Russia Insider – by Laurent Guyénot
Introduction
This article follows and concludes a series of four articles I wrote recently for the Saker blog. In the first one, “How Biblical is Zionism?” (reproduced under a different title on Russia Insider), I wrote: “When Israeli leaders claim that their vision of the global future is based on the (Hebrew) Bible, we should take them seriously and study the (Hebrew) Bible.” In the second one, “How Zionist is the New Word Order?”
I explained that Zionism was never a nationalist movement like others; insofar as it is rooted in the biblical narrative, it contained from the outset a plan for world domination. In the third article, “Who the Hell is the Prince of this World?” I contended that the core characteristic of the biblical ideology—and the best-kept secret of Judaism—is its materialistic anthropology, best summarized by American rabbi Harry Waton: “the only immortality there is for the Jew is the immortality in the Jewish people.” In the fourth article, “Is Israel a Psychopath?”
I argued that “Israel is the psychopath among nations, and that means a tremendous capacity to manipulate, intimidate, corrupt morally, and get what they want.” In this fifth and final part, I wish to address once again the issue of the biblical root of Jewishness, by arguing that the psychopathic behavior of Israel—understood both as a national state and as an international organized community—is the end result of the psychopathic “personality” of the Jewish God portrayed in the Bible.
Let me first state that I take no pleasure in offending anybody’s religious faith. Some Christians tell me that I do not read the Old Testament correctly, through New Testament glasses. My answer is: read it as you like, and convert the Jews to your reading if you can.
My purpose is to explain how the Jews, by whom and for whom it was written, have been reading it for more than a hundred generations, and how it has shaped their worldview, and continues to shape the worldview of many elite Jews. I understand and even empathize with Christians’ difficulty to engage in this effort, but I believe there will be no lasting cure from the corrupting influence of international Jewry without unprejudiced etiological inquiry.
To assess correctly the underlying ideology of the Hebrew Tanakh and its influence on those who hold it as their “roman national”, requires that we put aside the notion that it was inspired by “God” in any way, for this notion induces a cognitive dissonance which impairs our rational and moral judgment.
In fact, we should perhaps renounce looking at the Hebrew Bible as a religious book, because the category of “religion” fails to account for its strong influence on non-religious Jews. As I have shown in “How Biblical is Zionism?” most Israeli leaders, from Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu, are non-religious, but their worldview is profoundly biblical nonetheless.
The biblical outlook is the essence of Jewishness, of which Nahum Goldman said that it is impossible to decide if it “consists first of belonging to a people or practicing a religion, or the two together.”i This ambivalence is strategic: it is used by organized Jewry to ward off criticism by qualifying it either as anti-Semitic or as an assault on religious freedom, depending on the circumstance.
We should not fall into this trap. What I am dealing here is biblical ideology. Whether this ideology should be categorized as religious is irrelevant. Any idea, any ideology may be criticized, no matter how sacred or ancient it is held to be. And since the first victims of a toxic idea are the men and women who believe it, they are the first who need to be enlightened on its toxicity.
The most appropriate category to understand both the Torah and Jewishness is not “religion” but “covenant” (berit in Hebrew, meaning also treaty or oath of allegiance). The foundation of Jewishness is the Mosaic Covenant. While religious Jews consider it a covenant of Jews with God, non-religious elite Jews such as members of the B’nai B’rith (“Children of the Covenant”) or the Alliance Israélite Universelle, regard it as simply a covenant between the Jews themselves. That is why Jewishness could so easily shift from being defined as an oath of allegiance to Yahweh, to being today indistinguishable from an oath of allegiance to Israel.
Read the rest here: https://russia-insider.com/en/history/god-israel-bloodthirsty-vindictive-sociopath-does-explain-misanthropy-jews/ri24154
Is this article talking about the “Hebrew Bible” or Torah, or the Talmud, or the Bible Christians use? Because in the Hebrew Bible or Torah the Jews use, there is no Isaiah 53, for one thing. Why? Because Isaiah 53 foretells the coming of Christ; something Talmudic Jews and most Jews anyway do NOT want to know about! So, which Bible does the author mean?
Lol….. I ain’t gonna say a word…..
DL, I have no idea which Bible. I just like that there is a light being shown on some of the directives given in Torah that some claim cannot be from a God of Love. I did not read every word here, far too long, but the first few paragraphs pulled me in and they stand in support of Douglas Reed’s book, The Controversy of Zion. That book and this article show the link between old testament edicts and the modern havoc we are witnessing today. Maybe you already read Controversy of Zion, but if not and if you’re interested, it can be read online here:
https://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/reeedcontrov.pdf
I’m no bible scholar like you and Koyote, but I can recognize words that contradict the message of Christ. I think this issue will come to the surface more and more, and as I am counted among the un-chosen, I hope it does. Did I mention I’m no bible scholar. I’m no bible scholar.
🙂
.
“I wrote: “When Israeli leaders claim that their vision of the global future is based on the (Hebrew) Bible, we should take them seriously and study the (Hebrew) Bible.”
Israhell leaders are jews. To the author of this article, this is what Christ said about the jews…
“John 8:44-45 KJ
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.”
The jews were/are liars… FROM THE BEGINNING. They were NOT ‘God’s Chosen’, that was the HEBREWS.
jEWS ARE NOT HEBREWS!!!
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/hebrews-jews-is-there-a-difference/142465#comment-948641
So are we all Hebrews? I mean are you saying all goyim are Hebrews?
Aside: It could be that down at the root of things WE’RE ALL CHOSEN!! And maybe we even do the choosing. Only figuring it out for myself, not wanting to trample anyone’s beliefs. I only dive in here as it relates to the geopolitical problems and crises of our present time and how they threaten life as we know it. Otherwise, I wouldn’t open this chapter. I mean, God, get me out now!! What have I gotten myself into? I hope I can bust out soon. Religion has a way of making enemies and taking spotlight off common enemy. But that just might be bad religion. There are those who are fed from the cup of good religion; I hold them as ally.
Did I make it out? Geez.
.
I would have to say that the God of the Jews njoys a good bbq.
That God…one of many worshipped.
Says Humans taste like chicken.
And their babies tastes like veal.
Wish I had gotten in here earlier. The “jews” we all know and abhor are NOT the Hebrew descendants of Abraham or Jacob(Israel). They are (~94%) European descendants of Japhethite origins – NOT Semitic origins as the Israelites were. The vast number of those “jews” residing in Palestine today are atheists, and the rest are almost exclusively Talmudists. The BABYLONIAN TALMUD is the root and branch of Zionism; even among those who claim to be atheists, NOT the Old Testament Scriptures.
The “root and essence of jewishness” that the author postulates can be found by examining the Israelites who abandoned the true worship of God and began to twist and pervert the Scriptures to their own use. These became the Pharisees of Jesus’ day, whom He spoke against repeatedly as “snakes”, “vipers”, “children of the devil”, etc. Those Pharisees followed a perverted oral tradition handed down by their progenitors, which, after the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. began to spread in a written form known as the Mishnah. The Mishnah is the first part of what is now known as the Talmud. The “root and essence” of the Jewish perversion follows this departure from the true knowledge of God and the adoption of the myths created by these impostors. Those who revere the Talmud as authoritative revelation about God do not generally honor the Old Testament Scriptures, but study almost exclusively study the Talmud, though they might rarely give lip-service to the Scriptures.
By the way: The title of this article is a slander against the Most High. I consider the source to be satanically inspired, as are ALL attacks against God, whether the one making the attack is aware of it or not.
Well said, Darzak!
I couldn’t agree more.
I don’t know what”Bible” this guy is reading, but the book would be better served shoved up his bum sideways than I would sit and listen to his shitty uninspired Drool…