Straight Line Logic – by Robert Gore
What would it take to overthrow the U.S. government? The question may seem academic, but all governments fail. The U.S. government will too, for the usual reasons: its ever increasing size, rapacity, and attempts to control all aspects of life; the corresponding shrinkage of its constituents’ liberty; imperial overreach; welfare-state bread and circuses; debt; spreading poverty; crony capitalism, rampant corruption; widening income disparities, and oligarchic arrogance. As clearly odious as the government is, shouldn’t we do all we can to move it towards its inevitable rendezvous with failure?
Set aside the notion that the salvation of this creaky and corrupt monstrosity might come from the monstrosity itself. The recently passed Cromnibus (Continuing Resolution + omnibus—further corrosion of the once stately and beautiful English language into a leprous gargoyle) should lay to final rest the pitiably naive dream of Republican partisans that their “revolutionary” November victory would work anything revolutionary in Washington, or any kind of change at all. The first rule for honest people in our nation’s capital (if there are any): run like hell from anything hailed as a “bipartisan success,” and double-fast when The Wall Street Journal is doing the hailing, in a front page headline no less. The Republicans gave the Democrats a year’s more spending on their beloved, bloated beast, and did not mount a funding challenge to either Obama’s immigration policy (that’s supposed to come in two months) or Obamacare.
Hidden within the 1600-plus pages bill that nobody but the lobbyists read were the usual pork, earmarks, subsidies, phony cuts (in Washington, if a program is scheduled to grow 10 percent, and that is reduced to 8 percent, they call it a cut), and a Christmas present for the banks: loosening a requirement that they transfer some of their trading activities to affiliates not covered by federal deposit insurance. Naturally the Republicans, swearing fealty to global interventionism and never-ending war, bumped up the military budget—shiny new toys for the generals and admirals and a jobs program for defense contractors back home. With apologies to Ambrose Bierce, here’s a Devil’s Dictionary definition of “bipartisanship”: spending for all!
So forget revolution arising from the current political system. And don’t think that—taking a page from the first American revolution—rebellion will be led by wealthy and successful merchants and lawyers. Those original revolutionaries pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor; current plutocrats are terrified by a declining share price, pressure from a regulatory agency, a class action lawsuit, or unfavorable press. Many of them have a big, crony capitalistic stake in government; they’re not going to be in the vanguard to overthrow it.
Some, mostly on the left, look to a revolution that foments up from the oppressed and downtrodden. The welfare state has taken the sting out of the good old-fashioned economic oppression that was to fuel Karl Marx’s revolutions. Nowadays, beneficiaries would only revolt if the checks stopped. The focus has shifted to “white privilege” and “minority oppression.”
The left had hopes that recent killings by white police officers of unarmed blacks would spark a nationwide outbreak of demonstrations and upheaval, but the unrest has fallen well short of that. The problem with such upheaval, from a revolutionary point of view, is that it usually degenerates into mindless violence, looting, and vandalism, the perpetrators destroying their own neighborhoods and businesses. An effective revolution must have planning and organization absent in the usual race riot, and a goal more transcendent than the acquisition of a free big screen TV.
Looking the other direction on the political spectrum, one finds planning and organization among the groups that foresee continuing deterioration and either the imposition of a police state or degeneration into chaos. While some of these groups may be planning revolution, for the most part strategies are defensive and reactive. If a police state is the way the US goes, the admirably defiant sentiment is: not without a fight, they’ll pry my cold, lifeless fingers from my firearm! Potential chaos, on the other hand, has prompted extensive preparatory measures: stockpiling food, precious metals, medical supplies, and weapons; acquisition of autonomous power-generation capabilities; survival and guerrilla warfare training, and building small communities of the like-minded. Many of these efforts are well-coordinated, led by former members of the military. They scare the hell out of the US government and much of the intelligentsia.
Unfortunately, a police state would have a massive advantage in firepower and would not hesitate to use tyrannical tactics, including taking full advantage of already existing surveillance capabilities. Chaos would be less problematic for the cause of freedom. Secessionist enclaves could be carved out and defended by people committed to the founding principles of liberty and limited government, although there would be more devil in the details of working out actual arrangements than many envision. (It took the founders over a year to devise the Constitution and get it ratified.)
The “revolutionary” undercurrent flowing through American culture—both fictional literature and drama and nonfictional books and internet articles—focuses on dystopian and apocalyptic scenarios characterized by conflict and violence. However, there are millions of people who work in the private sector, pay their bills, mortgages, and taxes, and buy goods and services that power the U.S. economy and make it the world’s largest export market as well. While they may no longer be Richard Nixon’s “Silent Majority,” they are still the economic backbone of this country. The undercurrent ignores those millions of people and their economic leverage, which, if properly applied, could hit our government at its weakest point: its dependence on its citizenry and the capital markets for funding.
The government has no autonomous ability to pay for itself, and almost everything it does runs at a loss. Magnifying that weakness: it has over $18 trillion in debt and over $115 trillion in unfunded liabilities. Those unfunded liabilities represent only the domestic, welfare-state commitments it will never be able to fulfill, and do not include the extensive foreign commitments made pursuant to its policy of global intervention.
It is a matter of some urgency that the payers apply their leverage while they still have it. Simply put, they need to bankrupt the government before the government bankrupts them. On present course it will go broke, perhaps sooner than most people expect. In its desperate rapacity, it will seize every stream of income and asset it can get its kleptocratic hands on. It is incumbent on those with streams of income and assets to launch a preemptive strike or lose everything, which would surely usher in that dystopian apocalypse.
For years government economic policy has promoted borrowing and discouraged saving. The first step of a well-coordinated, long-term effort would be to give the government what it wants. Everyone to whom the government and its banking arm (Or is it the banks and their government arm? See “Bankers Nirvana,” SLL, 11/8/14) will extend credit should borrow money, as much as they can. They should also gradually (so as not to precipitate a financial crash too early) withdraw their “evil” savings from banks, money market and mutual funds, and other financial intermediaries. The money borrowed and withdrawn will help fund preparation for what’s to come.
Banks are highly leveraged and operate on thin margins. Any concerted refusal for an extended period of time by millions of customers to pay their debts, including mortgages, would force them to start writing down the value of those debts, their assets. For most banks those debts are their primary asset, and they are a multiple of their equity. A typical bank that had to completely write off 20 percent of its loans, or write down all of its loans by 20 percent, would see its equity wiped out (if loans are five times equity, a conservative assumption).
For those with compunctions about not paying their debts, recall how much compunction the banks and the government had about reaching into taxpayer pockets when banks’ speculative, highly leveraged business models fell apart in 2008. How much compunction have they demonstrated since as the central bank has promulgated a microscopic rate regime to artificially lower the banks’ cost of funding, while eliminating the return on honest savings? The banking system is just as speculative and leveraged now as it was in 2008, and even more concentrated. Global debt is over 40 percent higher.
When the next crisis arrives, regardless of Dodd-Frank and whether or not some bank activities are or are not “covered” by FDIC insurance, the government will attempt to bail out the banks. Don’t think it will be any different this inevitable next time; they’ll reach into taxpayer pockets once again, because that will be the only money available. The government has much more debt now, as does the Fed, which makes a big increase in debt problematic, and the Fed is already at the zero bound of administered interest rates, which gives it no room to configure monetary policy for the banks’ benefit.
Count on a new wrinkle: “bail ins.” When people deposit money in a bank, they become unsecured creditors of the bank, and that is all. If the bank goes bust, they stand in line with the bank’s other unsecured creditors. There is the FDIC’s deposit insurance, but if enough banks go bust, the FDIC fund will too. Cyprus was the template for bail ins, which is the euphemism for depositor haircuts (or, more correctly, scalps), which is the euphemism for depositors getting stuck with banks’ losses. After Cyprus, bail ins have become an acceptable option, quietly mentioned in banking, central banking, and government circles here and in Europe. No amount of money printing and government debt will save the financial system when banks fail en masse, and depositors will lose some or all of their deposits, whether it’s called a bail in or by its real name—theft.
So the choice is quite simple: screw or be screwed…again. The best defense is a strong offense, but to go on the offensive requires collective action among those who pay the government’s bills. Solitary non-payers face a credit cut-off and asset repossession. Millions of non-payers are a movement, and it would take years to jump through all the legal hoops, especially foreclosure proceedings, necessary to bring them to account. Some banks are still working through the last financial crisis.
While certainly disruptive, this movement, to reach its full effectiveness, would also have to involve a tax protest. Because of tax withholding, that may be more problematic. Major corporations are not going to stop sending in what they’ve withheld from employees’ paychecks. However, a substantial number of individuals refusing to pay estimated taxes and smaller businesspeople (who employ half the nation’s workforce) refusing to collect withholding would be enough for the government, and more importantly, capital markets, to take notice. Anything that called into doubt the capital markets’ bedrock assumption that U.S. debt was backed by the government’s priority claim on the nation’s private-sector production would send interest rates substantially higher, increasing the government’s debt burden.
What are the chances of getting millions of Americans to, as Lady Macbeth put it, screw their courage to the sticking place? Probably small. However, if one accepts the premise that the government-banking complex’s current course will inevitably render it insolvent, leading to a voracious and indiscriminate expropriation of wealth and savings, then this plan is strategically optimal. It relies on the remaining and still substantial American salt-of-the-earth—productive individuals in the private sector—while excluding the quisling wealthy, crony capitalists, welfare state teat-suckers, and random degenerates.Utilizing the salt’s potent leverage—its economic power—this plan seizes the initiative before the inevitable financial crises eliminates that leverage. It strikes a sharp blow against the complex’s weakest point—its accumulated debt and funding vulnerability—a blow against which it has little effective defense.
Execution of the plan will not prevent the dystopian apocalypse. The plan will hasten that outcome. However, preparations for it will in part be funded with the money that has been withdrawn from the financial system or has been borrowed but not repaid. (The paper claims thus extracted should be converted to real money—precious metals—during the preparation phase, before the government and banks completely devalue their own paper.) Note the irony: the government-banking complex will be providing funds for a revolt against it. By denying the complex funds, this plan shifts the odds between the post-collapse police state or chaotic anarchy outcomes in favor of the latter. Police states are expensive to maintain and retard the economic activity on which they are parasitically dependent. Historically, they have had to beg, borrow, and steal to maintain themselves, and the plan would exacerbate the financial difficulties for an American police state.
There are still millions of fundamentally decent, hard-working, tax-paying Americans who have watched as a deterioration that cannot be hidden has unfolded. Pick a proxy—national debt, the poverty rate, people on food stamps, growth of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, the savings rate—and they all portend impending disaster. There is widespread revulsion, frustration, and foreboding, and a mounting sense of helplessness: what can we do? Voting, which theoretically gives the electorate power to change things, has changed nothing. The two parties alternate doling out the spoils expropriated by a corrupt government.
Nothing in the world can stop the arrival of the day of reckoning—actions have consequences that debt and fiat money can perhaps forestall, but never prevent. The longer they “work” the worse the eventual consequences. On present course the government will go bankrupt. The one option for those of us who have provided so much of its ill-gotten and ill-spent loot—and received so little in return—is to seize the initiative, strike at its weakest point, extract a small percentage of what has been taken, hasten the inevitable crash, and then rebuild America into the great nation it once was.
It will be difficult, perhaps impossible, to persuade sufficient numbers to take that initiative, but in passivity lies ruin. By the time that ruin is obvious to all, it will be far too late. This plan has been sketched in broad strokes and will benefit from collaborative discussion and refinement from a variety of sources. It is an overall strategy and many details must be filled in. However, the only defense against what is surely to come is a strong offense, before our capacity to launch an offensive is stolen from us.
http://straightlinelogic.com/2015/01/07/revolution-in-america-by-robert-gore/
Great read.
Iv been cutting off the funds to them for 8 years now. Best choice I ever made.
Now if people would do it too.
Great read is right! Printing this one to have for always.
with reviews like that, now I have to read it.
“to have for always” 😉
In theory his plan would work, but he voices my complaint himself in the last paragraph by saying “It will be difficult, perhaps impossible, to persuade sufficient numbers to take that initiative,…”
And therein lies the rub…. if we could persuade sufficient numbers, we can do anything, and that’s why our road to victory requires re-educating the masses. Once they know what’s going on, they’re easily persuaded to take our side, and in fact, it’s hard for them not to.
And this premise I completely disagree with:
“An effective revolution must have planning and organization..”
Planning and organization are exactly the things that get our movement infiltrated and subverted, and I believe most, if not all successful popular revolutions (people’s uprising rather than a ‘coup de tait’ type of solution) were of the ugly, and brutal variety.
The nature of the next revolution will depend on how many people participate. If only a few, they’ll try to suppress it, if it’s many millions, they’ll flee for their lives. I think they’ll attempt to suppress it, but only because they’ve seriously misjudged the American people. In their arrogance, they assume we’re all stupid, and they don’t realize that we have the many millions.
We’ve had many millions looking forward to this for decades, and now it’s about to pop, because it can no longer be ignored, and Americans can no longer live comfortably without addressing the problem.
Jolly, great analysis of the situation. Appreciate your insight.
We’ve had many millions looking forward to this for decades, and now it’s about to pop, because it can no longer be ignored, and Americans can no longer live comfortably without addressing the problem.
My thoughts exactly, and as I read this article I was thinking that millions of people are already doing this. They are called preppers and have been hurting the beast for a while now. You are right it is about to pop, and unfortunately the rest of society not prepping won’t listen/get it until it is too late.
It didn’t take everybody to instill the current regime. It won’t take everybody to get rid of them either.
Yep.
May I submit an idea …..
If we started a road sign campaign, I believe the gained exposure
would start a rolling effect.
Most readers are widely located throughout the Republic.
That gives us the broad brush to work with.
Now for the signs.
There’s most likely, located near each of us, the
suppliers of corrugated plastic sheeting.
This usually sells for about ten dollars for a sheet 4’x8′
With this dimension, one can cut that into 12 -16″hx24″w signs.
The legs can be made out of a 12′ masons ladder cut to fit like an “H”.
A masons ladder is used in laying block, and it’s just a long wire product that can be easily cut to fit. One end of this “H” inserts into the sign and the other end into the ground.
This is how those signs you see on the side if the road are done.
I do this all the time in promoting my business.
I can produce 12 signs for less than twenty dollars.
To print your signage:
I made an overlapping stencil out of a sheet of cardboard.
Make your letters and numbers approx. 3″ tall.
Cutting out the letters and numbers in order to phrase the message.
As mine reads:
Cabinets and More
320 XXXX
I use a Fluorescent spray paint…..orange
The cut out letters can also be used to make a negative image of the
other sign. Just roll up a piece of tape and place the cut out letters and numbers in their respective places….. Then paint.
The message:
This can be simply a website address like:
From The Trenches World Report . Com or
Liberty Tree Radio . 4mg . Com
With Twelve of these located in smart places, in and around your local,
the word will get out and listener ship will increase.
Make sure to place the sign out of the way of mowers and in a place
where they’ll be easily seen from a distance.
Fluorescent paint will do the rest. I suggest an orange color.
My Fellow Patriots:
Unfortunately,… it appears people have not recognized one simple fact:
This article is DEAD-WRONG right out the gate!,…. it’s base-line assumption is completely wrong!,… therefore, any arguement or solution developed on that base-line assumption,.. is also wrong!,… bar none! (I’m still shaking my head in disbelief about what some people wrote in response to this article…)
Lets start right at the first 9 words:
************************************
“What would it take to overthrow the U.S. government?”
ALREADY,.. the author demonstrates his wanton ignorance,… overt stupidity,.. or both.
FACT: THE US GOV’T HAS ALREADY BEEN OVERTHROWN!,.. PERIOD,.. BAR NONE! (What part of this simple fact are people still not getting???)
If we had a legitmate, “US Gov’t”,… we would NOT want to overthrow it!,… and it would be PROTECTING us from the forces that have already infiltrated, subverted and taken COMPLETE control of this country and the global financial system, by a criminal cartel mistakenly called a gov’t!!!
Does anyone NOT understand this simple reality yet?? (Again,.. I’m shaking my head in disbelief at peoples perspective on this simple,.. but deadly reality!)
Quick Refresher Course On Some Fundamental Concepts:
**********************************************
GOVERNMENTS: Goverrnmets exist (legitimate gov’ts that is),…. for the BENEFIT of the people that agree to have that government!
Legitimate gov’ts seek to minimize internal frauds and abuses,. and to protect from external threats while creating and maintaining an atmosphere of safety and security.
CRIMINAL CARTELS: Criminal Cartels exist to the DETRIMENT of the people they claim control over!
Criminal Cartels seek to maximize internal frauds and abuses, and expose whole populations to every form of external threat to help create and maintain an atmosphere of fear and panic!
Now,… given what you know about the current,.. “US Gov’t”,.. which of those above descriptions more accurately portrays what we have in this country right now??
What the article SHOULD have started with:
********************************************
Given that the USA has ALREADY been overthrown from within and this Criminal-Cartel has now consolidated it’s power on all the facets of control,… How do we expose them?,… How do we remove them from their control?,…. How do we RESTORE a Constitutional Republic?,… and, How do we ensure this never happens again?
As I responded to Katie today, who was running along the lines of using the monetary/financial system AGAINST them,… I wrote:
********************************************************************************************************
“Yes!,.. but the question is,. how?
You can NOT run them out of a resource that they can produce an infinite amount of (…their monetary and financial fraud!,… remember,.. the supply of fraud is infinite,… so you can never implode their system by trying to engage them in a war of attritution on that bases)
We can NEVER win in any way, phyical (tactical) or otherwise, by engaging them on any of their systems of control,.. period,.. bar none!
So, what does that leave us?
We have to exit the typical fields of approach (which they already dominate),… and utilize a strategy and set of tactics that WE control.
This of course is more easily said than done,.. but none the less,… the only way to win,… is to engage this doctrine of “Asset & Resource Dislocation”,.. meaning,… being in control of all elements needed to gain control of our country back,… or dislocating all the resources needed by us,.. FROM the control of the commies now running this country.
Remember, whatever the commies control,.. by definition,… they control!,…. and will do so to our detriment!,… bar none.
This means,.. we MUST,.. if we intent to restore our country, utilize all elements and resources,… which we can acquire, control and maintain control of, as we engage,.. otherwise,,… they will SEIZE any resource that we attempt to use,… to unseat them.
The short version of this is: We can NOT rely on any resource that they can,.. and will take control of, as they seek greater control,.. and we seek to stop them.
A simple equation,.. but one that many people still do not understand as they keep trying to fight from “within” the system,… and then act surprised or confused when they hit ANOTHER roadblock in their efforts!
This is the nature of what we are up against.
The real fight is understanding this,.. and developing counter-strategies when the Enemy-Force-In-Occupation,… ALREADY has the upper hand.
This is not a comfortable reality to acknowledge,… but winning, requires, knowing what our true position is in this fight.
We will be discussing this more on the radio show as it is clear,.. the financial/economic systems are now near a breakdown event globally
JD”
******************************************************************************************************
I hope people understand the magnitude of what I just superficially commented on here!
The battle we face,.. is much more comprehensive, and tedious than most realize,… because most still do not realize the extend of the cancer that has now wholly,.. and completely invaded the body of the Republic. It is in fact no longer a Republic,… it is nothing more than anachronism of our former Republic,… that has now already suffered the complete and fatal effects of the complete morphology of communism in every regard except in name!
If we wish to RESTORE the Republic, which no longer exists,… than by God,…. we MUST start by at least admitting we no longer have one,… that a Criminal Cartel is now in COMPLETE control of this country,.. and their ultimate objective is the abject enslavement of all of mankind, and then the elimination of,… “un-necessary people”.
This is just a quick over-view,… but I pray people understand the true nature of our precarious postion at this point in history.
JD – US Marines – If you wish to FIX a problem,.. it must start with actually identifying what the real problem is!
.
Very well put, JD, correct and to the point.
“You can NOT run them out of a resource that they can produce an infinite amount of (…their monetary and financial fraud!,… remember,.. the supply of fraud is infinite,… so you can never implode their system by trying to engage them in a war of attritution on that bases)”
Yep. Excellent point, JD.
Yes, J.D., our government has already been overthrown, but there are still a group of people who govern the behavior of the U.S. population, and that, by definition, makes them the U.S. government.
No, they’re not a constitutional government, and they’re not even a legal government, but they still tax us, imprison us, and rule us, so they are the U.S. government right now, and they have to go.
Also…. they don’t really have an infinite supply of money (or fraud). The value of the dollar is only a function of someone else’s willingness to accept it, and with no backing of the people, or even an implied promise to pay, they can print all the dollars they want but no one will take them. If there were wide-scale refusal to pay taxes, they’d lose all legitimacy, at home and internationally.
But again,,, my problem with this is the numbers of cooperating people it will require.
Of course the US government has been overthrown. You know that, I know that, many people know that. However that does not change the fact that a majority of humans residing in the territory know as America DO NOT. Many of them know something is wrong and must change. This article, I think, was directed more towards those people.
Also the term “US government” is what these zionist criminal thugs go by as a name to their group. We can call them many terms[some much more accurate] but the fact is they are mascaraed-ing as “the US government”.
I understand too that cutting off money from the feds wont likely do a bit of good as they just “barrow” more. However. the local and state enforcement arms rely very heavily on these funds as they do fed money. By removing yourself and therefor your hard work and “money” these local agencies have a harder time implementing the control network in your area. If enough people choked the local thugs out the supposed feds would have less boots on the ground doing the dirty work.
This article outlined how these criminals are so despotic they will surely collapse themselves out of their own greed and want. Any help we can offer to pull them over should be used.
Still, imo, this article was worth reading. Unlike most of the waterhead “reporting” we see. This used actual sentences and can be read aloud. Plus it is trying to offer a solution. Something many who are wanting to awaken are always clamoring about.
JD, your points are very good points. I agree. I think most informed Patriots know this is only going to happen the hard way. BUT some need to believe it can happen a little easier. What ever keeps them in the trenches.
Yes, i agree it will happen the hard way eventually. The author does not elude to a physical battle, he does say that implementing this plan will not stop the collapse, but will provide funds for a revolt against itself.
Hi nottoobitter,
I understand your points,.. thank you.
Allow me to offer a few ideas:
You stated: “Many of them know something is wrong and must change. This article, I think, was directed more towards those people.”
Response: No,.. it is not!
The author of this article is DEAD-WRONG in every regard of importance,.. bar none, so it does not matter who, or what the author’s target audience is,… he is completely,.. and utterly,… dead wrong,.. and you don’t wake people up, by giving credence to any misconceptions or outright lies they want to believe in.
In fact,.. those people need the opposite,… like a good kick in the ass, and a slap across the back of the head.
We do not, and have not had a legitimate (Constitutional) government for than a century, however the complete evisceration of the Constitution and Bill Of Rights has been, and continues to be an ongoing process,… nearly complete now.
The money question:
**************************
Cutting the money off means nothing, period.
They have control of the printing press, they have control of the national and international financial systems, and they have control of the most lethal military in human history.
Do you understand what the really means?
Think of it this way:
This criminal cartel now spends an estimated 4 Trillion a year (roughly because NOBODY knows the exact amount due to the shear level of secrecy, fraud and misuse)
This criminal cartel takes in estimated 2 Trillion/yr (roughly…)
Now lets take the following as an illustrative example of how effective any type of “Financial-Blockade” would work:
Lets say this criminal cartel did, at one point, take in 4 Trillion/yr in taxes. (so,.. they did not need to borrow any money)
Then let’s say people woke up the fact this gov’t is a criminal cartel, and decided to engage in a “Financial-Blockade”.
Lets say it not only worked,.. but worked so well, that it reduced the amount of money flowing into the criminal cartel by 2 Trillion/yr,… so that the net result is – they are short 2 Trillion/yr!!
Now,… nobody is going to argue that cutting off 2 Trillion per year is not a substantial amount of money, or that the financial blockade is not working!!!! (after all,… that’s 50% of their revenues cut off now!!! THAT’s HUGH!!!)
So now,.. this criminal cartel needs to BORROW,.. (or simply print in reality) 2 TRILLION+ Per YEAR!!!!
THAT SHOULD SHUT THEM DOWN!!!,.. RIGHT??!!!!!
WRONG!
Because that is EXACTLY where they are now,… it has not only NOT slowed them down,… it has in fact given them the excuse to raise taxes, seize property, and INDEBT the nation even more!!!!
Remember: What is the main method by which the banksters take control of a nation>,… by creation of debt!!!! so the more you cut-off from them,.. the more excuse they have to create debt, which is how they sieze control of whole countries!!! (just look at Greece right now!)
So creating more debt, FEEDS their mechanism!
If you really want to get rid of them…. you need to do the OPPOSITE,.. and get rid of the debt altogether!,.. then you have ZERO need for them, or to obligate yourself (or your country) to them!
I know this sounds a little counter-intuitive,… but that is because most people prefer to offer, “shoot-from-the-hip-solutions”,.. rather than analysis the system,… figure out its operative dynamics,… and THEN,… develop the solutions that will eliminate the problem.
So whether the gov’t needs to “borrow” nothing (because it had enough total revenues),… or borrow the Two+ Trillion per year as it does now due to cash shortages,…..
MEANS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
(In fact,.. they NEED the system to constantly create more debt!)
ANY argurment, or strategy based on trying to usurp them via any mechanism, bases or financial assets they control,… is an act of blind idiocy.
Well intended idiocy to be sure,…. but none the less,…. a method and strategy which failed before it was even acted on because it NEVER had a chance of producing the desired result!
Any arguement or proposition that is built on undermining this global criminal cartel by attempting to confront them thru the mechanisms they control,.. lost the battle before it was even engaged,… bar none,.. hence the Sun Tzu Axiom: “All battles are won (or lost) before they are even fought”,.. and he was not just talking about armed conflicts.
Hope that helps a little.
If we are going to “fight them”,.. it MUST be in ways that they can not readily take control of,… and can not effectively ignore.
JD – US Marines – There is a way,… but it starts with coming to terms with the plain, simple,… and ugly truth. They have the upper hand at the moment, and we need to be more clever than them in our method of exposing them.
.
Well,
when you put it like that I got nothing.
Just me and my blind idiocy acting up again I guess.
I guess the only answer is to go and TAKE freedom till them or I am dead from it. There appears to be no other way and this must be a perpetual machine incapable of destruction.
Hi nottoobitter,
You misunderstand,…
This is a common problem of perception, because we have all been subjected to propaganda and lies our entire lives,… and it is difficult to seperate our everyday perceptions from the reality of our destruction.
We all slip back into the matrix mode of thinking and talking from time to time, which can be called the blind spot of truth.
No intent to offend you nottoobitter, you seem to be one of the good people, and like the rest of us,.. struggling to understand what they have concealled so well!
JD
I don’t know why people call it the US Government anymore because it sure as hell isn’t for the United States.
We should not have to “overthrow” OUR government !
The needed action is to RESTORE IT !
Thereby removing the usurpers …………..
Our form of government is the best there is, when those who participate in it are moral people. Remember, it’s been said by our founders that it would only work when moral people participate.
That’s the whole crux of the issue ….our government has been corrupted by immoral people with an even more immoral cause …..
That of socialism, which leads to communism.
Which is the enemy of all peoples, plain and simple.
Just as a reminder:
Government: Latin verb Guverno, Guvernare, meaning “To control” and Latin noun Mens, Mentis, meaning “Mind.” Put them together and you get “To control the mind.”