13-Year-Olds Who Trick or Treat in Chesapeake, Virginia, Face Fines, Possible Jail Time

Reason – by Lenore Skenazy

In Virginia, the scariest thing about Halloween is how much legal trouble people can face for merely trying to enjoy the holiday.

The city of Chesapeake, for instance, prohibits anyone over the age of 12 from engaging in “the activity commonly known as ‘trick or treat.'” Those who break the law are guilty of a misdemeanor, and could face a fine of $25 or up to six months in jail.  

In Newport News, teens face restrictions, too:

(a) If any person beyond the seventh grade of school or over twelve (12) years of age shall engage in the activity commonly known as “trick or treat” or any other activity of similar character or nature under any name whatsoever, such person shall be guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor.

Same rule in Norfolk. And in Suffolk: “It is against the law for anyone over the age of 12 to trick-or-treat.”

Finally, if you are 10 or 11 and want to trick or treat in York County, go head. But not on your own! You “should be accompanied by an adult.”

Read the rest of the crazy rules here.

These rules are turning a holiday that used to celebrate childhood independence—out they went, on their own, to get to know their neighbors, to get brave by facing the dark, to get goodies by being bold and ringing doorbells—into an orgy of adult supervision, regulation, and anxiety. The time frame gets shorter as the rules grow, all seemingly based on the idea that anyone above age 12 is a potential hooligan, anyone under age 12 is a potential victim, and any semblance of fun must be thrown out faster than a Kit Kat bar with a slightly torn wrapper.

Holiday hint for 13-year-olds in Chesapeake: Trick or treat in an orange jumpsuit costume. That way, later in the night you won’t have to change clothes.

https://reason.com/blog/2018/10/08/trick-or-treat-virginia-halloween-illega

3 thoughts on “13-Year-Olds Who Trick or Treat in Chesapeake, Virginia, Face Fines, Possible Jail Time

  1. Although this may sound meaningless to some, it must be noted that this violates peoples rights to freely move about and interact with others. It’s something that’s used as a precedent to create more rights violating edicts.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*