“It’s not him,” a third San Bernardino shooting witness proclaimed about Sayd Farook and his wife.
The so-called “terror couple” have been accused of masterminding an ISIS terror attack on a Christmas office party where Sayd worked.
Earlier this month, the attorneys for the Farook family maintained that they do not believe the suspects are the ones who carried out the attacksin question.
Several eyewitnesses and family of witnesses and victims initially said that three athletic Caucasian men had been responsible for carrying out the attacks. Police immediately banned them from speaking with the media.
Just days ago, another eye-witness in the office came forward and said that in spite of what the law enforcement and mainstream media narrative is saying, the people who carried out the attack where very athletic, large, Caucasian men, who were three – not two – in number. Farook’s wife, it should be remembered weighed approximately 90lbs.
Now, a third prominent eye-witness, Chirs Nwadike, has stepped up to challenge the mainstream narrative. He recently told reporters he received a phone call from an unknown person around 7 p.m., on the evening of the shooting, who told him that he must say that Sayd Farook was the shooter.
You read that right, he says that he was called and told to change his story and say that Farook carried out the attacks with his wife, even though that is very different than what he witnessed.
Nwadike told reporters:
“No it’s not him [Sayd]. I told them about it. He’s quiet. He doesn’t make any trouble.”
“He was just spraying bullets everywhere,” Nwadike said. But the gunman was not Sayd, or his wife.
Listen to what he has to say and help SPREAD THE WORD!
(Article by M. David)
http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/12/third-eyewitness-to-san-bernardino-says-it-wasnt-couple/
this guy better watch his back
chances are he will be shut up soon , either by him deciding to, or by them giving him no choice
no one has cell phone pictures of this? that in and of itself is hard to believe now a days
Yeah, what would they call it, if it were even possible in matters where the stakes are pushed this far?
Selective remote shut down of phone functions?
BTW, Someone I know saw something interesting on a train. He thought others might like to see this, so he started filming. When he was done, he walked to others to show his footage, and his phone had recorded nothing… Phone worked fine though. I guess operator error. 😉
very interesting
I wonder how much in Federal Government money San Bernardino gets for the drills? I am sure that San Bernardino wanted to cooperate with the Federal Government after its bankruptcy a few years ago.
As I write this, I wonder if other cities that have or about to file for bankruptcy will be coerced into holding these false flag drills?
dam good observation
“… said that three athletic Caucasian men had been responsible for carrying out the attacks. Police immediately banned them from speaking with the media.”
BANNED???
By WHAT ‘authority’ can anyone be BANNED from speaking to the ‘media’?
Regardless, I’m not falling for THIS banana in the tailpipe, either. I don’t believe anyone was killed or injured any more than they were at Sandy Hoax.
Red herrings.
“Three athletic Caucasian males” huh? Detain that man for mandatory “Re-education Camp”. “We’ll tell him what he saw!”
Sounds like the federal gangsters sent out there little puppet thugs to go stir things up again. Why all the false flags and what is really going on? Gun ban? ISIS ran US thanks to barry h? I think this is just a big smoke screen for something larger that is happening. Looks like it’s time to head off to the fema camps. Thank god for the 2nd….molon labe
Wow, another revelation that blows the msmedia lies apart. Liars, Liars, Liars!
Heh, heh, heh… 🙄
https://youtu.be/cOkjjGYKKgI?t=13
#1 thanks! Liar, liar pants on fire!
😀
I happen to be a proud owner of a “vintage” George W. Bush “Pants on fire doll”! Yep, G.W. with his cowboy hat on with pants on fire. F’ hilarious!
Too funny, would love to see a picture of this doll.