Council on Foreign Relations Reveals How World Government Can Be Achieved in 2013

The Globalist Report – by Andrew Puhanic

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an organisation established in 1921 by the global elite, has publicized what it believes to be the challenges that need to be overcome to establishWorld Government in 2013.

In summary, the Council on Foreign Relationshas sought the opinion of four Globalists from around the world on what are the greatest challenges the world faces that would prevent the formation of World Government in 2013.

  • Richard N. Haass –  President, Council on Foreign Relations (2012). Bilderberg Group (2005)
  • Yang Jiemian – Trilateral Commision Member (2010)
  • Igor Yurgens – Chairman of the Management Board, Institute of Contemporary Development, Russian Federation (2012)
  • Michael Fullilove – Executive Director of the Lowy Institute for International Policy (2012)

Astonishingly, these Globalists claim that the emergence of World Government will not occur if the following 7 ‘challenges’ are not overcome 2013.

1) The world needs to establish shared responsibility for the most intractable problems of our post-unipolar world. Therefore, for World Government to become a reality, China needs to play a greater role as a global power.

2) To implement World Government, it is essential to strengthen organisations like the United Nations, World Trade Organisation, International Monetary Fund and the G20.

Danges of New World Order3) Major powers need to begin engaging less prominent countries so that both major and minor players in the global political landscape can further the “networked governance” principle. Essentially, the key to World Government in 2013 is for all countries to enter into new mindsets and functioning mechanisms.

4) Globally, trade needs to be more regulated. In 2013, government subsidies should be tackled at the global level as opposed to regional or bilateral level.

5) The World needs to begin harnessing regional efforts into common action on a global level. Discouraged by the stalemate of global governance building, many countries and regions are now turning to regional and sub-regional integration, which explains why we are seeing more regional and sub-regional free-trade agreements.

If such a trend cannot be reversed in a timely fashion, then there will be no World Government in its real sense.

An image of the New World Order United Nations Logo6) The Internet needs to be more regulated. It is believed that governments should start ‘maintaining’ the free flow of information on the internet to limit the amount of cyber-aggression.

7) The deterioration of the political landscape in the Middle East has challenged the principles of World Government. Also, the inability of the international community to cope with this region’s challenges threaten to also undermine the establishment of a World Government.

These blueprints published by the Council on Foreign Relations for the establishment of World Government come at a time when the world’s political leaders are beginning to warm to the idea of a World Government.

Recently, the President of the European Council revealed a desire for the European Union and Russia to contribute to the development of World Government.

Herman Van Rompuy was quoted at the 30th EU-Russia Summit as saying:

By working together, the EU and Russia can make a decisive contribution to global governance and regional conflict resolution, to global economic governance in the G 8 and G20, and to a broad range of international and regional issues.

The push for World Government by institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations, the European Union and the Vatican are worrying signs that what the world has feared for many years might come to fruition in 2013.

6 thoughts on “Council on Foreign Relations Reveals How World Government Can Be Achieved in 2013

  1. These people only wield the power they do through their ability to keep people frightened and misinformed, and as that ability is rapidly waning, they’ll probably be running for cover real soon.

    “governments should start ‘maintaining’ the free flow of information on the internet to limit the amount of cyber-aggression”

    By ‘maintaining’ they mean controlling. The ‘cyber-aggression’ they fear is the growing aggression against them.

  2. CFR is ALL bad.

    The Trilateral Commission’s got nothing on those scum. (except that they’re often interchangeable).

  3. Actually, there is an 8th barrier to world governance. It’s known as the armed American. Until they take our guns away we will not relinquish our sovereignty. Good luck with that.

      1. I’m still thinking what the best reply to that would be..

        Intention wise from the Americans, I estimate that it would be somewhere between “From my cold dead hands” all the way up to “Over my dead body”…

        What was it.. “Sacret Honor”, where does that end?

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *