USA Today’s Brad Heath shows an out of control American Police State claiming traveling from Chicago to Los Angeles is SUSPICIOUS!
According to the Forfeiture order, police consider backpacks SUSPICIOUS!
A recent case US v. Newland, proves police consider every interstate a drug corridor and EVERY motorist to be SUSPICIOUS…
Given that nearly every stretch of interstate is considered a drug corridor, the fact that a stop occurred on any such route is almost meaningless. See United States v. Wisniewksi, 358 F. Supp. 2d 1074, 1093 (D. Utah 2005) (“Traveling on a ‘drug corridor’ cannot reasonably support a suspicion that the traveler is carrying contraband. To so hold would give law enforcement officers reasonable suspicion that every vehicle on every major—and many minor—thoroughfares throughout this country was transporting drugs.”), aff’d, 192 Fed. App’x 749 (10th Cir. 2006). Furthermore, because of courts’ willingness to designate various cities and states as “source” regions for narcotics, it is likely that most major roads in this country could be considered drug corridors. See Foreman, 369 F.3d at 795 (Gregory, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); United States v. Beck, 140 F.3d 1129, 1138 n.3 38 (8th Cir. 1998) (citing cases recognizing, inter alia, Colorado, Texas, Florida, Arizona, the entire West Coast, New Jersey, New York City, Phoenix, Fort Lauderdale, Houston, Chicago, and Dallas as drug source cities or states); State v. Quirk, 842 N.E.2d 334, 343 (Ind. 2006) (“Considering the substantial number of states and cities that have been designated as sources of drugs, a motorist, in our highly mobile society, would be hard pressed not to travel either from, to, or through a drug-source jurisdiction.”).
According to three recent government charts just about EVERYONE traveling in the U.S. is SUSPICIOUS.
A 2004 drug assessment summary reveals police consider most of America to be a drug corridor:
Chief Judge Richard Arnold, Warned Airports Are Becoming War Zones:
“Airports are on the verge of becoming war zones, where anyone is liable to be stopped, questioned, and even searched merely on the basis of the on-the-spot exercise of discretion by police officers. The liberty of the citizen, in my view, is seriously threatened by this practice. The sanctity of private property, a precious human right, is endangered. It’s hard to work up much sympathy for Weaver. He’s getting what he deserves, in a sense. What is missing here, though, is an awareness that law enforcement is a broad concept. It includes enforcement of the Bill of Rights, as well as enforcement of criminal statutes. Cases in which innocent travelers are stopped and impeded in their lawful activities don’t come to court. They go on their way, too busy to bring a lawsuit against the officious agents who have detained them. If the Fourth Amendment is to be enforced, therefore, it must be by way of motions to suppress in cases like this.”
Just last week I warned everyone that public transportation commuters are being spied on BILLIONS of times a year.
This is what America has become! We’re no longer a free-society, when traveling inside our country is deemed SUSPICIOUS!
2 thoughts on “Police State America claims traveling from one city to another city is SUSPICIOUS”
I KNOW THAT IF UR A SOUTHERN WHITE MAN,AND SAY ANYTHING AGAINST GOVERNMENT INTRUSION YOU ARE PEGGED A POSSIBLE DOMESTIC TERRIST.IM ALREADY ON THEIR “NO FLY” HIT LIST.
Here come the checkpoints, the search and seizure of anything the coppers choose to take………..do I sound suspicious?