Malaysian plane disappearance linked to 9/11: Barrett

Press TV

It happened on 9/11. Now it has happened again in Malaysia.  

Family members of the passengers on Malaysian Airlines MH370 report getting ring tones when they call their missing loved ones. Social networking sites show the missing passengers “on-line.” The airline reports getting ring tones on the crew’s cell phones.

According to the London Daily Mail, “a Malaysia Airlines official, Hugh Dunleavy has confirmed to families that his company had tried to call the cellphones of crew members and they too had also rang out. According to China.org.cn, 19 families of those missing have signed a joint statement confirming that their calls connected to their loved ones but that they rang out.”

The implications are astonishing. Again quoting the Daily Mail:

“Telecoms expert Alan Spencer told MailOnline that if the phones are really ringing, they can categorically not be under the sea. He added that the phones will only be ringing if they are ‘switched on, not in water, the battery is charged, and [they are] near a mobile cell site.’ This means that if the phones are genuinely ringing, the plane needs to have landed on land – not in the sea – and be in a location where there is cell service, rather than landing in the middle of a jungle, for example.”

Perhaps this was not an ordinary plane crash.

Malaysian authorities report that ground control lost contact with Flight 370 about two hours after takeoff. As with the four planes on 9/11, the transponder was inexplicably turned off and the plane veered wildly off course, yet the crew sent no distress signal –  a procedure that takes only a few seconds. Authorities report that Flight 370 flew hundreds of miles off-course, heading west instead of north, before disappearing.

The missing plane seemingly cannot have crashed in the water; if it had, cell phones would not be ringing out. It must have crashed – or landed – somewhere with cell phone service.

Some analysts believe the plane was stolen. According to them, it was an “inside job” hijacking, probably by remote control.

Radio journalist Michael Rivero wonders if money is the motive: “Is Malaysia Flight 370 in a chop shop? A 777 costs roughly $300 million. Given that scarcity drives up prices, the parts from a 777 would be worth at least $100 million in the aftermarket. There is a motive for the plane to vanish, leave no trace, and have flown so dramatically off course! If my theory is correct, the search of the Malacca straights will find nothing. I would start looking at abandoned/closed airfields in that region with large hangers.”

In an exclusive interview with Truth Jihad Radio, one of America’s leading physicists, Dr. David Griscom, asks whether MH370 may have been stolen by the same gang of international terrorists behind the 9/11 false flag operation. “The new Airbuses out of France are now fly-by-wire, which scares me, because a number of those planes have disappeared in ways that I think they really didn’t crash and disappear; they’ve been hijacked (by remote control) and somebody is putting them together for another false flag attack someplace. The Malaysian plane, a Boeing 777, is just the latest example (of an apparent remote-hijacking). Before that, there was the Airbus 744 from Brazil to Paris. It crashed under incredibly anomalous circumstances. And after a few days, they showed photos of ‘various pieces of it’ floating out in the water. Totally staged! One part of it was clearly something that the next wave that hit it would have sunk.”

Dr. Griscom points out that the anomalous cell phone calls from Malaysian Flight 370 are reminiscent of those from the allegedly hijacked airliners of September 11th, 2001. In both cases, “impossible” cell phone calls puzzled experts.

The FBI and the media initially reported 15 cell phone calls from hijacked airliners on 9/11. At least one of the recipients, Deena Burnett, was absolutely certain that her husband, a passenger on UA93, had called her from his cell phone, whose number came up on her caller ID. The problem: The Burnett call, and the other alleged cell phone calls, could not possibly have been placed from the airliners, which were flying at high altitudes, too fast and far beyond the range of 2001 cell phone technology.

In his article “Phone calls from the 9/11 planes: How they fooled America,” Dr. David Ray Griffin explains that the 9/11 cell phone calls –  starting with the notorious “calls” from Bush Administration cheerleader Barbara Olson to her husband, Bush’s Solicitor General Ted Olson –  must have been faked.

The FBI agrees with Dr. Griffin. After spending five years telling the American people about the “cell phone calls,” the FBI radically revised its story in 2006, admitting that 13 of the 15 alleged 9/11 cell phone calls never happened. Amazingly, the FBI even admitted that Ted Olson never received the famous phone calls from his wife, who (Olson claimed) had supposedly called him from hijacked Flight 77.

Olson should have been immediately arrested for obstruction of justice.

The FBI has recognized other 9/11 cell call anomalies. For example, according to the FBI, one of the alleged calls from Flight 93 lasted for two hours and six minutes after the supposed crash; another lasted 65 minutes after the official crash time.

No wonder the FBI has always taken the official position that “Osama Bin Laden was never wanted in connection with 9/11, because there is no hard evidence Bin Laden had anything to do with 9/11.” The FBI knows 9/11 was an inside job. They know – as Elias Davidsson’s book Hijacking America’s Mind on 9/11 explains – that none of the 19 Arabs blamed for 9/11 was even on board any of the allegedly hijacked planes.

Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakheim, a Zionist extremist, managed to lose 2.3 trillion dollars from the Pentagon’s accounts shortly before 9/11. Zakheim’s company SPC invented a “flight termination system” designed to allow operators to seize control of aircraft by remote control and fly them from the ground. Several of the key people who developed Zakheim’s “Flight Termination System” were on the 9/11 flights. Were they silenced? Or rewarded with money and a new identity in a National Security Witness Protection Program?

Zakheim’s “Flight Termination System” appears to have been used on 9/11.

Was it also used on Malaysian Airlines Flight 370?

HRB/HRB

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2014/03/12/354317/malaysian-plane-incident-linked-to-911/