What Do Sandy Hook Investigators Have to Hide?

What Do Sandy Hook Investigators Have to Hide?The New American – by Rebecca Terrell

More than 10 months after Adam Lanza massacred 26 students and faculty and committed suicide at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut, questions still abound in the midst of conspiracy theories and prolonged speculation. The October 21 edition of The Hartford Courant, which has been following the story closely since the mass murder last December 14, ran an editorial complaining about State Attorney Stephen Sedensky’s delay in releasing the full investigative report, originally expected by the end of June. In the meantime, says the Courant, details continue to leak, feeding “the sick conspiracy mill and prolong[ing] the pain.”  

But the editorial admits Sedensky’s stonewall is prompting a host of relevant questions. What have investigators found that prevents publication? Can investigators explain what prompted Adam Lanza’s murderous actions?

Along with the delayed report, other circumstances add to general mistrust. Why is the school building being demolished, access to the site closed to the public, and even photos and videos banned? The Courant continues:

Also raising suspicions are the confidentiality agreements that workers at the elementary school are being required to sign. They are tearing down the school to make way for a new one, a move The Courant supports. But pledging workers to secrecy about what they see is excessive and unlikely to succeed. At this rate the school may be razed before the report is out. What if the document raises questions about the building?

Then there is the subject of the 911 calls. On September 30, the Los Angeles Times reported that Sedensky is appealing the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission’s order to release the 911 recordings from the school shooting. Sedensky petitions for “sensitivity toward victims’ families.” Yet the Times notes, “The secrecy is striking in light of the quick release of information — from 911 recordings to pictures and video — in other notorious crimes.”

Perhaps most important are the results of Lanza’s toxicology tests, conducted by the Connecticut medical examiner in the weeks after the shooting to check for the presence of drugs in his system. The medical examiner released Lanza’s autopsy findings, which showed nothing of note, less than one month after the rampage, but what of the drug test results?

In May, the Huffington Post reported that Lanza’s toxicology tests showed no evidence of alcohol or drugs, illegal or prescription. However, the Post was not reporting official test results. Instead, this news was revealed by an “official close to the investigation” who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was “not authorized to publicly disclose the information.” The report also stated that warrants revealed no evidence of drugs or medications at the Lanza home, though authorities found “medical, psychiatric and prescription records” there. Unsurprisingly, the contents of these documents remain undisclosed.

However, it appears Huffington’s source may have been mistaken. The parent advocacy group AbleChild has been battling for months to obtain Lanza’s psychiatric drug history. During a recent Freedom of Information Act hearing in the case AbleChild vs. Chief Medical Examiner, Connecticut attorney Patrick B. Kwanashie argued against releasing the toxicology test records because they could “cause a lot of people to stop taking their medications — stop cooperating with their treating physicians just because of the heinousness of what Adam Lanza did.”

Kwanashie opined that AbleChild is requesting the information for illegitimate reasons. “Even if you can conclusively establish that Adam Lanza — his murderous actions — were caused by antidepressants, you can’t logically from that conclude that you know others would commit the same actions as a result of taking antidepressants.”

On the contrary, AbleChild argues that release of the results will promote informed consent and public health. Patricia Weathers, co-founder of AbleChild, lamented, “This opposition comes despite the fact that 31 school shootings and/or school-related acts of violence have been committed by those taking or withdrawing from psychiatric drugs resulting in 162 wounded and 72 killed,” with no federal investigation into the link between psychiatric drugs and such violence. If psychiatric drugs are indeed strongly linked to such violence, this could challenge the federal government’s narrative that guns are the problem and more gun control is the solution. Perhaps this explains the stonewalling of the investigation.

Photo of officials outside Sandy Hook Elementary school after the shooting on Dec. 14, 2012: AP Images

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/16789-what-do-sandy-hook-investigators-have-to-hide

8 thoughts on “What Do Sandy Hook Investigators Have to Hide?

  1. Thursday, 24 October 2013 09:21 posted by Field McConnell
    What the investigators led by Governor Malloy and J Paul Vance Sr need to suppress is this exact google pairing that led to Janet Napolitano’s departure from DHS:

    [ napolitano + dhs + dmort V + hseep + crisis actors + vision box + Field McConnell ]

    dmort is the KEY; it is a 10 region mobile mortuary that FEMA sends to scene of False Flag crimes and always from a different region. DMORT Region 5 was at Sandy Hook

    Any request for more details email me at fieldmcc@yahoo.com

      1. Joe McNeil kicked us off so we have our own show 6 times most weeks. M W F at 1pm central David and I do C2CSI and following those shows Pastor Clyde Holt does a Bible show. Our shows are archived at:
        http://new.livestream.com/accounts/1990801

        We have about 165 shows archived there and the one for today that says “live” will not go live unless there is an incident involving the Congress flights to Florida funeral or a nuclear event during FEMA’s nuclear response exercise in Calvert Cliffs, MD My email is fieldmcc@yahoo.com
        Since leaving Rumor Mill I have discovered 5 people encouraging me to stay at Joe McNeil’s station are working for the other side. Our new radio outlet is 100% disinfo free and will remain so.

  2. Now let’s see… didn’t OKC get demolished and the WTC remains carted off to who-knows-where and Jack Cashel get in a lot of trouble for obtaining forensic evidence on TWA 800 that didn’t match the lies?

    The family of Miriam Carey never saw her corpse, only pictures, and there was no blood at that scene as there was none at Sandy Hook.

    It is quite curious that there was a fleet of ambulances outside Sandy Hook and not one bleeding, injured party. There were few corpses presented later (just enough collateral damage to make it look like that hapless Lanza kid was a murderer).

    So here’s another thing: that kind of response to the situation is counter-intuitive. First responders should have been in there trying to save lives, not standing around posing for TV shots. That is, if the alleged story wasn’t yet another government horror movie to stampede the cattle into a desired response.

    1. The only ones I know of were in open coffins. At least one friend in CT says some adults did die and had open coffins. But hey, these days they could have the bodies in coffins with a drug that suppresses vital signs and after the funeral they turn up in the witness protection program somewhere.

      I am amazed at the time frame from the time it started until the body count was announced…. how could all those humans die so fast without being popped in the head? They even tried to revive Kennedy with half his head blown off. Not even one alleged victim was wheeled out of there on a gurney and no attempts to save lives were made…

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*