U.S. Under Martial Law Since The Civil War

Four Winds

Please be aware that what you are about to read will be very difficult to digest. All our life we have been living under a lie to keep us enslaved. The truth is now known. The problem is, what do we do now? Like you, I became aware of this same truth today and I don’t where to go from here.

I learned judges in California are not “public officials”  I wanted to know why, if they are elected by the people.

Now I know why, and so will you after reading this information.  

It will take many educated and creative minds to solve our problem. I pray you are up to the challenge.

Further proof that martial law remained in effect after the Civil War can be found in the “Congressional Globe” (now called the “Congressional Record”).  The following are excerpts from the April 20th through 29th, 1870 “Congressional Globe” concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to CONTINUE TO CARRY OUT MARTIAL LAW nearly five years after the end of the Civil War:

“The following bureaus shall be established in this department [the Department of Justice]:  a Bureau of International Law, a Bureau of Revenue Law, a Bureau of Military and Naval Law, a Bureau of Postal Law, a Bureau of Land Management Law.”

Congressman Lawrence then said in the record:

“This Bill, however, does transfer to the Law Department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and the cognizance of all subjects of military and naval law, except that portion of the administration of military justice which relates to military court martial, their proceedings, and the supervision of records.

“If a question of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of  government, it will now belong to the Attorney General, or to this Department of Justice.  It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of  the Army.  He will not be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law except as to that portion of the administration of military law which relates to military justice.

“In other words, the Judge Advocate General, instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the status of the states of the union, their right to call upon the government for military protection, or military aid, and other grave Constitutional questions, will be limited.  The Judge Advocate General will perform duties administrative in their character and almost exclusively so.

“But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has been proposed in this Bill.  If this had been done, the Bill would have encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this Bureau untouched in their official tenure in order that this Bill might get through Congress.

“But so far as the Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power over naval court partials and the records and proceedings of such courts, so that to that extent, this Bill accomplishes the great purpose which it has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government. It is misfortunate that there should be different constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers of the United States.”

WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT:

These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials.  This appeased the military leaders, who didn’t have the foggiest idea as to what was really going on.

Had the traitors fleeced the military of all their powers during their tenure in office, the military would have realized and possibly taken some military action.  But as nothing was happening at the hen house, they slept through this entire situation which resulted in an overthrow of the Constitution — an overthrow under which government pretended to operate in 1933, and under which it continues to pretend to operate today.

The traitors were now faced with a very serious problem, namely, what to do with the powers of the Office of the Judge Advocate General when their tenure in office expired. And they solved this dilemma by adding the following amendments, detailed in that same “Congressional Globe”:

Congressman Jenks:  I move to amend Section 3 by inserting the word “naval” before the words “Judge Advocate General”.

The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelburg stated:

I would suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this Bill by inserting after the words “the Naval Solicitor and Naval Judge Advocate General” the words “who shall hereafter be known as Naval Solicitor”.

Mr. Jenks: I have no objection to that amendment.

This amendment was also agreed to, and the Office of the Judge Advocate General became known as the Naval Solicitor.  Thus, when the existing tenure was over, the new office would have a different set of rules and regulations so that the Bill accomplished the great purpose which it had in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the government without the power of the Office of the Judge Advocate General getting in their way.

 This was a necessary step to bring the President into the position of  dictator over America. 

But they had one other problem facing them, namely, DIRECT ACCESS to the Treasury for the Department of Justice without interference.  They accomplished this by the following three sections of the Bill:

“…The Eighth Section provides that the Attorney General is hereby empowered to make all necessary rules and regulations for the government….

“…The Eleventh Section provides that all monies hereafter drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he may designate, and so much of the First Section of the Act, making appropriations, past March 3rd, 1859, as provides that money drawn out of the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be dispersed by such dispersing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby repealed….

“…The Fifteenth Section provides that the supervisory powers now exercised by the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the district attorneys, marshals, clerks, and other officers of the courts of the United States, shall be exercised by the Attorney General….”

It is important here to remember that under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the District Courts of the United States are:

   “…hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise and all such orders and decrees and to issue such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this Act.”

It is here that we find out that the district attorneys, marshals, clerks and other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice. That seems an obvious statement, given the state of the nation today.  But the REAL PROBLEM — given the broad scope of powers granted the District Courts under the Trading with the Enemy Act — is that the Department of Justice is *NOT* a part of the Judicial Branch of Government!

According to Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States Code, the Department of State, the Department of Treasury, the Department of Defense, the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Commerce, the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the Department of

Education, and the Department of the Veteran Affairs are *ALL* under the Executive Branch of Government.

All of the above departments are under the Executive Branch–which raises quite a few questions about the balance of powers between the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches of government.

How can this be?  There is no balance of power under a declared state of  emergency.  And we’ve been living under a declared state of emergency ever since the Civil War began, and have been living under a declared state of martial law ever since the Reconstruction Act.

This overthrow of the Constitution occurred long before the War Powers Act, and if we are going back in history to find our roots of legality — and if we stop our search when we reach the War Powers Act — we are NOT going to succeed in this venture. 

Where is the separation of powers if the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch? Shouldn’t it be part of the Judiciary?  The answer, of course, is yes; but it’s not.  Again, just check Section 101 of Title 5 of  the United States Code. There is no Judiciary!

If only Congress has the power to regulate Commerce, under Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, why are the Department of Commerce and the Department of Transportation under the Executive branch and not under the Legislative branch?

And if only the Congress has the power to coin money, according to the Constitution, why is the Department of Treasury under the Executive branch?

The Commerce Department (from Title 5):

 “…part of the Executive branch of federal government, headed by a Cabinet member, the Secretary of Commerce, which is concerned with promoting domestic and international business and commerce.”

To further illustrate the take-over by the Executive branch of government via martial law rule, the following offices, bureaus, divisions, and organizations are under the Department of Justice.  And remember, the Department of Justice is under the Executive branch — NOT under the judicial branch.

The Office of Solicitor General

The Federal Bureau of Investigation

The Drug Enforcement Agency

The Bureau of Prisons

Immigration and Naturalization

United States Marshal Service

Office of Justice Program

United States Parole Commission

United States National Central Bureau

The Office of the Pardon Attorney

Executive Office of the United States Attorney

Criminal Division

Civil Division

Anti-Trust Division

Civil Rights Division

Tax Division

Environmental and Natural Resource Division

Community Relations Services

Foreign Claim Settlement Division

Executive Office of United States Trustees

Executive Office for Immigration Review

Justice Management Division

Office of Legal Counsel

Office of Policy Development

Office of Legislative Affairs

Office of Public Affairs

Office of Liaison Services

Office of Intelligence and Policy Review

Office of International Affairs

Office of the Inspector General

Office of Professional Responsibility; and

Interpol — (Note: Interpol is a private corporation, yet it comes under (in this country) the Executive branch of government.)

In my opinion:  if the matter of the repeal of the Reconstruction Act and the old H.R. 1328 are not addressed, we will remain in a state of declared martial law. But  few people do any research anymore, and even fewer read the results of  research done by others.  Yes, we are already, and have been all our lives, living under declared martial law.

The source of this law is from 1875.

‑CITE‑  2 USC Sec. 118

‑EXPCITE‑

TITLE 2

CHAPTER 4

‑HEAD‑

Sec. 118. Actions against officers for official acts

‑STATUTE‑

In any action brought against any person for or on account of anything done by him while an officer of either House of Congress in the discharge of his official duty, in executing any order of such House, the United States attorney for the district within  which the action is brought, on being thereto requested by the officer sued, shall enter an appearance in behalf of such officer; and all provisions of the eighth section of the Act of July 28,  1866, entitled ‘An Act to protect the revenue, and for other purposes’, and also all provisions of the sections of former Acts  therein referred to, so far as the same relate to the removal of suits, the withholding of executions, and the paying of judgments against revenue or other officers of the United States, shall become applicable to such action and to all proceedings and matters whatsoever connected therewith, and the defense of such action shall thenceforth be conducted under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General.

‑SOURCE‑

(Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 130, Sec. 8, 18 Stat. 401; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 1, 62 Stat. 909.)

‑REFTEXT‑REFERENCES IN TEXT

The provisions of section 8 of act July 28, 1866, ch. 298, 14 Stat. 329, referred to in text, were contained generally in R.S.Sec. 643, which was incorporated in the former Judicial Code, Sec. 33, and was repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, Sec. 39, 62 Stat. 992. See sections 1442, 1446, and 1447 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure. Other provisions referred to were contained in R.S. Sec. 771, 989, which were also repealed by act June 25, 1948. See sections 509, 547, and 2006, respectively, of Title 28.

‑CHANGE‑

CHANGE OF NAME

Act June 25, 1948, eff.  Sept. 1, 1948, substituted ‘United States attorney’ for ‘district attorney’.  See section 541 of Title

28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

‑CROSS‑

FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

Judgment against certain public officers, satisfaction of, see Rule 69, Title 28, Appendix, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

‑SECREF‑

SECTION REFERRED TO IN OTHER SECTIONS

This section is referred to in section 118a of this title.

‑END‑

Statutes Relating to Commissions, Appointments, etc.

Sections in this file relate to required commissions, oaths, etc., for officers and employees of United States government and the government of the District of Columbia. All sections have been pasted directly from the 1996 CD-ROM edition of the United States Code produced and distributed by the Government Printing Office. Notes in Italics that follow the sections list regulations for each section listed in the Parallel Table of Authorities and Rules.It is significant that the “Seal of the United States” is no longer affixed to commissions of “judicial officers” appointed by the President with advice and consent of the Senate; commissions are filed with the Department of Justice under the D.O.J. seal, which is an executive seal. This is suggestive that there are no longer any Article III[constitutional] judges in the United States.

 

-CITE-

4 USC Sec. 41                                               01/16/96

HERE’S THER REAL KICKER   

THIS IS WHAT ENSLAVES US AS 14th AMENDMENT CITIZENS

The Insurrection Act (enacted in 1807) delegates authority to the President to federalize and deploy the National Guard domestically during an insurrection or civil disturbance (10 U.S.C. Sections 331-335).  Section 331 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to suppress an insurrection at the request of a state government.  Section 332 authorizes the President to use armed forces in such manner as he deems necessary to enforce the laws or suppress a rebellion.  Section 333 authorizes the President to use federal military forces to protect individuals from unlawful actions that obstruct the execution of federal laws or which impede the course of justice under federal laws.  Section 333 was enacted to implement the Fourteenth Amendment and does not require the request or consent of the governor of the affected state. 

http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/corporate_u_s/news.php?q=1252942793

23 thoughts on “U.S. Under Martial Law Since The Civil War

  1. No, and let me explain why.

    “These traitors knew they would have encountered opposition from the military with the provisions of H.R. 1328, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during their tenure, and transfer them to supervisory positions over court partials.”

    No, that is not the reason, Here in the USA we are required to use the MILITIA – trained as the Congress requires the military to be trained; knowledgeable about the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution. (I would have written this there but there is only an e mail address – so will send a copy of this to that person.) The reason for the Militia being trained that way, being armed and trained with all military implements, and keeping those near them that are reasonable in the home (meaning rocket launchers, etc should be kept in the Armory, and the rest stored in a guarded armory for their quick use when needed to stop invasions, etc (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15, then also refer to Article 2, Section 2). But what if a 24 hour/7 days a week military is needed to defend our nation from attack? They are pulled from the regular already trained Militia – the only thing that changes is that they no longer go home at night or when their shift ends, and that instead of being able to take orders ONLY Directly from either the Governor (if being used by the state), or the person who serves as the US President (none from military or state officers, though those orders are passed on through the Militia Officers. Both those that serve within the state governments and the federal governments have duties to the Militias (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16)

    What use telling an organization that is not supposed to exist UNTIL actually needed and the Congress calls them forth, declaring war. We are FORBIDDEN to have a permanent military for just the reasons we see today. They are unlawfully used to invade and basically take over other nations. But those who are high ranking military does not want to end their power/money/prestige which would happen if there was NO MILITARY. Article 1, Section 8, Clause 12 which starts with these words “To raise and support Armies,…”. But they are allowed to “provide and maintain a Navy”.

    It is really critical that people start to learn and know the US Constitution (as Henry has been from what I read here over the last few months) and here is why. One cannot recognize “Color of Law”, treason, etc if one does not know and understand our government. The contract cannot be enforced if the “enforcers” (Militia) do not know what those that serve can and can not do.

    Our government is the documents – the US Constitution and each state’s Constitution, they are compacts (contracts between governmental states), and the contracts that those that serve within our governments are under, and to make that relationship even more lawful and binding, Oath bound to. But the people merely SERVE within to carry out those written duties assigned to each branch and to named offices within a branch. The people who serve within our governments no matter what position are NOT “THE” government.

    Let me give you something to think about. Within the House of Representatives, and the Senate each STATE is to have EQUAL representation. But how can they be having equal representation if there is a “Leader of the House”, etc who decides who gets to decide who speaks, gets to represent whatever, etc? New members do not have full representative rights when the opposite is required in writing to be true, all states have equal representation. Why do we let this go on when the contract is in writing? Because that way of organization has been taught to us all of our lives and our parents lives; seniority, different levels of advancement with time, etc. So we see this, but we do not comprehend it as it is being done as something we take as normal, instead of reading and UNDERSTANDING that those words mean exactly what they say.

    Another, when in Article 1, Section 1 says “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives” it means that ALL legislation except where it is found in writing to be different such as Treaties which in writing requires that it is the President and 3/4’s of the Senate that makes those decisions. All legislation is statutes, codes, regulations, laws, etc, etc – anything that has an affect on the American people must be created completely by those that serve within the Senate and House of Representatives; PLUS it is required to be in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution or is only “Color of Law”, pretend law.

    What does that mean? Well, if Pres Trump was to actually clean the swamp as promised, there would be NO IRS, TSA, BLM, DHS – remember they are required in writing to use the MILITIA, Fed Reserve, no agency would write a code, etc and use it against the people, that person, etc would be arrested and prosecuted as that is a criminal act.

    Okay, back on track.

    Martial law can only exist where there are rulers – Kings, Tyrants, etc. Period. Same with “emergency powers” which is different from a “state of emergency” which is a request for assistance from other states becasue of some catastrophe. This is very difficult for Americans to wrap their mind around, realize how much more difficult it is for those that came here from ruled foreign nations.

    “The people or sovereign are not bound by general word in statutes, restrictive of prerogative right, title or interest, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind the King or the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the King, the former sovereign, …It is a maxim of the common law, that when an act is made for the common good and to prevent injury, the King shall be bound, though not named, but when a statute is general and prerogative right would be divested or taken from the King (or the people) he shall not be bound.” People v Herkimer, 4 Cowen (NY) 345, 348 (1825)

    “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, EQUALLY IN WAR AND PEACE, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. NO DOCTRINE INVOLVING MORE PERNICIOUS CONSEQUENCES WAS EVER INVENTED BY THE WIT OF MAN THAN THAT ANY OF ITS PROVISIONS CAN BE SUSPENDED DURING ANY OF ITS GREAT EXIGENCIES OF GOVERNMENT. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.” The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866

    “Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are not altered by emergency.” Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425 (1934)

    James Madison: “Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; AS WELL THAT WHICH LIES IN THE VARIOUS RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.”

    Yes, Madison was talking about Natural Rights being YOUR OWN PROPERTY that those in government are required in writing to protect, it is the reason for our government.

    Okay, hopefully most have started to realize that here in the USA there are no such things as “martial law” and “emergency powers”. The other thing that should make that clear is that here in this nation, the civil is above the military; which is why Militias cannot take orders from military officers of any rank. That if it was not named within the Constitutions, neither the US President nor state Governors would be able to give orders to the Militia, and is why only those orders DIRECTLY from those two above named offices can do so.

    These things that are our REAL, LEGITIMATE government take power, prestige, money away from those that serve within the military, within our governments which is why they do nothing about what is being done to the people. But silly them, if there is NO USA, the positions they occupy no longer exist. The ONLY power they will have is from those who will “just follow orders”, particularly when in an “emergency” because it seems legit. It is not legit, but it is treason, *terrorism against the American people.

    That is why there are organizations working to educate those who serve within the military that the OATH is to the US Constitution and makes the Oath taker personally responsible for their actions, not the person – Oath taker or not – who gives those orders. All Oath takers – be they military or law enforcement, serving within agencies, etc – are required by that Oath to say “NO” to anything that is not in Pursuance of the US Constitution. But even here in those organizations, they have all those decades of propaganda to overcome so that when they read something like, “The President shall be Commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, WHEN CALLED INTO THE ACTUAL SERVICE OF THE UNITED STATES;” – Article 2, Section 2, First Clause – they know that it means that when the Congress declares war and the people are being withdrawn from the Militia to be the US Military – which ever branch was pre-decided upon and trained for or when the Militia is being used for lawful purposes as defined within the US Constitution then the person serving as the US President becomes the Commander in Chief. Then and only then.

    “As general rule men have natural right to do anything which their inclinations may suggest, if it be not evil in itself, and in no way impairs the rights of others.” In Re Newman (1858), 9 C. 502.

    “Lawful”: in accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. Black’s Law Dictionary: Conforming to the law; according to law; required or permitted by law; not forbidden or discountenanced by law; good and effectual in law. Lawful pursuit for justice or decision under the law… Ex: Constitution of the United States of America, state Constitutions

    “Legal”: the “color of law”, “appearance of law”, “pretense of law without the substance of lawfulness”, “misuse of power made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state”. In accordance with the law of the land; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. Black’s Law Dictionary

    “Supreme”: Highest in power, importance, significance. Greatest in authority, or rank; dominant. Ultimate; final.

    “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”

    “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

    Notice that the most words describe exactly what they are to do for the US Constitution before anything else, including following orders of US presidents and/or orders of those above them or the duties of the position or office they will be occupying. Also notice that “obey the orders of the President of the United States” is joined in the same sentence with “and the orders of the officers appointed over me”, that is how low on the priority scale those presidential orders are compared to the US Constitution and all that is in Pursuance thereof it. Plus that the “Uniform Code of Military Justice” is mentioned because it requires ONLY lawful orders to be followed. So as many in the US Military found out before, THEY are held accountable for their actions following orders or not because they are REQUIRED to know what the oath says and MEANS.

    Basically, when those that serve within our government go far afield of the authority delegated, and granted in writing to the branch or named office within a branch, then they no longer represent the government, the people. Their actions are fictional and the actions of those who follow their orders are *terrorism.

    Dr. Edwin Vieira: “This has nothing to do with personalities or subjective ideas. It’s a matter of what the Constitution provides… The government of the United States has never violated anyone’s constitutional rights… The government of the United States will never violate anyone constitutional rights, because it cannot violate anyone’s constitutional rights. The reason for that is: The government of the United States is that set of actions by public officials that are consistent with the Constitution. Outside of its constitutional powers, the government of the United States has no legitimacy. It has no authority; and, it really even has no existence. It is what lawyers call a legal fiction.”

    *28 C.F.R. Section 0.85 Terrorism is defined as “the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives”.

    So armed with that information, verified by you, what is the solution? To demand that those who serve within our governments stop what they are doing as it is outside of the responsibilities delegated to the position in which they serve. Train as the Militia of your state, and get it implemented by your state legislature so they can be used as is required of them to be used – in writing. Train others as at this time those serving within our Congress are NOT doing their duties, but if one served/serves within the military they can train them as the Congress requires the military to train. If you do this, remember that as the Militia, the US Constitution and your own state’s Constitution is your highest Commander. That is where all your power/authority/lawfulness comes from – and it is in writing for all to see. Start serving within your state’s government at any level to start taking back your immediate government.

    It is also important to know that the U.S. Constitution, the supreme law of this land, has it in writing that the only crimes assigned to the federal government in the Constitution for law enforcement purposes are Treason, Piracy, Counterfeiting, and International law violations. All else are under the states, or were retained by the people for themselves to decide – and there were more then what was listed as the Ninth Amendment makes clear.

    The 14th Amendment was never lawfully ratified as required in writing by the US Constitution.

  2. There are three city-states and they rule the world.

    The flag in Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city state within the three city empire. ~ Albert T Milligan –

    The three city empire consists of Washington D.C., London, and Vatican City.

    London is the corporate center of the three city states and controls the world economically.

    Washington’s District of Columbia city state is in charge of the military.

    The Vatican is in charge of “spiritual” guidance.

    The constitution of the district of Columbia operates under a tyrannical roman law known as lex fori, which in no way resembles the U.S. constitution.

    When congress passed the act of 1871, it created a separate corporate government for the District of Columbia.

    This allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the constitution.

    If you take a moment to study some signed treaties and charters between the United States and Britain, you will find that the United States has always been a British crowned Colony.

    In 1606, King James (yes, the King James who revised the bible) signed the charter of Virginia.

    The charter granted Americas British forefathers a license to settle and colonize America.

    The charter also guaranteed future kings and queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.

    In 1783, the Paris peace treaty was signed.

    This treaty identifies the King of England as the prince of the United States contradicting the belief that America won the war of independence.

    Although King George III of England gave up most claims over his American colonies, he kept his right to continue receiving payments for his business ventures of colonizing America.

    If America won the war of independence, why would we agree to pay reparations to the king..??

    When the 13th amendment to the constitution was passed, the U.S. president was made subservient to the King of England.

    The 13th Amendment (the title of nobility amendment) forbids U.S. officials from using royal titles like king, or prince.

    For some strange reason though, the 13th amendment which was ratified in 1810 no longer appears in current copies of the U.S. constitution.

    The war of independence against the British bankrupted America and turned its citizens into debt slaves of the king.

    In 1812, the British torched and burned the white house and all U.S. government buildings to the ground, destroying many ratification records of the U.S. constitution.

    Then, nearly a century later, a corrupt U.S. congress committed the biggest theft in world history.

    They passed Paul Warburgs federal reserve act of 1913, handing over Americas gold and silver reserves (and total control of Americas economy) to the federal reserve bank.

    Most Americans still believe the FED is owned by the government, but it is not.

    The FED is a privately owned banking system whose majority class A shareholders include the Rothschild’s, Warburgs, J.P. Morgan, the Rockefeller’s and the Lehman brothers.

    Most U.S. citizens believe the United States is a country and the president is its leader, but the U.S. is not a country, it is a corporation, and the president is not our leader, he is the president of the corporation of the U.S.

    The president, along with elected officials work for the corporation, not for the American People.

    So, who owns the giant U.S. corporation?

    Like Canada and Australia, whose leaders are prime ministers of the queen, and whose land is called crowned land, the U.S. is just another crowned colony.

    Crowned colonies are controlled by the empire of the three city states. Thus, the U.S. is controlled by the three city states.

    Some symbolism…
    At the CENTER of each city state are giant phallic shaped stone monuments called obelisks.

    In D.C. the obelisk is known as the Washington monument. It was dedicated to George Washington by the Freemason Grand Lodge of the District of Columbia.

    The secretive brotherhood of Freemasons laid the Washington obelisks cornerstone in 1848 and contributed 22 masonic memorial stones. 250 masonic lodges financed the Washington monument obelisk including the knights templar masonic order.

    An obelisk is a Babylonian symbol – It’s a symbol of Nimrod’s male organ.

    Additional info:

    America is a British Colony.
    The ‘United States’ is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796.
    (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)

    The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War.
    (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

    A 1040 Form is for Tribute paid to Britain.
    (IRS Publication 6209)

    Britain is owned by the Vatican. Therefore, the Vatican owns America.
    (Treaty of 1213)

    This is why every President meets with the Pope.

    Ever Google (in images) terms like “World leaders bow down to Pope”?

    The Pope can abolish any law in the United States.
    (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)

    The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.
    (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)

    The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of Millions of people.
    (Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)

    The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone.
    (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)

    We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.
    (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)

    Military Dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) into Districts.
    (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)

    “The People” does NOT include you and me.
    (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)

    It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers.
    (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)

    Everything in the “United States” is up for Sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc… Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake??
    (Executive Order 12803)

    “We are human capital”.
    (Executive Order 13037)

    The U.N.-United Nations has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. ) and now owns every man, woman and child in America. The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.
    Source: http://home/iae.nl/users/lightnet/world/essays.html

    I don’t have the time or space to post it here, but …
    There is overwhelming proof that the Pope holds the modern day office of Nimrod.

    1. “There are three city-states and they rule the world.”

      Puppets all.

      The stinking jews ‘rule’ the world… and they don’t share power (or mammon) with ANYONE.

    1. You misunderstand the Bill of Rights. It does not give us our rights, it lists SOME of our natural rights that are above the authority – never delegated, but retained by the people – of those that serve within our governments.

      Almost everything within the Bill of Rights was NOT delegated. So the Second makes clear that weapons of any type, any amount we can afford, are NOT under the written authority of either the state or federal governments. Those that serve within our governments are actually required to PROTECT those rights as that IS the purpose why our governments were created.

      But defending oneself is a NATURAL right, and you see it everywhere in nature. Birds defend their nests, young; as do all species on this planet. Even plants have different defenses.

      So your Rights are your rights no matter what anyone who serves within our government says, does. Does that mean that they cannot hurt or kill you? No, they will. But would that action be lawful? No, it is not. But understand that a gang, or mafia can also force you to its will. At this point, those are better descriptions of what we have serving within our governments.

      Your rights are always yours. You decide what it takes for you to defend them. At this point, defense alone might be very difficult, so one must take the long way around. Get involved in your local government, hate serving within it or not, as YOU can change what happens there. The problem we have is we let all those who want that power but should never be near it take office, and we pay the price. So, instead we must “bite the bullet” and do those jobs within our community that we can – run for local office, and I care not if it is the water, or the parks and rec. Start making changes locally.

      1. I agree and strongly disagree with some of your viewpoints.
        e.g.
        The guy that put in my well is the son of a 33rd degree mason.

        He was on the city council at one time he told me.
        He helped balance the budget and actually saved the taxpayers money.

        Then guess what happened to him.
        They ganged up on him and ran him out.

        So getting involved with local government seems futile in my opinion.

        They like the way things are and are going to keep operating in the same way until they are physically stopped.

        Plus they have a police force an army and swat teams.

        My advice is to pull out of their system as much as possible.
        Become as self sufficient as you can.
        Because if you can’t protect yourself and provide for yourself first.
        There’s no way your going to be able to help your neighbors. ..friends and family.

      2. I agree….rights are not ‘given’ to us. I think the most important sector to infiltrate for change is the ‘education’ system. Kids are a captive audience from pre school through university being subjected to commie propaganda.

      3. Politics is the problem. Not the solution. Running and being elected to office just keeps the momentum going and helps make things worse. No human has a right to order another human around which is what politicians do.

  3. I told everyone this years ago. Even read the records from the floor of congress from 1968 where they discussed this and agreed…but did they stop it? Hell no!

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*