listen here

Or you can mail donations to Henry Shivley at P.O. Box 964, Chiloquin, OR 97624

Developer Ordered to Pay Graffiti Artists $6.7M for Painting Over Their Murals On His Own Property

Information Liberation – by Chris Menahan

A New York real estate developer was ordered to pay millions to a group of graffiti artists for painting over their artwork on his own property after a federal judge deemed their work “protected public art.”

From The New York Times:  

Graffiti at the 5Pointz complex in Long Island City, Queens, in 2001. The property owner had the murals erased in 2013, and a judge ruled on Monday that 45 of them had enough artistic stature to merit being protected.

Ruling that graffiti — a typically transient form of art — was of sufficient stature to be protected by the law, a federal judge in Brooklyn awarded a judgment of $6.7 million on Monday to 21 graffiti artists whose works were destroyed in 2013 at the 5Pointz complex in Long Island City, Queens.

In November, a landmark trial came to a close in Federal District Court in Brooklyn when a civil jury decided that Jerry Wolkoff, a real estate developer who owned 5Pointz, broke the law when he whitewashed dozens of swirling murals at the complex, obliterating what a lawyer for the artists had called “the world’s largest open-air aerosol museum.”

Though Mr. Wolkoff’s lawyers had argued that the buildings were his to treat as he pleased, the jury found he violated the Visual Artists Rights Act, or V.A.R.A., which has been used to protect public art of “recognized stature” created on someone’s else property.

In an odd legal twist, the judge at that trial, Frederic Block, altered the verdict at the 11th hour to make it merely a recommendation. But on Monday, Judge Block upheld the jury’s decision, and his ruling awarded the artists the maximum damages possible, saying that 45 of the dozens of ruined murals had enough artistic stature to merit being protected. The jury had found that only 36 of the works should be guarded under V.A.R.A.

“Artist Akiko Miyakami said that when she saw her artwork mutilated under a layer of white paint, according to a court document, she felt as though she ‘was raped,'” The Washington Post reports.

I distinctly remember as a youth that painting over other graffiti artists’ works was considered part of the art-form, which was viewed as “always evolving” and so on.

Who thinks this is art worthy of protecting until the end of time?

This sets the precedent now that vandals can go around tagging people’s property and then sue anyone who covers it up.

Information Liberation

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.
708

4 Responses to Developer Ordered to Pay Graffiti Artists $6.7M for Painting Over Their Murals On His Own Property

  1. Bill in IL says:

    I don’t know who is the stupidest one of all here. The judge clearly suffers from a low IQ and totalitarianism while jurors are just down right imbeciles. I wonder how they would react if a “graffiti artist” spray painted their house.

  2. Jolly Roger says:

    It’s a simple question of whether this graffiti was ruled to be “protected public art” before or after the property owner painted over it.

    Otherwise, as the author said, it “sets the precedent now that vandals can go around tagging people’s property and then sue anyone who covers it up”.

    This case isn’t over. Before this guy shells out a dime to graffiti artists, this will be in court again, and the settlement will be tossed out.

  3. Enemy of the State says:

    Anyone got a picture of this judge?

    I’ll hold my comments until I see if I’m right or not

  4. # 1 NWO Hatr says:

    “A New York real estate developer was ordered to pay millions to a group of graffiti artists for painting over their artwork on his own property…”

    Wait a minute… am I missing something here? His own property???

    Does he have an allodial title?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *