MISSOULA, Mont. (AP) — Just days before he shot to death a 17-year-old German exchange student, Markus Kaarma told hair stylists he had been waiting up to shoot some kids who were burglarizing homes.
He told them they would see it on the news. Kaarma hoped to bait an intruder by leaving his garage door partially open and placing a purse inside, prosecutors said. And when he did, a motion detector alerted him early April 27. Kaarma took a shotgun outside and almost immediately fired four blasts into the garage. Diren Dede, unarmed, was hit twice. He died after the final shot hit him in the head.
For those reasons, Kaarma’s “castle doctrine” defense, which allows people to use deadly force to protect their home and family, failed him Wednesday. A Missoula jury convicted him of deliberate homicide.
Cheers erupted in the packed Missoula courtroom when the verdict was read. Dede’s parents, from Hamburg, Germany, hugged and cried. “It is very good,” Dede’s father, Celal Dede, said with tears in his eyes. “Long live justice.”
Kaarma faces a minimum penalty of 10 years in prison when he is sentenced Feb. 11. His lawyers plan to appeal. On Thursday, Dede’s parents will give statements to the judge to consider at sentencing. Prosecutors asked for the hearing so the couple won’t have to return to Missoula in February.
Kaarma’s case was the latest in a series in which the shooter had invoked the castle doctrine, testing the boundaries of self-defense law. In May, a 65-year-old Minnesota man was convicted of murder after lying in wait in his basement for two teenagers and killing them during a break-in. In July, an 89-year-old North Carolina man shot and killed a 47-year-old tenant who angrily demanded the landlord fix his air conditioning. Prosecutors declined to file charges.
Last year in Florida, a jury acquitted security guard George Zimmerman in the 2012 shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman followed the teenager, contended the boy attacked him, and was acquitted of murder even though he was not at his home at the time of the shooting.
More than 30 U.S. states, including Montana, have laws expanding the right of people to use deadly force to protect their homes or themselves, some of them known as “stand your ground” laws. The self-defense principle known as the castle doctrine is a centuries-old premise that a person has the right to defend their home against attack. The name evokes the old saying, “my home is my castle.”
University of Montana law professor Andrew King-Ries noted state law does allow homeowners to use deadly force to protect their property, but it requires them to act reasonably. “What the jury’s saying here is, you have a right to defend yourself, but this isn’t reasonable,” King-Ries said. “Lots of people have guns here, and lots of people feel very strongly that comes with a responsibility to handle your weapon appropriately.”
Kaarma’s attorneys argued at trial that he feared for his life, didn’t know if the intruder was armed, and was on edge because his garage was burglarized at least once in the weeks before the shooting. They said Kaarma feared for his family’s safety.
But jurors heard neighbors testify that Kaarma’s girlfriend, Janelle Pflager, told them the couple planned to bait and catch a burglar themselves because they believed police weren’t responding. They also heard hair stylist Tanya Colby, who testified that Kaarma told her during a haircut: “I’ve been up three nights with a shotgun waiting to kill some kids.” She said he later told her, “I’m not kidding, you’re seriously going to see this on the news.”
One of Kaarma’s neighbors, Terry Klise, called the verdict a “huge weight lifted.” “The man was a threat to our neighborhood,” Klise said of Kaarma. The German government followed the case closely. Hamburg prosecutor Carsten Rinio said this week his office had been investigating the Dede case, as required under German law.
“We are really grateful to everybody involved and particularly impressed by the outpouring of sympathy that Diren’s parents experienced here in Missoula,” Julia Reinhardt, with the German consulate in San Francisco, said Wednesday.
Associated Press writers David Rising in Berlin and Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.
This guy was a scumbag for shooting the kid. He baited him. Never the less, he should have fired a warning shot first. He was an idiot to come out firing like a raving maniac. He knew he was a kid and at best should have taken him down physically . He knew he was unarmed, complete bullshit move by a maniac with a gun.
The kid entered and tried to steal…. BUT, I will have to agree… the guy should have beat the shit out of the kid. Not shoot him. Actions like this will only hurt the decent folks in Stand Your Ground cases. Now the kid is dead and the guy that killed him will be running from the Black Pipe in prison. Probably die from AIDS in the pen. Life ruined due to a idiot.
Wow what a scumbag. Why not get those claymore pepper spray mines that motion activate and then film it from 10 angles? Nope here is a guy who wanted to kill and thought he was smarter than the law. WHY would you tell anyone what you where planning. Well a 10+ year prison education is sure to help him be less retarded.
If he was such a manic with a gun then it’s the hairstylist fault too. she could have stopped all this from happening.
she heard it straight from the horses mouth and said nothing until it was time to testify.
this “kid” was a six foot tall seventeen year old athlete. I would love to see Mark in NV take him down…just teasing ya mark , maybe you’re a beast I dont know.
most people would not want to get physical with a “kid” like that .
I stand by every word. I would have just jumped him and sat on him. 300 lbs of me. Heavy and quick. And proud of it. Pass the biscuits and sausage gravy.
well, it looks good on paper but…i would still love to see it.
The guy was a coward for shooting him.
this is an AP article that is designed to divide us. How can you say he is a coward? all this info comes from the filthly jewbangies. you’re being programmed. I dont know the guy either but i wouldnt call him a coward. a irresponsible douche is more like it.
I say F the main Piss-stream Media.
The guy is a jackazz and has done nothing but make things worse for the rest of us who abide by common sense. He deserves what he gets for being idiot. And I wouldn’t tangle with Mark even if I was twenty, as getting my azz kicked isn’t high on my priority list.
abide by communist sense?
No Thanks.