Congressional Resolutions (HR 257, SR 118) will sic law enforcement on you for ‘hating’ Muslims, Jews, or blacks

Fellowship of the Minds – by Dr. Eowyn

Thought Crime comes to America.

There are two bi-partisan resolutions in Congress, House Resolution 257 and Senate Resolution 118, which mean to trigger a law enforcement “investigation” if you are deemed to “hate” Muslims or Jews or blacks.

HR 257 is called “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States”.  

HR 257’s companion in the U.S. Senate is Senate Resolution 118, which was introduced by Democrat Kamala Harris (CA) on April 5, 2017, when it was unanimously approved by the Senate. SR 118’s four co-sponsors are:

  • 2 Republicans: Marco Rubio (FL), Susan Collins (ME)
  • 2 Democrats: Dianne Feinstein (CA), Tammy Duckworth (IL)

HR 257 is sponsored by Republican Rep. Barbara Comstock (VA), who introduced the resolution in the House on April 6, 2017. On April 21, HR 257 was referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.

HR 257 has 12 co-sponsors:

  • 2 Republicans: Scott Taylor (VA), Carlos Curbelo (FL).
  • 10 Democrats: Debbie Dingel (MI), Luis Gutierrez (IL), Mike Quigley (IL), Tulsi Gabbard (HI), Gregory Meeks (NY), Gwen Moore (MI), Bonnie Watson Colman (NJ), Ro Khanna (CA), Peter DeFazio (OR), Raja Krishnamoorthi (IL).

Below is the text of House Resolution 257 in its entirety. I supplied the bold red and pink emphasis.


Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.

Whereas, in the past several years, violent crimes, threats of violence, and other incidents of hate-motivated targeting of religious, racial, and ethnic minorities have increased across the United States;

Whereas, in 2015, hate crimes targeting Muslims in the United States increased by 67 percent, reaching a level of violence targeting Muslim Americans that the United States had not experienced since the aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

Whereas, in 2015, anti-Semitic incidents increased in the United States for the second straight year, according to the Anti-Defamation League’s 2015 Audit of Anti-Semitic Incidents, which describes trends such as the tripling of assaults targeting Jews since 2012 and the rise of online harassment and hate speech directed at Jewish journalists and individuals through social media;

Whereas, in 2015, anti-Semitic incidents at institutions of higher education nearly doubled compared to the number of those incidents in 2014, and during the 2016–2017 school year there has been an increase in White supremacist activity on college campuses across the United States, according to the Anti-Defamation League;

Whereas, in 2015, among single-bias hate crime incidents in the United States, 59.2 percent of victims were targeted due to racial, ethnic, or ancestry bias, and among those victims, 52.2 percent were victims of crimes motivated by their offenders’ anti-Black or anti-African-American bias, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

Whereas, in 2017, there have been more than 100 reported bomb threats against Jewish community centers, Jewish day schools, and other Jewish organizations and institutions in more than 38 States;

Whereas, in 2017, Islamic centers and mosques have been burned in the States of Texas, Washington, and Florida, and Jewish cemeteries have been desecrated in the States of Missouri and Pennsylvania;

Whereas, in 2017, there has been harassment and hate-based violence against individuals who are perceived to be Muslim, including members of South Asian communities in the United States, and Hindu and Sikh Americans have been the target of hate-based violence targeting religious minorities; and

Whereas, on February 28, 2017, President Donald Trump, before a joint session of Congress, acknowledged threats targeting Jewish community centers and the vandalism of Jewish cemeteries, and stated that “we are a country that stands united in condemning hate and evil in all of its very ugly forms”: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, that the House of Representatives

(1) affirms that the United States stands united in condemning hate and evil in all forms;

(2) rejects hate-motivated crime as an attack on the fabric of the society of the United States and the ideals of pluralism and respect;

(3) condemns hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States;

(4) calls on Federal law enforcement officials, working with State and local officials

(A) to expeditiously investigate all credible reports of hate crimes and incidents and threats against minorities in the United States; and

(B) to hold the perpetrators of those crimes, incidents, or threats accountable and bring the perpetrators to justice;

(5) encourages the Department of Justice and other Federal agencies—

(A) to work to improve the reporting of hate crimes; and

(B) to emphasize the importance of the agencies’ collection and reporting of data pursuant to Federal law;

(6) encourages the development of an interagency task force led by the Attorney General and bringing together the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education, the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to collaborate on the development of effective strategies and efforts to detect and deter hate crime in order to protect minority communities; and

(7) calls on the executive branch—

(A) to offer Federal assistance that may be available for victims of hate crimes; and

(B) to enhance security measures and improve preparedness for religious institutions, places of worship, and other institutions that have been targeted because of the affiliation of the institutions with any particular religious, racial, or ethnic minority in the United States.

Note that:

(1) Although HR 257 (and SR 118, which is already unanimously approved by the Senate) says “Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States,” only Muslims and Jews are mentioned as  “religious” targets, and blacks or African-Americans as the “racial” targets. No mention of Christians or whites as being even potential targets of religious or racial “bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus”.

(2) The vagueness and ambiguity of important words, such as “hate crime”, “incitement to violence”, “bias”, “threats”, and especially “animus”. The Cambridge English Dictionary defines “animus” as “a feeling of hate or anger towards someone or something”. A feeling is an in-dwelling emotion, in contrast to “hate crime” and “incitement to violence”, which are outward behaviors of speech and/or action. That means HR 257 and SR 118 seek to make feelings (of hate or anger toward Muslims, Jews, or blacks) into thought crimes.

Then there is the important matter of how “animus” — having a feeling of hate or anger — is detected and determined. Is simply criticizing Muslims, Jews, or blacks “animus”?

Contact your reps in the House of Representatives and tell them you oppose HR 257, which, under no circumstances should be approved!

To find out who your representative is and how to contact him/her, click here.

H/t John Molloy


44 thoughts on “Congressional Resolutions (HR 257, SR 118) will sic law enforcement on you for ‘hating’ Muslims, Jews, or blacks

  1. “LAW ENFORCEMENT”????????


  2. I would be more worried if they started arresting those who criticize the U.S. government for striving to attain one world government at the expense of the Constitution which they took an oath to uphold. Even putting it all on the Jews may be playing into their hands. Only about 62% of the Council on Foreign Relations are jews. Shouldn’t one question who are the other 38%?

    Let’s get the populace all riled up about the Muslims, the Jews, the Left, the Right, The Republicans, The Democrats, the high price of gas…as long as they don’t look too deeply at us. We just might pull this off before they grab their guns in a state of awareness and do the one thing we fear the most. We told Obama he had 8 years to get the guns and he failed.
    We’ll have to put our plans in high gear. We just have to hope our urgency goes unnoticed, it shows vulnerability.

    1. It has to be a top priority for all honest patriotic Americans, that when the first blue helmet sets foot on American soil, that it be immediatly crushed. I’ll take a look at the video, but like I said, us focusing on the jews may be part of their plan.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if that looking back someday jews laugh and say, remember all those jew hateing anti-semites online, back in the old days? Half of them were us!..Oi imtellinya!… It kept the goy looking in the wrong direction….Oi….i’m so schmot, right Isaac?

      1. Its just a song, the attack could come from anywhere and the largest most obvious enemy is the military and police who follow orders (which is who I am speaking to in my message, the Jew song is only bait and a symbol of defiance).
        The fight has to start somehow and what I’m really saying here is “they have no balls”, free speech is an excellent way for the fight to begin and I welcome it.

        What are your thoughts on that Bob?

        1. Right Frank. I think they are smarter than to expect Americans to shoot Americans on a grand scale. That’s debatable seeing what the cops are up to. It’ll take allot more than the cops to get the job done. I was taken aback by a gun store owner once, when he said out of the blue that he plan of action prepared when he sees a blue helmet.
          I think that’s Adam Sandler in the video. I used to think the guy was funny until I got some knowledge ,like Sarah Silvershit, another nasty pig.

          1. Unfortunately, the US military has been used against the people of this country on several occasions in our history, from the Whiskey Rebellion to gun confiscation after Hurricane Katrina. Out of all those incidents, I’m not aware of a single time when significant numbers of “our troops” failed to follow orders to either threaten or attack Americans. “Blue helmets” will not be needed.

            Speaking of helmets, the newest model in the military (the Enhanced Combat Helmet, or ECH) can stop most rifle rounds. (5.56 M855 “green tip” is probably an exception. So are genuine AP rounds in .308, .30-06, etc. I suspect a heavy Brenneke slug would dent it in enough to be lethal, too.). A rifle-resistant helmet was not possible even ten years ago.

            That’s one example of a larger point: infantry technology, developed to fight “insurgents” overseas, will inevitably be used to fight “insurgents” here at home if there is an uprising, mass gun confiscation, etc.

            Take surveillance technology as a further example: that which was originally developed for overseas use has now been used by domestic law enforcement for years.

            I saw these developments coming even before the Iraq invasion and tried to warn people about it on right-leaning discussion boards. The rabble shouted me down as a “traitor,” “liberal,” “terrorist sympathizer,” and all sorts of other retarded crap. I wish I’d been wrong, but time has proven me correct, and well beyond what even I’d suspected at the time.

            “Technology transfer” from the military to the pigs is how the military has been destroying our freedom up to this point. That’s bad enough, but in the future, the military may again play a more direct role in destroying freedom, as with the Whiskey Rebellion and other aforementioned examples.

            The military is not invincible yet — it can’t even defeat the Taliban — but it is only getting stronger with time. Civilian weapons and capabilities are not keeping pace with those being developed for infantry forces, and that disturbs me greatly. We need more creative, technically-minded people to start working HARD on new ideas and new countermeasures (like homemade AP rifle ammo).

          2. BMF, very interesting. I’ve had a bad feeling for some time now when I think of AR15’s and the frenzy over them recently, of which I am guilty.
            I keep thinking the average guy would have been smarter loading up on AR10’s instead, or both. He may end up with a knife at a gunfight.
            It’s not too late, prices are coming down. Thanks for the great info.

      2. I disagree.
        The fact that the Jews had infiltrated our highest level of government was kept hidden while being perpetrated.
        If you want to kill the snake, you have to cut off the head, and the head has a yarmulke on it.
        No matter what the threat, at the top I know where the orders are coming from and I will continue to shout it at the top of my lungs at every occasion.

        1. Don’t get me wrong, I want the jews out of the picture just as much as anyone.I know they have had this plan to ruin the United States for over 100 years. I am trying to figure out who is collusion with them. It appears to be many. They have convinced many non jew, liberal communists (like themselves) to join the club.
          Many people have been brainwashed through the educational system, so now, we not only have the jews to deal with but many more sympathizers.People that have no clue that we as Americans have a right to free speech, whether we agree with them or not.
          Americans haven’t been taught civics for a long time. They think they know, but like me, they have to learn what was purposely left out of their education.If they really want to know they will have to go out and get the information for themselves.It’s been my experience, that usually won’t happen. Most go around thinking what they know is all there is to know. In reality it is an evolutionary process. The story changes as you learn more, sometimes.
          My main thought here though, It’s much more than just the jews we have to worry about.
          A final thought:
          The public has been brainwashed into thinking anyone who mentions the word Jew is a racist Nazi. They have no clue whatsoever what the truth is. They have a knee jerk reaction because they don’t know what we know.
          Say the word Hitler, what do people think of? The leader of a country during WWII? I don’t think so.

          1. The communists are a part of it, but it is the Jeeewwwdeo Christians, made up of a lot of good ol’ boy mush minds, that have decided that the Jeeewwws are their God’s chosen people. Now whether you believe the book or not, there were no Jeeewwws at the time Jesus Christ was supposed to have been upon this Earth. Those people were Heeebrews and the Book says they condemned Christ and turned a murderer lose in the same motion. Doesn’t look like things have changed a whole lot, does it?
            Anyway, these Jeeewwwdeo Christians have pledged their loyalty to a foreign king and offered our children up for sacrifice to the Jeeewwws they worship. And this is the true treachery within. That’s why the truth about the Jeeewwws is paramount to the stand we must make.

          2. “Now whether you believe the book or not, there were no Jeeewwws at the time Jesus Christ was supposed to have been upon this Earth. Those people were Heeebrews and the Book says they condemned Christ and turned a murderer lose in the same motion.”

            Disagree, Henry.

            Granted, they weren’t CALLED jews (considering that word didn’t even EXIST until the mid 1800’s), but the Pharisees & Sadducees were descended from the Canaanites, Edomites & Amalakites (Esau, as opposed to Jacob)… all enemies of the Hebrews (Jacob). They literally walked into Israel and set up shop when the Hebrews were sent into exile – first Assyria, then Babylon. They became the religious ruling class by deception (ALWAYS been their forte, they never would have survived, otherwise).
            The Hebrews, on the other hand, polluted and watered down their racial purity by doing what God specifically told them NOT to do… marrying into other races
            (nations), and worshiping their false gods, until they were virtually indistinguishable from the jews themselves…

            “And it shall be, if thou do at all forget the Lord thy God, and walk after other gods, and serve them and worship them, I testify against you this day that ye shall surely perish.
            As the nations which the Lord destroyeth before your face, so shall ye perish, because ye would not be obedient unto the voice of the Lord your God.” Deut. 28: 14, 15 KJ.

            They weren’t obedient, obviously.

          3. Thats’s right Henry, I knew I was Forgetting someone! A big part at that.
            Christian Zionists.
            I just found out LBJ was one, days ago.

          4. #1,
            Canaanites? So the bad Hebrews went away in the exile and the good Hebrews joined up with the Canaanites and they weren’t supposed to marry anyone out of their race? Which means that the true line came from Adam and Eve, part of which turned bad and the other races were the Goyim, hence animals?
            I have American Indian in me, am I part animal?
            Do you see how the interpretations of open subject matter can get away from a fella?
            Never preach to me again, otherwise I’ll have to unleash my own contradictions.
            By the way, my grandmother was Sicilian, does that make me a nigger because of the Moors. 🙂
            By the way, Judas was a Canaanite too, right?
            And by the way, by the way, if you believe the Book, in 400 years of bondage in Egypt the enslaved Hebrews managed to keep their bloodline pure because the Egyptians were above raping a slave because they wanted to keep their bloodline pure? 🙂

          5. “Never preach to me again,…”

            Knowing your outlook on the Bible, I would never presume to ‘preach’ to you, Henry. My comment could only be construed to be ‘preaching’ if the information divulged came from the Bible. It didn’t (other than the quote at the end, that is). It came from researchers such as Hoffman, Marrs & Cleraubat, all of whom I have great respect for.

            The following is part of a comment of mine from my ‘Hebrews & jews… is there a difference’ article…

            “I am not ignorant of what the Bible says, I have read it from cover to cover more than a dozen times. While I believe it to be historically accurate, it is by no means a COMPLETE history of that era. As stated in the article… “I do not claim to be able to prove this conclusively, but the neither do I believe that anyone can provide conclusive evidence to the contrary.” This article is based solely on my BELIEF that it is true, given the research material I’ve managed to acquire on the subject.”

            My beliefs are my own. If I’m not welcome to present my beliefs for consideration by others posting here (which was my main purpose, knowing your thoughts on the matter already), I will simply refrain from replying to any of your comments in the future. 🙂

            p.s. years ago I was accused by some (not regular) posters of being your clone. Although you & I both know it’s pure b.s., this is proof-positive for any others with that false notion. 🙂

          6. It’s not the Bible that bothers me, but rather the interpretations. I too have read the Book and a lot of other books, in fact I took the time to study religion back to its sources. The line of Jacob back to Adam and the notion of a pure race and the begots. It is just too incredible to believe considering the span of time involved because I know that all these people were human and the human equation missing from the formula is ‘momma’s baby, papa’s maybe’. And the Priests of San Hedron and their declared direct channel to God plays into today’s notion of spiritual elitism.
            If there is a special chosen people today like there was claimed to be back then, then everyone else is of a lesser lower class and this class system, well evidently exists into eternity. If there is a chosen people of a god that isn’t me, then I reckon that isn’t my god, it is theirs and they are welcome to him. And if they try to assert that elitism through their notion of their god on me in this life, it will be my pleasure to send them to their elitist eternity at the first opportunity.
            I don’t think I’m any better than anybody else and in the end equation, nobody is better than me.
            And finally, from my study of religion back to its source, I have found that in every religion through history, those who put the pen to the paper just happen to end up to be those who were the special chosen of their god with everybody else being something less.
            There is good and bad in all peoples and it can be demonstrated in life on this earth and I see those of the worst ilk claiming a pass from that absolute through some extra-terrestrial assertion made by their people a thousand years ago.
            The Bill of Rights is man’s equal consideration and application of the law, yet I know there are those who have rejected our law and caused untold misery through self serving interpretations of open subject matter coming from ancient text. You can’t prove it wrong, they can’t prove it right, yet they would assert their conclusions upon you. That is what is unacceptable. One person asserting their conclusions on another. That is why I reject it. If one wants to take their own conclusions and live their lives accordingly without it violating my rights, I would die for their right to do so. But that is not what I see or hear from the self-righteous who have violated the hell out of my rights via their bullshit and conclusions of open subject matter.
            I meant you no insult, just trying to avoid any conflict by making sure you understood where my lines are. You will note that I never go directly at anybody unless they directly address me or a matter concerning my rights. The religious discussion between individuals here is their business and I wish all peace in their conclusions, as I have found individual beliefs in the good lead to good people.
            I guess religion is like all knowledge, good if used for construction, bad when used for destruction. 🙂

          7. “The religious discussion between individuals here is their business and I wish all peace in their conclusions,…”

            Exactly, Henry, that is my only intent here… discussion. I have no desire to force any of my personal beliefs on anyone, only to present certain conclusions that my research has led me to. Although my belief about the origins of these Satanic scum isn’t absolutely provable, you have to at least admit that it sounds highly likely/logical. 🙂

      3. I gotta agree with Henry on this one.
        The Jews will brag about being the inventors of Capitalism.
        They also invented Communism.
        Marx was a Jew.
        The fella who helped him write his Manifesto was a Jew.
        The Capitalists created the Communists as a means of controlled opposition, pitting one side against the other, while the string pullers control them both through gaining control of the banks.
        Who are the International bankers?

  3. The jews already did this to Europe, and the United Kingdom. You are next Jew-merikans. Years in jail for ratting out jew lies and black crimes.

  4. Well, I’m gonna break their “law” right now and call those niggers in Georgia that broke the lady’s nose and gave a concussion to her daughter at the chicken restaurant in Georgia low life scum niggers.

    1. Oh my god Katie. …
      I never thought you would say something like that.

      Well we have something in common.

      I hate niggers to.

      And I’m not even white.

      These are the people that make intelligent black people ashamed to be black.

      Or in the old days…
      Colored or Negro.

      I would be more concerned with the Hispanics.

      Evidently by nigger standards…
      The food was sh!tty.

      1. Before I retired, I worked with a number of blacks, women and men. It was interesting to have THEM, the men anyhow, tell me the difference between a black man and a Nigger.
        So, now I know, and agree. There’s nothing racial about it.
        There seems to be no excuse for the jew. It appears they would all sell the USA down the river for the preservation of Israel.

    2. Before I retired, I worked with a number of blacks, women and men. It was interesting to have THEM, the men anyhow, tell me the difference between a black man and a Nigger.
      So, now I know, and agree. There’s nothing racial about it.
      There seems to be no excuse for the jew. It appears they would all sell the USA down the river for the preservation of Israel.

  5. This is funny. I just spent part of the morning bashing Jews in the comment section and now this story pops up.

    1. This bill is for minorities. The Mexicans/Latino’s aren’t a minority anymore, apparently.
      It’s pretty funny. They describe this bill as a means to combat racism, but the bill itself is inherently racist by it’s very nature.

    2. Think about it. NWO It’s really not a racial thing, there should be no guilt on the part of white people anyway. It has been my experience the whites are a live and let live people. Others protest, what are the first words out of their mouth? “here are the conditions we are pissed about””here’s the solution we want” NO. It’s always whitey’s a bad guy, whitey is the cause of all our problems. Whitey is racist.
      Kill whitey.There are, exceptions. If we really were the way they say, would we not have finished the job long ago. I don’t know now about you but I’m tired of hearing it. I do have a vivid imagination of what life would be like, when whitey is the minority in America. We don’t need to imagine, take a good look at South Africa.

      1. My ex is Mexican. so it would be tough to call me racist, regardless.

        That aside, I was being utterly facetious, something I do a lot of here.

        1. It’s all good, man.
          My point was, who knows how many illegal aliens are in the country? I’m sure somebody somewhere is keeping track but they sure aren’t telling us. They might not be a minority anymore.

        1. Mary, I’m wary of going to sites unfamiliar to me due to the ransom wear stuff going on, authentic or not, so having to “enter site” was not an option for me.

          Having said this, what are they preparing for?

          Looks like chaos going on from the revolving pictures on the front of the site you provided.

          1. Bob,thank you. I just started watching and have seen some of the footage before. My question is, is S.Africa preparing to release more people?

            Mary had said they were preparing.

          2. We think we’ve got it bad here, being white.
            Things will be the same here if our problems with illegal immigration

            I think Mary meant the white people are Prepping in South Africa. It showed in one of the “Suidlander” videos.
            (“suidlanders” is what they call their group)
            That’s all they can do, but where do they go?
            You would think the US government would let the South African whites immigrate here? Not a chance. That’s reserved for the people who make race, the issue (racists). Those who wish destroy our country and to accomplish the CFR and Trilateral commission’s goal. Jewish lead communism and one world government. The NWO

    1. FarmerDave, That 38% is just the Council on Foreign Relations.
      There’s plenty more Jew ,as lickers, out there.
      One of them is the president.

  6. So when the Jews, Blacks or Muslims calls the white man a racists name, what then, they get a pass because of pay back?

    Will Hollywood stop using slurs in their block buster movies?

    Will blacks stop calling each other Niggers?

  7. Knowing that Satan is a counterfeiter, always has been always will be, of the genuine of God, makes perfect sense he’d counterfeit God’s chosen as these murdering Zio jews.

    Sheesh, anybody that’s read the scriptures knows they were to be a holy nation of priests, showing forth the praises of God, declaring God to the other nations.

    Are they doing this, uh, NO, so pooey on em’.

    Peter was written to the Diaspora (scattered) of Israel who were born again, distinguished from others as a royal priesthood, purpose being to declare the praises of God to the other nations.
    Exodus 19:6 And you shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation. These are the words which thou shalt speak unto the children of Israel.

    All they are is a counterfeit, period!

  8. Henry, this cracked me up first thing this morning ….” it will be my pleasure to send them to their elitist eternity at the first opportunity.”

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.