Warning: Federal Court Rules that 2nd Amendment Right is Now a Reason for Cops to Detain You

Free Thought Project – by Jay Syrmopoulos

Grand Rapids, Mich. – In a stunning violation of 2nd Amendment rights, the U.S. District Court of Western Michigan ruled police have the legal authority to detain individuals that choose to exercise their constitutional right to open carry a firearm. Open Carry is also specifically allowed under Michigan law.

The ruling means that people in Michigan who choose to exercise this constitutional right are now subject to being stopped by law enforcement for engaging in a completely lawful activity.  

Officers detained Johann Deffert in early 2013. He was walking down the sidewalk with a holstered FNP-45 pistol, after receiving a 9-1-1 call from a woman who spotted Deffert with the open carried, but holstered, handgun on his person.

The dispatcher initially informed the caller that Michigan is an open carry state. However, the woman subsequently explained that she found Deffert’s presence alarming, due in part to his wearing of camouflage, although she admitted that he wasn’t threatening anyone. Somehow the dispatcher made the decision that someone engaging in a completely legal activity, as earlier in the call noted by the dispatcher, should now be inspected by police, due to caller saying they found wearing camo disturbing.

The absurdity in logic; that someone wearing camo takes the situation from being a completely legal situation not to be interfered with, and raises it to a level of needing police assistance, shows the extreme arbitrary nature of the entire situation.

The incident was captured on responding officer Moe Williams’ dash cam, and lasted 14 minutes. Williams had indicated he believed that perhaps Deffert was suffering from some type of mental illness, as he seemed to be “talking to nobody” when the officer arrived on scene. Upon further investigation, Deffert was revealed to have been happily singing the song “Hakuna Matata” from the Disney movie “The Lion King” while strolling down the sidewalk.

The video shows the officer command Deffert to lay face down on the ground upon arrival on the scene. Deffert was treated as if he were a criminal that needed to prove he was not doing anything wrong, as the officer detained him while running a mental and criminal background check. Deffert was polite and respectful throughout the encounter, but strongly asserted his rights regarding open carry laws in the state of Michigan.

Remember, all of this transpired despite Deffert’s total compliance with Michigan law, in respect to open carry of a firearm. Eventually, Deffert was released, as he had violated no laws, done nothing wrong, and there was no legitimate reason to hold him. Shortly after the incident, in what seemed like a vindication for Deffert at the time, Grand Rapids Police Sgt. Steve LaBreque recommended to Moe’s commanding officer, that Moe “would benefit from some additional training in handling ‘open carry’ issues.”

Several months later Deffert filed a federal lawsuit alleging his constitutional rights were violated and that he was assaulted and falsely imprisoned. The legality of open carry in the Michigan was never in question, only if law enforcement had the authority to detain an individual simply because they were open carrying a firearm, according to court records.

In the most convoluted of logic, U.S. District Judge Janet Neff claimed that officers do have such authority. Neff wrote that the officers were “justified in following up on the 9-1-1 call and using swift action to determine whether [Deffert’s] behavior gave rise to a need to protect or preserve life … in the neighborhood.”

When a call to 9-1-1 is made in regard to a completely legal activity, the police should not even be dispatched. If in fact the police needed to “determine whether [Deffert’s] behavior gave rise to a need to protect or preserve life … in the neighborhood,” they need not impeded a citizen from going about their legitimate and legal business,” as Neff asserts, but rather could passively watch from a distance to determine if there is any reasonable suspicion of criminal activity afoot, and if so act accordingly.
Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/federal-court-rules-police-detain-individuals-open-carrying-firearms/#L0UZuA6zEdzDJqZd.99

8 thoughts on “Warning: Federal Court Rules that 2nd Amendment Right is Now a Reason for Cops to Detain You

  1. And next week, the “constitutional experts” will discover that exercising any of your constitutional rights can get you arrested.

    You see, the founding fathers wanted us all in jail for owning guns, and the second amendment was only written as a ploy to get guy owners to reveal who they are.

    Do you see the nonsensical logic behind this? If a cop can stop you for exercising a constitutional right, YOU DON’T HAVE THAT RIGHT.

    if you want your rights and freedom restored, you’re going to have to fight for them. End of story. Keep listening to the Zionist media and they’ll convince you that your rights never existed in the first place.

  2. this is why EVERYONE needs to open carry. If they want to harass everyone who does, then I guess we can at least keep them busy until they grow sick of it .

    1. They will and have been picking us off one-by-one and will continue to do so. Make it easy for them, frankly I’m not wasting my time or money on them, I’ll wait for the right time! Open carry or war!

      If you open carry you better be ready to kill or be killed!

  3. well clearly, if the judge doesn’t know the law, or chooses not to respect the law… THE JUDGE SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM POSITION.

    Same goes for all those politicians violating laws and rights of the people.

  4. “… should now be inspected by police, due to caller saying they found wearing camo disturbing.”

    Useful idiots like this stupid b#tch are going to get people killed.

    Hopefully some of them will be pigs.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *