Mammograms are more harmful than you think

mammogramsNatural News – by Reuben Chow

Mammograms are widely touted as an effective breast cancer screening tool. But some research and experts suggest that it could be causing more harm than good.

Increases cancer risk

In undergoing mammograms, women are exposed to radiation. And radiation, as we know, is a cause of cancer.  

Dr. Russell Blaylock, an oncologist, brain surgeon, and neuroscientist, estimated that annual mammograms could raise breast cancer risk by 1 percent to 3 percent per year. According to him, “some radiologists say it’s even higher than that”.

In a study on 1,600 European women published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in July 2006, researchers found that women who underwent mammograms at least once had a 54 percent higher risk of developing breast cancer as compared to those who never did.

Further, Dr. Samuel Epstein, in his book The Politics of Cancer, wrote: “Regular mammography of younger women increases their cancer risks. Analysis of controlled trials over the last decade has shown consistent increases in breast cancer mortality within a few years of commencing screening. This confirms evidence of the high sensitivity of the premenopausal breast, and on cumulative carcinogenic effects of radiation.”

And it’s not just about the radiation. During mammograms, the breast is at times quite literally crushed, in a bid to get clearer images. The pain can get so bad as to bring tears to some women’s eyes. Such physical manipulation of tumors, should they be present, could actually trigger the spread of cancer cells into the system, thereby elevating the risk of future metastasis.

Indeed, Dr. Charles Simone, a former National Cancer Institute associate, said that “mammograms increase the risk for developing breast cancer and raise the risk of spreading or metastasizing an existing growth.”

Poor accuracy

Many doctors do not feel that mammograms are effective at detecting breast tumors. In a Swedish study published in the British Medical Journal which involved 60,000 women, it was revealed that seven out of every 10 tumors flagged up by mammograms were in fact false positives.

And false positives often result in unnecessary emotional anguish, financial drain, invasive biopsies, and even physical maiming.

The “diagnostics are really not that accurate, and they are causing a lot of women to have chemo and radiation for no reason at all,” said Dr. Blaylock.

And not to mention lose their breasts through mastectomies as well.

Doesn’t lower death rate

To compound matters, some research, including a recent large Canadian study which followed 90,000 women for 25 years, showed that mammograms did not lower the overall death rate from breast cancer. It is clear that while mammograms could have saved some women, it’s probably also harming others. Here, it is important to make the distinction between emotional and statistical analyses and keep the big picture in mind.

Profits and politics

Why, then, does mammography remain a mainstream screening tool?

“This industry supports radiologists, x-ray technicians, surgeons, nurses, manufacturers of x-ray equipment, hospitals, etc, and will not be allowed to disappear by curing and preventing breast cancer,” said Dr. James Howenstine.

“There is evidence that mammograms are not really that diagnostic and may be inducing breast cancer, particularly in highly sensitive women. But so much money is being made, and so much money has been invested in these units in hospitals, that no one wants to admit the truth,” Dr. Blaylock also said.

Alternative diagnostic tool

A good alternative to mammography is thermography, a safe, very accurate, inexpensive diagnostic method which can detect breast cancer many years earlier than physical exams and mammograms. Progressive physicians in Europe and the US have been using thermography since 1962.

Sources for this article include:

Blaylock, Russell L, MD. Natural Strategies For Cancer Patients. New York, NY: Kensington Publishing, 2003. Print.

Somers, Suzanne. Knockout: Interviews With Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer And How To Prevent Getting It In The First Place. NY, USA: Three Rivers Press, 2009. Print.

Bollinger, Ty. Cancer: Step Outside The Box. 5th ed. USA: Infinity 510 510 Partners, 2011. Print.

About the author:
Reuben Chow has a keen interest in natural health and healing as well as personal growth.

Follow on Facebook his health websites.

His main health websites Insights on Health and All 4 Natural Health focus on being healthy naturally, while his other health websites cover topics such as cancer research and informationholistic depression helpdepression help and natural remedies, as well as omega 3 fatty acids. He also owns self improvement and inspirational websites like Inspiration 4 Livingallinspiration.comLife Changing Quotes, and 101 Inspirational Ideas. Through his network of sites at The Journey of Life, he hopes to help improve people’s lives.

Learn more:

6 thoughts on “Mammograms are more harmful than you think

  1. Mammograms are useless medically, but the doctors love ’em anyway.

    “Sore throat and persistent cough? Okay…let’s have a look at those breasts and see if there’s a problem.”

  2. Thanks for posting this Paul.

    I went in for a mammogram in the early 90’s, and it came up with a false positive. I anguished for six weeks until the follow up to find out it was nothing. Years later I read that they were useless, and have never gone for one again, and never will. I’m healthy as a horse. I attribute that to staying away from mainstream quack doctors. 🙂

    1. Hello Deb
      Yes mammograms can actually cause cancer. Not good. Told the wife to stop doing them about 15 years ago because of that fact. doctors do not make much off my wife and I.

    2. I had a similar experience, Deb, 8 years ago. And I had 2 followups with (ignorantly agreed to by me) multiple exposures (and yes I am now quite angry about the unnecessary radiation to my breast — more than a lifetime’s worth in one diagnostic episode) because they were having trouble figuring out what they were seeing. Ended up being “nothing…. we don’t think…. watch and wait….”

      well I’m still watching and waiting, and I will never go back. I have learned how to eat a cancer-preventive diet and how to treat myself if symptoms appear. There is SO much that can be done on one’s own, to prevent and treat these types of health issues. No need to allow the fear to take over. The fear is what they count on.

      Too much profit in it, to ever make this industry go away through a “cure.”

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *