Revelation thanks to our posters, who realized this immediately as an arch-fake.
Is it not incredible, particularly on the heels of the two arch-Zionist Australian hoaxes, the Lindt Cafe fake and the Cairn stabbing hoax? Now, just as these arch-hoaxes are revealed, now comes another filthy arch-Zionist fake, the NYPD ‘revenge’ killing of two policemen. The killer, acclaimed as a black Muslim, did it all, if the Zionists are to be believed, as a means to avenge the ‘deaths’ at the hands of the cops of Michael Brown and Eric (arch-hoaxer) Garner.
This is, by the way, a mere distraction, a means of garnering (no pun intended) public attention away from the revelation of the Sydney arch-fake.
Even so, the ‘shooting’ occurred simultaneously with the occurrence of a heavy-duty anti-terror drill occurring in the city.
Yet, it is said:
Ismail Brinsley shot and killed two NYPD officers before committing suicide in Brooklyn’s Bed Stuy neighborhood just before 3 p.m. on December 20. He’s believed to have walked up to the cop’s patrol car and open fire, “execution” style.
How can anyone open fire, “execution-style?” How? Opening fire is opening fire. It’s not the same as bringing the gun right up to a restrained person and committing an execution. Sure he did it, right. Then, as in all the other hoaxes he went off into insane land and killed himself, supposedly with a ‘single shot’ to the head.
A person blows their brains out and does the same to two cops, and there is no imagery to support it? Good God, the hoax is confirmed already. Then, who is this arch hoaxer “Ismail Brinsley?”
Now, incredibly, it is being said that he is a ‘black Muslim.’ Any bells ringing regarding the words of Bill Cosby saying that the black Muslim community should be recognized for some of their ways? Right, he came all the way from Baltimore to kill two NYPD ‘pigs.’ Of course he did, people witnessed the entire affair:
“I seen them putting the cop in the ambulance. He looked messed up,” McKie, a barber, added. “He took a high-caliber weapon to the face. He was lifeless…I couldn’t see where the holes was that, all I could see was blood. His body was lifeless.
Here’s what you need to know:
1. After the shooting, he took his own life. Brinsley, 28, ran to the entrance of a Subway station on Marcy Avenue and killed himself with a self-inflicted gunshot wound, reports NBC New York.He was taken to a Brooklyn hospital where he was pronounced dead on arrival. Police recovered a silver handgun from his death scene.
OK, he killed himself. He cannot be used as a witness or a proof of what really happened. There’s no retroactive investigation, no court appearances, no trial: no responsibility to be maintained for such a crime. He’s dead, like all the other arch-hoaxers.
Funny thing, he doesn’t look dead:
There is paint on the forehead, cheek, and even with the CPR tube (or on the outside of it). Yet, where is the gunshot wound, the entrance and/or exit wound. And where is all the massive spurted out bloooooddd, all five liters of it? In contrast, regarding the cheeks it looks like mere applied moulage, mere brush strokes.
There is some additional blood, rather, paint. Yet, in this case it is supposedly that of the shot-dead cops. Really, how did the police-persons’ blood get all the way over there? Moreover, there is none on the curb, none on the street, and nothing reddish-colored on the car?
There is a bit of the red material on the stretcher. Does that make any sense? What is all the black material strung (staged) about? Is that chaotically placed body armor?
The fake blood zoomed in:
Well, there it is, proof of the hoax, mere tempura pain dabbed on and stroked onto the pavement. There is no arterial spray to be seen anywhere, no spatter: and none on the curb’s edge.
Yet, he did it, he killed those cops in revenge. Moreover, it was that very system, the cops and EMTs, that sought to rescue him from his own self. They’re heroic, after all:
Yet, what else is seen. Look at this carefully. Yes,. there is the cop in the background checking his text messages. It is what is in the foreground of the above image that is so crucial. Look at the chest compression agent. That is not possible. There is no way he could properly and safely give chest compressions at such an angle. He could not exert the necessary force. He’s faking it, which is easy to prove.
That quick, he decides NOT to give any more compressions?
He must also be a moulage mole. Notice the red pain residue on his gloved hand.
Arch-pro-Zionist hoaxer Brimsley is a black Muslim in camo? Really?
Brimsley is apparently experienced in the application of red jelly. Regardless, who believes in real life a killer would produce such a post. Too, he says his shoe is blood tinged? Really, it surely isn’t obviously bloody.
The Zionists are behind this, make no mistake about it. Brooklyn is their domain.
How about more and more senselessly place police tape with a crime scene that is open for compromise, like the allowance for the entrance of this media agent. Note the microphone in hand as she moves to find a crisis actor to interview.
There are plenty of smiley faces in this fake. This is an arch-Zionist hoax, one that is impossible to refute. Let anyone attempt to contest it. Such a one will fail miserably.
http://nodisinfo.com/execution-two-nypd-cops-vengeful-gunman-hoax/
Gee….why am I not surprised…… 🙄
“Even so, the ‘shooting’ occurred simultaneously with the occurrence of a heavy-duty anti-terror drill occurring in the city.”
Again, why am I not surprised…… 🙄
this presents no ACTUAL proof of a hoax. and furthermore, most of what this person states is missing or “paint” can either be seen in other photos with better quality or just makes no sense.
The suicide of the shooter is the most common and obvious give away. Good article.
Thanks for posting these things, Henry. Even if the jury’s still out, it’s good to post the possible hoax angle to get people to think. We need guts like that, people not afraid to question ALL “official stories”.
I assume things like this are a false flag, then work backwards anymore. Instead of believing the “news” and working backwards: I assume the OPPOSITE of the “news” and work backwards.
You’re probably more often right than wrong, if you assume the OPPOSITE of the “news”.
I do not know what to believe anymore. MSM lies all the time, now alternative media is almost the same. We the People are being played with and there is little we can do. Read all the stories and draw you ouw opinion.