The World Economic Forum wants to create a climate change treaty

The Counter Signal – by Keean Bexte

The World Economic Forum (WEF) wants to create an international climate change treaty supposedly to save the ocean.

“The science is clear: to maximize the health and resilience of the global ocean, at least 30% of it must be protected through a network of “highly” and “fully” protected Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) by 2030,” writes the World Economic Forum in an article

“To achieve this goal, a new treaty for the conservation and management of marine life in the high seas must be concluded to ensure that human activities are managed to prevent significant adverse impacts, with robust oversight mechanisms and provisions to establish fully protected MPAs in the high seas.”

According to the Forum, government officials who’ve joined the “Blue Leaders” campaign will meet and rally for other countries to join them at an upcoming convention in China, as well as at the UN Ocean Conference from June 27 to July 1.

The climate change treaty to save the oceans isn’t the only treaty on the WEF’s agenda, though. They also want a climate change treaty to tackle plastic pollution.

“Do we need a global treaty to tackle plastics pollution, similar to the one on climate change. Campaigners and a growing number of governments and businesses say we do. Ahead of a United Nations Environment Assembly which could launch talks on a plastics pact, the World Economic Forum heard from a range of experts on why we need a treaty and what it might contain,” the WEF writes.

Of course, the Forum is also supporting the World Health Organization’s attempts to create a global pandemic treaty that will usurp the health sovereignty of all 194 member states. One can only imagine how international climate change treaties may impact global and national economies and the day-to-day activity of people deemed to have too large of a carbon impact.

The Counter Signal

2 thoughts on “The World Economic Forum wants to create a climate change treaty

  1. Jabs used for control, False-Flags used for control, Climate issues used for control. Safety issues used for control/censorship/disarming. Just some of the ways the hammer is coming down. Now this regarding their brand new treaty:

    “To achieve this goal, a new treaty for the conservation and management of marine life in the high seas must be concluded to ensure that human activities are managed to prevent significant adverse impacts, with robust oversight mechanisms and provisions…”

    Hmmm… “Ensure that human activities are managed.” In other words, prepare to be a robot-slave, serving the Mammon Kings.

    NOT!!!

    I can love and take care of the ocean without you “managing” me!!!

    .

  2. In other words (to add to Galen’s comment), a treaty to “save the oceans” for the criminal psycho elites to have access to all of the food in the oceans, denying us “useless eaters” of any fish, shrimp, oysters, mussels, crab, clams, etc. Boats not owned by the Davos crowd will be banned from the oceans (including Gulf of Mexico)….Pacific Islanders who rely on sea life for food, jobs, etc., and it’s part of their culture, will be denied; Icelanders rely on cod and other fish for economy–no more of that! Plus this was theme in the dystopian movie “Soylent Green,” where only the elites could eat real food and fish… The movie was set in the year 2022!

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published.


*