When a young man who generally considers himself as an anarchist (defined as simply “no ruler”) sees the value in using the Bill of Rights one must wonder why others calling themselves patriots and wrapping themselves in the flag shirk from it?
GREAT STUFF HENRY. SPENDING A LONG EVENING REVISITING.
IF WE ARE EVER DISARMED WITHOUT A FIGHT…. WELL, THERE WILL BE NO FIGHT. WE SHOULD NOT FACE THE FATE OF THE PALESTINIAN……………… KOYOTE MARK
YA KNOW, MY DAD WAS IN BUSINESS FOR YEARS. I WAS HIS “ACE IN THE HOLE”. I AM VERY GOOD AT SEVERAL TRADES. I MADE MY DAD A FORTUNE. BECAUSE OF THE LOSS OF THE COMMON LAW COURT, NONE WAS RECOVERED.
Henry and the Trenchers,
Thank you! THIS is the pre-requisite to seeing through any other law that makes me a subject slave! If I don’t know this, I don’t know s**t!
Say “no” to government because …
politicians want power and money
politicians ignore their oath of office
75+% of “laws” are unconstitutional/illegal
politicians need to be held accountable
politicians exaggerate, lie and are hypocritical
most politicians are selfish and corrupt
they are sometimes wrong. Question them.
freedom requires it. Our founders did it.
100% of statutory law are not illegal, they are unlawful under the people’s Bill of Rights.
And this is not our government, this is a corporation by the Act of 1871 (see Title 18, definition 15).
The Bill of Rights is separate law and it is the only law of this land.
The Charter for the United States Corporation is in violation of the 9th and 10th Articles of the people’s ratified law of the December 15, 1791.
The Constitution is illegitimate as it was not ratified by the people and never given our consent.
Just enforce the Bill of Rights and all unlawful activity will come to a halt. This is what our true founders from the uprising of April 19, 1775 intended.
We the people have the superior jurisdiction and we the people have the absolute jurisdictional authority to enforce the lawful Bill of Rights and remove the illegal United States Corporation, the 14th Amendment, and enforce our autonomy. We rule ourselves, apart from any pretended government entity or the corporate entity it was unlawfully changed into.
Question them hell, destroy them, as they are blatantly guilty of treason and sedition under the 9th and 10th Articles of the Bill of Rights, which is the absolute law of this land. Anything in contradiction holds no jurisdictional authority over any individual free sovereign national.
The international corporate mafia have declared war on our people and our law. The talking part’s over.
True. Nearly every person regardless of party would agree that we have not approved of these foreign engagements however deep, dark and twisted they may be, and so is it not treason for them to force us to be involved in another country or to be at war with another country that we have no idea why we are at war with them or having these nefarious entanglements with them? We did not agree to send weapons and aid to any country and if we knew all of these things and any member of congress were to ask the American people we would not approve. Any money that is sent to any one of these countries is being used against the will of the American people, they are committing acts of treason, Pelosi, Biden, Romney, Clintons, Bushes, they are all criminals in a long list of criminals. Do the American people approve of killing innocent people all around the world, of conducting unlawful experiments in indigenous populations, giving weapons to both sides to keep these wars going and then sending billions in aid to these countries? I do not think most people would agree to this if these things were ever put on a ballot, they do not represent our interests. They should be fired.
This illegitimate occupation could never hold a legitimate election to any effect.
It is not our government. It is an unlawful corporation and a violation of the supreme superior absolute law of December 15, 1791.
That takes care of that.
Your NC name is not going to cut it. We have an NC on here who has been on here for years and I’m not going to sort through his writings and your writings. In short, there will be no two NCs. You can alter it as in N-C, N.C., whatever you want to do.
You are welcome here but I’m not going to sort two people using the same handle.
YOU ARE DERRANGED!! YOU SUCKING UP ALL THE NEWS!??!? WE HOLD OUR SHT TOGETHER HERE >>> GO AWAY!!!! I MEAN WE STICK TOGETHER HERE FCK YOU TO ANYONE THAT CANT SEE IT!!! THEY PROBABLY NEVER SEEN A CHEMTRAIL EITHER>>>>>> FCK EM!!!!! GET OUT OF MY FCKG WAY!!!!!!
I am in agreement that most laws are unconstitutional and in fact if a federal is established to diminish the rights of the states or the people it is invalid. No law must be made to deny any person of any rights, this is very clear. So that being said, everything from the moment we are born is not constitutional, birth certificates, social security cards, driver’s licenses, insurance, childhood vaccines is all to force a person to do something without giving them a choice to make whether they want to have these things or not. We must be able to choose if we want to do these things or not and they cannot force us to participate to deprive of something unless we are electing to get something in exchange. Congress in DC is in the business of usurping the rights of the people of the states to engage in the political process. They are not serving the interests of the people at all.
ARE WE TALKING CONSTITUTION!?!?! WHO GIVES A FCK!! THEY CAN WIPE THEIR ASS WITH THAT PIECE OF PARCHMENT!! ITS THE BILL OF RIGHTS BABY!!! THE CELEBRATION IS DEC 15TH PLEASE JOIN US!!!! SHOTGUNS IN THE NIGHT!!!! LOL
Caleb, this is THE page to be on! I’m on it all day long today! The way it is working for me is that day by day, each article becomes easier to commit to memory so that I can grab on to the ones I need when I see the violations. So far, I know Articles I, II, III, VIII, IX and X well. I still need to work on IV, V, VI and VII. I can hardly wait until all the details of all the articles are alive in my mind! It’s like blocking in the elements of a masterpiece. It comes together as I lay out the big picture on the canvas first, then fill in the details until it all comes flawlessly and understandably into perfect focus. Soon, it will be mine! Now, I’m seeing an even bigger picture of the possibilities because of all the people who have already mastered the law, with more to come! BOOM!
Today, I came across a ted talk by a guy named Mark Charles who lectured on how “We the People” are the 3 most misunderstood words in US history. It was about how the US constitution is a white supremacist document. We know who the real supremacists are, and they are not the freedom abiding American People. I had to defend the Bill of Rights today. This was my comment.
The reason why racism was ever allowed to exist as it does, on the lands that are supposed to belong to the people is because everything that came after the 9th and 10th Articles of the BILL OF RIGHTS, which NEVER should have been attached to that phony constitution, is an usurpation of the law, the Common Law, which outlines the maxims and procedures that guarantee ALL of the people on the land who won their liberty and who wrote the Bill of Rights, regardless of race or color, their natural born rights through DUE PROCESS of the LAW. Everything written in that butt wipe rag they call the constitution that violates the natural rights of the people of the Land, (NOT the Corporation, which is run under the law of the sea) is TREASON against the Bill of Rights which belongs to the People, equally. All people who live on the land of that law, who are against SLAVERY, which is what that constitution was written to enforce, under the guise of freedom and liberty, in VIOLATION of the Bill of Rights, are covered in the Common Law outlined in the Bill of Rights, but they must enforce the law that belongs to them! Unlike the constitution, the Bill of Rights was ratified by the representatives of the people on December 15, 1791. That constitution is a slave document. The Bill of Rights is a freedom and liberty document, of, by and for the People.
Today, I came across a video on youtube commemorating “Bill of Rights Day” in which they discuss the Anti-Federalists and the Bill of Rights. It was encouraging to know that there are people out there who are talking about this! https://youtu.be/EycxYd5-Ylo
Today on my social media, I came across this lengthy, eye opening article which sheds light on the history of the fraud committed against the American people by the US Corporation. I understand, based on what I learned here, of the Bill of Rights, how it applies to what is written in the 9th and 10th Articles, and to what I learned from Henry through the daily broadcasts. If this is something that is acceptable for the Trenches to post here, I hope I got it right. I have been doing as much as I can to teach the BOR and reach as many people as possible. I want to be sure that the following article should be promoted. If not, I apologize if I got it wrong. Thanks in advance, Diana O’.
Observation: Common Law and the Bill of Rights was never mentioned anywhere in this letter. I think this could be a red flag. Could this be a slick way of hijacking the upheaval for rights the people are trying to assert today, as a means by which to keep the Bill of Rights hidden? Hmmm… I wonder.
International Public Notice:
About Sovereignty
Perhaps no issue garners more misunderstanding than “sovereignty”.
We exist as a sovereign people, therefore, we also have sovereign nation-states.
The sovereignty of the people devolves upon them from “Nature and Nature’s God”.
We are born with free will and freedom of movement.
We can think what we like and say what we dare to. We are not bound by any Social Contracts. We are not part of any greater construct, apart from the Earth itself.
In the world of men, we established our sovereign nation-states, known as the Union States, as a consequence of our own natural sovereignty.
In international jurisdiction, we exercise sovereignty via grant of sovereignty from those already sovereign by birth; we sail under the auspices of a clan and nation which has never been conquered.
In global jurisdiction, our business affairs are secured by our standing on the land and at sea, so that in all things, by free will and by choice and by rule enforced by force of arms, by custom, and by tradition, the American people are free, independent, and sovereign people.
And so are our several nation-states: Pennsylvania, New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, et alia. (Note — in the old Latin-based system of nomenclature, these states were styled as pennsylvania, new york, new hampshire, vermont, etc.)
All the sovereignty of this country is vested in its people and in its several, now fifty, nation-states.
Our sovereignty is not vested in any collective instrumentality, such as The United States or The United States of America. Such unincorporated instrumentalities are limited to representing the sovereignty of the nation-states they serve. They are not sovereign in-and-of themselves.
Thus, the character of sovereignty is indigenous by nature, attached closely to the living men and women who self-govern their own lives, and who then direct the course of their common government.
Their Sovereignty is represented in international realms by their unincorporated Federation of States known as States of the Union (This Federation is viewed as a Confederation from the standpoint of the Union States, but as a Federation by the rest of the world).
The States of the Union belong to the Union States.
The realms of land and soil exist in perpetual union as a fact of nature, so that the sovereign Union States abide in eternal joinder with their States of the Union, with the Union States directly presenting the government of the nation-states — our national jurisdiction, and the States of the Union representing the Union States in international jurisdiction.
At no point does the sovereignty of the people nor the sovereignty of their nation-states devolve to any incorporated entity whatsoever.
The very condition of being incorporated is by definition dependent, not independent, and not sovereign.
It doesn’t matter where an incorporated entity is created (registered) nor does it matter who or what incorporated it.
The bar against an incorporated entity possessing sovereignty remains.
Recently, people have presented claims of sovereignty on behalf of the old Federal Republic, the American Federal Subcontractor operated under The Constitution for the united States of America, which was a service contract issued in 1787— but this entity never possessed sovereignty in-and-of itself, and never directly represented any sovereign power.
The Federal Republic operated entirely on contract and exercised powers delegated to it by The United States of America and the Second Confederation known as the States of America.
We know this to be true, because the delegated powers exist only in international and global jurisdictions.
The way to view this is that the sovereign Union States created two Confederations. The first Confederation created the States of the Union. The second Confederation created the States of America.
This is clearly demonstrated in the nomenclature used throughout.
The Constitution that created the Federal Republic, The Constitution for the united States of America, was issued to the States of America Confederation, which operated and provided oversight for the Federal Republic.
In terms of sovereignty, the First Confederation directly represented the Union States in international jurisdiction. The Second Confederation represented the Union States in global jurisdiction.
In a pinch, we know that the States of the Union were enabled to operate on behalf of the Union States in both international and global arenas, because they did so for five years, 1776-1781, but once the Second Confederation was formed, it took over the global commercial functions, and delegated some of those functions to the Federal Republic.
Thus, even though the States of the Union are able to perform all the international and global functions, the work was distributed, with the States of the Union doing all the work in international jurisdiction, and the States of America doing all the work in the global jurisdiction — and the Federal Republic exercising some powers delegated to them by the States of America.
So the original plan was that the sovereign Union States created the States of America to represent their interests and powers in global commercial affairs, and the States of America got the service contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America, and delegated some of those powers to the Federal Republic.
Please note that all sovereign power remained vested in the Union States.
Both the States of the Union and the States of America merely “represented” the Union States —- with the States of the Union operating in international jurisdictions, the States of America operating in global (commercial) jurisdiction
The Federal Republic exercised some powers delegated to it by the States of America Confederation.
Not only did it have no sovereignty of its own, it borrowed all its delegated powers from the States of America Confederation, which was itself only an instrumentality “representing” the Union States, and having no sovereignty of its own.
Only the people and their nation-states have sovereignty; all the rest of these instrumentalities only “represent” that sovereignty to different degrees and in different jurisdictions.
When the States of America lost a quorum to operate in the spring of 1861, this complex web of duties, powers, and associations was partially destroyed.
The States of the Union remained, relatively undisturbed. The States of America Confederation was inoperable, and because the States of America Confederation was inoperable, so was the Federal Republic, because its contract was held by the States of America.
The only remaining intact instrumentality of the Union States operating in international and global jurisdictions, is (from their standpoint) the First Confederation formed by their States of the Union.
Neither the Union States operating as The United States nor the States of the Union operating as The United States of America required any reconstruction. They were not incapacitated by any circumstance related to the so-called American Civil War.
What should have happened (and what has eventually happened) is that the States of the Union should have stepped forward into the gap left by the States of America. Instead, the loyal officers and staff serving the States of the Union were accidentally-on-purpose misidentified as “rebels” and persecuted and hunted as such by General Grant’s U.S. Army.
The two remaining Federal Subcontractors, both foreign, wanted to take over the powers and functions and assets of the Federal Republic, so they used the confusion resulting from the so-called Civil War and declarations of “emergency” to usurp them.
Ten years later, these disloyal foreign Federal Subcontractors self-interestedly and officially latched upon the Federal Republic that had been doing business under the name “the United States” and seized its identity, assets and powers for themselves on February 2nd 1871 — while still hunting down, burning out, murdering, and suppressing the officers of the actual remaining American Government.
Thus, a coup occurred at the hands of our own employees, foreign subcontractors, who owed us “good faith service”.
The Union States and the States of the Union still remain.
Aware of a plan to place a “claim on abandonment” against ourselves and our assets in 1998, we raised our hands and notified international and global authorities that we still exist, and are still here.
This caused no end of consternation, but nobody could prove otherwise; against all odds, The United States of America — our unincorporated Federation of the States of the Union — was still alive, still knowledgeable, still staffed, still functioning after nearly a century and a half of suppression.
The loyal officers of the States of the Union passed on the torch to their sons and daughters and despite more than a century of persecution at the hands of the British Government and its Bar Attorneys, we are still here, still representing the lawful and sovereign government of the Union States.
We discovered the unlawful conversion these criminals imposed upon our country and our people by various means of deceit, including the whole scheme to politically convert American State Nationals into Dual Federal Citizens without their knowledge or consent.
Five years ago, we summoned the States of the Union into Session, and began the process of unraveling the false registrations and false claims in commerce that the criminals used as a basis to attack, subject, and mischaracterize individual Americans.
As the Americans “returned” one by one to the land of this country, they repopulated the States of the Union and they also at the same time, repopulated the Union States.
With fifty out of fifty States formally enrolled as States of the Union, and all fifty State Assemblies in Session, there is no possible rationale for British or Holy Roman Empire claims to the effect that our land and soil are vacated. Nor is there any excuse for claiming that our government is “absent” or “in interregnum”.
And most particularly, there is no reason to think that the remaining foreign corporation(s) acting as Successors to The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States, have any powers beyond those strictly delegated to them in 1789 and 1790, respectively.
They certainly have and hold none of this country’s sovereignty.
To be blunt, their claim to own the assets of the original Federal Republic doing business as “the United States” as of February 2nd 1871, was an act of deliberate and self-interested treason and fraud. The Federal Republic belonged to the States of America and the States of America belonged to the Union States — not a British Territorial Federal Subcontractor. And they knew it.
The Union States still had the States of the Union operating in international and, if necessary, global jurisdictions, at the time these Pikers made their claims and began their rampage of racketeering and war-for-profit — literally — in our names.
We are still here, still bringing forward our customary and lawful government, which is superior in every respect to any foreign for-profit corporation acting as a Federal Subcontractor. Our American Government has precedent, superior claim, and both lawful and legal standing.
If any entity on Earth has the right to claim and to operate our Federal Republic, it is our Federation of States and the States of the Union, stepping into the gap left by the States of America.
We know that the States of the Union are competent to function in both international and global contexts, because they have already done so from 1776 to 1781. The absence of the States of America Confederation is thus no obstruction to our government’s ability to function, and never was.
Likewise, the False Claims brought by the U.S. Congress on February 2nd 1871 are null and void for fraud and breach of trust; these same Miscreants owing us “good faith service” were fully aware of the fact that both the States of America and the Federal Republic doing business as “the United States” belonged to the Union States and were subject to the administration of the States of the Union.
This fairytale to the effect that our government was ever “absent” or “in interregnum” is no doubt wishful thinking on the part of those British Territorial Perpetrators responsible for this Mess, who still hope to feast themselves and their foreign Creditors on our Substance, but it self-evidently is not true.
A government of, for, and by the people of a country does not so easily disappear with the death or suppression of one leader or one bureaucracy. It endures. It adapts. And it conquers in the end.
Just as the Truth itself remains, obdurate in the face of time and circumstance, our Government has remained.
It is in the best interests of this country and the entire world, that our American Government takes command, and that the remaining incorporated service providers which have been serving as Successors to Contract under The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States, cease and desist all claim of any emergency powers, and abide fully by the limitations of the contracts that give them form.
From our perspective, we serve the Union States in international and global jurisdictions and the Union States are the lawful owners and operators of the States of America which owned and operated the Federal Republic doing business as the United States.
While we were suppressed, physically, and prevented from bringing forward the claims of the Union States in 1871, the British Territorial Subcontractors operating as the U.S. Congress committed fraud and breach of trust against their Employers. There is no statute of limitation on fraud or breach of trust.
What was wrong in 1871 is still wrong today, and what is false is always false.
We have served both Notice and Due Process of these issues, internationally and globally, from 2007 to 2014, a period of seven (7) years. We have continued to bring forward our claims in every applicable venue, in the High Courts, and in the Public ever since.
Offers by the incorporated entities presently serving under The Constitution of the United States of America to occupy our Federal Republic have been returned to them; they and their British Territorial Predecessors have been illegally, unlawfully, and immorally occupying our Federal Republic since 1871 and the results are self-evident.
It is our intention to operate the Federal Republic and its delegated powers until such time that the Union States convene in Congress Assembled, and reconstruct the States of America.
The States of the Union have always been the back stop and replacement for the States of America and they were only prevented from fulfilling this role by the interference and usurpation of foreign Federal Subcontractors operating in breach of trust and under color of law.
The constructive fraud they have employed against us and against our States of the Union and ultimately against the Union States’ interest as well, can only be described as criminal and the results — six generations of constant commercial warfare benefiting foreign interests — speak for themselves.
It’s more than past time for these crimes to be addressed and for the Perpetrators to be recognized. It’s also past time for the foreign corporations acting as Federal Subcontractors to come to heel and obey their actual employers — the people of this country. We are not, as they would prefer it, their dependents. We are their employers.
And we always have been.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger — Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
March 13th 2025
Dianna, I know your heart is in the right place and I respect that. But friends owe friends the truth. So, that said…
I would not, could not, will not, and absolutely refuse to read this very verbose and exceedingly long article. But, and since you asked… I did skim over it a bit and there were so many terms that were new to me that much of it came across as word-salad. Perhaps that’s just my own limitation of understanding but I did not connect with what little I did attempt to dive in to. You introduced it with this:
“Observation: Common Law and the Bill of Rights was never mentioned anywhere in this letter. I think this could be a red flag.”
Well that’s a pretty damn big red flag. I even think I hear trumpets and cannons. (grin)
Then I came across this:
“The sovereignty of the people devolves upon them from ‘Nature and Nature’s God.’
Definition of the word DEVOLVE: “transfer or delegate (power) to a lower level.”
I don’t see the personal sovereignty of humans as lower than anything, not even nature. We are nature.
Then this:
“If any entity on Earth has the right to claim and to operate our Federal Republic, it is our Federation of States and the States of the Union…”
Well, what about THE INDIVIDUAL?!! Each a king in his own right. I kept waiting for that word to show up; INDIVIDUAL, but my skimming didn’t bring it to me. The collective is not more powerful than THE INDIVIDUAL. There’s an old saying in France: “‘Fifty-million Frenchmen can’t be wrong.” To that I say, Oh yes they can!!
Brings one other famous saying to mind: “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” I changed that one, too: “When in Rome, be yourself.” We just gotta keep lookin’ out for the individual or we’ll get smothered by the gang.
I googled the writer’s name and came across this about her:
“But American common law, ‘the law of the land,’ she says, is simply based on the biblical ten commandments. ‘It was adopted because basically the ten commandments were acceptable both to the Jews and to the gentiles and that’s why they basically arrived at that conclusion, that everybody agreed these were ten things nobody should do.’”
Ha, not all The Ten Commandments tell you what you shouldn’t do; some tell you what you SHOULD do. But that ain’t the point. The point is that The Common Law is the spouse, so to speak, of The Bill of Rights. It sees that The Bill of Rights is honored and things are in order for it to go on being The Supreme Law of the Land. And there are things The Bill of Rights does not object to that the commandments do, things like having strange gods, craven images, being able to swear/cuss in whatever way, choosing not to “keep the sabbath,” etc. The commandments state “Thou shalt not kill,” but as you know, sometimes we have to. Sometimes self-defense, defense of innocents, or infringement on our right to live free, requires us to kill evil. Well, simply put, The Bill of Rights is just about living free while not infringing on another’s freedom.
So to that writer, Anna Maria Riezinger, I might suggest, Just cut to the chase, Anna. The 10 Articles of The Bill of Rights are our assurance that nobody, I mean NOBODY, and no institution or ‘governing body,’ be it the states or the local bar-crowd, is sovereign over anyone else. Anything denying that is a lie, and deficient in protecting our rights.
Thanks, galen. I know you have a sharp critical eye and mind, and this is why I came here to see if I could better sort this out with some help. One of the statememts that jumped out at me was this:
” We are not bound by any Social Contracts. We are not part of any greater construct, apart from the Earth itself.
In the world of men, we established our sovereign nation-states, known as the Union States, as a consequence of our own natural sovereignty.” It all sounds good, except for the social contract part. Is not the social contract of the American national, that document the men and women fought, bled and died for during the uprising of 1775 to 1791 when the BOR was written and ratified, to define them and their law, the Bill of Rights? Much of the business being done that is mentioned in this letter took place before the lae came into effect. Anyhow, we know that to be true, and this is where it should have been mentioned in this letter, but nope. I agee with you. This will be my argument when these kinds of word salad letters come up. The people are seeking an alternative to the system that is oppressing them. I tell them that if the Bill of Rights is ignored, it is an insult to the people who suffered, bled and died to give them the best law of its kind to live by as free, sovereign, American nationals. It is their duty to promote it, uphold it and enforce it. I always mention this most important detail. Thanks again, galen. You always help me to see things I miss, to deepen my understanding and to load me up with ammo for the psychological warfare we are all going through right now.
Yeah, I can see how you were drawn in; there was a pearl or two among the rubble, the rubble under which the individual got buried. But we unearthed it. And speaking of 1775… One wonders if Anna is familiar with old Sam Whittemore. He knew a thing or two about the strangling nature of hierarchy.
Hi galen, I took a few moments to skim through the article from the link you included in your reply. Holy cow! Even this article is a disgusting red herring that leads the reader into the darkness of the sewer of a rabbit hole, as far away from the Bill of Rights and the Common Law as they can possibly go, and even further down into the pit than that. Although she is under attack for what good it appears she is trying to do, to reclaim American sovereignty, the bottom line has never ever been reached in either case. That line is the Common Law as outlined in the maxims and procedures of the Bill of Rights, fully ratified, of, by and for the people on December 15, 1791. She did use the word, “individual” one time in this article, approximately 2/3 of the way to the bottom of the page, but in the wrong context. “Five years ago, we summoned the States of the Union into Session, and began the process of unraveling the false registrations and false claims in commerce that the criminals used as a basis to attack, subject, and mischaracterize individual Americans.” If only she would have backed it up with something, anything, quoted from the law itself, the Bill of Rights, there would be more credibility. Okay. That was a valuable exercise for me in critical examination, with the help of the best of the defenders of the Bill of Rights, to see through how that Bill of Rights is deliberately being hidden in the name of “sovereignty.”
Thank you Henry and Laura.
This is well done thank you.
When a young man who generally considers himself as an anarchist (defined as simply “no ruler”) sees the value in using the Bill of Rights one must wonder why others calling themselves patriots and wrapping themselves in the flag shirk from it?
well stated
IMO this should always be the first post on this site. Thank you Henry and Laura.
I agree, or in its own tab/section of the header, it should be easy to find/see and always available.
Ditto
We put it in the top menu and on the right sidebar.
OUR LAW SHOULD ALWAYS BE HONORED AND OBEYED…………
Man’s Law does not apply equally to all.
Man’s Law seeks to Bind you to their will.
There is only one Law that is Liberating and applies equally to all.
A belated Thank you.
GREAT STUFF HENRY. SPENDING A LONG EVENING REVISITING.
IF WE ARE EVER DISARMED WITHOUT A FIGHT…. WELL, THERE WILL BE NO FIGHT. WE SHOULD NOT FACE THE FATE OF THE PALESTINIAN……………… KOYOTE MARK
YA KNOW, MY DAD WAS IN BUSINESS FOR YEARS. I WAS HIS “ACE IN THE HOLE”. I AM VERY GOOD AT SEVERAL TRADES. I MADE MY DAD A FORTUNE. BECAUSE OF THE LOSS OF THE COMMON LAW COURT, NONE WAS RECOVERED.
Henry and the Trenchers,
Thank you! THIS is the pre-requisite to seeing through any other law that makes me a subject slave! If I don’t know this, I don’t know s**t!
Say “no” to government because …
politicians want power and money
politicians ignore their oath of office
75+% of “laws” are unconstitutional/illegal
politicians need to be held accountable
politicians exaggerate, lie and are hypocritical
most politicians are selfish and corrupt
they are sometimes wrong. Question them.
freedom requires it. Our founders did it.
“75+% of “laws” are unconstitutional/illegal”
100% of statutory law are not illegal, they are unlawful under the people’s Bill of Rights.
And this is not our government, this is a corporation by the Act of 1871 (see Title 18, definition 15).
The Bill of Rights is separate law and it is the only law of this land.
The Charter for the United States Corporation is in violation of the 9th and 10th Articles of the people’s ratified law of the December 15, 1791.
The Constitution is illegitimate as it was not ratified by the people and never given our consent.
Just enforce the Bill of Rights and all unlawful activity will come to a halt. This is what our true founders from the uprising of April 19, 1775 intended.
We the people have the superior jurisdiction and we the people have the absolute jurisdictional authority to enforce the lawful Bill of Rights and remove the illegal United States Corporation, the 14th Amendment, and enforce our autonomy. We rule ourselves, apart from any pretended government entity or the corporate entity it was unlawfully changed into.
Question them hell, destroy them, as they are blatantly guilty of treason and sedition under the 9th and 10th Articles of the Bill of Rights, which is the absolute law of this land. Anything in contradiction holds no jurisdictional authority over any individual free sovereign national.
The international corporate mafia have declared war on our people and our law. The talking part’s over.
True. Nearly every person regardless of party would agree that we have not approved of these foreign engagements however deep, dark and twisted they may be, and so is it not treason for them to force us to be involved in another country or to be at war with another country that we have no idea why we are at war with them or having these nefarious entanglements with them? We did not agree to send weapons and aid to any country and if we knew all of these things and any member of congress were to ask the American people we would not approve. Any money that is sent to any one of these countries is being used against the will of the American people, they are committing acts of treason, Pelosi, Biden, Romney, Clintons, Bushes, they are all criminals in a long list of criminals. Do the American people approve of killing innocent people all around the world, of conducting unlawful experiments in indigenous populations, giving weapons to both sides to keep these wars going and then sending billions in aid to these countries? I do not think most people would agree to this if these things were ever put on a ballot, they do not represent our interests. They should be fired.
This illegitimate occupation could never hold a legitimate election to any effect.
It is not our government. It is an unlawful corporation and a violation of the supreme superior absolute law of December 15, 1791.
That takes care of that.
Your NC name is not going to cut it. We have an NC on here who has been on here for years and I’m not going to sort through his writings and your writings. In short, there will be no two NCs. You can alter it as in N-C, N.C., whatever you want to do.
You are welcome here but I’m not going to sort two people using the same handle.
YOU ARE DERRANGED!! YOU SUCKING UP ALL THE NEWS!??!? WE HOLD OUR SHT TOGETHER HERE >>> GO AWAY!!!! I MEAN WE STICK TOGETHER HERE FCK YOU TO ANYONE THAT CANT SEE IT!!! THEY PROBABLY NEVER SEEN A CHEMTRAIL EITHER>>>>>> FCK EM!!!!! GET OUT OF MY FCKG WAY!!!!!!
I am in agreement that most laws are unconstitutional and in fact if a federal is established to diminish the rights of the states or the people it is invalid. No law must be made to deny any person of any rights, this is very clear. So that being said, everything from the moment we are born is not constitutional, birth certificates, social security cards, driver’s licenses, insurance, childhood vaccines is all to force a person to do something without giving them a choice to make whether they want to have these things or not. We must be able to choose if we want to do these things or not and they cannot force us to participate to deprive of something unless we are electing to get something in exchange. Congress in DC is in the business of usurping the rights of the people of the states to engage in the political process. They are not serving the interests of the people at all.
ARE WE TALKING CONSTITUTION!?!?! WHO GIVES A FCK!! THEY CAN WIPE THEIR ASS WITH THAT PIECE OF PARCHMENT!! ITS THE BILL OF RIGHTS BABY!!! THE CELEBRATION IS DEC 15TH PLEASE JOIN US!!!! SHOTGUNS IN THE NIGHT!!!! LOL
Sign me up
Contact Henry via email, and he’ll put you in touch with who you can get the CD’s from.
Caleb, this is THE page to be on! I’m on it all day long today! The way it is working for me is that day by day, each article becomes easier to commit to memory so that I can grab on to the ones I need when I see the violations. So far, I know Articles I, II, III, VIII, IX and X well. I still need to work on IV, V, VI and VII. I can hardly wait until all the details of all the articles are alive in my mind! It’s like blocking in the elements of a masterpiece. It comes together as I lay out the big picture on the canvas first, then fill in the details until it all comes flawlessly and understandably into perfect focus. Soon, it will be mine! Now, I’m seeing an even bigger picture of the possibilities because of all the people who have already mastered the law, with more to come! BOOM!
Today, I came across a ted talk by a guy named Mark Charles who lectured on how “We the People” are the 3 most misunderstood words in US history. It was about how the US constitution is a white supremacist document. We know who the real supremacists are, and they are not the freedom abiding American People. I had to defend the Bill of Rights today. This was my comment.
The reason why racism was ever allowed to exist as it does, on the lands that are supposed to belong to the people is because everything that came after the 9th and 10th Articles of the BILL OF RIGHTS, which NEVER should have been attached to that phony constitution, is an usurpation of the law, the Common Law, which outlines the maxims and procedures that guarantee ALL of the people on the land who won their liberty and who wrote the Bill of Rights, regardless of race or color, their natural born rights through DUE PROCESS of the LAW. Everything written in that butt wipe rag they call the constitution that violates the natural rights of the people of the Land, (NOT the Corporation, which is run under the law of the sea) is TREASON against the Bill of Rights which belongs to the People, equally. All people who live on the land of that law, who are against SLAVERY, which is what that constitution was written to enforce, under the guise of freedom and liberty, in VIOLATION of the Bill of Rights, are covered in the Common Law outlined in the Bill of Rights, but they must enforce the law that belongs to them! Unlike the constitution, the Bill of Rights was ratified by the representatives of the people on December 15, 1791. That constitution is a slave document. The Bill of Rights is a freedom and liberty document, of, by and for the People.
Today, I came across a video on youtube commemorating “Bill of Rights Day” in which they discuss the Anti-Federalists and the Bill of Rights. It was encouraging to know that there are people out there who are talking about this! https://youtu.be/EycxYd5-Ylo
Today on my social media, I came across this lengthy, eye opening article which sheds light on the history of the fraud committed against the American people by the US Corporation. I understand, based on what I learned here, of the Bill of Rights, how it applies to what is written in the 9th and 10th Articles, and to what I learned from Henry through the daily broadcasts. If this is something that is acceptable for the Trenches to post here, I hope I got it right. I have been doing as much as I can to teach the BOR and reach as many people as possible. I want to be sure that the following article should be promoted. If not, I apologize if I got it wrong. Thanks in advance, Diana O’.
Observation: Common Law and the Bill of Rights was never mentioned anywhere in this letter. I think this could be a red flag. Could this be a slick way of hijacking the upheaval for rights the people are trying to assert today, as a means by which to keep the Bill of Rights hidden? Hmmm… I wonder.
International Public Notice:
About Sovereignty
Perhaps no issue garners more misunderstanding than “sovereignty”.
We exist as a sovereign people, therefore, we also have sovereign nation-states.
The sovereignty of the people devolves upon them from “Nature and Nature’s God”.
We are born with free will and freedom of movement.
We can think what we like and say what we dare to. We are not bound by any Social Contracts. We are not part of any greater construct, apart from the Earth itself.
In the world of men, we established our sovereign nation-states, known as the Union States, as a consequence of our own natural sovereignty.
In international jurisdiction, we exercise sovereignty via grant of sovereignty from those already sovereign by birth; we sail under the auspices of a clan and nation which has never been conquered.
In global jurisdiction, our business affairs are secured by our standing on the land and at sea, so that in all things, by free will and by choice and by rule enforced by force of arms, by custom, and by tradition, the American people are free, independent, and sovereign people.
And so are our several nation-states: Pennsylvania, New York, New Hampshire, Vermont, et alia. (Note — in the old Latin-based system of nomenclature, these states were styled as pennsylvania, new york, new hampshire, vermont, etc.)
All the sovereignty of this country is vested in its people and in its several, now fifty, nation-states.
Our sovereignty is not vested in any collective instrumentality, such as The United States or The United States of America. Such unincorporated instrumentalities are limited to representing the sovereignty of the nation-states they serve. They are not sovereign in-and-of themselves.
Thus, the character of sovereignty is indigenous by nature, attached closely to the living men and women who self-govern their own lives, and who then direct the course of their common government.
Their Sovereignty is represented in international realms by their unincorporated Federation of States known as States of the Union (This Federation is viewed as a Confederation from the standpoint of the Union States, but as a Federation by the rest of the world).
The States of the Union belong to the Union States.
The realms of land and soil exist in perpetual union as a fact of nature, so that the sovereign Union States abide in eternal joinder with their States of the Union, with the Union States directly presenting the government of the nation-states — our national jurisdiction, and the States of the Union representing the Union States in international jurisdiction.
At no point does the sovereignty of the people nor the sovereignty of their nation-states devolve to any incorporated entity whatsoever.
The very condition of being incorporated is by definition dependent, not independent, and not sovereign.
It doesn’t matter where an incorporated entity is created (registered) nor does it matter who or what incorporated it.
The bar against an incorporated entity possessing sovereignty remains.
Recently, people have presented claims of sovereignty on behalf of the old Federal Republic, the American Federal Subcontractor operated under The Constitution for the united States of America, which was a service contract issued in 1787— but this entity never possessed sovereignty in-and-of itself, and never directly represented any sovereign power.
The Federal Republic operated entirely on contract and exercised powers delegated to it by The United States of America and the Second Confederation known as the States of America.
We know this to be true, because the delegated powers exist only in international and global jurisdictions.
The way to view this is that the sovereign Union States created two Confederations. The first Confederation created the States of the Union. The second Confederation created the States of America.
This is clearly demonstrated in the nomenclature used throughout.
The Constitution that created the Federal Republic, The Constitution for the united States of America, was issued to the States of America Confederation, which operated and provided oversight for the Federal Republic.
In terms of sovereignty, the First Confederation directly represented the Union States in international jurisdiction. The Second Confederation represented the Union States in global jurisdiction.
In a pinch, we know that the States of the Union were enabled to operate on behalf of the Union States in both international and global arenas, because they did so for five years, 1776-1781, but once the Second Confederation was formed, it took over the global commercial functions, and delegated some of those functions to the Federal Republic.
Thus, even though the States of the Union are able to perform all the international and global functions, the work was distributed, with the States of the Union doing all the work in international jurisdiction, and the States of America doing all the work in the global jurisdiction — and the Federal Republic exercising some powers delegated to them by the States of America.
So the original plan was that the sovereign Union States created the States of America to represent their interests and powers in global commercial affairs, and the States of America got the service contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America, and delegated some of those powers to the Federal Republic.
Please note that all sovereign power remained vested in the Union States.
Both the States of the Union and the States of America merely “represented” the Union States —- with the States of the Union operating in international jurisdictions, the States of America operating in global (commercial) jurisdiction
The Federal Republic exercised some powers delegated to it by the States of America Confederation.
Not only did it have no sovereignty of its own, it borrowed all its delegated powers from the States of America Confederation, which was itself only an instrumentality “representing” the Union States, and having no sovereignty of its own.
Only the people and their nation-states have sovereignty; all the rest of these instrumentalities only “represent” that sovereignty to different degrees and in different jurisdictions.
When the States of America lost a quorum to operate in the spring of 1861, this complex web of duties, powers, and associations was partially destroyed.
The States of the Union remained, relatively undisturbed. The States of America Confederation was inoperable, and because the States of America Confederation was inoperable, so was the Federal Republic, because its contract was held by the States of America.
The only remaining intact instrumentality of the Union States operating in international and global jurisdictions, is (from their standpoint) the First Confederation formed by their States of the Union.
Neither the Union States operating as The United States nor the States of the Union operating as The United States of America required any reconstruction. They were not incapacitated by any circumstance related to the so-called American Civil War.
What should have happened (and what has eventually happened) is that the States of the Union should have stepped forward into the gap left by the States of America. Instead, the loyal officers and staff serving the States of the Union were accidentally-on-purpose misidentified as “rebels” and persecuted and hunted as such by General Grant’s U.S. Army.
The two remaining Federal Subcontractors, both foreign, wanted to take over the powers and functions and assets of the Federal Republic, so they used the confusion resulting from the so-called Civil War and declarations of “emergency” to usurp them.
Ten years later, these disloyal foreign Federal Subcontractors self-interestedly and officially latched upon the Federal Republic that had been doing business under the name “the United States” and seized its identity, assets and powers for themselves on February 2nd 1871 — while still hunting down, burning out, murdering, and suppressing the officers of the actual remaining American Government.
Thus, a coup occurred at the hands of our own employees, foreign subcontractors, who owed us “good faith service”.
The Union States and the States of the Union still remain.
Aware of a plan to place a “claim on abandonment” against ourselves and our assets in 1998, we raised our hands and notified international and global authorities that we still exist, and are still here.
This caused no end of consternation, but nobody could prove otherwise; against all odds, The United States of America — our unincorporated Federation of the States of the Union — was still alive, still knowledgeable, still staffed, still functioning after nearly a century and a half of suppression.
The loyal officers of the States of the Union passed on the torch to their sons and daughters and despite more than a century of persecution at the hands of the British Government and its Bar Attorneys, we are still here, still representing the lawful and sovereign government of the Union States.
We discovered the unlawful conversion these criminals imposed upon our country and our people by various means of deceit, including the whole scheme to politically convert American State Nationals into Dual Federal Citizens without their knowledge or consent.
Five years ago, we summoned the States of the Union into Session, and began the process of unraveling the false registrations and false claims in commerce that the criminals used as a basis to attack, subject, and mischaracterize individual Americans.
As the Americans “returned” one by one to the land of this country, they repopulated the States of the Union and they also at the same time, repopulated the Union States.
With fifty out of fifty States formally enrolled as States of the Union, and all fifty State Assemblies in Session, there is no possible rationale for British or Holy Roman Empire claims to the effect that our land and soil are vacated. Nor is there any excuse for claiming that our government is “absent” or “in interregnum”.
And most particularly, there is no reason to think that the remaining foreign corporation(s) acting as Successors to The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States, have any powers beyond those strictly delegated to them in 1789 and 1790, respectively.
They certainly have and hold none of this country’s sovereignty.
To be blunt, their claim to own the assets of the original Federal Republic doing business as “the United States” as of February 2nd 1871, was an act of deliberate and self-interested treason and fraud. The Federal Republic belonged to the States of America and the States of America belonged to the Union States — not a British Territorial Federal Subcontractor. And they knew it.
The Union States still had the States of the Union operating in international and, if necessary, global jurisdictions, at the time these Pikers made their claims and began their rampage of racketeering and war-for-profit — literally — in our names.
We are still here, still bringing forward our customary and lawful government, which is superior in every respect to any foreign for-profit corporation acting as a Federal Subcontractor. Our American Government has precedent, superior claim, and both lawful and legal standing.
If any entity on Earth has the right to claim and to operate our Federal Republic, it is our Federation of States and the States of the Union, stepping into the gap left by the States of America.
We know that the States of the Union are competent to function in both international and global contexts, because they have already done so from 1776 to 1781. The absence of the States of America Confederation is thus no obstruction to our government’s ability to function, and never was.
Likewise, the False Claims brought by the U.S. Congress on February 2nd 1871 are null and void for fraud and breach of trust; these same Miscreants owing us “good faith service” were fully aware of the fact that both the States of America and the Federal Republic doing business as “the United States” belonged to the Union States and were subject to the administration of the States of the Union.
This fairytale to the effect that our government was ever “absent” or “in interregnum” is no doubt wishful thinking on the part of those British Territorial Perpetrators responsible for this Mess, who still hope to feast themselves and their foreign Creditors on our Substance, but it self-evidently is not true.
A government of, for, and by the people of a country does not so easily disappear with the death or suppression of one leader or one bureaucracy. It endures. It adapts. And it conquers in the end.
Just as the Truth itself remains, obdurate in the face of time and circumstance, our Government has remained.
It is in the best interests of this country and the entire world, that our American Government takes command, and that the remaining incorporated service providers which have been serving as Successors to Contract under The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States, cease and desist all claim of any emergency powers, and abide fully by the limitations of the contracts that give them form.
From our perspective, we serve the Union States in international and global jurisdictions and the Union States are the lawful owners and operators of the States of America which owned and operated the Federal Republic doing business as the United States.
While we were suppressed, physically, and prevented from bringing forward the claims of the Union States in 1871, the British Territorial Subcontractors operating as the U.S. Congress committed fraud and breach of trust against their Employers. There is no statute of limitation on fraud or breach of trust.
What was wrong in 1871 is still wrong today, and what is false is always false.
We have served both Notice and Due Process of these issues, internationally and globally, from 2007 to 2014, a period of seven (7) years. We have continued to bring forward our claims in every applicable venue, in the High Courts, and in the Public ever since.
Offers by the incorporated entities presently serving under The Constitution of the United States of America to occupy our Federal Republic have been returned to them; they and their British Territorial Predecessors have been illegally, unlawfully, and immorally occupying our Federal Republic since 1871 and the results are self-evident.
It is our intention to operate the Federal Republic and its delegated powers until such time that the Union States convene in Congress Assembled, and reconstruct the States of America.
The States of the Union have always been the back stop and replacement for the States of America and they were only prevented from fulfilling this role by the interference and usurpation of foreign Federal Subcontractors operating in breach of trust and under color of law.
The constructive fraud they have employed against us and against our States of the Union and ultimately against the Union States’ interest as well, can only be described as criminal and the results — six generations of constant commercial warfare benefiting foreign interests — speak for themselves.
It’s more than past time for these crimes to be addressed and for the Perpetrators to be recognized. It’s also past time for the foreign corporations acting as Federal Subcontractors to come to heel and obey their actual employers — the people of this country. We are not, as they would prefer it, their dependents. We are their employers.
And we always have been.
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger — Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
March 13th 2025
Dianna, I know your heart is in the right place and I respect that. But friends owe friends the truth. So, that said…
I would not, could not, will not, and absolutely refuse to read this very verbose and exceedingly long article. But, and since you asked… I did skim over it a bit and there were so many terms that were new to me that much of it came across as word-salad. Perhaps that’s just my own limitation of understanding but I did not connect with what little I did attempt to dive in to. You introduced it with this:
“Observation: Common Law and the Bill of Rights was never mentioned anywhere in this letter. I think this could be a red flag.”
Well that’s a pretty damn big red flag. I even think I hear trumpets and cannons. (grin)
Then I came across this:
“The sovereignty of the people devolves upon them from ‘Nature and Nature’s God.’
Definition of the word DEVOLVE: “transfer or delegate (power) to a lower level.”
I don’t see the personal sovereignty of humans as lower than anything, not even nature. We are nature.
Then this:
“If any entity on Earth has the right to claim and to operate our Federal Republic, it is our Federation of States and the States of the Union…”
Well, what about THE INDIVIDUAL?!! Each a king in his own right. I kept waiting for that word to show up; INDIVIDUAL, but my skimming didn’t bring it to me. The collective is not more powerful than THE INDIVIDUAL. There’s an old saying in France: “‘Fifty-million Frenchmen can’t be wrong.” To that I say, Oh yes they can!!
Brings one other famous saying to mind: “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” I changed that one, too: “When in Rome, be yourself.” We just gotta keep lookin’ out for the individual or we’ll get smothered by the gang.
I googled the writer’s name and came across this about her:
Source here:
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hate-watch/interview-sovereign-judge-annas-world/
“But American common law, ‘the law of the land,’ she says, is simply based on the biblical ten commandments. ‘It was adopted because basically the ten commandments were acceptable both to the Jews and to the gentiles and that’s why they basically arrived at that conclusion, that everybody agreed these were ten things nobody should do.’”
Ha, not all The Ten Commandments tell you what you shouldn’t do; some tell you what you SHOULD do. But that ain’t the point. The point is that The Common Law is the spouse, so to speak, of The Bill of Rights. It sees that The Bill of Rights is honored and things are in order for it to go on being The Supreme Law of the Land. And there are things The Bill of Rights does not object to that the commandments do, things like having strange gods, craven images, being able to swear/cuss in whatever way, choosing not to “keep the sabbath,” etc. The commandments state “Thou shalt not kill,” but as you know, sometimes we have to. Sometimes self-defense, defense of innocents, or infringement on our right to live free, requires us to kill evil. Well, simply put, The Bill of Rights is just about living free while not infringing on another’s freedom.
So to that writer, Anna Maria Riezinger, I might suggest, Just cut to the chase, Anna. The 10 Articles of The Bill of Rights are our assurance that nobody, I mean NOBODY, and no institution or ‘governing body,’ be it the states or the local bar-crowd, is sovereign over anyone else. Anything denying that is a lie, and deficient in protecting our rights.
.
Thanks, galen. I know you have a sharp critical eye and mind, and this is why I came here to see if I could better sort this out with some help. One of the statememts that jumped out at me was this:
” We are not bound by any Social Contracts. We are not part of any greater construct, apart from the Earth itself.
In the world of men, we established our sovereign nation-states, known as the Union States, as a consequence of our own natural sovereignty.” It all sounds good, except for the social contract part. Is not the social contract of the American national, that document the men and women fought, bled and died for during the uprising of 1775 to 1791 when the BOR was written and ratified, to define them and their law, the Bill of Rights? Much of the business being done that is mentioned in this letter took place before the lae came into effect. Anyhow, we know that to be true, and this is where it should have been mentioned in this letter, but nope. I agee with you. This will be my argument when these kinds of word salad letters come up. The people are seeking an alternative to the system that is oppressing them. I tell them that if the Bill of Rights is ignored, it is an insult to the people who suffered, bled and died to give them the best law of its kind to live by as free, sovereign, American nationals. It is their duty to promote it, uphold it and enforce it. I always mention this most important detail. Thanks again, galen. You always help me to see things I miss, to deepen my understanding and to load me up with ammo for the psychological warfare we are all going through right now.
Yeah, I can see how you were drawn in; there was a pearl or two among the rubble, the rubble under which the individual got buried. But we unearthed it. And speaking of 1775… One wonders if Anna is familiar with old Sam Whittemore. He knew a thing or two about the strangling nature of hierarchy.
🙂
.
Hi galen, I took a few moments to skim through the article from the link you included in your reply. Holy cow! Even this article is a disgusting red herring that leads the reader into the darkness of the sewer of a rabbit hole, as far away from the Bill of Rights and the Common Law as they can possibly go, and even further down into the pit than that. Although she is under attack for what good it appears she is trying to do, to reclaim American sovereignty, the bottom line has never ever been reached in either case. That line is the Common Law as outlined in the maxims and procedures of the Bill of Rights, fully ratified, of, by and for the people on December 15, 1791. She did use the word, “individual” one time in this article, approximately 2/3 of the way to the bottom of the page, but in the wrong context. “Five years ago, we summoned the States of the Union into Session, and began the process of unraveling the false registrations and false claims in commerce that the criminals used as a basis to attack, subject, and mischaracterize individual Americans.” If only she would have backed it up with something, anything, quoted from the law itself, the Bill of Rights, there would be more credibility. Okay. That was a valuable exercise for me in critical examination, with the help of the best of the defenders of the Bill of Rights, to see through how that Bill of Rights is deliberately being hidden in the name of “sovereignty.”