Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

The anti-vax movement seems to be spreading to Maine pet owners. That worries animal care experts.

Bangor Daily News – by Abigail Curtis

More than 20 years ago, Don Hanson of Green Acres Kennel Shop of Bangor took his golden retriever puppy, Tikken, to the veterinarian to get her mandatory rabies vaccine.

Tikken had a bad reaction to the vaccine, he said, and developed severe aggression and what in humans would be called obsessive compulsive disorder.  

Eventually, a treatment was found and she lived a long, happy life before dying at the age of 16. But Hanson was never able to forget what had befallen his dog. He began a long effort to educate pet owners about what he believes is the over-vaccination of their animals.

At first, it was a lonely fight.

“We were not popular amongst the veterinary community when we started,” he said.

But things have changed. Nowadays, more and more pet owners, and even some veterinarians, have adopted Hanson’s way of thinking about vaccines. He’d like pet owners to be more thoughtful and careful about the vaccines they give to their cats and dogs.

“I would say we’re seeing more and more people who feel this way,” Hanson said. “It’s been a slow change, but I think everybody’s getting more educated about it. That goes nationwide, too.”

Still, the pendulum can swing too far. Hanson and other pet experts said that there are growing numbers of people, in Maine and elsewhere, who have decided that instead of simply being thoughtful about vaccines for their animals, they would rather skip them entirely.

In addition to being illegal — Maine state law requires that all cats and dogs are vaccinated against rabies — it’s not very wise, he said.

“Some people are overreacting the wrong way, and choosing not to do vaccines at all, which is a bad idea,” the kennel owner said. “Vaccines do save a lot of animals from early death. But this is a conversation they should be having with their veterinarian. They shouldn’t be relying on Dr. Google.”

Pet anti-vaccine movement

In some ways, the pet anti-vaccine movement has parallels with the human anti-vaccine movement.

Skeptical pet owners say they want to do due diligence when it comes to putting vaccines in their pets’ bodies. They believe they are rightfully pushing back against blind acceptance of what medical authorities, the government or pharmaceutical companies want them to do. And they believe that instead of offering protection from disease, vaccines instead can cause harm.

That’s a problem, according to Dr. Jean Dodds, a California-based holistic veterinarian who is at the forefront of the movement to change vaccine protocols. She is concerned about animals being over-vaccinated and about vaccines being formulated with ingredients that can cause them harm.

She is glad that more people want to be careful and thoughtful about vaccine use for their pets. Yet she is not anti-vaccine.

“I’m very vocal about what vaccines can and can’t do. People assume that because I talk about the potential adverse effects of vaccines they shouldn’t vaccinate at all, and that is very foolish,” she said this week. “It’s very important that puppies and kittens and other animals and people get appropriately immunized … the pet anti-vaccine movement, I don’t agree with it. It’s based on misinformation, hysteria and, unfortunately, the internet.”

She told the story of one champion dog breeder who decided not to vaccinate her dogs and lost a pregnant female and 10 puppies to canine parvovirus, a highly contagious viral illness.

“It was an absolute tragedy,” Dodds said.

Dr. Michael Munzer, who owns All Creatures Acupuncture Holistic Veterinary Therapies in Bucksport, said that in the 10 years he has worked in the field he has noticed growing numbers of people who have concerns about vaccination.

“Absolutely, I have a lot of clients who are concerned,” he said. “They have read about over-vaccination and are concerned about the pharmaceutical industry. Certainly, for humans, there’s been increasing awareness, and that’s extending to our pets, too.”

Some vaccines can remain effective for a long time, he said, and antibodies against disease can be checked with blood tests, called titers, rather than giving animals booster shots indiscriminately.

“I am pro-vaccination, but pro-judicious vaccination,” he said. “Just because a pharmaceutical company says this is a schedule you should adhere to doesn’t mean you should line up and say, ‘Yes, sir, thank you, sir.’”

Cost concerns

Sometimes, Hanson said, people have jumped on the anti-vaccine bandwagon more because of the cost of vaccines than for ethical reasons. For his family, it has been more expensive to be thoughtful about pet vaccines. Instead of getting all their shots at once, his dogs get a course of vaccines over a period of time, which requires more trips to the vet.

“I’m willing to pay that price. Some people aren’t,” he said. “Some people, I suspect, their anti-vaxx attitude is driven by, ‘I just don’t want to pay for that.’”

That might help explain why the Waldo County Pet Food Pantry in Belfast saw a sharp drop-off in visitors in January, the first month that proof of vaccination against rabies was required for people to pick up free dry food, canned food, litter and dog treats. The pet food pantry generally serves about 50 households a month, but in January that number dropped to 11.

“It’s blowing my mind, it really is,” Blood said. “The average rabies vaccine is $10. Why on Earth wouldn’t you spend $10 to be in compliance with the law and get up to six months of free pet food?”

But one Camden woman who didn’t want to share her name said that money isn’t the reason why she is careful about the vaccines she chooses to get for her dogs. She would never skip core shots like rabies or distemper, but said she feels “gun-shy” about newer vaccines on the market, such as vaccines against Lyme disease or the influenza virus.

“I would feel that way about medication I take for myself,” she said. “For me, it’s about the efficacy of the vaccines and also not overloading my dogs with vaccines.”

Rabies reality

In Maine, where there has been a spate of high-profile rabies-related incidents lately, the preventable viral disease has grabbed headlines and attention. Rabies infects the central nervous system, ultimately causing disease in the brain and death, but is preventable with the vaccine. Some pet owners worry that the vaccine will cause harm, but not getting vaccinated can lead to far worse outcomes, according to Dr. Julie Keene of the Veazie Veterinary Clinic. She has a response ready when people with indoor-only cats tell her that their pets don’t need the rabies shot.

“A, it’s state law. And B, I have had clients who had rabid animals get into their houses,” the veterinarian said. “A rabid raccoon broke a screen door and attacked a dog and a litter of puppies. It’s an example of what can happen.”

Another time, a client with six cats came home and found a bat wing on the floor, but no bat body to test for rabies. They didn’t know which cat had been exposed to the bat, so in the end all of the cats were vaccinated and the house was put on quarantine.

If they hadn’t done that, there was a chance that one or more of the cats could have been exposed to rabies and then bitten a person.

“That’s what can happen and how people can get infected. That’s how I counsel my clients,” Keene said. “If all the cats had been up to date, you’d be a lot less worried.”

She and other veterinarians would much rather that clients come to them to talk about their concerns about vaccinations rather than skip them entirely.

“We can talk about what the risks of the vaccines are versus the risks of the disease,” she said. “I think it’s important to have the conversation with the veterinarian about what can be done to make sure the pet is safe. But we’re still vaccinating.”

https://bangordailynews.com/2019/01/31/news/midcoast/the-anti-vax-movement-seems-to-be-spreading-to-maine-pet-owners-that-worries-animal-care-experts/

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
768

4 Responses to The anti-vax movement seems to be spreading to Maine pet owners. That worries animal care experts.

  1. Patrick Jordan says:

    OK, lettuce Line Item this one.
    No one should be owing pets. The reason it is an INDUSTRY is because it is a military operation to get animals to be disease vectors directly into people’s homes. The vaccines deliver the disease and except for animals with the digestive diseases that result from the vaccines (that model human illness) requiring specialty diets, the doof giving to pets models that fed to the other herd animals: their Hu-man owners. When viewed from a purely biological standpoint this makes perfect sense because if you are hotboxing disease that you want to vector from the delivery vehicle (pets) to human then the diets should be the same so that the transition of the bug from one host to another is seamless. When is the last time you saw a dog hunt down an ear of corn and eat it or a cat sneak up on a green garden pea? They feed soybeans to farmed salmon. No one should own pets because it is licensed which means it is against the ‘law’ to own them but you are given a permit (for a fee) to do something unlawful. And because you are participating in madness they will see your madness and raise you insanity by the REQUIRING YOU TO SACRIFICE THE ANIMAL THAT YOU SHOULD NOT OWN TO THE GOD OF VACCINES. What that does is condition you to be a good obeyer of the Law and sacrifice yourself and your children to the god of vaccines. This is the second purpose of the use of innocent animals as biowarfare agent vectors: to train you how to be insensitive to Nature, Reason, Logic and the life and health of an animal.

    That’s the prologue. Now, lettuce eggzamine the lies within the text:
    the ONLY times I have ever been bitten by dogs on the farm is when they were recently or chronically vaccinated with rabies. The vet told me that it was a ‘false heat’. The vet should have been euthanized.

    They use the tired myth that vaccines save lives. This is Opposite Day; vaccines ruin and shorten lives if not kill the pet outright. ANYONE who promotes the use of vaccines or ‘green’ vaccines, or a smaller amount of vaccines is a co-conspirator in the delivery of biological warfare agents.

    Champion dog breeder… blah…blah… blah… absolute tragedy. See my opening statement. No one should be owning pets let alone breeding them. Parvovirus? Perhaps it might have started in pets but it has morphed into a human disease and can even now be transmitted via organ transplant in humans. Want to know the best way to get parvo virus? Inject it into a pet and have the pet shed it to animals and people alike (did I just repeat myself?)

    It is heartening to see that the same miliary psyop used on people at Walgreens where you get some coupons for getting a flu or shingles shot is applied to the same mentally vulnerable crowd who would volunteer their pet for a bioweapon just to get some free food (until the pet develops intractable digestive problems and must get specialty food for life).

    The rabid raccoon probably got the infection from the rabies bait dropped from helicopters and since the bat was not confirmed to have rabies then it may never had had rabies. Rabies is so low on the prevalence scale as to be statistically insignificant. It was some of the first fear porn created by Looney Louey Pasteur.

    Cats bite people all the time even during play and Lyme and coinfections are a global pandemic to where vets are in fear of their lives from these debilitating and lethal diseases yet some brain trust in the article above was wistfully rhapsodizing about a LYME VACCINE FOR PETS. See the Lyme Cryme ladies to find out how well that vaccine works in humans. It is the definition of a biological/chemical warfare agent. Distemper is animal measles so it can run the gamut from zoonoses to animal autistm since the MMR is implicated in measles infections in the brains of kids with autism.

    • Patrick Jordan says:

      most excellent link. In my diatribization I forgot to highlight that among the other military purposes of pets that they provided the perfect alpha test for vaccine efficacy (as weapons) the beta test was putting them into the homes of the owners. The shorter lifespan of animals allows for more immediate evidence of disease especially cancer for the Proof of Concept that the military so longs for when it invests in new weapons technology. The fact that pets come down with human diseases like diabetes, etc. should have made the whole whirled just stop to re-evaluate what was going on, but they are so hynotized and the process is so industrialized that they just keep stepford wive stepping through life in a field of landmines. Cheers.

Leave a Reply