6 thoughts on “LA Activists Respond to NRA

  1. I guess i must have missed the video where the NRA said to kill black people.
    I have heard their commercial on the radio where they are selling shooting insurance. You know, just in case you gotta shoot somebody, if you got the NRA shooting insurance, you can get the best lawyer the NRA can buy.
    I did hear a radio commercial where the NRA were talking about Muslim terrorists.
    Anywho, I’m going to go look on youtube for this “kill all the darkies” NRA video.

    1. So the NRA is selling shooting insurance? They’re normalizing the idea of insurance for gun owners. Great. They’re making America great again by paving way for insurance giants to try to steal yet another piece of silver from our pocket every year. The NRA will fight for gun owners. They will never allow guns to be illegal. You may soon be limited to a single shot, smooth bore, licensed, registered and insured, firearm, of a caliber not exceeding .22″,utilizing federally approved microstamped ammunition and stored at all times in a federally approved safe with trigger lock in place. But hey, we tried!
      This organization is just waltzing freedom elegantly into the grave.

      And their provoking ads are just the antagonist role in the divide and conquer people talked about yesterday, allowing this racist black lady to play protagonist in the coming social revolution that will resemble the recent neo-nazi Ukranians murdering eastern Ukes and calling them terrorists.

  2. Okay. I looked (not very hard) for the “NRA shoot the negro’s” video and I couldn’t find it.
    Seems this is all just more divide and conquer tactics.
    “Whitey” is supposed to side with the cops and the black folk will feel they have no choice but to kill all the white folk.
    The only shooting insurance I got is lots of extra mags.

    1. “The only shooting insurance I got is lots of extra mags.”

      As long as they’re full. 🙂

  3. In a sane world, the NRA and the families of those wrongly killed by the pig enforcers would be on the same team, and for the same reason: civilian gun ownership helps prevent unaccountable tyranny and protects civil liberties.

    Elsewhere I’ve made the distinction between being pro-gun and supporting the 2nd Amendment. The NRA is more or less pro-gun, but it does NOT support the 2nd Amendment. The NRA views civilian gun ownership as justified only for hunting, target shooting, and self-defense against common criminals; it doesn’t view privately-owned guns as a bulwark against rogue cops, soldiers, or government.

    On the other hand, any BLM-type organization that’s opposed to extensive civilian gun ownership is just plain retarded. If unaccountable police brutality is a problem — and it obviously is — why would you want your tormentors to have a monopoly on effective weapons? The level of stupidity there is astonishing.

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*