Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Texas Rancher Fights Back Against BLM Land Grab

Patriot Rising

A Northern Texas rancher says property that’s been in his family for over half a century is now suddenly being targeted for confiscation by the Bureau of Land Management.

Ken Aderholt runs cattle on his roughly 1,250 acres in Harrold, Texas, along the Red River, which forms the border between the Lone Star State and Oklahoma.  

Aderholt’s family has had a deed to the land since 1941, and he had hoped to pass the property and the family business on to his sons.

“They come down here a lot and play,” Aderholt told KAUZ News Channel 6. “They help with the cattle and help building fences. They are very interested in hanging round here and helping me out.”

But according to the Bureau of Land Management, the same federal government agency that confronted Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy in 2014, some of that land belongs to the feds, and they want the Aderholts off it.

Furthermore, the BLM claims the deed that proves Aderholt’s ownership of the land, given to his parents by the State of Texas, is worthless.

“The BLM is saying we should have never had a deed to it. That Texas should have never produced that deed,” Aderholt said.

The rancher concedes the BLM is entitled to land “along the gradient boundary,” according to KAUZ, which Aderholt says is dependent on “the way the water washes and cuts into different properties.”

But the BLM argues the real boundary lies a half mile inland from the river, which cuts into 600 acres of Aderholt’s land.

KAUZ reports the BLM’s efforts could leave Aderholt and his family homeless, as his “house is located inside the 600 acres the BLM wants to claim.”

Despite never bothering him for the last 70 years, the feds aren’t offering Aderholt an explanation for what they plan to do with the land.

“They could own it, they could turn it to the public, they could condemn it, they could sell it back to me,” Aderholt says.

“It is a land grab,” Aderholt insists. “As far as I am concerned, this is private property.”

http://patriotrising.com/2015/10/13/texas-rancher-fights-back-against-blm-land-grab/

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
2668

4 Responses to Texas Rancher Fights Back Against BLM Land Grab

  1. flee says:

    Bundy Ranch Version 2.0
    Now who is going is protect you ?
    That would be you!
    Now gun up… and prep!
    This is my rifle there are many like it but this one is fkg mine!
    My rifle is my best friend.
    IT IS MY LIFE!!!!!

  2. MARKW says:

    The BLM wants to control all the waters and lands in both Texas and Oklahoma. This came out about a year ago about stealing lands and waterways

  3. Cal says:

    First, show me where within the US Constitution those that serve within our government was delegated the authority to create a “BLM”. There is none.

    Then show me where on the list that is put into writing within the US Constitution where those treasonous cretins serving within the general government are allowed to own any property that is not specifically listed within it; plus the ways they are ALLOWED to purchase land and for the ONLY purposes they are allowed to purchase it for.

    Again, what they are allowed to lawfully do is DELEGATED, and when or if we allow them to continue to do this stuff against the American people it is not only Treason, but is *Terrorism also.

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    When those who serve within our governments go against their delegated authority they no longer serve the people and are themselves criminals, and depending on what actions they are taking are Traitors and Terrorists against the American people to whom they owe loyalty and fidelity as it is from the people the delegation of authority comes.

    Of course we are required to “police” those who serve within our governments with the “organized” (trained as the US Military is trained) Militia, as well as to enforce the US Constitution and all laws that are in pursuance thereof it and each state’s Constitution. That is OUR constitutionally assigned duty.

    Those that have served within the US military should all be training those around them so that they can lawfully enforce the laws of our land. Arrest and charge all Traitors and Terrorists, make sure that our elections are free and lawful, enforce the laws of our land as we are the ONLY people constitutionally assigned those duties.

    The Militia is not a governmental agency.

    John Adams, A Defense of the Constitutions of the United States: “To suppose arms in the hands of citizens, to be used at individual discretion, except in private self-defense, or by partial orders of towns, countries or districts of a state, is to demolish every constitution, and lay the laws prostrate, so that liberty can be enjoyed by no man; it is a dissolution of the government. The fundamental law of the militia is, that it be created, directed and commanded by the laws, and ever for the support of the laws.”

    Alexander Hamilton, Federalist Papers 28: “The militia is a voluntary force not associated or under the control of the States except when called out; [when called into actual service] a permanent or long standing force would be entirely different in make-up and call.”

    BTW, neither is the Grand Jury a tool of those that serve within our governments, it is the Peoples tool to use for Investigations at our will, and if enough evidence is gathered, to prosecute criminals that serve within our governments in a Grand Jury Trial (not under the judges or prosecutors as is presently told (lies) to the people. We actually have the lawful tools to stop these usurpations and Treason, but we must know what they are and then use them.

  4. ConfederateMan says:

    TY Cal. You know your stuff.

    Meet the scumbag offshore corporation called the blm:

    From a post on another site:

    BLM is actually a sub-corporation of UNITED STATES INCORPORATED, a private foreign owned off-shore corporation since its last incorporation in 1925, copyrighted, trademarked and registered in Puerto Rico).

    Under the Reorganization Act of Washington District of Columbia, by it’s own private business charter, neither the BLM, nor any other federal/corporate agency has lawful/legal authority, jurisdiction or
    interstate nexus within the 50 state geographical landmass.

    BLM, is actually classified as an: “Agent of Foreign Principle”, under the intergovernmental Personnel Act. In other words, they don’t represent the Constitutional Republic or the interests of the American People but rather, a foreign owned principle i.e., the international banking/military corporate cartel of London City, England known as Crown Corporation as their supreme authority.

    This has been openly admitted and exposed through Supreme Court cases since and even before 1938.

Leave a Reply