It’s easy for the prepper survivalist to get lost in the endless confusion, attempting to discern between wants and needs. Is it a small knife or big blade? Do you carry a handgun or a rifle? However, it is even more important to determine the difference between what is a trend…and what will actually work in the field. In most cases, the right answer is: it depends on the situation.
The .22 Long Rifle rim-fire cartridge has had an excellent run, and built a legendary reputation, since its inception in 1887. The cartridge itself has been enveloped in tales of unfathomable deeds in the backwoods, taking everything from grizzlies (usually shot in the eye) and field mice (usually shot from the hip). Though, these are stories often repeated by old frontiersmen and armchair online forum dwellers alike. Anecdotal ‘evidence’ might suggest that the .22LR is the ‘do-all’ round, but is this actually true? Is it the perfect survivalist cartridge, providing enough kill power on small game while limiting damage to the meat, yet delivering just enough punishment in a ‘tactical situation’?
It is important to explore what the round can do, and more importantly, what it cannot do. All too often, we envision our own survival situations, handling our trusty Ruger 10/22, dispatching small game by the bundles and carrying home a sack of deceased critters as the sun begins to set, right on time for dinner. We even imagine ourselves bagging a whitetail, because we got a ‘lucky shot between the eyes’. If this is truth, then the .22LR should be the only rifle for the survivalist, but my gut tells me, this is probably not a reasonable expectation of the old cartridge – and you might want to pack other ways of procuring meat sources.
The Two-Fold Achilles Heel of the .22 Long Rifle
I’ve often heard it said, “If you poke enough holes in something, it’ll go down.” Usually, this is said by avid .22LR advocates, defending their ancient heritage or new purchase. While this statement does carry some obvious truth, many experienced outdoorsmen, and especially those who study ballistics might disagree on grounds of practicality.
One of the most crucial aspects of a round’s utility has to do with the hydrostatic shock factor. ‘Hydrostatic shock’ is defined as…
The observation that a penetrating projectile can produce remote wounding and incapacitating effects in living targets, in addition to local effects in tissue caused by direct impact, through a hydraulic effect in liquid-filled tissues.
Referencing an article written by Dave Henderson, it takes a velocity of at least 2,000fps in order to deliver the death-dealing power necessary for an incapacitating strike on the shooter’s target. Essentially, you want the round to hit the target (four-legged critter or two-legged crazy) and make them cease whatever activity they were previously doing, whether grazing, climbing, or pointing a weapon in your direction.
The hottest of hunting .22LR loads are cruising along at 1,280fps at the muzzle. If the shooter wants to reach out to 100 yards, that velocity drops to 1,015fps, about half of what’s needed to achieve the same hydrostatic shock factor that most center-fire hunting rounds can deliver. Simply put, there’s just not enough ‘punch’ to bag that whitetail with a .22LR, likely causing either an agonizing drawn out death by hours of bleeding, or months of injury and subsequent starvation to the noble beast (hence, the legality issue in almost every state).
Also, a slower round is going to have accuracy issues. Of course, we’ve heard of Bob Munden-types lobbing a .22LR, 400 yards into a bowling pin – but let’s face it, 99% of us aren’t that good from a bench, much less in the field. Even with those 1,280fps zingers, you’ve still got a drop of 3.5” at 100 yards, and that’s without having to compensate for wind. With only 37 grains, moving at that velocity, a slight breeze would ruin the shot.
Either way, the survivalist does not harvest the deer, coyote, or raccoon, wastes a round, and in certain scenarios, risked identifying his or her position from the report of the shot.
Also, one more fatal flaw commonly associated with the .22LR has to do with it’s questionable reliability. Indeed, no backwoodsman would ever consider a Savage bolt-action or a Ruger 10/22 as an unreliable rifle. These rifles have offered astounding performance for decades; however, reliability is also heavily dependent on the quality of the rounds being fed. Unfortunately, rim-fire cartridges are disproportionately handicapped in this respect, compared to their center-fire counterparts. Primers, insufficient pressure, and quality control are usually the culprits.
If you’re shooting a rim-fire cartridge and the bad guy in your sights is shooting a center-fire cartridge, pray you didn’t get a rough batch from the factory.
Why You Still Need a .22LR
Nevertheless, while the .22LR might have its drawbacks, it’s important for us to remind ourselves that we are mistaken if we attempt to identify a ‘do-all’ round. There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, especially in terms of firearms. All cartridges have their strengths and weaknesses, and the .22LR is no exception.
And, the .22LR does have strengths…lots and lots of strengths.
Talk to any .22LR owner and they will laugh at you after telling them how much you spent on ammunition for your centerfire. This is perhaps one of the most obvious strengths of the old cartridge. Being able to spend less than $20 on a 500-round ‘brick’ of ammo is what has .22LR lovers shooting, while everyone else on the firing line has shot their budget and gone home.
Of course, from the survivalist’s perspective, being able to carry 1,000 rounds of any kind of ammo is a lovely proposition. A fifth of that in .308 is still tediously heavy but in .22LR, carrying that amount of ammunition is a breeze. The .22LR is a tiny round without much brass, lead, or powder.
Do you remember how I said that the .22LR is inferior to most hunting cartridges because of it’s low velocity? The interesting part is the fact that the .22LR is superior to other hunting cartridges…because of its low velocity. Without the presence of hydrostatic shock, meat does not get obliterated upon penetration. Thus, you can take rabbit all day long, preserving the meet with a .22LR, whereas a .223 would leave nothing but a mangled attempt at acquiring a meal.
Simply put, the .22LR is the best selling ammunition on the globe for good reason. Brad Zozak, from TruthAboutGuns, calls the Ruger 10/22, “the single most popular firearm of all time.” In a SHTF scenario, you might not be able to replace the stock on your Springfield M1A – but check any abandoned farmhouse, and you’ll most likely find replacement parts for your 10/22 (and probably .22LR rounds to go with it).
The Purpose of the .22LR
Overall, the .22LR should not be expected to perform the functions of other, better-suited rifles. At the same time, one should also not expect a .30-06 to effectively take and preserve the meat off small game – arguably the type of game you’d want to harvest in the first place.
However, the survivalist that hopes to sling a Ruger 10/22, trek through the woods, and be sustained on that alone is unfortunately mistaken. It takes the ability to hunt big game to survive (both for the nutritional value and also for the other resources that can be procured from the beast), meaning that a centerfire-hunting rifle is absolutely crucial over the long haul.
If the survivalist hopes to remain true to the craft (and not kick the bucket in the backwoods), it takes more than just the possession of a .22LR rifle. It takes the ability to trap and forage for wild edibles in order to live in somewhat of a comfortable state of self-reliance. One needs to intelligently pack for survival scenarios. From carrying knives to packing a fire starter, everything needs to be picked thoughtfully. The legendary frontiersmen of the 19th and 20th centuries relied more on their survival kits than they did on their rifles, and for good reason.
The .22LR is a fantastic survival cartridge, but it shouldn’t be your only option for filling your game bag and your gut. Stay safe, keep your guns ready, knives sharp, and never forget to memorize thebasics of preparedness.
About the Author – Usman is a writer, outdoor enthusiast, technology lover, and knife collector.
Good luck buying any ammo for a 22..let alone find 22LR
many people probably own a nice 22 Cal. baseball bat, thanks to the lack of 22 ammo inventory
besides I like a Big Hole, yes I know shot placement is key..we don’t always have the luxury of sitting still, breathing calmly and squeezing off a round when your bum rushed by a gang ,or a car jacker, so a nice .45 with at least 6 rounds is my game changer.
when you plug a dam near half inch hole in your assailant it tends to get noticed right away..let alone when they see the business end of a .45 theres no question they have a dam good chance of pushing up daisies
This is why the Henry AR-7 is a good choice also. It will fit in your BOB and it is light. It will not perform in any way like a 10/22 but it isn’t designed to that’s why they call it a survival rifle.
http://henryrepeating.com/rifle-survival-ar7.cfm
REDHORSE,
I have been wanting one of those for a few years. Outstanding weapon. I have just been forced to put it lower on my Wish List. I do plan to get one. That is a good choice for a bug out bag. They are also affordable.
As Bart said, it IS very hard to find .22lr ammo, and what’s there is expensive
I stocked up on ammo for my .22 not too long before the ammo crunch hit, so I’m ok for a good while.
What the .22 lr lacks in hitting power, it sort of makes up for it by being so useful and practical to have on hand! It’s indispensable on small game, and can be used to successfully harvest larger game if one has no other choice.
In addition, when trapping, the .22 is needed for efficient and damage-free killing of the fur bearing animal. I trap a lot in my remote area, and that is what I use my .22 primarily for.
Also when one has an adequate amount of .22 ammo on hand, the .22 is excellent to practice with, in order to keep shooting sharp!
Just use an atlatl.
We also stocked up on .22LR before the crunch, and a couple of weeks ago went to Bass Pro and bought two boxes of 525 each. Everytime I go to the store I pick up a box, but the score at Bass Pro was a good one.
Geeze Missy, the only 22 shell ya can find around here are the 22 magnums and the 22 will have to be made to fire those. Yep, there are a lot of those 22 mags but no other sizes at all
we got lucky, when we went into bass pro we could not find it the .22LR, and we asked the guy, he said let me check! and they had boxes of 525 and I think 325, so we picked up 1,050 rounds for $50.00!!!! 🙂
Everytime I go to the store that sells ammo I check for .22LR, my daughter Loves to shoot both of her 22’s.
The guy at bass pro did tell us that one of the sales associates got stabbed by a man over .22 ammunition.
Good idea Missy. I will have to ask if they got any in the back room. Thanks for the tip. I like 22`s, 22 LR hollow points are my favorite for hunting with when it comes to 22`s. The LR`s are just as good though i think. 🙂
Don’t be hatin’, all, but it’s gotten much easier to find .22LR here in the last 3 – 4 months. Got a nice stash of CCI Stinger 32 gr. HPs. 1640 fps. Nice rounds. 🙂
Lucky guy #1 😉
Be even luckier if I didn’t have to live in this POS state, digger. 🙁
As far as killing power, a .22 works just fine. I kill at least 20 pigs a year, weighing 250 to 600 pounds. One shot between the eyes, then bleed them out. Works the same on Cattle, Sheep, People. As far as not available, I don’t care. I bought 2 cases years ago, enough to last awhile. One note though, they have to be looking at you to get a good shot.