In Rare Alliance, Obama, Ryan Oppose 9/11 Bill

Roll Call – by John T. Bennett

A Senate bill that would allow families of those killed in the 9/11 attacks to sue the Saudi government has achieved a rare Washington distinction, by uniting the Obama administration and some of its fiercest GOP critics.

President Barack Obama, Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., are rallying to kill the bipartisan plan that would make it possible for American citizens to sue foreign governments believed to be linked to terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.  

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest warned the legislation could lead other countries to craft even broader versions that could do significant harm to the U.S. government.

“It certainly is plausible … that that other countries when they’re implementing these laws would not tailor them so specifically,” Earnest said. “And that does open up the United States to a unique degree of risk, and putting our country, our taxpayers, our service members and our diplomats in legal jeopardy in that way is contrary to our interests.”

Earnest said it would be “unwise” for the Senate to pass the legislation, “particularly when there is an alternative mechanism for us to resolve these kinds of issues with other countries.”

That alternative, he said, is “the essence of diplomacy.”

Shortly before Earnest appeared in the White House briefing room, Ryan spoke out against the so-called ‘9/11 bill.’

“I think we need to look at it,” Ryan told reporters at the Capitol. “I think we need to review it to make sure we are not making mistakes with our allies and that we’re not catching people in this that shouldn’t be caught up in this.

“The White House is opposed to it. It’s received some opposition here. We’re going to let these things work the process,” he added. “We’ll see where it goes from there.”

Administration officials are “gratified” to have Ryan as an ally as they try to block the legislation.

There has long been speculation that some members of the Saudi ruling family provided support to the al-Qaida hijackers on 9/11.

The White House on Tuesday picked up another unlikely partner in Graham, a hawkish Armed Services member and former GOP presidential candidate who is a frequent critic of Obama on foreign policy and national security matters. Graham placed a hold on the bill, wanting to review changes that have been made.

In fact, the legislation appears to align the president with many more Republican members than Democrats. Such scenarios, save a handful like trade bills, have been few and far between during Obama’s presidency.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada says that in the Senate, it’s Republicans that are more split.

“I support it, almost everyone in the caucus supports it,” Reid said of his Democrats.

Earnest acknowledged that this White House’s alliances with GOP members “is rare.”

“But I think in this instance it is an indication of just how significant these questions are, and, you know, we’re obviously gratified that there are other Republicans who have taken … a close look at this legislation and recognized the serious, unintended consequences that could result from its passage,” he said.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Tuesday declined to discuss prospects for the bill, which is sponsored by Majority Whip John Cornyn of Texas and the No. 3 Senate Democrat, Charles E. Schumer of New York.

Graham appears to be “concerned with the way that this administration has treated our allies, and particularly Saudi Arabia as a result of the misguided Iran nuclear deal,” Cornyn told reporters. “And now the president seems to want to use the leverage of the 9/11 families in order to somehow mollify or cure that rift that the president has created.

“This is really narrow provision, which only has to do with terrorist attacks on our own soil,” Cornyn said, adding that it wasn’t necessarily the case that it would apply to Saudi Arabia. “Let’s let the chips fall where they may.”

Saudi leaders have threatened to sell $750 billion in U.S. assets should the 9/11 victims bill become law. Earnest, however, seemed to dismiss that threat earlier this week , saying the Middle East power is a “large economy” and has no interest in destabilizing the global economy.

On a related note, Reid said that he supported the position of members of the independent, bipartisan commission that investigated the attacks, who want to see 28 pages of their report that remain classified be made public. The material is believed to draw a picture of foreign support for the 9/11 hijackers.

White House officials are actively contacting members to make their case. Earnest said the administration would like to have “a dialogue” with lawmakers about the legislation.

Contact Bennett at johnbennett@cqrollcall.com. Follow him on Twitter @BennettJohnT.

Contact Lesniewski at nielslesniewski@cqrollcall.com and follow him on Twitter at @nielslesniewski.

– See more at: http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/bipartisanship-breaks-block-911-bill#sthash.1VKqo9WW.dpuf

 

13 thoughts on “In Rare Alliance, Obama, Ryan Oppose 9/11 Bill

  1. Traitor fkus. And we just sit and wait. This is treason at its most dispikable and obvious. SoetoroRyanGrahm remember it. Barry can’t ok it cause he’s moving to the UAE when ever he leaves ( no extradition ).

  2. Barack Obama, Paul Ryan, and Lindsey Graham, the three cigar smoking stooges, can all go suck a tailpipe.

    Who gives a rat’s arse whether they release it or not, they’ll still be 28 pages missing. How stupid do they think we are?

    The more I read of the traitors involved, besides the 3 amigos, I just get more pissed off! Cornyn, McConnell, Schumer, and the rest deserve a good rope stretch. Like I’ve said before, we may as well burn the place to the ground and start over.

  3. “No, no…It reeeaaaalllly did happen the way we told you. Now stop asking questions, or you’re “one of them” “.

    1. Yeah, remember when George W. Bush said, “Your either with us, or against us.” Looking back, it sounds even more sinister today.

  4. Careful; https://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/naturalization-test/naturalization-oath-allegiance-united-states-america

    “Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States of America

    Oath

    “I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.””

    So them foreign governments they want to shield since it might hurt our interests are basically our enemies and are given aid and comfort…
    If for nothing else then to finance the retry.
    Every other American or to be American has to play by different rules and moral code.. That makes sense.

  5. “…..make it possible for American citizens to sue foreign governments believed to be linked to terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.”

    They can’t allow this, because evidence brought out in court will trace too many terror attacks to our own rogue “government.”

    “There has long been speculation that some members of the Saudi ruling family provided support to the al-Qaida hijackers on 9/11.”

    You can speculate all you like, but when you’re ready to look at actual evidence, you’ll find out that Israel did it.

    1. You know J.R., you would think by now everyone would know Israel was behind 911 but that’s not the case. And we all know who’s to blame for that. Still, there has to be millions aware of the truth, but any mention of it in D.C. may get lead flyin’. We may as well call ourselves the United States of Zion. Jew bastards have positioned themselves in all of our seats of power, have absolute total control over our banking and mass media, and have stolen trillions from us. But we can do nothing? We better do something!
      Some would say we should just kill ’em all and be done with it.
      Thou shalt not kill, Christ is coming back, and he’ll sort it out.
      In the meantime, these F’N Zionists will get every ounce of resistance and every grain of lead I can muster.

      1. I think that comment almost…..almost sounded anti semitic Mill.
        How come when I type in kike it always comes up as kick.
        🙂

        1. Whoever doesn’t resist this Zionist takeover is a traitor in my mind. And yes, I hate these Zionist joo son’s of bitches and what they are doing to my world.

      2. “Christ is coming back, and he’ll sort it out.”

        It is their book, of course they wrote that.. You got to keep ‘m around while you sit on your thumbs and endure everything they throw at ya. Even the Atheists among them.

  6. WHY in the heck do the families of the 911 victims need the permission via a new law to sue the den of snakes called Saudi Arabia anyway????? WTF?

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*