Published on Mar 22, 2017 by Scott Anthony
March 22, 2017
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
FBI Facial Recognition Technology
Approximately half of adult Americans’ photographs are in a FRT database.
18 states each have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the FBI to share photos with the federal government, including from state departments of motor vehicles (DMV). The committee identified Maryland and Arizona as having MOUs with the FBI.
The FBI will continue to pursue MOUs with states to gain access to DMV images.
The FBI used facial recognition technology (FRT) for years without first publishing a privacy impact assessment, as required by law.
FRT has accuracy deficiencies, misidentifying female and African American individuals at a higher rate. Human verification is often insufficient as a backup and can allow for racial bias.
The FBI went to great lengths to exempt itself from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
To review the current state of FRT, its various uses, benefits, and challenges, and to evaluate if legislation is necessary.
To examine the FBI’s use of FRT and the FBI policies that govern the recording, retention, and use of photographs by law enforcement.
The Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law estimated that, when accounting for all of the databases that law enforcement has access to, nearly one in two Americans is in a facial recognition database.
The FBI’s Next Generation Identification system includes an Interstate Photo System that allows the FBI and selected state and local law enforcement to search a database of over 30 million photos. The FBI also has agreements with at least 17 states that allow it to request a FRT search of state driver’s license databases.
A Government Accountability Office report found that the FBI should better ensure privacy and accuracy in its use of FRT.
*I will immediately reply to any legitimate copyright concerns should one exist.*
*DOD Non-Endorsement Disclaimer: “The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.”*
*Department of Defense (DoD) motion and still media files are referred to as Visual Information (VI)*; in general, DoD VI that are works of authorship prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are not eligible for copyright protection in the United States.