Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie

Breitbart – by Ian Hanchett

During testimony before Congress on Thursday, FBI Director James Comey stated that the FBI’s interview with presumptive Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was not under oath or recorded, but it still would be a crime to lie to the FBI.

Comey stated that he did not personally interview Clinton, and did not talk to all of the “five or six” who did interview Clinton.  

He was then asked, “did she testify or talk to them under oath?” Comey answered, “No.” But added that “it’s still a crime to lie to us.”

When asked if there was a transcript of the interview, Comey stated that there wasn’t one because the interview wasn’t recorded, but there was an analysis of Clinton’s interview.

Follow Ian Hanchett on Twitter @IanHanchett

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/07/07/comey-hillarys-fbi-testimony-wasnt-under-oath-or-recorded-but-it-would-still-be-a-crime-to-lie/

3 thoughts on “Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie

  1. “Comey: Hillary’s FBI Testimony Wasn’t Under Oath Or Recorded, But It Would Still Be a Crime To Lie”

    “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”

  2. So there was no recorded device for the interview with Hitlery but they wouldn’t hesitate and it would be standard procedure to record you or I.

    Yea I see how it is. Blatant treason and criminal cover-up, right there, front and center!

  3. “He was then asked, “did she testify or talk to them under oath?” Comey answered, “No.” But added that “it’s still a crime to lie to us.””

    Hahahahahaha!!!

    Oh man, so what Commie is saying is, “it’s still a crime to lie to us, but we won’t record you just in case you are lying to us”.

    Priceless…

    Unfrigginbelievable…..

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*