listen here

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Connecticut governor says background check opponents ‘have blood on your hands’

Daily Mail

Connecticut’s Democratic Governor Dannel Malloy said Wednesday that opponents of universal background checks ‘have blood on your hands’ as he waged a war against the country’s ‘insane’ gun laws.

Malloy argued on CNN that 97 percent of Americans support background checks for all firearms sales, including those that take place at gun shows.  

‘It is insane to allow that to happen. If you support that legislation, if you, if you vote to allow that to happen in Washington or in your state capitol, you do have blood on your hands,’ Malloy posited.

The fiery rhetoric was a curtain-raiser to President Donald Trump‘s listening session with parents, teachers and survivors of school shootings that the White House has said will include people affected by the tragedies at Columbine and Sandy Hook, an elementary school in Malloy’s state.

A mentally ill man shot and killed 20 children and six adults before committing suicide at the Newtown, Connecticut, school in December of 2012.

Federal legislators tried and failed to pass new background check requirements several months after the shocking rampage. Guns that are sold by private sellers remain exempt from federal background check requirements.

One of the early actions Trump took in his presidency was to withdraw an Obama-era initiative making it more difficult for people suffering from mental health issues to buy guns.

Malloy said last week that Trump and the Republican Members of Congress who passed the bill that served as a vehicle for the rollback ‘have blood on their hands.’

‘What the hell is the president of the United States doing signing that bill?’ he said a day after the Parkland, Florida, shooting. ‘And what the hell are members of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States doing voting on that? And why would you puff your chest about making guns available to people with mental health challenges?’

The Connecticut Democrat implored legislators to ‘just do sane things’ in his appearance Wednesday morning on CNN’s ‘New Day’ program, telling them, ‘Let’s not sell guns to people who have protective orders against them. Let’s not sell guns to people who have mental illness. Let’s not sell guns to people who are on the no-fly list.

‘We can’t even do that in our country. That’s insane,’ Malloy stated.

President Trump called on politicians on both sides of the aisle to back stronger background checks for prospective gun owners on Tuesday evening.

But he has not endorsed a mandatory bill like the one Malloy is pushing federal lawmakers to pass.

‘Whether we are Republican or Democrat, we must now focus on strengthening Background Checks!’ was all the president tweeted.

'Whether we are Republican or Democrat, we must now focus on strengthening Background Checks!' Trump tweeted on Tuesday night
His push for stricter gun controls comes after thousands of students and parents have called on his administration to implement changes to prevent future mass shootings.   

Hours earlier, Trump took action to outlaw bump stocks like the one used in the Las Vegas massacre last fall.

‘I signed a memorandum directing the Attorney General to propose regulations to ban all devices that turn legal weapons into machine guns,’ Trump said .

The bump stocks directive, which he pointedly brought up at a White House Medal of Valor ceremony, followed his press secretary’s announcement minutes before that the president had ordered his administration to look at ways it could unilaterally deter mass shootings like the one in Parkland.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders also said that Trump had not closed the door on new gun controls, including an assault weapons ban that is unpopular with the president’s base.

Sanders said Tuesday at her first briefing since the shooting that Trump had also directed his Health and Human Services department to review its rule-making ability and to advise him on possible improvements it could make to the mental health system.

Trump has not provided specifics about what he wants new background checks to entail of what changes he envisions to the mental health system.

He’s waiting until after his listening session with survivors of mass shootings, including the 1999 massacre at Columbine High School, parents and teachers. He’ll have a White House meeting the following day with state and local leaders.

After the talks, with the input of his administration, Sanders said that Trump will come up with concrete proposals on how to mitigate rampages like the one in Parkland.

‘Unfortunately, when horrific tragedies like this happen, everybody wants a quick and a simple answer, but there isn’t one.’ she told reporters. ‘There’s not a quick and there’s not a simple answer.’

Students are planning marches in cities all around the nation, including Washington, D.C. to demand action next month.

‘President Trump, I think it’s really important that you listen to us, We are your constituents, and you’re working for us. And kids are dead,’ one student organizer, Sofie Whitney, told CNN just after Trump’s bum stock announcement. ‘It’s really symbolic that we’re the ones doing it because we’re the ones who experienced it.’

Riding on a school bus at the time of the interview, Whitney, said Trump’s ban is ‘obviously, that’s a step forward.’

‘But there’s still so much more to be done,’ she said. ‘Because even though that would have stopped deaths in Las Vegas, it still wouldn’t have helped when it came to my school.’

The gesture to ban bump stocks immediately came under attack from Democrats, including Dianne Feinstein, who is a co-sponsor of legislation in the Senate to ban bump stocks.

‘I’m glad President Trump finally understands that bump stocks should be illegal. Now he needs to follow through with action and support our bill to ban these deadly devices,’ she said in a statement.

Feinstein said that ATF currently does not have the authority to do what Trump directed Attorney General Jeff Sessions to do.

‘The agency made this clear in a 2013 letter to Congress, writing that “stocks of this type are not subject to the provisions of federal firearms statutes.” ‘

ATF is already in the middle of a rule-making process for bump stocks. A comment period on the proposed regulations ended several weeks ago.

On Tuesday, Feinstein said that the rule-making process could be tied up in court for years, if ATF follows through on Trump’s direction ‘and that would mean bump stocks would continue to be sold.’

‘Legislation is the only answer,’ she stated. ‘Words are one thing, Mr. President, but we need meaningful action. If you want these devices off the street, call congressional Republicans and tell them to stop blocking our bill.’

Trump said Tuesday at the White House event that he had directed his AG to ‘clarify whether certain bump stock devices, like the one used in Las Vegas, are illegal under current law’ and that review began in December.

‘I expect that these critical regulations will be finalized very soon,’ Trump said Tuesday from the White House’s East Room.

The president had come under scrutiny, though, in the days since the Florida shooting for his relative silence on the issue of gun violence after he failed to mention firearms, aside from a reference to gunfire that took place at Marjory Stoneman, in a national address the day after.

He insisted at the White House event on Tuesday afternoon that school safety is a ‘top priority’ of his administration.

‘The key in all of these efforts, as I said in my remarks the day after the shooting, is that we cannot merely take actions that make us feel like we are making a difference,’ he said. ‘We must actually make a difference.’

The White House on Monday said that Trump is mulling legislation to strengthen existing background check and federal firearms laws in the wake of last week’s Florida massacre.

Sanders said Trump has been in touch with the Republican author of a Senate bill that would provide the carrot and the stick to states and federal agencies to provide better comply with background check requirements and those conversations are ongoing.

‘While discussions are ongoing and revisions are being considered, the President is supportive of efforts to improve the Federal background check system,’ she said in a Monday statement.

Sanders did not go into further detail on Tuesday on what specifically the president would be willing to support when it comes to background checks or other gun controls.

‘But we want to make sure that we’re addressing the problem. And we want to make sure that we’re meeting and talking with as many people that not only are affected, but that play in this process as possible,’ she stated.

The president’s spokeswoman suggested that Trump might even be willing to endorse gun control legislation that has been repudiated by Republicans like an assault weapons ban.

‘I don’t have any specific announcements, but we haven’t closed the door on any front,’ she said. ‘Again, that’s the next several days and weeks will be — to have conversations and to see what this process looks like, and to see what areas we can help make changes to, and in what places that we can do better.’

The Senate legislation that the White House has said that Trump would be willing to back looks to ‘fix’ the National Instant Criminal Background Check System legislation has the backing of key senators on both sides of the aisle.

On the Republican side, it is being pushed by Sen. John Cornyn, the majority whip. Democrat Chris Murphy of Connecticut, whose state is home to Newtown, is a sponsor, as well.

GOP Sen. James Lankford, another sponsor of the bill, said Sunday on ‘Meet the Press’ that he legislation primarily upgrades ‘our background check system to make sure that all the information is actually getting in there.’

‘We have a lot of warning signs that were out there, and people in Parkland, and all across the country, have every reason to be grieved and incredibly furious,’ Lankford said.

The senator said that Parkland shooter Nikolas Cruz’s file should have reflected social service visits to his home, his expulsion from school, the violent posts he made online and warnings people who were concerned about him sent into the FBI.

‘All the warning signs were there. The community did all the things the community should do to engage. They saw something, they said something, and nothing was done,’ the Oklahoma senator said.

Cornyn has not commented on the White House’s suggestion Monday that it would be willing to get behind his bill, depending on how the finalized text is worded.

Murphy said in a tweet that the statement made for an ‘interesting morning’ and the president’s support for the legislation ‘is another sign the politics of gun violence are shifting rapidly.’

The Democrat crusader for gun control legislation also said, ‘No one should pretend this bill alone is an adequate response to this epidemic.’

A progressive organization with the sole purpose of cracking down on firearms laws they see as too lax likewise said that the measure alone was not to make a dent in gun violence.

‘If all Congress does is pass the Fix NICS Act, then lawmakers will have failed to meet this moment and do their job,’ Everytown for Gun Safety said.

The group said that Americans across the country are ‘demanding that Congress finally get serious and meet this moment with robust action to reduce gun violence’ and the Cornyn-Murphy bill ‘is a small step forward.’

‘Congress needs to do much more, starting with legislation to require criminal background checks on every gun sale — supported by 95 percent of Americans,’ the group said.

Background checks are not required when firearms are sold by private sellers, including at gun shows. The exemption has given rise to the term ‘gun show loophole’ for that reason.

Legislators unsuccessfully attempted to pass legislation in the Senate placing new restrictions on firearms sales in 2013 after the Sandy Hook shooting in Murphy’s home state.

Then-President Barack Obama aggressively chased the reforms but none of the measures earned the required 60 votes in bitterly divided upper chamber.

A assault weapons ban championed by Feinstein and background check legislation spearheaded by Sens. Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, and Pat Toomey, a Republican from Pennsylvania, each failed.

Lashing out at his predecessor’s party on Twitter on Saturday evening, Trump said, ‘Just like they don’t want to solve the DACA problem, why didn’t the Democrats pass gun control legislation when they had both the House & Senate during the Obama Administration.

‘Because they didn’t want to, and now they just talk!’ the Republican asserted.

Democrats were in control of the House and Senate for Obama’s first two years in office. They chose to prioritize healthcare reform in those years, ultimately passing Obamacare.

Obama’s gun control push in his second term, when Democrats controlled the Senate but not the House, did not pan out. The president consequently took as much executive action as the White House believed he legally had the power to in order to enact some new firearms regulations.

Republicans lawmakers rolled back an Obama-era rule that was intended to make it more difficult for people with mental health issues to purchase guns at the beginning of 2017.

Democrats were swift to point out on Thursday that it was Trump who signed the legislation containing the scale-back into law after the Republican president said mental health was the issue.

Trump in a tweet also appeared to blame peers of Cruz’s and adults around him who knew that something was off about his behavior and did not contact the police.

A separate message that Trump sent over the weekend that ridiculed federal authorities for not acting on a tip upset students who survived the shooting because it made reference to the FBI’s investigation into collusion between his campaign and Russia in the 2016 election.

A student claiming to be a survivor of the shooting said in response:’17 of my classmates are gone. That’s 17 futures, 17 children, and 17 friends stolen. But you’re right, it always has to be about you. How silly of me to forget. #neveragain” ‘

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5417799/Gov-says-background-check-opponents-blood-hands.html#ixzz57lEKcf5L
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
786

7 Responses to Connecticut governor says background check opponents ‘have blood on your hands’

  1. will E coyote. Super genius says:

    97 percent? Lying piece of dog shit!

  2. will E coyote. Super genius says:

    Come get em you spineless faggots!!!!

  3. # 1 NWO Hatr says:

    “‘It is insane to allow that to happen. If you support that legislation, if you, if you vote to allow that to happen in Washington or in your state capitol, you do have blood on your hands,’ Malloy posited.”

    To begin with, if you vote, PERIOD, you’re an unmitigated MORON.

    And that’s rich, coming from a POS commie jewb#tch who has the blood of MILLIONS OF MURDERED IRAQIS on his filthy hands.

    Not to mention all the other countries YOU’VE (not ‘we the people’) invaded, and MURDERED the inhabitants of as well.

    Short drop, with a sudden stop is the only future your scumbag @ss has.

  4. H D says:

    Just how many body guards does he have .how many sit outside his home ? He talks a big game but he doesn’t live by what he’s pushing on every body else . Disarm governor I wonder how many that would save

  5. Bill in IL says:

    The communists are all over the comment sections, braying that 97% of all Americans want tougher gun laws and “enhanced” background checks (whatever that means).

    • Henry Shivley says:

      It means 97% of the 25% that are registered to vote, as polled by the mainstream media, which they say only 9% of the people believe.
      It is more meaningless bullshit that isn’t going to change a thing.
      Jigs up.

Leave a Reply