Rampant rumors sparked by comments from Trump underlings were laid to rest this afternoon when Donald Trump explicitly told the New York Times “No” when asked if he is taking investigations of the Clintons off the table!
Web sites across the US reeled with shock and dismay earlier Tuesday after Trump underlings, appearing on an MSNBC television program, said they understood Trump would not be prosecuting any crimes involving Hillary (or Bill) Clinton. It turns out that “their understanding” was wrong.
Trump was interviewed by the New York Times today and blurbs from that meeting were being live-Tweeted by NYTimes’ Magie Haberman. When it came to the topic of prosecuting the Clintons, Trump was asked if he is taking investigations of Clinton “off the table.” He replied bluntly “No.” Here is the Tweet from Magie Habereman who was in the New York Times meeting with the President Elect today:
Trump says "no" when asked if he is taking investigations off the table for Clintons but adds he doesn't want to "hurt the Clintons."
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) November 22, 2016
Says he wants to move on and move forward. "I'm not looking to go back and go through this," Trump says.
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) November 22, 2016
So there you have it. Despite all the hand-wringing taking place earlier today by web sites who mistakenly accepted the word of underlings as fact, the PEOTUS himself has laid the issue clearly to rest. He will NOT be taking investigations of the Clintons off the table.
13 thoughts on ““No.” Trump PERSONALLY Tells NY Times he is NOT taking Clinton Investigations Off the Table”
In this new age of google and facebook analytics the enemy can change its tune on a dime, however it also means the enemy is being reactionary which gives us an advantage while exposing the hypocrisy. Excuse my language but if we keep this F%(*ER Trump and whats being done in his name under a microscope we can paralyze them to one degree or another. Trump is not that charming or hypnotic, we need to keep making fools of the TRUMPETS by doing nothing more then calling out their stupidity, hypocrisy and their worship of the state.
“however it also means the enemy is being reactionary which gives us an advantage ”
Very good observation.. not many people are picking up on this..in another one of my comments i speculate that this is the time We the People change this game back to OUR power , and clean the state of these parasites in our government
the window of opportunity is small , and short .. if we as a population( or the true patriots of the Republic) snooze we will lose , again
Im only 1 guy, and can only do so much alone
they will not relinquish power easy, and when cornered will lash out
its not for the weak minded or frail backs , or wishy washy ..it will become ugly , but in the end if we stick to our principals we will prevail , but only if we act and swiftly .. time is already being wasted ..
I’d like to see JD’s take on this , and JR’s and Henrys too .. guys am i all wet? you three do a much better job of covering the bases than I do
In my mind its a bit tricky to understand why Trump would put egg on the face of his supporters almost daily since the acceptance speech. Are they treating Trumpets like a battered wife? If so I’m thinking another false flag is waiting in the wings.
I do believe he won’t take “investigations ” off the table. Just like the investigations the FBI supposedly conducted and found “no wrong doing”. Like the too numerous to count investigations against establishment figures time and time again that produce “no convictions”. As proven in his own words, he OWES her a great deal of gratitude and doesn’t want to hurt her or her husband, after all they’re such nice people he’s looking forward to taking advice from. So he’ll (probably) put on some half cocked “investigation” show, and it’ll be very entertaining and all. But don’t hold your breath for a prosecution even though there is absolute proof of guilt.
He doesn’t want to hurt the Clintons, as any person with integrity does not want to hurt a criminal when he is prosecuted for crime. They want to punish them for their offense, not ‘hurt’ them to be hurting them.
When I had to spank my children for disobedience, I didn’t do it to hurt them but to help them by showing them there are painfull results from misbehaving..
When was the last time your children committed treason or murder of thousands or theft of millions or the destabilization of sovereign nations in violation of the very oath they swear to be bound by? So you think he has integrity and only wants to spank hillary? We’ll see. I promise you and all, he’s gonna show you his “integrity”. These trumpet blowers think they have a knight in shining armor, their new lord and savior. They think they can get to heaven by dealing with the devil. He has ALREADY shown his true colors, what more do you need? But as I’ve said they’ll morph into the agenda rather than face the reality and foolishness of their choices. A guy like trump was out there to do exactly what we see coming from his supporters. It’s a shame they don’t see it.
Where DO they come from, Jamal???
Henry called it, planet retardia! Lol
In a galaxy far, far away…
“He doesn’t want to hurt the Clintons, as any person with integrity does not want to hurt a criminal when he is prosecuted for crime.”
If you honestly BELIEVE that POS jewb#tch has an OUNCE of integrity… you’re certifiable.
Go play with AJ, LOSER.
I think everyone is missing the point. “HE” won’t go after her his DOJ will. They will nail her on the emails and find her guilty. Then Trump will pardon her for “that” crime looking like a hero to the Demorats.
The DOJ will then go after her for the foundation and find her guilty. At this point Trump will just say I can’t spend all my time pardoning the Clinton’s and not look like it’s revenge. He’s as dumb as a fox….
“They will nail her on the emails and find her guilty.”
“He’s as dumb as a fox….”
Still drinking the Kool-Aid, I see.
my hat is very tasty.
nom nom nom.