Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law

Department of Justice

    • Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law

15 thoughts on “Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law

  1. Geeee….I wonder if or when any unlawful, color of law, corporate USA ‘official’ has ever read or even glanced at Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 without showing a twisted little smile…. How many people did what to the Hammonds and the Bundys, not to mention God knows how many others…

    1. I get that
      but what i see here is using their own set of rules against them ..because its so deserved

      am I wrong for thinking this way?
      am I wrong for using the enemies tactics against them ?

      no seriously Im asking for anyone to clear my mind on this ….. Henry?

      1. I have to agree with Charlie. Charlie has taken the time and has the intelligence that has allowed him to decipher the Bill of Rights. Charlie told us of his encounter the other day where he recited the 4th Article to the foreign entity he was confronting. I believe Charlie understands the Bill of Rights. He understands why he is absolutely in the right and he can explain it to anyone standing in front of him.
        The inductions of the United States Codes is a direct assault on the common law Bill of Rights.
        I would ask you, Charlie, how does it feel to know exactly what your rights are and to be able to, with confidence, put the accusation of treason and official oppression into the face of the ignorant little traitor in front of you?
        I myself find it a feeling like none other. Our people have got to understand who we are and start enforcing our right to peace under our common law Bill of Rights, absolutely as the absolute, never can be changed, law that it is.
        Charlie had an air of pride in his voice when he spoke the other day, and it sounded good to this free man’s ears.
        The United States Codes are for government enforcement upon government, within the government. Their assertion into our private lives is an act of war.

        1. ” Their assertion into our private lives is an act of war.”
          IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE TO INTERPRET IT ANY OTHER WAY…………………………………………….

        2. Thank you Henry for clearing my mind on this
          So many acts of war against us all
          So little time left to tolerate it

        3. Henry, on taking the time “to decipher The Bill of Rights, “… I have found that there is no better use of my time. Yes, I’ve a long way to go, but every day, understanding a bit more, I will get closer to where Charlie is.

          You have invested a lifetime of study in it, and you match that study with mental steel and unshakable integrity. I guess knowing the material adds confidence and commitment. I want to keep moving in that direction.

          I see many have a strong moral fiber and just need a little more on the intellectual side of understanding and imparting The Inalienable Rights. May study take a place of prominence where is stood in days of old, where a book was gold and a teacher, that which made it shine.

          I thank you with everything in me, and will keep learning best I can.

          .

  2. Obama and Holder were in clear violation of this statue when they conspired to use straw purchasers to purchase weapons that they wanted to ban (AR-15s, AK-47s, etc) from licensed gun dealers in the U.S. and then smuggle them into Mexico, where they deliberately sold them to the Mexican drug cartels – because they wanted to establish a paper trail between U.S. gun dealers and the drug cartels where one did not previously exist. This was the ‘fast and furious’ gun running scandal that the gutless GOP establishment allowed these two clowns to get away with. The idea was for the DEA and the corrupt Mexican law enforcement to order a raid on the drug cartel people who they had given those weapons to and then conveniently ‘find’ the weapons on the premises – run a serial number check, and BINGO – claim this was proof that U.S. gun dealers were selling dangerous weapons to drug cartel killers and therefore, those types of firearms should be banned from being owned by law abiding American citizens.

    Straw purchases are against the law. I also read that some of those weapons that Obama and Holder smuggled into the hands of the drug cartels were found to have been used to kill U.S. Border Patrol and/or US DEA agents.

  3. “Straw purchases are against the law.”
    KISS MY GRIT WILLIE.
    MY FAMILY BUYS GUNS FOR ME ALL THE TIME.
    WHAT ARE YOU? A WORD TWISTING “ATTORNEY”?
    “””””SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED-“P E R I O D!

  4. To Galen @ 11:58 am,
    The people that are the Trenchers figuring this out is a revelation taking shape in front of our eyes. None of you may know just how close you are, but that feeling I talked about when I strapped on my pistol and headed down the hill to face the dirty bastard that I didn’t yet know had tried to harass my son (my son cussed him like the piece of shit that his unauthorized ass was and he fled the scene before he had to confront me), but when I tell you, walking down that hill with absolute righteousness and peace in my being, was a feeling that is indescribable. When I heard Charlie speak the other day, I knew that he had felt the same.
    There are so many so close and we are the multitude. 3% of our ancestors shot the mightiest army on the planet at the time out of our country. That accomplishment occurred because we were so in the right.
    I know now that there was no fear in the heart of Nathan Hale, only the feeling of righteousness and peace when he proudly and boldly declared, “I only regret that I have but one life to lose for my country.” In his soul, he knew that though he would be dead, because he knew that that indescribable feeling that held him at his pride in the face of death, he had conveyed to enough others to assure an enemy that the British could not even conceive.
    When I stand back and look at it, an American national who understands it complete, is the only person or persons in this world who can feel that feeling.
    Knowing everything I know about them, knowing them for the cowards that they are, that they will bring a hundred to kill one, I felt euphoric, happy, because I knew at that instant that that feeling could exist and that in the face of the most brutal, there was no fear. There is no fear. We are all going to die one day, only an American national, defending the Bill of Rights as his or her personal being, can feel that feeling and that feeling makes the American national the most unbelievably unstoppable mortal being to ever exist.
    It is as simple as this. Defending that most righteous part of myself, which is my natural rights, even if I am killed, will be my pleasure. And once the people en masse gain that feeling, no enemy can stand against the power it creates.
    I believe that the hardest part of reaching the ultimate understanding is simply realizing how simple it is. People look at the big huge problem and the admiralty ball of spaghetti and they see reaching a point of righteously executing an outside enemy attacking the natural rights of our being as something insurmountable. The simpler you look at it, the simpler it is. The person standing before me is there illegally, as the guarantee of the common law court is removed with the removal of the due process that creates the court has been removed.
    To kill somebody is no small matter, but to kill a foreign attacker who has already announced the intent to enslave you, your family, to murder, rape, and pillage in direct violation of your absolute unquestionable right to be left alone, and again this is a foreign actor, you can do nothing more righteous than putting a bullet right through the bastard’s head.
    Number one, the attack was shut down with the death of that agent.
    Number two, if you are killed in the process, you died defending your children and grandchildren’s right to life, literally.
    And like I said, we are all going to die. I find life precious, but as I know that someday I will die, under these circumstances, today is a good day to die, the best death that any decent human being could die.
    Stay tuned, as the revelation is forming into a tidal wave that can’t be stopped. It is a damnable shame that so many innocents will die prematurely and be robbed of the time that was theirs for their enjoyment of the experience of life with peace of mind and body, but it is neglect of the understanding that life without such is servitude in misery.
    I see progress in leaps and bounds and I know without a doubt that the message for the acquirement of the good feeling in having to commit the ugly act has been conveyed and is understood. And those that know it cannot help but to be driven to bring the same to every other American national, not for a uniting or a battle charge, but the individual righteousness in the killing of the deplorable sick in the mind critically flawed son of a bitch that would want to harm it.
    Onward and upward.

    1. Yes, I’m understanding more and more: Live life on the front lines. Recognize a violation when it appears and deal with it right then and there. To destroy evil is to preserve good.

      This letter-post from you, now moves from letter to Document, one that in years to come will sit in a glass case somewhere, and posterity will read it and know that one man took a stand, and many followed suit, and posterity will know what rescued freedom and now it is they who carry the charge.

      .

  5. United States Codes as in title 18 USC section 241 and 242 only applies to government franchises, agencies, departments, contractors, agents, actors, officers, employees, ect…
    The Bill of Rights is only a list of PROHIBITIONS for the same entities above, the Bill of Rights does not give, grant, convey, bestow, afford any RIGHTS to the People, PERIOD!
    (You are born with rights as a gift from your Creator)
    IT is better construed, that the government is to recognize and acknowledge that the People have these Rights and are forbidden from infringing on the People’s Rights.
    NOTE: the bill of rights does not list all of the people’s rights, see 9th amendment.
    If you do not know your rights, you better get a clue and start exercising them.

    1. “The Bill of Rights is only a list of PROHIBITIONS for the same entities above, the Bill of Rights does not give, grant, convey, bestow, afford any RIGHTS to the People, PERIOD!”
      Absolutely f#@king wrong! And you should know better. This is the lie that was taught to open the door for the removal of the rights, you goddamn fool.
      The Bill of Rights is the maximums in law, you know like they pretend the Supreme Court decisions are that have no bearing on us.
      The 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th Articles are all procedural due process.
      The 9th Article reads: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
      Of course all your rights are not listed in the Bill of Rights. That is what the Bill of Rights is for. It is for the procedural due process through the common law jury to enforce our every right, which are too numerous to be written down. The procedure provides for us, as a people, to define each right and to what measure it meets the rights of another under different conditions.
      I will tell you what the 9th Article means by the law, in fact, as it is written. And it doesn’t have a goddamn thing to do with what is not listed in the Bill of Rights.
      Keep in mind that the Bill of Rights was written after the Constitution, apart and separate from the Constitution to address the proposed government powers in the Constitution. Now, the enumeration in the Constitution, which you are somehow trying to pretend is the Bill of Rights, is addressing the Constitution, saying that the writing down in that Constitution of certain rights, defined in law, a right is an authority, just like our rights in the Bill of Rights are defined as our authorities.
      These authorities in the Constitution, again, not to be confused with the Bill of Rights, shall not be construed, that is interpreted, to deny or disparage, which is to remove or infringe, on others retained by the people.
      This is a fact written in fact. It says no authority can be created through the Constitution to deny the rights secured by the procedural due process, which is the Bill of Rights.
      You are a f#@king shill, probably a f#@king attorney shill. Only such a low life scum sucking piece of shit would dare to come on this site where we have the knowledge and try to sell us what the communists tried to sell us in third grade. You must think we are really stupid. The fact is, there can be no supreme court or any other element in government that can have the authority to change or alter the procedures contained in the Bill of Rights that enforce the every right, written down or not, conceived or un-conceived to that moment.
      I’ll go ahead and straighten you out on the 10th Article since you seem to think you are going to attorn some words here.
      The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, that means the states can create no authority to change the Bill of Rights. Just like the Constitution cannot. Those prohibitions being talked about are the prohibitions in the Bill of Rights. That is why it is clear full of those shalls and shall nots.
      We understand our rights, you dirty son of a bitch, and we understand our authorities. So now get your attorning, shill ass off of our site, you paid f#@king government troll.

  6. Okay, girls, now we know what “attorn” means. Thanks for helping with the soup. There will be much soup needed as the weeks and months roll on. We feed soup to people we love. And bread. And yes, I have plenty of rolling-pins, sturdy, and oversized.

    🙂

    .

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*