“National Emergency: A state of national crisis; a situation demanding immediate and extraordinary national or federal action” Black’s Law Dictionary
“I think of all the damnable heresies that have ever been suggested in connection with the Constitution, the doctrine of emergency is the worst. It means that when Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution… for when this bill becomes a law, …there is no longer any workable Constitution to keep the Congress within the limits of its Constitutional powers.” -Spoken by Congressman Beck in 1933 prior to the passage of the Farm Bill.
Once an emergency is declared, there is no Constitution. Senate Report 93-549 (written by Congress in 1973) states in the very first sentence
“Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency. Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and… control the lives of all American citizens”
This situation has continued absolutely uninterrupted since March 9, 1933. We have been in a state of declared national emergency for nearly 63 years without knowing it.
According to current laws, as found in 12 USC, Section 95(b), everything the President or the Secretary of the Treasury has done since March 4, 1933 is automatically approved:
“The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March the 4th, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by Subsection (b) of Section 5 of the Act of October 6th, 1917, as amended [12 USCS Sec. 95a], are hereby approved and confirmed. (Mar. 9, 1933, c. 1, Title 1, Sec. 1, 48 Stat. 1]”.
On March 4, 1933, Franklin D. Roosevelt was inaugurated as President. On March 9, 1933, Congress approved, in a special session, his Proclamation 2038 that became known as the Act of March 9, 1933:
“Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby declares that a serious national emergency exists and that it is imperatively necessary speedily to put into effect remedies of uniform national application”.
This is an example of the Rule of Necessity, a rule of law where necessity knows no law. This rule was invoked to remove the authority of the Constitution. Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1 of this Act of March 9, 1933 is the exact same wording as Title 12, USC 95(b) quoted earlier, proving that we are still under the Rule of Necessity in a declared state of national emergency.
12 USC 95(b) refers to the authority granted in the Act of October 6, 1917 (a/k/a The Trading with the Enemy Act or War Powers Act) which was “An Act to define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy, and for other purposes”. This Act originally excluded citizens of the United States, but in the Act of March 9, 1933, Section 2 amended this to include “any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof”. It was here that every American citizen literally became an enemy to the United States government under declaration.
According to the current Memorandum of American Cases and Recent English Cases on The Law of Trading With the Enemy, we have no personal Rights at law in any court, and all Rights of an enemy (all American citizens are all declared enemies) to sue in the courts are suspended, whereby the public good must prevail over private gain. This also provides for the taking over of enemy private property. Now we know why we no longer receive allodial freehold title to our land… as enemies, our property is no longer ours to have.
The only way we can do business or any type of legal trade is to obtain permission from our government by means of a license.
So who initiated all of these emergency powers?
On March 3, 1933, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York adopted a resolution stating that the withdrawal of currency and gold from the banks had created a national emergency, and “the Federal Reserve Board is hereby requested to urge the President of the United States to declare a bank holiday, Saturday March 4, and Monday, March 6”.
Roosevelt was told to close down the banking system. He did so with Proclamation 2039 under the excuse of alleged unwarranted hoarding of gold by Americans. Then with Proclamation 2040, he declared on March 9, 1933 the existence of a national bank emergency whereas
“all Proclamations heretofore or hereafter issued by the President pursuant to the authority conferred by section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are approved and confirmed”.
Once an emergency is declared, there is no common law and the Constitution is automatically abolished. We are no longer under law. Law has been abolished. We are under a system of War Powers. Our stocks, bonds, houses, and land can be seized as Americans are considered enemies of the state. What we have is not ours under the War Powers given to the President who is the Commander-in-Chief of the military war machine.
Whenever any President proclaims that the national emergency has ended, all War Powers shall cease to be in effect. Congress can do nothing without the President’s signature because Congress granted him these emergency powers. For over 60 years, no President has been willing to give up this extraordinary power and terminate the original proclamation. Americans are an enemy subject to tribunal district courts under Martial Law wartime jurisdiction; a Constitutional Dictatorship.
GREAT ARTICLE
agreed..
This country has ALWAYS been a Constitutional dictatorship. Unfortunately.
The Constitution was put to the vote of the people ONLY in Rhode Island and it was defeated by an an 11 to 1 margin. Read just the last 15 Anti- Federist papers!
*** Once an emergency is declared, there is no common law and the Constitution is automatically abolished. ***
An emergency didn’t even need to be declared for the Constitution to be abolished. All that was needed was for the government to begin violating the Constitution without sufficient resistance from the population. That’s exactly what happened.
Words have zero power without force or threats to back them up. Written laws and constitutions are no different.
“Words have zero power without force or threats to back them up. Written laws and constitutions are no different.”
Exactly. That is why every single person in every single governmental position is required by the supreme LAW of this land to take an Oath to Support and Defend the US Constitution; by that Oath they are saying they know exactly what is expected of them by that document, and that they are taking PERSONAL responsibility for their actions. (Lt Calley is but one example of following unlawful orders, throughout our history that personal responsibility was paid for by individuals – that is why H. Clinton cannot be allowed to go free for any reason, by her Oath she swore she understood.)
That is the reason why the US Constitution cannot be changed by statutes, regulations, etc. It matters not what those who serve within our government declare as “law”, if it is NOT in Pursuance thereof the US Constitution it is just usurpation – and it is in writing that it is the people as the Militia that hold them accountable for their actions, etc.
US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel invasions.“
What that says is it is the Militia has as its constitutionally assigned duties to:
— Enforce the US Constitution (supreme law) and each state’s Constitution (highest law of the state, except in the few instances of conflict with the supreme law),
— Enforce and keep the “Laws of the Union” (which are constitutional laws ONLY),
— Protect the country against all enemies both domestic and foreign, and
— “to suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions”.
Read this and tell me who “gun control” is supposed to be on…
Tench Coxe, Delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787: “The power of the sword, say the minority…, is in the hands of Congress. My friends and countrymen, it is not so, for The powers of the sword are in the hands of the yeomanry of America from sixteen to sixty. The militia of these free commonwealths, entitled and accustomed to their arms, when compared with any possible army, must be tremendous and irresistible. Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress has no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every terrible implement of the soldier are the birthright of Americans. The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.”
When an item or duty is assigned to an office, branch, group, etc; then it is forbidden from any other to act upon it.
Those who serve within our governments are REQUIRED to use the people – trained as the congress requires the military to be trained, and knowledgeable about the US Constitution and their own state’s Constitution – to do those duties listed above, and ONLY the Militia is to lawfully do them.
The excuse used to create the governmental law enforcement agencies was first that it was to free up the people from those tedious duties. Then after the people were dumbed down enough to not study the contract that those who serve within our governments at all levels are under, and “forgot” that they are the Militia, those law enforcement agencies have been turned against us – which was the complete reason for the people to be the defenders, the “law enforcement”, etc.
There is NO such thing as “emergency powers”. This was debated by the framers and decided that was too much power to allow those who serve within our governments.
The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866: “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism.”
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425 (1934) : “Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are not altered by emergency.”
Once again, only dictators and kings, etc can have such things as “emergency powers” and “martial law”, or “assassination powers” as they are the ruler.
Here in the USA, there is NO person who is the ruler, that’s the documents – Constitution of the United States of America and each state’s Constitution. That is why the authority is delegated to positions, not people. The power is delegated to a branch, to an office within a branch, but NEVER to a person. Then the person who serves in any of those positions must meet the contract, take and KEEP the Oath, do the duties assigned to that position, etc.
Think of an engineering position that opens up. The person who qualifies is required to do certain things under the contract, and as long as that contract is followed, they have the prestige, money, and authority of that position. IF they break that contract they no longer meet the requirements of the position and can be removed.
It is the same thing of those who serve within our governments. That is all in writing. Also, another thing to consider is that the US Constitution does not say that it is only those who serve within our governments that can bring treason, impeachment, charges.
What it says in Article 2, Section 4 is: “The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Article 3: Section 3: Treason against the United States, shall consist only of levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have the Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.”
No where does it say that it is only those who serve within our governments that can bring those charges. Do not forget that the Grand Jury Investigations and Grand Jury, like the Militias, are also OUR tools.
Grand Jury – “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”.
“Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present “True Bills” of indictment to a court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding. Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby created a “buffer” the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.” (Misbehavior, “Good Behaviour” requirement)
“The grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside, we think it clear that, as a general matter at least, no such “supervisory” judicial authority exists. The “common law” of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury.”
“Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the judicial branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm’s length. Judges’ direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. The grand jury’s functional independence from the judicial branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing, and in the manner in which that power is exercised.”
“The grand jury ‘can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.’ It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even “the precise nature of the offense” it is investigating. The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. It swears in its own witnesses and deliberates in total secrecy.”
“Recognizing this tradition of independence, we have said the 5th Amendment’s constitutional guarantee presupposes an investigative body ‘acting independently of either prosecuting attorney or judge”.
“Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court, it should come as no surprise that we have been reluctant to invoke the judicial supervisory power as a basis for prescribing modes of grand jury procedure. Over the years, we have received many requests to exercise supervision over the grand jury’s evidence-taking process, but we have refused them all. “it would run counter to the whole history of the grand jury institution” to permit an indictment to be challenged “on the ground that there was incompetent or inadequate evidence before the grand jury.” (Nor would it be lawful of them to do so.) Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said In the Supreme Court case of United States v. Williams, 112 S.Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L.Ed.2d 352 (1992)
My Fellow Americans:
These are NOT Constitutional Acts since the Constitution is specifically prohibited from extending it’s authority in any such manner, in addition to wholly violating the 9th Article of The Bill Of Rights, which specifically prohibits “In Perpetuam” (In Perpetuity or Forever…) any such violations of our Unalienable-Rights.
The Trading With Enemies Act declared in 1917, then expanded upon in 1933 were nothing more than a “Declaration Of Occupying Powers”,… hence why you hear me refer to this illegitimate gov’t by its proper name,… an EFIO or Enemy-Force-In-Occupation.
My phrases are NOT euphemisms,… but are explicitly correct nomenclature of our current state of affairs.
JD – US Marines – The Etruscans occupied other countries for several hundred years,…. Rome occupied other countries for nearly a thousand years, the British have occupied other countries for hundreds of years,…. and the Zionist-jew-communists have occupies Palestine since 1948,… why would anyone not think we too are occupied when they have openly declared it!!!
.
“JD – US Marines – The Etruscans occupied other countries for several hundred years,…. Rome occupied other countries for nearly a thousand years, the British have occupied other countries for hundreds of years,…. and the Zionist-jew-communists have occupies Palestine since 1948,… why would anyone not think we too are occupied when they have openly declared it!!!”
There appears to be an obvious repeat of history here, similar to those that “discovered” America, and occupied the natives.
Guess we will (or at least some of us will)
Have to defend our feelings about our constitution from the barrel of our guns
Because if you don’t
It holds no relevance to the EFIO
Or any of the oligarchs anyways
When the fight is brought to your boot tips it is your responsibility to put the fear of the opposing tyrant life as his main concern
Or your rights as a human on this earth , will be subjugated , guaranteed
I will receive all my rights , why? Because I will hold the tool to demand they respect them
Or die trying to take them from me
Could be the end of me ? Yes .. but not all of us truly live free or live truly dedicated to ones own personal freedoms
I will not provoke , but I will not accept their rule over me either
Feel lucky ?
Better be faster than me than
No Gov action, under any circumstance, is above the US Constitution.
hey all you ANARCHISTS that want no government?
WHY ARE YOU BITCHING?? YOUVE NEVER HAD ONE!!!!!!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE HAVE NO “GOVERNMENT”” GENTLEMEN, LADIES, WE ARE BEING RULED BY AN ILLEGAL CULT OF CRIMINALS THAT ARE TO DAMNED LAZY TO WORK, AND GAIN THEIR MEANS THROUGH FRAUD AND OURIGHT BULLSHIT…….
Lock & load.
No other options at this point.
“any person within the United States or any place subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes, by definition, the several states.
To tell ya the truth. .
I really don’t mind a Dictatorship.
As long as I’m the Dicktater.
Hmmmn..
Where have I heard that b4.
Bingo…!
WOW….. SO BACK IN 33 THE CONSTITUTION WAS SUSPENDED, FORCING A DICTATORSHIP ON THE “CITIZENRY”……….. THEN IN 1866( ABOUT)… THE 14TH AMMENDMENT WAS FORCED THROUGH, MAKING EVERYONE HERE “CITIZENS” BY FORCE…………………I GTOT IT BACKWARDS……. LMAO!!
And let’s not forget the Act of 1871 here…just another proverbial brick in the wall here…and while we’re at citing song lyrics, meet the new boss, same as the old boss… Good to know though that there are those of us who KNOW this nation is under lawlessness. Why? well, for one thing (especially applied to us true Christians), it means anyone throwing Romans 13 in your face is just committing an abomination against God in your face! It is man’s ‘authority’, not God’s, that has brought about said lawlessness. In fact, true Christians MUST resist this lawlessness! This is what Romans 13 really says! (As does Ephesians 6:12, about those principalities and powers and wickedness in high places).
The blacks law rabbit hole is an enlightening path, how words and meanings change with the editions.
Person, persona, the mask, etc.
The legal fiction.