Pork Projects, Section 8, and Ancient Worries

When one looks at the massive amount of spending done by the elected representatives of the federal government on unpopular wars and unpopular projects, one might ask oneself, “By what authority do these people, some elected not even by popular majority, tax us against our will to fund projects which we do not support?”

Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. constitution states in part:

“The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;”

Ignoring spending power usurped by the executive branch of the government, (which is a different story) doesn’t this clearly gives the U.S. congress the absolute power to tax whatever it pleases for whatever purpose it deems necessary, regardless of what local and state governments, not to mention the people they represent, decide? If yes, then the current pork projects and other unrepresentative spending, which many people feel are abuses, are justified by the highest law in the land.

It may seem difficult to believe that a people who just made themselves free from the tyrannies of a foreign king, as the founders of this country were, would invite such abuses from so powerful a government. Not surprisingly, just such concerns did promulgate in the post-revolution States.

After the Constitution was framed and proposed, a series of correspondences were published in newspapers across the land discussing the pros and cons. The letters that were in favor of ratification of the new Constitution were called collectively the Federalist papers; those opposed the Anti-Federalist papers. (Both can be found easily online) Below is an excerpt from one of the latter written by a citizen of Pennsylvania under the pseudonym “Centinel”:

Now what can be more comprehensive than (article 1: section 8); not content by other sections of this plan, to grant all the great executive powers of a confederation, and a STANDING ARMY IN TIME OF PEACE, that grand engine of oppression, and moreover the absolute control over the commerce of the United States and all external objects of revenue, such as unlimited imposts upon imports, etc. they are to be vested with every species of internal taxation; whatever taxes, duties and excises that they may deem requisite for the general welfare, may be imposed on the citizens of these states, levied by the officers of Congress, distributed through every district in America; and the collection would be enforced by the standing army, however grievous or improper they may be. The Congress may construe every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes, to be for the general welfare, and thereby seize upon every object of revenue.”

His fears were the fears of many Pennsylvania citizens and on October 6, 1787, James Wilson, delegate from Pennsylvania to the Constitutional Convention, tried to allay the fears of his fellow citizens during a public meeting. He says in part:

“The power of direct taxation has likewise been treated as an improper delegation to the federal government; but when we consider it as the duty of that body to provide for the national safety, to support the dignity of the union, and to discharge the debts contracted upon the collected faith of the States for their common benefit, it must be acknowledged that those upon whom such important obligations are imposed, ought in justice and in policy to possess every means requisite for a faithful performance of their trust. … Why should we be alarmed with visionary evils?”

Remember, this is one of the framers of the Constitution speaking. One could infer from this speech and events of the time that people would not accept taxation by the federal government unless it was to, “Provide for the national safety, to support the dignity of the union, etc.” How would these first Americans have perceived the famous “Bridge to Nowhere” or other programs funded by federal tax dollars that benefit only a very few?

Today, our elected representatives routinely tack on riders to bills that give federal funds to the special interests of their constituents and the wealthy people who funded their campaigns. Because of the nature of an election in which the voters probably do not know and will never meet the candidates, the people who are elected are those who can afford an extensive media campaign.

This opens the door for making profit by running a successful campaign (buying more TV time), getting someone who will do what they are told elected, and then relying on that person to get more pork than the campaign costs. And of course, if one could not afford a campaign, one could chip in with others and buy a candidate. With the enormous revenues generated by the federal income tax, this is a good investment of capital.

It could be asserted that, since the people on 1787 had just fought a war to rid their land of tyrannical government, they had a better idea of how a powerful government can overwhelm the rights of free people. In answer to the question, “Does Section 8 give congress the power to tax what it pleases as it pleases for whatever purpose it pleases?, how do you think the first patriots would answer?

3 thoughts on “Pork Projects, Section 8, and Ancient Worries

  1. Jesse,

    From Wikipedia:
    The oligarchy (from Greek ὀλιγαρχία, oligarkhía[1]) is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small segment of society distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, or military control. The word oligarchy is from the Greek words “ὀλίγος” (olígos), “a few”[2] and the verb “ἄρχω” (archo), “to rule, to govern, to command”.[3] Such states are often controlled by a few prominent families who pass their influence from one generation to the next.

    Oligarchies have been tyrannical throughout history, being completely reliant on public servitude to exist. Although Aristotle pioneered the use of the term as a synonym for rule by the rich, for which the exact term is plutocracy; but oligarchy is not always a rule by wealth, as oligarchs can simply be a privileged group, and do not have to be connected by bloodlines as in a monarchy. Some city-states from ancient Greece were oligarchies.

    You don’t suppose…uh…nah…ridiculous! Not in America!

  2. There is a law firm asking people to submit their stories about delays in food stamp processing. If you have had any problems please call 303.539.2975.
    This is the # to a law firm -(represented as the ‘Food Stamp Task Force’) not a bunch of b.s. –
    If you are having problems with applying for and receiving food stamps – or know of someone who is, pease call and leave your name, number and a lawyer at then firm will return your call…
    Please share this information…

    Denver Unemployment Examiner

  3. SAY NO TO HOME INVASION,THIS IS REAL, ,I would like to thank Lincoln county pud board for not installing an smart-meter tracking divice on my home
    Violation of my
    Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    Central Lincoln PUD
    P.O. Box 1126
    Newport, OR 97365
    board members,

    PRESIDENT Ron Benfield..rbenfield@newportnet.com
    VICE PRESIDENT Curt Abbott cabbott@peak.org
    SECRETARY Judy Matheny jjmatheny@q.com
    TREASURER Tom Tymchuk ttymchuk@cencoast.com
    DIRECTOR Larkin Kaliher lkaliher@cencoast.com

    Introduction to this letter of violation of my and all legal Americans 4th amendment, born rights

    Final Episode of Freedom Watch: When the Government Fears the People, There Is Liberty

    I do not participant in violation of our ,yours and my 1st, 4th,10th ,16th ETC>> amendment of Constitutional born rights.
    I do NOT VOLUNTARY COMPLY with any Smart meters or any other devices that are in , VIOLATION OF our 4TH Amendment rights


    Consent search – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Other parties|
    Revoking consent and exceptions|
    … conducting the consent search does not necessarily have to be identified as a law enforcement officer, and the person granting consent need not be the person police …
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consent_search – Cached

    I would like to thank pud for not putting an smartmeter on my home.

    ..In Helping the Elected and public employees unions members All NON_PROFITS, Public utility commissioners,{ Destroying Ours, yours , present and future grandchildren FREE use of public lands and all common law right of ways.. http://www.patriotnetwork.info/Citizens_rule_book.htm

    The posiblity of new sickness of our community thast could be related from any said smart meter aim..etc,, volition of your 4th amendment rights.

    Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.

    So If you trespass other then reading the meter I have right now meter number 56088,,,,95601441,

    Remedy, 20lbs 99.9 pure gold in one ounce pieces and $500,000.00 Cashiers check. To the strawman account of edwand malone johnston or to his trust, My Clan Name Is Boyd.
    If you trespass and violate my 4th amendment.
    two weeks after violation installation.
    The Board members our each liable for all court and lawyer fees/under .


    I would like to thank Lincoln county pud board for not installing an smart-meter tracking divice on my home.

    Please educate yourself on the real purpose possibility’s of the smart meters and the elected and public employees pre-crime bill. commercial codes agents for personal gain

    The posiblity of new unidentified sickness of our community that could be related from any said smart meter aim..etc,,
    some links
    Smart Meter Nausea – YouTube,
    Radiation Sickness: Smart Meter and Animals? – Detect Energy

    In my opinion in violates your consitutional rights.
    Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.

    Minority Report’ Precrime for Real? House Bill Would Have …
    [Aug 8, 2011] in ‘ Minority Report,’ Tom Cruise played a member of a police ‘ precrime’ unit, arresting people for crimes they had not yet committed. A bill in Congress proposes … ( 11 Comments )
    Remember it is possible for anyone could be allege commiting a crime in your home from this device,
    volition of your 4th amendment rights.

    Judges are not immune from criminal sanctions under the Civil Rights Act. ex parte Virginia (1879), 100 U.S. 339.
    By the great weight of authority it is acknowledged that generally “public officials” are not immune from suit when they allegedly violate the civil rights of citizens, and that a “public official’s” defense of immunity is to be sparingly applied in these kinds of cases. James v. Ogilvie, 1970, DC Ill., 310 F. Sup. 661, 663.

    Stop Smart Meters, Orange County, CA
    Messages In This Digest (1 Message)
    Important Info on Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E Customers From: melissa levine
    View All Topics | Create New Topic
    Important Info on Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E Customers
    Posted by: “melissa levine” Melissalevine@cox.net melissalevine1
    Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:05 pm (PDT)

    I posted this on web site. It has info for getting one’s analog meter
    back, which I highly recommend (even if they are charging).

    http://stopsmartmet ersirvine. com/2012/ 04/19/free- at-last-cpuc- approves- smart-meter- opt-out-for- sce-and-sdge- dr-neil-cherry- rfs-effect- on-neurotransmit ters-public- space-increasing ly-irradiated/

    Free at Last: CPUC Approves Smart Meter Opt Out for SCE and SDG&E; Dr.
    Neil Cherry: RF’s Effect on Neurotransmitters; Public Space
    Increasingly Irradiated

    Posted onApril 19, 2012

    Good News. 🙂

    Today the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved a
    smart meter opt out option for both Southern California Edison and San
    Diego Gas and Electric customers. Please share this information with
    friends and neighbors.

    From the SCE press release: /”Starting May 9, customers may opt out by
    calling 1-800-810-2369. For customers already on the delay list,
    calling the number will enable them to enroll in the opt-out program and
    keep their current meters. Customers who have a smart meter, but would
    like to opt out, can have their meter exchanged for the type (i.e.
    electro-mechanical analog meter or non analog, non-smart digital meter)
    that was previously in place.”
    /San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) has not yet announced the date
    their opt out will go into effect, but they need to offer it within
    twenty days. Their contact number is 1-800-411-7383 .

    Even though the CPUC has given the utilities permission to charge (price
    gouge?) California rate payers to opt out (a 75 dollar initial fee even
    if you already have an analog and a ten dollar additional monthly fee) I
    recommend that people still go for it. They don’t want you to. (They
    have many plans–financial incentives– for their smart grid including
    feeding your information to third party vendors). *Inactivate their
    “smart” meter program by refusing to participate! * Also, when you opt
    out you can send a note that you are paying the opt out fee “under
    protest.” See also the Northern Californian web site Stop Smart
    meters! for othersuggestions
    challenge the fees.

    Besides the satisfaction of not going along with the big utility
    monoliths, there are, of course, other reasons to opt out of a “smart”
    meter. It is extremely easy for all of us to be inattentive to the
    possible effects of non ionizing radiation–as it is invisible, has no
    taste or smell, etc. You can only tell if you are being irradiated if
    you have a special meter/analyzer or if you happen to be
    electrohypersensiti ve.

    However, there are too many studies, including WHO’s designation of it
    as a carcinogen, which show (even as it becomes so ubiquitous in our
    society) that Radio Frequency electromagnetic radiation may have adverse
    health effects. Arecent Yale study
    involving cell
    phones and mice, for example, showed cognitive changes from non
    ionizing radiation. Also, even though you may not be able to
    immediately feel the effects radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is
    having on you, your cells are still responding. As the lateDr.Neil
    Cherry has said in a radio interview
    /”Our brain
    is an electromagnetic organ. [In] our central nervous system, every cell
    communicates with its neighbors to see how they are–using
    electromagnetic signals.” /One effect radio frequency electromagnetic
    radiation has is to disrupt the calcium ions in our brains. . Says Dr.
    Cherry/”calcium ions control the neurotransmitters in the brain. . .
    .//If you expose the brain to these frequencies- you alter the calcium
    ions–you alter the brain patterns. That’s what Ross Adey in California
    showed; repeated by the EPA; Carl Blackman; and it’s been repeated in
    about 10 or 12 laboratories in the world–that calcium ions are changed
    by these signals. That’s pretty well established. Frequencies match and
    cells react and change the behavior which changes the brain pattern, the
    reaction time.”/

    To stay updated about the ins and outs of the Smart Meter rulings,
    please see the following web sites and Facebook pages Burbank Action
    StopOCSmartMeters, Stop Smart Meters
    Now (Facebook)
    Center for Electrosmog Prevention
    , EMF Safety Network
    ,Stop Smart Meters!
    and Eon3emfblog .
    among others. There continue to be many issues with the smart meter opt
    out option (and the smart grid in general): it doesn’t allow businesses
    to opt out; doesn’t address multiple co-located smart meters; the soon
    to come (useless for you but lucrative for them) gas and water “smart”
    meters, etc.

    My web siteStop Smart Meters Irvine
    also has archived articles, links
    and occasional updates. I am not able to update it regularly, but the
    entire wireless issue (that is the complete irradiation of our public
    spaces) continues to advance.

    *Just FYI, Here are Some Mainly Local Examples*:

    1.Wi Fi on OCTA Buses. The metal buses create what Dr. George Carlo
    calls a resonant cavity (increasing the radiation level); it’s like
    riding in a traveling microwave oven. (For a funny take on the
    “microwave oven” idea, seeStephen Colbert’s video
    he puts an Amy’s burrito between himself and his cell phone).

    2. Wi Fi In Medical Clinics. In Irvine, medical clinics now offer
    irradiation services for free (no co pays) not in the radiology
    department but in the waiting room: The Kaiser Permanente medical
    clinic in Woodbridge, Irvine, frequented by newborns, people with
    pacemakers and others with various illnesses is now fitted with
    radiation emitting wi fi–because their administrator told me “their
    members wanted it.”

    3 The Irvine libraries have routers right above the reference desk so
    the employees are exposed to this all day long. Bonjour? I recommend
    they brush up on their French and call the National Library of
    France-where Wi Fi was completely removed because librarians became
    active and protested the health effects.

    4. Buy your Daisy Sour Cream. Irradiate your Head! If you shop at the
    local grocery stores, you can be irradiated as you do your grocery
    shopping (Albertson’s Campus store, dairy section; look above you on
    the wall–the spider like device is a high powered router. (There is Wi
    Fi in Ralphs and Gelsons, also.)

    5. Mission Viejo Library: Special teen only section with cool
    irradiating spider: The irradiating “spider” is also affixed to a wall
    at the Mission Viejo Library near the children’s area.

    6. RF Chips Credit Cards: Also besides not holding (as neurosurgeon Dr.
    Keith Black recommends) your cell phone to your brain, you might think
    twice about stashing your new credit card in your pocket or bra–because
    the credit companies are now installing RF chips in these, which creates
    not only health but security risks. See this you tube video for the
    security issues .
    Note: If your company sends you such a card, you can punch the RF chip
    out with a hole puncher.)

    I will not comply with an With

    Radio-frequency identification

    Rfid Technology Tracking Devices – Video Results
    Play Video Play Video Play Video

    spychips.com – how RFID will compromise privacy, security …
    … where global corporations like IBM, Procter & Gamble, and Wal-Mart’s technology partner NCR plan to equip every product with a tracking device and use a network of RFID …
    http://www.spychips.com – Cached

    S0 I could be track by credited card SSI number,, .

    NEW DRIVERS LICENSE(.YOUR FIRST TRACKING DEVICE) … 2:51 Add to US confirms ( RFID) high- tech driver’s licences by norfid 15,757 …

    By smart meter anyone in the USA could be track in anyone private,{YOU AT ALL TIMES ANY WERE IN THE COUNTRY} are commercial industry.. If you do anything that the elected and public employees unions or any financial not for profit gain on your strawman account

    Is it possibly I heard this from Lars Larson on his talk show in feb 2012,,, Please ask him If I’m correct, ::{{Become I my self have been falsely accused in the past}} , As I will emailed to him this as well..,, As I was saying I believe I heard him said on his talk show then If you don’t won’t to comply smart meters spying or other new job development spying on one anther,{turning you neighbor so there assets can be Confiscated by public employes,family and friends speeding your wealth and assets.. other and it possible medical trauma as-well devices of pre-crime,,,,you don;t need,life ,subsistence food of GOD,Electricity,water ,firewood heat off public lands , What a Christen, If you don’t pay your corporation strawman , if you don;t comply , Americans of hundred years are more of all races should starve and dehydrate not have the right to travel.DRIVERS LICENSE VS RIGHT TO TRAVEL
    Lars there our responsible Americans why should we give up are freedom for the stockholders of the elected and public employees
    Lars I hope I’m wrong in this please correct me,,

    Why are DHS and ICE stockpiling ammo? – YouTube The US Department of Homeland Security and the Immigrations and Customs Enforcement Office have placed an order for 450 million rounds of .40 caliber …
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lw64vE0HXQ – Cached

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Amendment_ to_the_United..

    my opinion PLEASE DON”T TAKE THIS WRONG anyone, , To me you are saying to all LEGALLY BORN AMERICANS BORN WHO OUR TRULY BORN ON USA. SOIL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH MARITIME LAWS. OF THE STRAWMAN ACCOUNT >>>..Of those who don’t have GOD given rights of Country…YouTube – Republic vs Democracy
    if you do not comply in giving up your 4th amendment,””,This includes drug testing of the innocent for profits is a violations wears our compensation from commerce for the lost of our born rights””,Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.2.7-14..www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/ uscode42/usc_sec_42..

    In My opinion how can any American can deprived life from GOD almighty,, of Subsistence food hunting and fishing off of the coast lines and public lands,, Eclectic, Water, medical ,public service,,,,,,oathkeepers.org/oath/about

    PLEASE SIR LARS I HOPE I”M NOT misquoting YOU in any way>> IF I AM PLEASE EXCEPT MY APOLOGIES RIGHT KNOW>>KNOW IN GOD ALMIGHTY S NAME<>>I personally know what that is like when some one else puts wrongs in ones mouth,, I personally try never to do that,…..
    In my opinion would consider this treason to real legal Americans.


    evergreen15317.org/met.php?irk=bush- signs…treaty-2006
    I believe this is commerce agreements

    German-American Relations – President George Bush …
    President George Bush. September … to ratification, the Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany and a Related Agreed Minute, signed …
    usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga6-900925.htm – Cached

    This means That the legal Americans you do not have signed his or her rights away to the corporation of the elected and public employes unions members or any other unknown corruption we all have no rights this includes you as well.. With respect here ..your are entering in a Maritime law contract . Apply only to legal American
    employ …. SO WHY SHOULD I BE.,,,, like most ., Physically disabled and elderly, an legal American worker we have rights by

    Despite those who don’t believe we DO have rights..

    Our Legal American for-fathers since 1970 when the debt further on ones strawman for the service we have today,,

    where’s the countability,and bank statements from our elected and public employees member corporation agency’s from the last 70 years of existence…
    As you personally know that Americans across the states our still denied countability of taxes and budget figures , local bank statements , That I believe is call local control of separation from church and state.., from our local union and city cooperation.. {{{This exclude private unions the our paid for bay direct tax dollars. so we and our children today don;e have to live in fear of legal AMERICANS,,, the value of their know what is gowning and what is written off on the strawman…. http://www.yourstrawman.com..

    gift to http://www.oregontrackers.org



    Pending Cases





    By installing thous meter on any Legal American violate his or her GOD GIVEN RIGHTS UNDER GOD::{{ NOT THE DEVIL||||<< YOUR GOD GIVEN rights.. That Adolf Hitler and democracy.. YouTube – Republic vs Democracy .wont you to live this way.. Our LEGAL AMERICANS Grand parent and siblings. went and fought the
    ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolution,,en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_ Wa.
    Civil war To my understanding my Ancestry fought for.Republic Separation from church and state..Live's were sacrificed in the belief so we would not have to pay the slavery taxes to the elected and public employes of Federal state state local employes.,property, local,excise taxes.,1776 revolutionary, , Civil, war, war of 1812,
    WWI, WWII answers.yahoo.com/question/ index?qid=20111026194608AAoN74M


    MARITIME ATTACK: Law of the Sea Treaty in US Senate for Approval
    May 15, 2012, 1:13 pm By Arlen Williams

    The U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs is once again diddling with the ultra-massive U.S. sovereignty and communitarian wealth giveaways known as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea Treaty (UNCLOS or LOST). Whenever one sees “communitarian,” one may think “global communist.”
    Neo-Marxist Saboteur Barack Obama‘s State and Defense Departments (including numerous compromised, NATO-head officers) are pressuring the Senate to adopt this travesty after years of resistance dating back to Ronald Reagan’s presidency. If the committee goes forward with it, they could choose either of two paths: 1. the honorable and traditional congressional method of holding hearings, or 2. “fast-track” it, in order to slip voting through with as little light of day or time for the People to react, as possible.
    The Senate is still Harry Reid’s crypto-Marxist Senate, and this committee’s chairman is John Kerry, so LOST may pop up for a vote like a rapist plunging from behind the bushes in the dark, within the next few days.
    Recent and upcoming reports may be found at Heritage.org: “heritageaction.com/tag/law-of-the-sea-treaty.” Gulag Bound will also continue to monitor: “gulagbound.com/tag/un-convention-on-the-law-of-the-sea-unclos-or-lost.”
    For other sources, see in Investors.com, “Obama Seeks Sovereignty Surrender Via LOST Treaty,” May 8, 2012; in U.S. News & World Report, “Kill the Law of the Sea Treaty,” May 10; and at Breitbart, Daily Caller, or American Thinker, “American Sovereignty: LOST at Sea?” by Ken Blackwell and Bob Morrison, May 14.
    Perhaps the most thorough of the most recent articles is found at Liberty News Online, “The Creature from the Ocean’s Floor – the Law of the Sea Treaty,” by John W. Wallace, May 15. We hope Mr. Wallace does not mind our excerpting it at length.

    The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) was first conceived in the early 1980’s by the United Nations as a method for them to gain control of most of the activities on, over, and beneath the ocean’s surface. The fundamental premise of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that the resources on the ocean’s floor belong to all of the people of the world and those resources should be protected and controlled by an international organization like the United Nations. Although that may sound like a noble goal, in order to achieve this goal, the United Nations has created a multinational, bureaucratic creature called the International Seabed Authority (“ISA”) and charged this entity with regulating and controlling the world’s mineral resources in the oceans.
    When President Reagan was president, he objected to several of the treaty’s provisions that would have resulted in surrendering our nation’s sovereignty and refused to sign it, but that didn’t stop the proponents of world government and the New World Order. In 1994, the “progressives (a nice term used to describe communists) at the United Nations decided to keep moving forward with their plans by creating a diversion they called an “Agreement of Implementation” that was supposed to address the concerns of the United States and other industrialized nations. It didn’t change anything. This new agreement was all smoke and mirrors, but our Oxford educated, globalist president Bill Clinton signed it anyway. The Senate, however, refused to ratify it, as required by the U.S. Constitution.
    Proposed regulations in the new Law of the Sea Treaty will require private companies that want to conduct exploration and mining operations in international waters to submit substantial application fees to the UN’s International Seabed Authority (ISA), which in turn would allow the ISA to use these application fees to partially pay for its own mining efforts through its own mining subsidy, called the Enterprise. Corporations from member nations operating in international waters would have to pay annual fees and even be taxed to pay a percentage of their profits to the ISA. These corporations would also be expected to share their mining and navigational technology with third world countries to ensure that opportunities aren’t restricted to more technologically advanced. This is insane. The decision to grant or to withhold mining permits in international waters would now be decided by unelected, globalist bureaucrats at the United Nation’s International Seabed Authority (ISA).
    The Treaty would essentially give the United Nations, a notoriously corrupt, anti-American, anti-capitalist and un-democratic organization, the power to assert control over 70% of the earth’s surface.
    Using the regulations issued by the ISA, the United Nations would now be given the power to levy international fees and taxes on American companies. Mining approvals would be highly politicized and could discriminate against American operators. The United Nations would be given the power to regulate ocean research, exploration, fishing, marine environmental protection and navigation. They could even impose production quotas and licensing requirements on American fishermen operating in international waters.
    The United Nations, through the ISA, would be given the power to create an international court system to render and enforce its judgments! This new system would lie outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. legal system and the U.S. Constitution, leaving American citizens and businesses at the mercy of international tribunals whose corrupt UN bureaucrats could subject them to Sharia Law or other non-Western legal traditions.
    The Treaty calls for prosperous member nations like the United States to provide financial and technical assistance not only to developing countries, but also to “people who have not attained full independence or other self-governing status” (codeword for groups such as the Palestinians).
    The Treaty would do irreparable harm to U.S. military and intelligence operations and would force the United States to hand over proprietary technology to less developed third-world countries, many of whom are actively hostile to U.S. interests. Giving up the U.S. Navy’s long established primary mission of “maintaining freedom of the seas for all” and handing it over to a historically corrupt organization like the United Nations should be unthinkable.
    The most important objection concerns Article 314 of The Law of the Sea Treaty (located in Part XVII) that empowers the LOST member Assembly, dominated by nations of the developing world, to amend the terms of the treaty over the objection of any individual member state. In other words, the terms of the treaty could be changed significantly and the United States would have to abide by those changes without the U.S. Senate having the opportunity to consent to the changes. This undermines U.S. sovereignty and is clearly unconstitutional.
    The Law of the Sea Treaty creates a new United Nations’ worldwide bureaucracy that will create a whole new restrictive system of destructive environmental regulations that would be costly and counter-productive to American businesses, while at the same time, handing over the hard-earned, American taxpayer money to many of our enemies.
    The socialists, Marxists, globalists and other supporters of the New World Order keep pushing for this treaty. Senator Harry Reid has indicated that he might reintroduce the treaty in the Senate for a vote in the near future and Barack Obama, our socialist President, who is a long term advocate of the Law of the Sea Treaty, has indicated that he will sign it if passed by the Senate.

    The Coalition to Preserve American Sovereignty has brought an open letter to the senate, coordinated by Frank Gaffney, with the signatures of nineteen notables. This letter is featured in The Minority Report, which would also expose a separate, false-hood front group calling itself The American Sovereignty Campaign, purporting itself as pro-sovereignty while lobbying for LOST. The American Sovereignty Campaign – interesting – almost as if someone’s email or telephone conversations were caught. Oh well. It is a common practice for immoral Marxists and other ideological movements sponsored by the kleptocratic central bank complex to either attempt to control their opposition, or to set up an operation posing as a faction of it.

    Sen. Kerry summoning a political jiu-jitsu pose

    It is again time for immediate and forcefully amassed communications to U.S. Senators of all kinds, even their numerous Fabianists. A two-thirds majority is required to approve a treaty, but these people are being heavily pressured by the kleptocracy and their globalist co-conspirators.
    Senate Committee on Foreign Relations members

    John F. Kerry (MA-D) Chairman
    Richard G. Lugar (IN-R) Ranking Member – rank globalist traitor on the GOP side, exiting by recent popular vote
    Democrat majority members

    Barbara Boxer (CA)
    Robert Menendez (NJ)
    Benjamin L. Cardin (MD)
    Robert P. Casey (PA) – isn’t he okay? isn’t he pro-life?
    Jim Webb (VA) – the conflicted one
    Jeanne Shaheen (NH)
    Christopher Coons (DE) – self described former “bearded Marxist;” now shaves
    Richard J. Durbin (IL) – designated neo-Marxist spinmeister following in Joseph Biden’s footsteps, often comic, always dangerous
    Tom Udall (NM)
    Republican minority members (to be contacted and watched with no less diligence)

    Bob Corker (TN)
    James E. Risch (ID)
    Marco Rubio (FL)
    James M. Inhofe (OK)
    Jim DeMint (SC)
    Johnny Isakson (GA)
    John Barrasso (WY)
    Mike Lee (UT)
    Another response, though typically of lesser impact, a petition to the senate is being sponsored by conservative PAC, Right March.
    Following is notable and extensive analysis from the recent past.

    After public anger over a provision in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that allows indefinite detention of American citizens without accusation or trial, Congress has paraded a “new” version that is supposed to overcome this danger. [However, a close reading of the bill reveals that nothing has changed except the addition of assuring phrases without substance. It proves that those who drafted this bill are using deliberate deception.]
    NDAA 2013 Headed to Full House; Smith/Amash Amendment Offered

    After a US federal court blocked NDAA indefinite detention of US citizens the House of Representatives passes the 2013 NDAA which reauthorizes it.

    CPS Drugs 4 Year Olds – Baby LK Report For May 20th 2012



    wake up stop the elected and public employees who don’t protect your oathkeepers.org
    our people alive our a computer.
    birds and Fish are now Dying all Around the World | EUTimes.net UPDATED on March 09, 2011 Massive fish deaths are back! NEW MASS DEATHS reported in California! The story was published on January 6. Update 1 was
    http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/birds…dying-​all-around-the-world – Cached

    More reports of dead birds and fish from around the world More reports of dead birds and fish from around the world … said penguins, petrels and other seabirds were already dying in large …
    http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/weather/weather_​news/reports-of... – Cached

Join the Conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *