Yet Another Medical Study on the Nasty Contamination by Respiratory Viruses on Outer Surface of Masks

NoMaskInfo

We’ve all seen people tug, pull, grab and smear the outside of their facemasks, including mask proponents Trump, Fauci, Newsom, etc.

In a previous post Doctor David Lang of Wisconsin says a face mask is “basically a giant Petri dish you have strapped to your face”

Following is an interesting 2019 medical study which points out the common contamination problems associated with face masks.

“Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self- contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use… Respiratory pathogens may be present on used masks layers and lead to infection of the wearer… While using masks, or during long periods of time of re-using them, these pathogens may cause infection through hand or skin contamination, ingestion, or mucus membrane contact.”

Following are more excerpts. The most interesting parts I highlighted in bold text. You can read the full study here.


Contamination by respiratory viruses on outer surface of medical masks used by hospital healthcare workersPage 7 We also aimed to identify the area on the mask surface with maximum respiratory virus concentration. Laboratory based pilot study showed maximum fluorescent contamination on upper sections of the masks, which is also the likely area to be touched on removal. Of the three positive tests in hospital-based pilot study, two samples were positive from outer sections of mask, while one sample was positive from middle section. In the main study we were able to check the location of con- tamination on a quarter of mask samples. Of the 38 mask samples, one or more viruses were isolated from four (10.5%) samples – two from middle section of masks and two from right section of the masks. This presents a large area of potential contamination which place HCW at risk when removing a mask. These data may assist in developing policies on for doffing of masks after encounter with infective cases. As a general rule, HCWs should not reuse masks, should restrict use to less than 6 h and avoid touching the outer surface of mask during doffing, and practice hand hygiene after removal.


Page 6 Theoretically, there may be a risk of infection in wearer if contaminated masks are used for prolonged time. Currently there are no data around risk associated with reuse and extended used of masks and other PPE. One study showed that influenza virus may survive on mask surface and maintained infectivity for at least 8 h [25]. Our study showed very low infection among HCWs who used masks for ≤6 h. High virus positivity on masks samples worn by HCWs who examined > 25 patients, may be due to more frequent clinical contact with infective cases and transfer of more pathogens from patients to mask surface.


Page 7 ConclusionTo maintain the functionality and capacity of the health care workforce during outbreaks or pandemics of emerging infections, HCWs need to be protected. This study provides new data, which will help developing policies for safe workplace environment. The study shows that the prolonged use of medical masks (> 6 h) and frequent clinical contact in healthcare setting increase the risk to health workers through contaminated PPE. Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use.


Page 1 Abstract

Background: Medical masks are commonly used in health care settings to protect healthcare workers (HCWs) from respiratory and other infections. Airborne respiratory pathogens may settle on the surface of used masks layers, resulting in contamination. The main aim of this study was to study the presence of viruses on the surface of medical masks.

Methods: Two pilot studies in laboratory and clinical settings were carried out to determine the areas of masks likely to contain maximum viral particles. A laboratory study using a mannequin and fluorescent spray showed maximum particles concentrated on upper right, middle and left sections of the medical masks. These findings were confirmed through a small clinical study. The main study was then conducted in high-risk wards of three selected hospitals in Beijing China. Participants (n = 148) were asked to wear medical masks for a shift (6–8 h) or as long as they could tolerate. Used samples of medical masks were tested for presence of respiratory viruses in upper sections of the medical masks, in line with the pilot studies.

Results: Overall virus positivity rate was 10.1% (15/148). Commonly isolated viruses from masks samples were adenovirus (n = 7), bocavirus (n = 2), respiratory syncytial virus (n = 2) and influenza virus (n = 2). Virus positivity was significantly higher in masks samples worn for > 6 h (14.1%, 14/99 versus 1.2%, 1/49, OR 7.9, 95% CI 1.01–61.99) and in samples used by participants who examined > 25 patients per day (16.9%, 12/71 versus 3.9%, 3/77, OR 5.02, 95% CI 1.35–18.60).

Most of the participants (83.8%, 124/148) reported at least one problem associated with mask use. Commonly reported problems were pressure on face (16.9%, 25/148), breathing difficulty (12.2%, 18/148), discomfort (9.5% 14/148), trouble communicating with the patient (7.4%, 11/148) and headache (6.1%, 9/148).

Conclusion: Respiratory pathogens on the outer surface of the used medical masks may result in self- contamination. The risk is higher with longer duration of mask use (> 6 h) and with higher rates of clinical contact.

Protocols on duration of mask use should specify a maximum time of continuous use, and should consider guidance in high contact settings. Viruses were isolated from the upper sections of around 10% samples, but other sections of masks may also be contaminated. HCWs should be aware of these risks in order to protect themselves and people around them.

Keywords: Mask, Health care workers, Viruses, Infection control


Virus positivity was significantly higher in masks samples worn for > 6 hours. Most of the participants (83.8%, 124/148) reported at least one problem associated with mask use. Commonly reported problems were pressure on face (16.9%, 25/148), breathing difficulty (12.2%, 18/148), discomfort (9.5% 14/148), trouble communicating with the patient (7.4%, 11/148) and headache (6.1%, 9/148).


Page 2 Reuse and extended use of masks are also common in many parts of the world, particularly during outbreaks and pandemics [8, 9]. Respiratory pathogens may be present on used masks layers and lead to infection of the wearer [10]. In hospital settings, these patho- gens may be generated from breathing, coughing or sneezing patients or during aerosol generating medical procedures [11]. Studies have shown that influenza virus can remain airborne for 3 h after a patient has passed through an emergency department [12]. While using masks, or during long periods of time of re-using them, these pathogens may cause infection through hand or skin contamination, ingestion, or mucus membrane contact [10]


Previous studies show that influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) may survive on outer surface of PPE [11–14]. A study showed that influenza viruses may survive on hard surfaces for 24–48 h, on cloth up to 8–12 h and on hands for up to 5 min


Page 2 If health departments do not provide clear guidance on the use of masks in these situations, HCWs may con- tinue using contaminated masks and may get infection [15]. The risk of self-contamination of HCWs is influenced by the mask itself, its shape and properties, and the virus concentration on its surface. To our knowledge, only one study examined the presence of contamination on mask and various bacteria were isolated from outer surface of medical masks [16].

The main aim of this study was to study the level of contamination on the surface of medical masks.


Page 2 The aim of this pilot study was to identify areas of maximum virus concentration on the surface of masks…In all three experiments, most particles were concentrated on upper right, middle and left sections of the masks (Figs. 1 and 2).


Currently there is very limited data on testing of masks surface for presence of pathogens. In previous studies influenza virus was detected on over 50% of the fomites tested in community settings during influenza season [17].

https://nofacemask.blogspot.com/2020/07/yet-another-medical-study-on-nasty.html

16 thoughts on “Yet Another Medical Study on the Nasty Contamination by Respiratory Viruses on Outer Surface of Masks

  1. I could just hear them, behind closed doors: “Hey, let’s just get them to contaminate themselves. Would make our work so much easier.”

    I know there are some who can still buy food without putting on the symbol of slavery, but I cannot. Where I live there is no venue that would allow me in in my natural un-masked self. I wonder if any other Trenchers are dealing with this. So I put on the freakin’ thing, get my groceries and the second I’m out the door I tear it off in defiant mode. But I am left feeling ashamed, ashamed that in order to feed my family I had to stoop down to Communism. Is starving a better option? Authentic concerns.

    🙁

    .

      1. Thanks, Martist. That’s a possibility. But I even hate succumbing to that limitation, that I can’t shop freely. And also, I can’t trust them to pick out my lettuce, tomatoes, etc. I’m fussy about freshness and stage of ripening. Well, I’ll keep lookin’ for ways to live free. It’s infuriating that The Bill of Rights is right in front of us (accidental pun) with the simplest way out, the solution, and it is blocked. A good thing Trenchers are fully invested in unblocking it.

        .

        1. Oh I hear ya sister. This is a Philly suburb and a hotbed of control for these commie sob’s. Been planning an exit from the area for a few years but now I am down to a few months and my final move. After that or before that, come whatever. ..

          1. Good luck, Martist. I know The Bill of Rights is ever with you. You made me think of this:

            “I am drawn to the wild not because it is wild but because it is sensible, logical, ordered, stable, resilient. Wild nature is everything we’re struggling to regain.”
            — Carl Safina

            .

        2. Only one in my family I know of that these Marxists have tried to force a mask on, handed him a mask when coming through the door saying he had to wear it. He put it on his finger like a rubber band and shot it in the dude’s face, then said, “Don’t you know better than to arm your enemy?” He said the dude was flabbergasted and he just walked into the store, got what he wanted, paid for it, and left, unmolested as he plainly is the display of a man that just ain’t going to take getting f-ked with.
          If everybody took this attitude, enforcement of these unlawful crimes, I can’t even say under color of law as that does not even exist, anyway they couldn’t f-k with us if we all said no at the same time.

          1. Okay, Henry, I’ll give it a go. I’m remembering my altercation at Walmart when I refused to show my receipt and the guy kept pulling my cart back, forcing me into a tug-o-war where I eventually overcame him and was able to pull free and walk away. Afterwards I was not without a feeling of shakiness. With that, and reading the comments here I see that I have to toughen up more. Work in progress, but determined to walk free.

            .

          2. Sounds like you need a little ol’ 5 million watt tazer to defend your right to freely move about in public, unimpeded, unless by common law warrant or a common law jury court order.
            It is escalating and that is a good thing. We want this over with as life was meant to be enjoyed. To secure that liberty and freedom, every once in a while we have to endure a little pain and suffering in order to destroy those who would subjugate us. The longer we put it off, the bigger the chore, but I guarantee you we are up to it.

    1. They are requiring them
      And tons of shit has just closed back down
      I’m not complying , because I’ve been not complying for most of my life , and I sure as hell ain’t starting now
      I have only been turned away at Menards and told I must wear a mask

      So guess where my wallet don’t go
      In

      1. Thanks, EOTS. I certainly non-comply when I can, but because of the food issue, I’m only comin’ in at about 97%. Shame!!

        .

  2. Most people and myself included in my area just walk into the places without wearing masks. No one says anything because even the employees feel it’s a stupid rule and don’t want to alienate their customers. So just go in don’t wear one. Stand up and ignore this ridiculous rule.

    Meanwhile black lives matter, antifa and all the other groups are going around destroying things without wearing masks and no one is saying or doing anything. I guess us regular folk are the only ones acting like submissive slaves wearing masks without putting up a fight.

    1. Wish I could do that. They won’t let me in. Every door/entrance has a guard-person and often pushin’ their hand-sanitizer.

      .

      1. Tell them you don’t have a mask, so what am I supposed to do? Not be able to shop anywhere or buy anything anymore? They’ll cave in.

        Either that or just wear it under your mouth. Technically you’re still wearing a mask and they will be too afraid to say anything knowing you basically have a mask on you.

      2. I was told it’s a HIPPA violation to ask why you are not wearing a mask
        So run that up their flag pole when they ask

        It’s really dodging the freedom we should have to just say F-off

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*