Expose Obama – by John Whitehead
“No power on earth has a right to take our property from us without our consent.”—John Jay,first Chief Justice of the United States
“How ‘secure’ do our homes remain if police,armed with no warrant,can pound on doors at will and … forcibly enter?”—Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg,the lone dissenter in Kentucky v. King
If the government can tell you what you can and cannot do within the privacy of your home,whether it relates to what you eat,what you smoke or whom you love,you no longer have any rights whatsoever within your home.
If government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard,praying with friends in your living room,installing solar panels on your roof,and raising chickens in your backyard,you’re no longer the owner of your property. If school officials can punish your children for what they do or say while at home or in your care,your children are not your own—they are the property of the state.
If government agents can invade your home,break down your doors,kill your dog,damage your furnishings and terrorize your family,your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Likewise,if police can forcefully draw your blood,strip search you,and probe you intimately,your body is no longer your own,either.
This is what a world without the Fourth Amendment looks like,where the lines between private and public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control,manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes,and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord.
Examples of this disregard for the sanctity of private property—whether in the form of one’s home,one’s possessions,or one’s person—abound. Here are just a few.
In San Rafael,California,it is now illegal to smoke a cigarette or other tobacco product inside “apartments,condos,duplexes,and multi-family houses.” Although lawmakers hope the ordinance will be “self-enforcing,” they’re encouraging landlords to threaten tenants with eviction should they run afoul of the law.
In Ohio,it’s illegal to alter one’s car with a hidden compartment if the “intent” is to conceal illegal drugs. Although Norman Gurley had no drugs on his person,nor in his car,nor could it be proven that he intended to conceal drugs,he was still arrested for the “crime” of having a hidden compartment in the trunk of his car.
In Florida and elsewhere throughout the country,home vegetable gardens are being targeted as illegal. For 17 years,Hermine Ricketts and Tom Carroll have tended the vegetable garden in their front yard,relying on it for 80 percent of their food intake,only to be told by city officials that they must get rid of it or face $50 a day in fines. The reason? The vegetable garden is “inconsistent with the city’s aesthetic character.”
In Iowa,a war veteran attempting to wean his family off expensive corporate farm products,GMOs and pesticides has been charged with violating a city ordinance and now faces up to 30 days in jail and a $600 fine for daring to raise chickens in his backyard for his personal use,despite statements of support from his neighbors.
In Virginia,school officials suspended two boys for the remainder of the school year and charged them with possession of a firearm after they were reported to the police for playing with toy airsoft guns in their front yard,while waiting for the morning school bus. At no time did the boys attempt to take the toy guns on the bus or to school.
The most obvious disrespect for property rights comes in the form of the tens of thousands of SWAT team raids that occur across the country on a yearly basis. Usually undertaken under the pretense of serving a drug warrant,these raids involve police arriving at a private residence in SWAT gear,armed to the hilt,kicking down doors,apprehending all persons inside the home,then determining if a crime has been committed. That was Judy Sanchez’s experience when FBI agents investigating gang activity used a chainsaw to cut through her door,then forced Sanchez and her child to the ground. It was only after invading Sanchez’s home and terrorizing her family that agents realized they had targeted the wrong address.
Unfortunately,we in America get so focused on the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of a warrant before government agents can invade our property (a requirement that means little in an age of kangaroo courts and rubberstamped warrant requests) that we fail to properly appreciate the first part of the statement declaring that we have a right to be secure in our “persons,houses,papers,and effects.” What this means is that the Fourth Amendment’s protections were intended to not only follow us wherever we go but also apply to all that is ours—whether you’re talking about our physical bodies,our biometric data,our possessions,our families,or our way of life. However,in an 8-1 ruling in Kentucky v. King (2011),the U.S. Supreme Court sanctioned SWAT teams smashing down doors of homes or apartments without a warrant if they happen to “suspect” you might be doing something illegal in your home.
At a time when the government routinely cites national security as the justification for its endless violations of the Constitution,the idea that a citizen can actually be “secure” or protected against such government overreach seems increasingly implausible,while suggesting that a person take steps to secure his person and property against the government could have one accused of fomenting anti-government sentiment.
Nevertheless,the reality of our age is this:if the government chooses to crash through our doors,listen to our phone calls,read our emails and text messages,fine us for growing vegetables in our front yard,jail us for raising chickens in our backyard,forcibly take our blood and saliva,and probe our vaginas and rectums,there’s little we can do to stop them. At least,not at that particular moment. When you’re face to face with a government agent who is not only armed to the hilt and inclined to shoot first and ask questions later but also woefully ignorant of the fact that he works for you,if you value your life,you don’t talk back.
This sad reality came about as a result of our being asleep at the wheel. We failed to ask questions and hold our representatives accountable to abiding by the Constitution,while the government amassed an amazing amount of power over us,and backed up that power-grab with a terrifying amount of military might and weaponry,and got the courts to sanction their actions every step of the way.
However,once the dust settles and you’ve had a chance to catch your breath,I hope you’ll remember that the Constitution begins with those three beautiful words,“We the people.” In other words,there is no government without us—our sheer numbers,our muscle,our economy,our physical presence in this land. There can also be no police state—no tyranny—no routine violations of our rights without our complicity and collusion—without our turning a blind eye,shrugging our shoulders,allowing ourselves to be distracted and our civic awareness diluted.
So where do we begin? How do we go about wresting back control over our freedoms and our lives in the face of such seemingly insurmountable odds?
There’s an old adage,albeit not a very palatable one,that says “when eating an elephant take one bite at a time.” The point is this:when facing a monumental task,take it one step at a time. In other words,we’re going to have to wage these battles house by house,car by car,and body by body. Most importantly,as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves:The Emerging American Police State,we’re going to have to stop the partisan bickering—you can leave that to the yokels in Congress—and recognize that the suffering brought about by a police state will be the great equalizer,applying to all Americans,regardless of their political leanings (the fact that we are all now being targeted for government surveillance is but a foretaste of things to come).
As John Adams rightly noted,“The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people. This radical change in the principles,opinions,sentiments and affections of the people was the real American Revolution.”
It’s time for a second American Revolution. Not a revolution designed to kill people or tear down and physically destroy society,but a revolution of the minds and souls of human beings—a revolution promulgated to restore the freedoms for which our founders sacrificed their fortunes and their lives.
Learn more about John W. Whitehead at www.rutherford.org.
7 thoughts on “Obama Abolishes Private Property”
This is what happens when ya are pointing the finger telling every other country to clean up their own back yard in this world while our own back yard is going right down the F`n crapper. 😈
Hey All,As long as they can throw you off “your property” for lack of a measley $50 tax payment(tribute) you dont own diddly squat. and thats a fact.Home ownership in this country is a MYTH
Meanwhile, there’s some jerkwad filing “quiet title” claims in Ohio – like 11 of them – just outright stealing people’s homes while they are away. These are not abandoned dilapidated homes. Did HE pay the taxes for any of these properties? PROBABLY NOT! But yet, he gets to file a piece of paper and lay claim to the property of others and not pay taxes on that property and nobody from the state is kicking him out of any of them. We really live in bizarro world folks.
And then there’s this reality check about how this guy is so totally trespassing:
The key to unlock the cage we all find ourselves in at this time is the judiciary. This branch of government was created, in part, to protect the people from the ambitions and excesses of the other branches of government. Nearly all important issues are ultimately determined in a courtroom. Citizens no longer have direct access to grand juries and find that their complaints are first filtered through the political office of the district attorney who will routinely refuse to prosecute anyone who is politically connected. Litigants are routinely denied standing or due process in the courts to frustrate those who seek justice from the state.
In Marbury v. Madison the supreme court ruled that an unconstitutional statute is void “ab initio” or from it’s inception. In the famous Miranda decision, the court ruled that ” Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.” It reasonably follows that one of the first issues before any court should be the constitutionality of the law involved. Judges swear an oath to support and defend the constitution, within which is found your right to due process of law. Why is it that a denial of due process, the very definition of a void judgement, per Black’s 6th, never renders any judgement void or results in prosecution of the judge for perjury of his oath?
Judges are the gatekeepers of society. We depend upon them for redress and remedy. They have failed. In order to obtain remedy we must take back our courts by holding judges accountable.
“Jail For Judges” is a concept which creates an external review board to hear complaints of judges actions and negligence and to sanction judges up to and including imprisonment. When judges must choose between according due process to litigants and going to jail for failure to do so, that is when people will receive due process and not a minute before. When “Jail For Judges” becomes law in any single jurisdiction, i.e. any state of the union, a person need only move to that state long enough to establish residency in order to qualify to petition the court for vacation of a facially void judgement, which is the court record of a case which demonstrates a denial of due process.
People must qualify ballot initiatives to institute “Jail For Judges” and re-institute direct access for the public to grand juries to facilitate indictments against govt. actors who commit crimes. In this way the system may be used to purify itself and to return our country to a constitutionally restrained republic. http://www.angelfire.com/co3/jail4judges/index/jail.htm
“The key to unlock the cage we all find ourselves in at this time is the judiciary. This branch of government was created, in part, to protect the people from the ambitions and excesses of the other branches of government. Nearly all important issues are ultimately determined in a courtroom.”
WHOA!!! SERIOUSLY, DUDE???
Where have you been? Do you not understand that the so-called ‘court system’ is absolutely TOTALLY corrupt? It’s designed for one thing, and ONE thing ONLY – to separate us from our fiat ‘money’, in every way possible. This is what the justUS system in this country has become, the ‘us’ being the elite. You may as well joust with windmills as try to get any relief through that dead end.
Also, you made another common mistake, to wit:
” Citizens no longer have direct access to grand juries……..”
Citizens are slaves of the state, and are considered as such by the so-called ‘government’ if they willingly accept that designation.
We are nationals, and the only option the Zionist controlled, communist so-called ‘government is leaving us is to wipe the slate clean and start over.
As for this:
“Jail For Judges” is a concept which creates an external review board to hear complaints of judges actions and negligence and to sanction judges up to and including imprisonment.”
Up to and including imprisonment???
The vast majority of these judges have committed TREASON.
Last I checked, that’s a hanging offense.
You all probably already know this. Per the 14th amendment, we are all slaves. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA has been governed entirely by foreign, private, corporate law and Washington, D.C. has been under British control. It is a corporation, whose jurisdiction is applicable only in the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia and to whatever properties are legally titled to the UNITED STATES, by its registration in the corporate County, State, and Federal governments that are under military power of the UNITED STATES and its creditors.
People need permission to use Britain’s imposed laws. These people, who use this British legal system for and usually against the American people, are referred to as attorneys, as opposed to lawyers. Yes, there’s a difference.
BAR = British Accredited Registry. And all of them know this. It’s their law vs ours. We truly are a lawless land. Looks like we’ve been usurped!!
Thank you Julie for bring up this truth , but I agree w/ Ed . They may think that we are nothing but a Colony of England , but Possession is 9/10ths of the law . Come & get it !!!