It’s Time To Break Free – July 20, 2017

Join in on the conversation. Call (641) 715-3610 then enter 220029#, press *6 to mute and unmute.

You can listen on our player.

To listen on a smart phone, just click this link: http://listen.spacial.com/api/listen/?sid=9826&method=sc It will ask if you want to download or execute. Click “Execute”. Then on the next screen, Complete action using, click “Google Play Music”.

Get together in our chat room: The Pub.

Archive: ITTBF 7-20-17

17 thoughts on “It’s Time To Break Free – July 20, 2017

  1. David, great broadcast, and way to make that groaning sound so as not to leave dead airspace. You did this when reading the info. about Boycott.

    Henry is the pro at no dead airspace, even if he has to hum.

    Cool history of boycott. Actually came from a name. Learn something new all the time.
    Very good reading, David. Clear and enunciated.

    1. …and he is not only on air but on the best place to be FTTWR….congratulations to you Janet

  2. How about putting a time on to let folks know,,and can join

    The right to a fair trial, guaranteed to state criminal defendants by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, imposes on States certain duties consistent with their sovereign obligation to ensure “that ‘justice shall be done’ ” in all criminal prosecutions. United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 111, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976) (quoting Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314 (1935)). In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), we held that when a State suppresses evidence favorable to an accused that is material to guilt or to punishment, the State violates the defendant’s right to due process, “irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Id., at 87, 83 S.Ct. 1194.

    Cone v. Bell, 556 U.S. 449, 451 (U.S. 2009)

    Authority – AFFIDAVIT V. MOTION Bench: I have considered the Defense Motions & they are all DENIED. Real Man: I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits. Bench: Well I am treating your documents as motions!! Real Man: AGAIN, I did not file any motions, I filed affidavits; it is a criminal offense to file a false affidavit, I notice I am not under arrest for filing a false affidavit so it is clear that my affidavits are true, correct, and accurate; an affidavit is a statement of truth so my UNCONTESTED AFFIDAVITS are the TRUTH; I’m sure this court isn’t deliberately DENYING THE TRUTH in order to FALSIFY THE RECORD!!! I’m certain it isn’t this court’s intent to FALSIFY THE RECORD AND CREATE DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS…is it??? MORRIS V NATIONAL CASH REGISTER, & GROUP V FINLETTER Defendant is likely to be the only individual, now or in the future, who is willing and able to place a sworn affidavit affirming the herein disclosed facts under penalties of perjury, into the record of this case and as such, in absence of sworn counter-affidavit signed under the penalties of perjury regarding these same facts, laws, case law and evidence, Defendant should be the only prevailing party. Morris v National Cash Register, 44 S.W. 2D 433, clearly states at point #4 that “uncontested allegations in affidavit must be accepted as true.”, and the Federal case of Group v Finletter, 108 F. Supp. 327 states, “Allegations in affidavit in support of motion must be considered as true in absence of counter-affidavit.

    1. Look at the sidebar on the right side of the page (second item). It gives you the time ( 1 pm – 2 pm Pacific).

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.


*