacts to all these engineered panics (plandemics). AIDS was one, and don’t forget the 2009 H1N1 swine flu, which was a rehash of the 1976 swine flu plandemic. Read this archived article from 2009: “Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist: ‘Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon'” — https://archive.is/uqPmw

          1. I met a retired af and then he retired army vet.
            He volunteered for swine flu experiment in mid-80’s and said he was never sicker, yet continued to serve them for both branches. Hopelessly devoted…

  3. The original is different. SAE is adverse event (nothing to do with “someone who was exposed to someone who got the vax”. Also, the original does not say : “contact with a vaccine test subject”, but ” contact with the study intervention”. Something is apparently happening, but it is not true that the report is admitting anything.

    1. This document is evidence that Pfizer has blood on its hands, as Pfizer *anticipated* that people coming into contact with the study participants (the ones receiving the Pfizer vaccines) might exhibit SAEs (serious adverse events) or AEs (adverse events). And that is *exactly* what is happening now, with thousands of women around the world (who did NOT take the “vaccine”) reporting adverse effects with their menstrual cycles (severe bleeding, clotting, cramps, miscarriages, starting bleeding after 10 years of being menopausal) from coming into contact with those who received the mRNA “vaccine”. Read the section 10.4.1, where it states, and I quote: “Male participants are eligible to participate [in the study, where they would receive the Pfizer Covid “vaccines”] if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention [the “vaccines”], which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study interventions(s).” READ that part and what follows, as men receiving the jabs are then told to REFRAIN from having sex with a “female of childbearing potential”. Got that?! How many men taking the Covid jab have been warned not to have sex “for at least 28 days” after their 2nd Covid jab? According to this Pfizer document, anyone not knowing about that warning has potential to cause “reproductive safety risk”.

    2. That’s correct page 126 of the document defines SAE. It refers to serious adverse events, including death, life-threatening condition or hospitalization.
      Also, ‘study intervention’ means the experimental vaccine. In this case, environmental exposure, ‘by inhalation or skin contact’ with someone who has received the ‘study invention’, i.e. the experimental vaccine. Based on the second example of environmental exposure in the document, there can be primary AND secondary environment exposure. The report is ‘admitting’ that some biological agent can be passed to a person who has environmental exposure to the vaccine and that they may suffer an AE or SAE.
      https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/04/24/breast-fed-baby-passes-away-after-being-poisoned-by-mother-who-had-taken-the-pfizer-covid-vaccine/

      It is also scary what they are NOT studying. From page 72 of the report:
      8.5. Pharmacokinetics
      Pharmacokinetic parameters are not evaluated in this study.
      8.6. Pharmacodynamics
      Pharmacodynamic parameters are not evaluated in this study.
      8.7. Genetics
      Genetics (specified analyses) are not evaluated in this study.
      8.8. Biomarkers
      Biomarkers are not evaluated in this study.

      From Wikipedia – [Pharmacokinetics] attempts to analyze chemical metabolism and to discover the fate of a chemical from the moment that it is administered up to the point at which it is completely eliminated from the body. Pharmacokinetics is the study of how an organism affects a drug, whereas pharmacodynamics is the study of how the drug affects the organism. Both together influence dosing, benefit, and adverse effects”.

      This means that Pfizer will not be reporting on how the ‘intervention’ reacts internally in a vaccinated person or the mechanism of how it is passed on to another person.

    3. I agree. Also, perhaps they are monitoring for secondary adverse events in case of vaccine failure or vaccination failure. The test subject could be fully vaccinated and then challenged with the virus and then act as a fomite to pass that virus on to someone else.

      1. They dont care about vacc failure.Its a Deathjab,wake up and stop helping the Murderers.You are turned into a walking virus factory spreading death to the unaware.Look into the history of these pharma deathco.s.

  4. Our children our what I worry about, how Gates walks free is beyond me. He must account. Hemp rope, tall tree, heavy wind and a stapler to staple his eye lids open.

    And a mirror so he can watch.

    1. Gates is one man (?), a mouthpiece for whomever his boss is and for now seemingly untouchable.
      The minions that carry out the agenda should start disappearing. When the minions realize they are being hunted down for their crimes I’m thinking the tide will turn.
      #1 minion…the media

  5. Remember when millions were rushing out to get their ‘free’ nasal swab to be tested for a virus no one had isolated in human tissue using a test that was not a test…PCR Ask yourself what if those people were seeded with something coming off that swab. Those people could have actually been ‘vaccinated’ but since they did not get the jab they are being called the non vaccinated. I have not heard any of the ‘experts’ currently discussing this transmission problem raise the question about the swab being a vector for a ‘vaccine’

    1. The swab tests contain the CDC/Fauchi funded WUHAN Laboratory created COVID-19, & nanosized gel with nanosized aluminum, Hitachi nano chip, & nasal tissue cutters, to cut the tissue in the nasal membrane beneath the crib form plate & your brain, & introduce the lab created synthetic mRNA Covid-19 code into your bloodstream, sealed blood system, & nanosized poisons-adjuvants, directly into your brain. NOT ONE VERIFIED CASE, (actual electron microscope pictures), OF THE LAB CREATED COVID-19 UNTIL THE DEPOPULATION SWAB TESTS & DEATH SHOTS!!! DEPOPULATION FDA EUC EXPERIMENTAL DRUG TRIAL & CULLING/GENOCIDE OF THE MASSES.

  6. Please note that this paper PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines) Protocol C4591001 describing SAs and SAEs is the study design that was published in April 2020 – not the results.

    It only tells the people monitoring the participants in the study what to look out for and report, it does not report the results of any such outcomes.

    In November 2020, here is the interim report with results from Phase 2 of the trial (https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download) stated:

    “Among the 37,586 participants with a median of 2 months of safety follow-up after Dose 2, no clinically meaningful differences in SAEs were observed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, or baseline SARS CoV 2 status subgroups.”

    There was no mention of any issues reported regarding pregnancy.

  7. Self-disseminating vaccines are vaccines that after one person has been “infected” by a vaccine the vaccine then jumps to the nearest and dearest through breath, skin, or bodily fluids. Self-disseminating vaccines will mean no one can just say “no” to a vaccine. It will jump (actual term) to us whether we want it or not. In the name of the greater good it will mean that those who are allergic to the point of anaphylaxis will most likely die. And those vaccines that are contaminated or with serious problems will be spread among the population. Remember there is no liability for vaccines. The COVID vaccines may very well have been designed as self-disseminating “vaccine/gene therapy”.

  8. Some of the doctors going up against the vax are asking that we stop calling it “shedding,” but rather call it “transmitting.”

    .

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*