Since Jews like to celebrate their holidays by killing Goyim, look for the cruise missiles to start flying into Syria when Rosh Hashanah starts on September 4.
Land Destroyer – by Tony Cartalucci
The Wall Street Journal has confirmed what many suspected, that the West’s so-called “evidence” of the latest alleged “chemical attacks” in Syria, pinned on the Syrian government are fabrications spun up from the West’s own dubious intelligence agencies.
The Wall Street Journal reveals that the US is citing claims from Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency fed to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a repeat of the fabrications that led up to the Iraq War, the Libyan War, and have been used now for 3 years to justify continued support of extremists operating within and along Syria’s borders.
Wall Street Journal’s article, “U.S., Allies Prepare to Act as Syria Intelligence Mounts,” states:
One crucial piece of the emerging case came from Israeli spy services, which provided the Central Intelligence Agency with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit that oversees Mr. Assad’s chemical weapons, Arab diplomats said. The intelligence, which the CIA was able to verify, showed that certain types of chemical weapons were moved in advance to the same Damascus suburbs where the attack allegedly took place a week ago, Arab diplomats said.
Both Mossad and the CIA are clearly compromised in terms of objectivity and legitimacy. Neither exists nor is expected to provide impartial evidence, but rather to facilitate by all means necessary the self-serving agendas, interests, and objectives of their respective governments.
That both Israel and the United States, as far back as 2007 have openly conspired together to overthrow the government of Syria through a carefully engineered sectarian bloodbath, discredits entirely their respective intelligence agencies. This is precisely why an impartial, objective third-party investigation has been called for by the international community and agreed upon by the Syrian government – a third-party investigation the US has now urged to be canceled ahead of its planned military strikes.
The Wall Street Journal reports:
In an email on Sunday, White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice told U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power and other top officials that the U.N. mission was pointless because the chemical weapons evidence already was conclusive, officials said. The U.S. privately urged the U.N. to pull the inspectors out, setting the stage for President Barack Obama to possibly move forward with a military response, officials said.
The US then, not Syria, is attempting a coverup, with fabrications in place from discredited, compromised intelligence sources and the threat of impending military strikes that would endanger the UN inspection team’s safety should they fail to end their investigation and withdraw.
The Wall Street Journal also reiterated that the US is planning to fully sidestep the UN Security Council and proceed with its partners unilaterally:
…if the U.S. chose to strike, it would do so with allies and without the U.N., in order to sidestep an expected Russian veto.
The US proceeds now with absolute disregard for international law, all but declaring it has no intention of providing credible evidence of its accusations against the Syrian government. It is a rush to war with all the hallmarks of dangerous desperation as the West’s proxy forces collapse before the Syrian military. Western military leaders must consider the strategic tenants and historical examples regarding the dangers and folly of haste and imprudence in war – especially war fought to protect special interests and political agendas rather than to defend territory.
The populations of the West must likewise consider what benefits they have garnered from the last decade of military conquest their leaders have indulged in. Crumbling economies gutted to feed the preservation of special interests and the growing domestic security apparatuses to keep these interests safe from both domestic and foreign dissent are problems that will only grow more acute.
Outside of the West, in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran, leaders must consider a future where Western special interests can invade with impunity, without public support, or even the tenuous semblance of justification being necessary.
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/cofirmed-us-claims-against-syria-there.html
I have wondered about this and thought to myself, “what stops the US right now from a ‘boots on the ground’ invasion” and that is Syria’s chemical and biological arsenal.
Is this a very long game, as we saw with Saddam, where the US is seeking to push the Syrians to surrendering their only protection from invasion?
Look back to Iraq and how some of it played out, how the rhetoric of invasion became reality once it was really being shown that Saddam really had disposed of the one thing that prevented America invading, deep analysis I know but have wondered a lot as to why this is happening almost to a script…
Listen to the CIA whistleblower Susan Lindauer. If IRAQ was planned way before the 9/11 hoax ( as well as the patriot act) then Syria would be too. They certainly wouldn’t stop there. Next stop Iran. Unless of course the American sheople wake up! If the fact that its illegal keeps getting exposed to the public , mixed with high emotions of being broke this might actually help. Even though the general public is asleep, they are still tired of seeing their money pissed away. They logically cant uae a humanitarian exscuse with Bronco Bomber droning women and children all the time. Interesting times indeed.
Several of those cruise missile launching destroyers were dispatched to the eastern Mediterranean over a month ago, so someone knew back then an attack on the Syrian people was about to take place.
Barry Sotero better watch his back, his YID masters aren’t happy that he hasn’t already bombed the hell out of Syria and might be looking to replace him with that that clown Joe “I’m a Zionist” Biden.
Cure the “problem”, just re aim the cruse missiles a little further south, and say “oops, our finger slipped”