The Daily Sheeple – by Kimberly Paxton
A disabled Army veteran was brutally beaten by a group of 6-8 teenagers in Cleveland on Friday, while bystanders did nothing.
Matthew Robinson, who was riding a Regional Transit Authority (RTA) bus, told station 19 Action News that a group of six to eight teenagers boarded the bus on Feb. 7, followed him off, and started taunting him near Public Square.
Three suspects, identified by Cleveland police as Kenneth Matthews, 18, Ronald Reid Williams, 19, and a 16-year-old girl, were arrested by Cleveland and RTA police, CBS Cleveland reported
The girl – who was not publically identified because she is a minor – had the entire alleged attack on her cell phone, authorities said. (source)
What’s interesting is that despite widespread media coverage (here, here, and here, for example), no mention is directly made of the race of the perpetrators. Note the careful editing of Matthew’s statement here – he mentions the attack being racist but is never quoted as specifying the race of the attackers:
‘What they were saying was, ‘Knock that boy out!’ ‘White boy.’ ‘Cracker’. They were saying, ‘Knock that white boy out’,’a visibly shaken Matthews told 19 Action News.
‘The whole time I’m just thinking, pretty much protect myself and don’t let anybody in behind you. No-one stepped in to help, so I thought it was a shame.
‘No-one should have to deal with that kind of racism or ridicule.
‘I think there should be jail time for assaults. Who’s to say that your mother or sister couldn’t be on the bus, and the same thing could happen to them.’ (source)
It wasn’t until mug shots were shown on a video that the fact that the two young men arrested were black was absolutely confirmed. None of the mainstream coverage online had posted photographs of the alleged attackers. They posted lots of pictures of the bus, the police cars, and the victim, but prominently absent were the mug shots of the two people charged with the crime.
Captured in screenshots from a video posted on the website for the NY Daily News, here are the photos of the two men that were immediately arrested for the savage attack.
There has been no mention thus far of federal hate crime charges, despite the fact that black criminals used racial slurs against the white victim, who is shown in the following photo.
This lack of federal charges only goes to further prove the point that things like the knockout “game” are only hate crimes when a white person launches an assault against a black person. When Conrad Barrett assaulted an elderly black man in Texas last December, he faced a substantial amount of additional jail time because the repugnant attack was considered a racially motivated hate crime.
Up until now nearly all of the attacks have been black people punching white people. The mainstream has limited it’s coverage of this fact to avoid being considered racist. The only reason we know that the previous attacks were perpetrated by blacks is because of mug shots and videos that were published. Race is not mentioned throughout most of the articles.
That has all changed now that a white man has punched a black man in the face. Before, the mainstream media called it a “game” that deprived, neglected inner city youth “played”. Now that a white guy has “played”, it’s suddenly a federal hate crime.
This attack was equally as despicable as all of the attacks that preceded it. A strong 27 year old man greeted an elderly man in a friendly manner, struck him in the face so hard that the victim’s jaw was broken, and yelled, “Knockout”, videotaping the entire thing for posterity.
The only difference is, this time the attacker was white and the 79 year old victim was black. The US Department of Justice has filed federal hate crime charges against Conrad Alvin Barrett, upping his potential jail time exponentially as per the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. (source)
The charges against Barrett were justified by “experts” at the time based on the language he used during the assault.
Dr. Donald Green, Political Scientist, Columbia University in New York:
“The reason why you have black perpetrators and white victims being prosecuted asymmetrically hinges on what evidence there is about why they’re doing what they’re doing…If suspects call the victim racial names, and one of the other witnesses testifies to that effect, it would be prosecutable as a hate crime.”(source)
Special Agent in Charge Stephen Morris, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Houston Office
“It is unimaginable in this day and age that one could be drawn to violently attack another based on the color of their skin. We remind all citizens that we are protected under the law from such racially motivated attacks, and encourage everyone to report such crimes to the FBI.” (source)
Ted Williams, defense attorney:
“[Barrett] also during the course used the ‘n’ word. There may be those that would say the requisite intent for the national hate crime is not there but I do believe that this would be an excellent test case.” (source)
So by this definition, if we look at the assault on Robinson, this, too, was a clearcut hate crime. Remember? He heard the attackers say, ‘White boy.’ ‘Cracker’. They were saying, ‘Knock that white boy out’.” If the video on the girl’s cellphone backs up his statement, then federal charges should immediately be laid against each person involved in this crime.
If Justice was truly balanced, that’s exactly what would happen. But considering the reticence of the media to call black criminals “black”, when they had no problem whatsoever gasping in shock over the “white” Conrad Barrett attacking a black victim, I strongly suspect that we will become old and gray waiting for the Department of Justice to step up and charge Matthews and Williams with a hate crime.
Delivered by The Daily Sheeple
Contributed by Kimberly Paxton of www.TheDailySheeple.com.
Kimberly Paxton, a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple, is based out of upstate New York. You can follow Kimberly on Facebook and Twitter.
This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.TheDailySheeple.com.
I do my best to be realist and not racist, but these mooncrickets spouting that shite near me and to a vet that has already been used up and tossed aside by his kike govt. like a wet nap at a bris to wipe off the mohels dirty lips after he does the unspeakable would need tampons to plug their recently acquired breathing ports. End
Don’t hold your breath. “Hate crimes” are only for attacking white Americans in court when they’re not being victims in the street.
Hating white people is part of black culture since the Jews convinced them that white people were responsible for slavery. They have their own holocaust hoax written into the bogus history of slavery that’s become part of who they are.
I have no bad feeling toward black people, but I avoid them because they hate me for being white.
And I’ve known a lot of black people too. Black people from Senegal, Jamaica, and Haiti, are some of the nicest people I’ve ever met, but it seems like the descendants of American slaves are taught racial resentment from a very young age. (“get whitey” , and “kill whitey” are American, or Zionist notions, but Africans don’t feel that way)
Yep, and I thought I was the only one who felt that way. While living in Asia, I experienced the same feeling. I had many Black friends from Ghana, Jamaica and Ivory Coast who were extremely polite, never even gave a thought of race in any issues and treated everyone like equals. Hell, none of them even mentioned a word about slave trade. Completely different from those in America.
If the truth were known, JR, the blacks would realize that they have very little right to complain about their slavery. An excellent read is “They Were White, And They Were Slaves” by Michael Hoffman. It chronicles the slavery of all the white people who were brought to this country from England, and how they were treated FAR worse than the African slaves were. They were snatched from the streets of London, and the countryside, some as young as 10 years old. This is where the term kidnapping originated. They were treated worse than animals, and many were beaten excessively and killed, because they were FAR cheaper than black slaves, due to the cheaper costs of transporting them from England, as opposed to all the way from Africa. They were what the ‘history’ books (which we are all aware are FULL of lies) laughingly referred to as ‘indentured servants’. Black slaves were much more highly prized, way more expensive, and treated FAR better than the white slaves were, BECAUSE of the great expense incurred in bringing them such a great distance.
Unfortunately, most of them prefer to believe the lies in the (so-called) ‘history’ books, rather than doing some honest research on the subject, since it’s so much easier to blame someone other than themselves (OR the true perpetrators, the NWO) for their misfortunes.